US officials do not want to sell advanced AI chips to company run by UAE spy chief: Report
US officials are weighing whether or not to sell chips directly to a company owned by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the UAE's powerful national security advisor.
Tech CEOs, diplomats, security officials and investors have all been waiting for clarity on whether the US would begin exporting Nvidia AI chips to the UAE as part of a much-hyped deal that President Donald Trump announced during a visit to the Gulf in May.
Bloomberg reported earlier this month that neither Saudi Arabia nor the UAE have been approved to receive the chips by the Commerce Department.
On Thursday, the WSJ reported that plans to export chips to the UAE have been delayed, as the US weighs new terms for a deal.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The original agreement envisioned the UAE purchasing up to 500,000 of Nvidia's most advanced AI chips annually, starting in 2025. Of that amount, 400,000 would go to US firms working on data centres and AI projects inside the oil-rich Gulf state.
But a big slice - 100,000 chips - is supposed to go directly to G-42, the state-owned AI firm run by Sheikh Tahnoon, who is also the UAE's AI czar.
Tahnoon, who sports aviator sunglasses because of an eye condition, manages the UAE's most ambitious tech investments and has personally overseen outreach to the US.
His lobbying has been framed as a bet by the wealthy Gulf state on American technological prowess over China. He visited US President Donald Trump at the White House in March to lay the groundwork for the deals announced in May.
White House AI czar David Sacks, who spearheaded the deal, is seen as an advocate for pushing the sales through.
How BlackRock and an Italian shipping dynasty are upending Middle East's port business Read More »
Supporters believe that if the US doesn't relax its restrictions, it could lose a valuable market in the Gulf to China. Huawei has approached both Saudi Arabia and the UAE to purchase AI chips, albeit not its most advanced ones, Bloomberg reported.
But US suspicion over the UAE's commitment to safeguarding American technology hung over Trump's visit. Trump stopped in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE in May. His trip to the UAE was the shortest and did not include a dinner like in Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
Middle East Eye revealed at the time that Trump's National Security Council pushed to downplay his stop in the UAE, in part due to frustration over the Emiratis' perceived economic and military ties to China, one source briefed by the NSC told MEE. Trump has since fired many of those NSC officials.
Some US defence and intelligence officials were concerned that in his rush for deals, Trump overlooked concerns about how to secure the technology behind American weapons systems and AI from China.
The WSJ has reported that US officials want to cut off direct access to chips for G42. The Commerce Department doesn't plan to approve any chips going to the Emirati state-owned group, the WSJ reported.
Trump would have the final say on exports. Just this week, he lifted his ban on Nvidia selling H20 artificial intelligence chips in China after meeting Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang. The decision lifted Nvidia's share price.
The UAE is interested in H100 chips, the most advanced AI chips produced by Nvidia. A single chip costs an estimated $25,000. Clinching the sale of 500,000 to the UAE would be a boon to Nvidia. The sheer number of chips underscores the Gulf region's unrivalled buying power.
The UAE's ambassador to the US, Yousef al-Otaiba, and Khaldoon al-Mubarak, the CEO and managing director of Mubadala, the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund, attended an energy and tech conference with senior US officials in Pittsburgh this week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
9 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Trump says more hostages to be released from Gaza shortly
Another 10 hostages will be released from Gaza shortly, US President Donald Trump said on Friday, without providing additional details. Trump made the comment during a dinner with lawmakers at the White House, lauding the efforts of his special envoy Steve Witkoff. Israeli and Hamas negotiators have been taking part in the latest round of ceasefire talks in Doha since July 6, discussing a US-backed proposal for a 60-day ceasefire. "We got most of the hostages back. We're going to have another 10 coming very shortly, and we hope to have that finished quickly," Trump said. Trump has been predicting for weeks that a ceasefire and hostage-release deal was imminent, but agreement has proven elusive. A spokesperson for the armed wing of Hamas, the Palestinian group Hamas that controls Gaza, on Friday said the group favors reaching an interim truce in the Gaza war, but could revert to insisting on a full package deal if such an agreement is not reached in current negotiations. The truce proposal calls for 10 hostages held in Gaza to be returned along with the bodies of 18 others, spread out over 60 days. In exchange, Israel would release a number of detained Palestinians. Israel's campaign in Gaza has killed more than 58,600 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities. Almost 1,650 Israelis and foreign nationals have been killed as a result of the conflict, including 1,200 killed in the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on southern Israel, according to Israeli tallies. Reuters
Middle East Eye
9 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Dozens arrested at London protest against proscription of Palestine Action
Fifty-five people have been arrested in London at a rally against the proscription of Palestine Action outside the UK parliament on Saturday, according to the Metropolitan Police. Demonstrators gathered in support of the organisation, which was proscribed under anti-terror laws earlier this month. They held up placards reading "I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action" before police began bundling attendees into vans. Similar protests took place in Edinburgh, Cornwall and other parts of the country, also leading to arrests. A counter-demonstration by pro-Israel activists in London - holding placards that read "there is no genocide" and describing the population of Gaza as "2 million human shields" - was shielded by police. Read more: Dozens arrested at London demonstration against proscription of Palestine Action
Gulf Today
12 hours ago
- Gulf Today
To satisfy Trump, GOP delivers blow to health industry
Doctors, hospitals, and health insurers for weeks issued dire warnings to Republican lawmakers that millions of people would lose health coverage and hospitals would close if they cut Medicaid funding to help pay for President Donald Trump's big tax and spending bill. But Republicans ignored those pleas, made even deeper cuts, and sent the legislation on July 3 to the White House, where Trump signed it the next day. The law's passage marked a rare political loss for some of the health industry's biggest players. When unified, doctors, hospitals, and insurers have stood among the most powerful lobbying forces in Washington and have a long track record of blocking or forcing changes to legislation that could hurt them financially. But health industry lobbyists are catching their breath and assessing the damage after Trump's massive bill raced through Congress in less than two months with only Republican votes. Several lobbyists offered various reasons for being unable to stave off big cuts to Medicaid, a $900 billion state-federal health insurance program that covers an estimated 72 million low-income and disabled people nationally and accounts for 19% of all spending on hospital care, about $283 billion a year, according to the latest data. But nearly all agreed that GOP lawmakers were more worried about angering Trump than facing backlash from local hospitals and constituents back home. 'Members were more scared of Trump issuing a primary challenge than disappointing local voters who may find their hospital has to close or their insurance premium may go up,' said Bob Kocher, a partner with venture capital firm Venrock who served in the Obama administration, referring to election primaries leading into the midterms. Consider what happened to Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). After he took to the Senate floor to announce his opposition to the bill because of its cuts to Medicaid, Trump threatened to support a challenger to run against Tillis next year. Shortly thereafter, Tillis announced his retirement from politics. But other factors were at work. The health industry's warnings to lawmakers may have been dismissed because hospitals, health centers, and other health care provider groups are seen by Republicans as strong backers of the Affordable Care Act, the law known as Obamacare that's considered Democrats' biggest domestic achievement in decades. The ACA expanded government health insurance coverage to millions of people previously not eligible. And no Republicans voted for it. 'Hospitals' support of the ACA has frustrated Republicans, and as a result there is less a reservoir of goodwill to hospitals than in the past,' Kocher said. Ceci Connolly, chief executive of the Alliance of Community Health Plans, said her lobbying team spent extra time on Capitol Hill with lawmakers and their staffers, raising concerns about how the legislation would imperil health care coverage. 'There was almost an overriding sense on the part of Republicans in Congress to deliver a major victory for President Trump,' she said. Her group represents health plans that provide coverage in about 40 states. 'That superseded some of their concerns, reluctance, and hesitation.' Connolly said she repeatedly heard from GOP lawmakers that the focus was on delivering on Trump's campaign promise to extend his 2017 tax cuts. She said the concerns of some moderate members helped lead to one concession: a $50 billion fund to help rural hospitals and other health providers. The money, she said, may have made it easier for some lawmakers to support a bill that, in total, cuts more than $1 trillion from Medicaid over a decade. Another twist: Many new lawmakers were clearly still learning about Medicaid, she said. Republicans also seemed eager to reduce the scope of Medicaid and Affordable Care Act marketplace coverage after enrollment in both programmes soared to record levels during the pandemic and the Biden administration, she said. Trump's law requires states to verify eligibility for Medicaid at least every six months and ends auto-enrollment into marketplace plans — steps health policy experts says will reverse some of those gains. Tribune News Service
