Voter ID won't be scrapped, minister says
Sir Keir Starmer said it could risk "locking people out of democracy".
Today, the government has decided to continue with the policy, instead announcing it is expanding the forms of ID which will be accepted.
Plans are under way for UK-issued bank cards to be included as acceptable forms of ID. This will be legislated for in a new Elections Bill.
The democracy minister said the voter ID policy was still in place to prevent "issues from previous elections" including fraud and other forms of election interference.
Rushanara Ali said she was aware that legitimate voters, including disabled voters, were excluded from voting at the last election.
She added that her plans for expanding which forms of ID will be accepted would be "striking the right balance" of fairness.
4:57
In August last year, the Electoral Commission said some 3% of people do not have photo ID eligible for voting.
That includes 14% of people in council housing, 10% of unemployed people and 7% of disabled people.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission has raised questions in previous elections over whether the voter ID policy is discriminatory towards ethnic minority voters and disabled voters.
"We are concerned about the impact voter ID had on people who share certain protected characteristics," a spokesperson said.
"This could affect the right to free and democratic elections, protected under the Human Rights Act."
During the election campaign, both Angela Rayner and the prime minister said the disproportionality of the policy was concerning.
Sir Keir told me he would "look into it".
The disability charity Mencap welcomed the prospect of a review at the time, but today it seems the government have shelved these plans.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Keir Starmer faces poverty grilling from top MPs amid call to axe DWP two-child benefit limit
Keir Starmer, who will appear at the Liaison Committee on Monday, has been warned that without scrapping the Tory-era two-child benefit limit he risks overseeing a rise in poverty Keir Starmer is set to face a grilling from MPs on levels of poverty amid fresh calls to axe the controversial two-child benefit limit. The Prime Minister, who will appear at the Liaison Committee on Monday, has insisted he will leave "no stone unturned" to tackle levels of child poverty But he faces warnings today that without scrapping the Tory-era two-child benefit limit he risks overseeing the first Labour government to see a "significant rise in child poverty". The policy, which has been blamed for trapping kids in poverty, restricts parents from claiming Child Tax Credits and Universal Credit for a third or subsequent child. Recently Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said scrapping the measure remains on the table as part of a delayed child poverty strategy. She said it will be "looking at every lever and we'll continue to look at every lever to lift children out of poverty". Monday's session will give MPs the chance to quiz Mr Starmer on the strategy. Dan Paskins, executive director at Save the Children, told The Mirror: "The Prime Minister has been clear that tackling child poverty is his government's moral mission. mExpanding free school meals and Best Start Family Hubs shows ambition but will not be enough to truly reduce the number of children growing up in hardship." He added: "Every day 109 more children are impacted by the two-child limit, facing growing up without enough to get by, simply because they have more siblings. The Prime Minister has a choice to make ahead of the Autumn Budget: scrap the two-child limit on Universal Credit in full or risk being the first Labour government to oversee a significant rise in child poverty." Alison Garnham, chief executive of the Child Poverty Action Group, added: "The key question for the PM is given his government has a moral mission to reduce child poverty, will he now commit to scrapping the two-child limit in the autumn child poverty strategy as the most cost-effective way to get record child poverty down?" Speaking last month, Mr Starmer said: "I want to get to the root causes of child poverty. One of the greatest things the last Labour government did was to drive down child poverty. I am determined we will do that." MPs on the Liaison Committee include three senior Labour MPs - Debbie Abrahams, Helen Hayes, and Florence Eshalomi. All three signed an amendment to the welfare bill last month to block cuts to a key disability benefit - Personal Independence Payments (PIP). A government analysis of the reforms, which were eventually gutted in a major climbdown, had warned the cuts could result in 250,000 people being pushed into poverty.
BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Hull teenagers offer view on lowering of voting age
Young people in Hull have reacted to the government's decision to lower the age of voting to the voting age from 18 to 16 means there could be over 1.5 million more potential voters at the next general Hand, 18, said she had mixed feelings about the move, adding that while she felt voting age should be in line with the age for consent, some might be "too immature". Emma Hardy, MP for Hull West and Haltemprice, said the decision "draws us into line" with Scotland and Wales, where 16-year-olds have been able to vote for a number of years. Hardy said: "To me, it makes sense. They've been able to vote from 16 in Scotland for years. They've been able to vote from 16 in Wales for years, and this draws us into line. It was something that was in our manifesto. "It's something that I spoke to people about ahead of the election, and I'm really pleased to see that we're fulfilling the promises that we made."Hardy has also spearheaded the future parliament programme, run by Hull College and the University of Hull. The scheme was launched in 2024 to help increase political awareness and engagement among young people in the city. Hull has historically had some of the lowest turnouts in the UK at general and local elections. Bethany Hand, 18, was among those who attended an event at University of Hull on Friday. She said she had mixed feelings about lowering the age of voting to 16. "If the age of consent is 16, and they can have that opinion, that choice, then they should also have the choice to vote for their future".However, she was also concerned that some 16-year-olds would be too immature. "Some of them might vote [for] the wrong person for a laugh, or parents [or] friends could pressure them into voting for someone," she said. Oscar Coupe, a university student, said he thought lowering the age limit was the correct said: "It's easy to say that 16 and 17 year olds are impressionable… but I think there's plenty of adults also very impressionable."There is not political support across the parties on lowering the voting age. Reform are against the measure and the Conservative party question why 16-year-olds will be able to vote but not "marry, go to war, or even stand in elections".Liberal Democrat Sarah Olney, MP for Richmond Park, said her party had campaigned for a lowering of the voting age for "well over 30 years" and so welcomed the Richard Tice, MP for Boston and Skegness, said: "We think it's completely wrong that youngsters who are still legally children should be able to vote. "It's interesting that they themselves are split down the middle as to whether or not they should be given the right to vote."The next election is due to be held by August 2029 at the latest, as the maximum term for parliament is five years from when it first formed. However, the prime minster has the option of calling an early election if he chooses to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices
BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Farming union urges changes on inheritance tax plans
The head of Wales' leading farming union has written to the prime minister urging him to make changes to inheritance tax proposals, which he said are leaving older farmers "tormented with continual worry".The UK government has announced plans, beginning in April 2026, to tax inherited agricultural assets worth more than £1m at a rate of 20% - half the usual rate. NFU Cymru President Aled Jones has called on Sir Keir Starmer to "mitigate very many of the human impacts" of the proposals, while also increasing government UK government, which previously said its inheritance tax reforms were "vital", has been asked for comment on Mr Jones' appeal. Mr Jones said he felt "compelled" to write to the prime minister after being contacted by "hundreds of Welsh farming families" he said were impacted by the proposed UK government has said the changes will only affect the wealthiest 500 farms each year, but Mr Jones said he was concerned that the number of farms impacted "will be far greater than Treasury predictions".Farming unions have estimated that up to 70,000 farmers could be affected overall. Mr Jones said he was particularly concerned about the impact on older farmers, who are "tormented with the continual worry that their passing will create an unmanageable financial burden for their loved ones"."I know that no government would want to place anyone in the difficult and invidious position that many elderly farmers now find themselves in," the letter said."My view remains that an opportunity still exists for your government to mitigate very many of the human impacts of these policy proposals, whilst meeting the government's aim of raising revenue."The UK government has maintained that, under its changes, three quarters of estates would continue to pay no inheritance tax at all, while the remaining quarter would pay half the inheritance tax that most people pay.
