
Chris Brown ‘could be sued for MILLIONS' if he cancels string of UK arena gigs over nightclub ‘bottle attack' charge
CHRIS Brown could be sued for millions if his UK tour is cancelled following his GBH charge.
The American R&B singer allegedly assaulted a music producer at a London nightclub.
3
He was arrested at a 5* hotel in Manchester last week after flying into the city on a private jet.
The 36-year-old was later charged with causing grievous bodily harm to Abe Diaw at the Tape nightclub in Mayfair in February 2023.
He was remanded in custody at Manchester Magistrates' Court on Friday.
The two-time Grammy winner will appear at Southwark Crown Court on June 13 - just two days before he is set to kick off his 20-year anniversary tour.
The charge had led to uncertainty about whether the Breezy Bowl XX arena gigs would go ahead.
However, the singer was today granted conditional bail after a further application was made to the London court.
The ruling means he will be allowed to kick off the world tour next month.
It comes as insurance law experts had warned Brown, understood to be worth at least $50 million, could have been held 'personally liable' for breaching his contract if the nine performances are axed.
Dr Franziska Arnold-Dwyer, Associate Professor of Law at UCL, told The Sun that event promoters or venues could task their insurers with taking him to court for loss of revenue.
She said: 'If Chris Brown doesn't turn up, then they've got a breach of contract… The insurers could hold him liable if they think they could get something out of him.
Chris Brown gets stuck in the air during Newark concert and shouts at crew as he's forced to get down with ladder
'It could include the price of refunding tickets that have already been sold, the expenses of running a venue or other arrangements that have been made.
'For example, the venue might have incurred expenses for hiring staff, equipment and security.
"It could be a significant amount.'
Tickets to the UK leg of the star's tour are priced at between £76.50 and almost £500, including fees.
It means the cost of refunding tickets to one concert alone could start at nearly £5 million.
That is before taking into account production expenses such as marketing, venue rentals, and hiring staff.
Professor Ozlem Gurses, Vice-Chair of the British Insurance Law Association Committee, said some venues may also have insured themselves against loss of expected profits.
She said: 'Organisers may have event cancellation insurance. That would cover their expenses, wasted expenditure and maybe loss of profit too.'
The insurance experts said Brown could have set up a company for all his business transactions.
This would have limited liability in the event of legal action and would protect his personal assets.
They also stressed that all contracts differ and there could be a special clause which accounts for circumstances such as an arrest.
It comes after a judge stipulated a number of conditions Brown must follow today.
Judge Tony Baumgartner
said the two-time Grammy winner must reside at an address known to the court.
A security of £5million must also be lodged with the court - and £4million of that must be provided before he can be released from custody.
Brown is banned from contacting his co-accused Omolulu Akinlolu, who was charged with GBH by the Met on Saturday.
He is also forbidden from contacting the complainant Mr Diaw or from attending the Tape Nightclub.
The bail conditions mean Brown must surrender his passport or any travel documents to police.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Meghan Markle's Hollywood A-list wedding guests were friends she 'wanted to recruit', royal insider claims
It was the celebrity event of the year when Prince Harry and Meghan said 'I do' in May 2018. But while royal weddings are often a who's who of A-listers, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex 's matrimony had more of a tinsel town sparkle than any previous union. George and Amal Clooney, the cast of Suits and Oprah Winfrey were just some of the Hollywood guests in St George's Chapel. Although many famous faces from across the pond were there as friends of Meghan, it has been claimed that the duchess was not very chummy with the stars. The attendants were not Meghan's nearest and dearest but rather the friends she 'most wanted to recruit', royal insider Tina Brown wrote in her book The Palace Papers. 'The celebrity guests were a portrait not of Meghan's intimate circle but of the friends she most wanted to recruit,' Brown said. Even Oprah had 'scarcely met' Meghan before the big day and when columnist Rachel Johnson asked the Clooneys how they knew Meghan, the couple replied: 'We don't.' Since Harry and Meghan stood down as working royals in 2020, the duchess has struggled to recruit the friends she was so keen to make. George and Amal Clooney at Harry and Meghan's wedding. They were just some of the A-list celebrities at the ceremony Amal attended Meghan's lavish £221,000 New York baby shower in 2019. However, in recent years the lawyer has only deepened her ties with royals by launching the Amal Clooney Women's Empowerment Award with the King's Trust. After her notorious interview with Oprah in 2021 - when the duchess opened up about her mental health struggles and claimed a member of the Firm asked about Archie's skin colour - it does not appear the pair have been in contact much since. And Oprah was not one of the guests Meghan booked for her Netflix series With Love, Meghan. Indeed, the calibre of stars on the lifestyle programme lacked much of the Hollywood glamour the duchess attempted to project at her wedding. Meghan is said to have struggled to book some of her more famous friends for the show, which launched in March. Viewers had expected her to bring in the likes of Montecito neighbour Oprah, tennis superstar Serena Williams and filmmaker Tyler Perry - who is godfather to Princess Lilibet. The Duchess could instead only muster up Suits co-star Abigail Spencer, Delfina Figueras - socialite wife of Harry's polo-playing chum Nacho - and chef Roy Choi. The biggest stars to appear were Harry himself - restricted to a couple of minutes of the final episode in the eight-part series - and US Office actress, writer and producer Mindy Kaling, who appears in the second episode. A source told The Sun: 'They struggled to book guests. They had a real hard time, and it shows.' Hopes had been high for the series after Meghan's earlier creative projects featured a host of top-tier stars. Short-lived podcast Archetypes - which lasted 12 episodes across three months - featured Serena, Mariah Carey, Paris Hilton and Superbad filmmaker Judd Apatow. And Harry & Meghan, the Sussexes' first Netflix project, featured Perry and Serena, the latter talking about attending the Sussexes' wedding. But Netflix executives are alleged to have been underwhelmed by the couple's output, from docuseries Heart of Invictus through to Harry's recent series Polo, which featured very little of the duke at all. While Serena Williams did not appear in With Love, Meghan, she did take to Instagram to give it a shout-out. She wrote: 'I'm so excited for you to check out WITH LOVE, MEGHAN, now streaming exclusively on Netflix! 'Join my wonderful friend @meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, as she opens up her world and shares her personal tips for the kitchen, garden, and so much more. 'It's a fun and inspiring series that reminds us all how easy it is to bring a little beauty into our everyday lives, even when we least expect it. Can't wait for you to experience it!' With Love, Meghan cracked Netflix's 'Top 10' in the UK after one day, reaching number six in the charts. However it has been critically panned, with just a 33 per cent approval rating from professional critics according to aggregator Rotten Tomatoes. In her Mail+ review, Amanda Platell branded it 'so awful it is almost compelling', while Hollywood bible Variety panned the series as 'a Montecito ego trip not worth taking'. The Guardian's Chitra Ramaswamy called it 'vacuous, over styled joylessness', while the Telegraph's Anita Singh noted glibly that the format appeared to consist of Meghan 'invit(ing) people to her pretend house and they tell her how amazing she is'. Reacting to the negative reception, royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams told MailOnline: 'This, after the Hearts of Invictus series failed to grab viewers' attention and the Polo series predictably didn't either, is make or break for Meghan.' He added: 'Who will watch apart from the fans? Perhaps a few stay-at-home mums who can afford the luxury which Meghan obviously worships. 'At the moment she and Harry can, too. However, after spending four hours watching a series as bad as this, one has to ask, for how much longer?'


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
What to do if your bike is stolen – and how to break the cycle
Whether you use your bike to commute daily, for a quick trips to the shops or long rides to keep fit, having it stolen can be a nightmare. Here's what to do if yours goes missing. Report the theft to the police and describe the bike in as much detail as possible, giving the model, make and where it was stolen. You should also include a description of any scratches, dents and marks that could help identify it, and a picture if you have one. You can go into your local police station or call 101 in the UK to file a report. Make sure you get a crime reference number. Home insurance policies will often cover your bike when it's at home but you will probably have needed to pay extra to extend this for when you're out and about, or if you have a valuable bike. Report the loss to your insurer and give it the crime reference number. Your bike will not be covered if you failed to look after it, such as not locking it securely or with a suitable lock. Declare your bike stolen on BikeRegister, a UK bike database – you can do this even if you have not registered your bike on there before. It will help improve the chances of your bike being recovered if there are pictures and descriptions of the bike, and where it was stolen. Post on bike and cycling forums, such as Cycling UK Forum, Bike Forum and CycleChat in case people come across it when looking to buy a new bike. Look on resale sites such as Gumtree, Facebook Marketplace and eBay to see whether someone is trying to sell your bike. You can set up alerts for bikes that are the same make and model. If you find one that looks like yours, alert the police – they may be able to recover it. It is not advisable to set up a sting or try to deal with the case yourself. Alert the local community on neighbourhood forums such as Nextdoor or local Facebook groups and get in touch any bike shops nearby in case someone comes in to the shop and tries to sell one that matches your description. Scuff the frame up a bit using sandpaper, paint and stickers so it is less appealing to thieves. Some kitsch, drawn-on hearts might save you a lot of hassle in the future. Register it on BikeRegister and upload pictures alongside the frame number, which is usually found on the bottom bracket shell between the pedals or on the rear dropouts where the back wheel slots in. This will help the police trace it back to you if it is stolen and recovered. Invest in two high-quality locks to make your bike less of a target. At least one of these should be a good-quality D-lock. Be sure to attach the frame to the stand when locking up. Take any removable parts with you whenever you leave it. Find and apply for your nearest cycle parking. This gives another layer of protection, but be sure to still lock up securely. In cities there are also many cycle hangars, such as Cyclehoop, which are small bike stores on residential streets you can apply for at a small cost each year. Check whether there's one near you. Conceal a Bluetooth tracker on your bike to help locate it if it goes missing. The smaller and more discreet the tracker, the better. Good spots to hide them include under the seat or inside the handlebar. Apple AirTag and Tile Sticker are popular among bike owners.


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Drug dealer brother of former Liverpool football prodigy loses appeal
A gang member who had a "leading role" in an international drugs plot involving his brother, a former Liverpool football prodigy, has lost an appeal against his prison Cassidy was part of a drugs gang, along with his brother Jamie, which saw cocaine imported from the Netherlands and used to supply users across north-west England, Birmingham and younger Cassidy brother had played alongside Michael Owen and Jamie Carragher in the Reds youth team before injuries curtailed his was jailed 21 years and nine months alongside his brother last year. An appeal hearing in London to challenge his sentence was dismissed. Manchester Crown Court heard last year the operation dealt with 356kg of the drug, worth around £26m, with £10m in cash changing hands in the space of three told the court Jonathan likened himself to the infamous drug smuggler El sent an associate a picture of an actor playing the Mexican drug lord in the TV programme Narcos and joked how they shared the same admitted importing drugs, conspiring to supply drugs and conspiring to transfer criminal an appeal hearing in London last month, his lawyers claimed the sentencing judge gave him insufficient credit for his guilty pleas and that not enough weight was given to mitigating in a ruling published on Monday, three senior judges dismissed the challenge. Lord Justice Fraser, sitting with Mr Justice Hilliard and Mr Justice Constable, said that they were "not persuaded" the sentence was "manifestly excessive or reached after an error of principle".They also dismissed an appeal bid brought by Jonathan's co-defendant, Nasar Ahmed, who admitted the same offences and received the same jail Richard Wright KC told Manchester Crown Court last year that Jonathan played a "leading role" in drugs importation and the buying and selling of class A drugs while Ahmed acted as a middleman and "facilitator".One associate was arrested in a car in Liverpool, where police found two Asda bags for life containing almost £250, the encrypted EncroChat network used by Jonathan and Ahmed was infiltrated by law enforcement agencies, Jonathan travelled to Dubai in July 2020 and inquired with estate agents about purchasing a villa with a budget of £2.3m, including a £22,000 travelled back to the UK in October that year, but was arrested on his Jonathan and Ahmed's appeals, Lord Justice Fraser said that both knew "what their conduct had been and the degree to which it was unlawful".He continued that despite defendants in other EncroChat cases being given greater credit for guilty pleas, there was "no one single EncroChat discount" that should be applied. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.