Ministers STILL won't come clean on secret airlifts after the Mail revealed 18,500 Afghans were brought to Britain as part of £7BILLION scheme

Daily Mail​

4 days ago

Ministers were last night urged to 'come clean' over a government operation smuggling Afghans to Britain.
The highly secretive mission followed a military data leak that put 100,000 at risk of being killed by the Taliban.
Now, after 23 months of being gagged by a draconian super-injunction, the Daily Mail can reveal how the projected £7 billion cost was signed off while taxpayers and MPs were kept in the dark.
But the revelation sparked another secrecy row last night as Defence Secretary John Healey's emergency explanation to Parliament appeared at odds with facts heard at secret High Court hearings over the last two years.
The covert airlift of thousands of Afghans – codenamed Operation Rubific – was launched after the UK military catastrophically lost a database of details of those who had applied for sanctuary in the UK to flee the murderous Taliban.
It put 100,000 'at risk of death', in the Government's own words. It also exposed British officials whose details were on the list.
After the Mail was the first newspaper in the world to discover the data breach, in August 2023, the Ministry of Defence mounted a cover-up and successfully hushed up our exclusive.
They obtained a super-injunction and ever since then, cloaked by the unprecedented news blackout, ministers have been clandestinely running one of the biggest peacetime evacuation missions in modern British history to rescue people the UK had imperilled – smuggling thousands out of Afghanistan and flying them to Britain at vast cost, with taxpayers being neither asked nor informed.
Every few weeks, unmarked government charter planes are landing at airports including Stansted and RAF Brize Norton packed with hundreds of Afghans, who are processed before being whisked off to a new life.
So far 18,500 Afghans whose data was breached have been flown to Britain or are on their way in taxpayer-funded jets. A total of 23,900 are earmarked for arrival.
They are living in MoD homes or hotels until permanent accommodation is found. More than 70,000 others will be left behind in Afghanistan and will have to fend for themselves after the Government yesterday shut the scheme.
Incredibly, hundreds of the Afghans rescued by the Government are now poised to sue the UK for leaking their data in the first place – potentially adding a further £1 billion in compensation to the colossal costs of the rescue and rehousing mission.
Last October, ministers signed off the £7 billion project which 'will mean relocating 25,000 Afghans [and] extend the scheme for another five years at a cost of c.£7bn', the secret court hearings were told. The £7billion figure was used repeatedly throughout the case.
Yesterday, however, as the injunction was lifted, Mr Healey told the Commons the costs were actually only £400 million to £850 million, not £7 billion, while claiming the numbers rescued because of the data breach would hit 6,900.
The Afghan migrants have been landing at Stansted around once a fortnight and are bussed from a private hanger
An MoD official last night said there was a distinction between Afghans coming because their data was leaked and those on the list coming here anyway via other relocation schemes.
As Mr Healey formally apologised for the data breach in the Commons, and Afghans began receiving messages from the Government saying 'we understand that this news may be concerning', it can be revealed:
Mr Justice Chamberlain, the judge who heard the case, queried the billions being spent saying: 'I'm starting to doubt myself... am I going bonkers?' And he questioned the MoD's demand for secrecy by saying: 'This is a resettlement programme for immigrants to the UK';
Amid a housing crisis, one in ten of the new arrivals is expected to 'enter the homelessness system';
An incredible 20 per cent of all MoD property has been given over to housing Afghans;
Ministers were privately warned areas with Afghan arrivals were 'hotspots' for last summer's riots;
The MoD warned of 'the risk of public disorder' after the super-injunction was lifted.
Adnan Malik from Barings Law, a Manchester firm that already has 1,000 clients ready to sue the Government, said: 'Since the super-injunction was lifted, we have heard conflicting information from the UK Government which goes against facts which were previously heard in court.
'We urge the Ministry of Defence to be clear and transparent with the public about the extent of this fiasco.'
Last night there was also a political storm brewing as the chairman of the Commons defence committee, Labour MP Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi, said he was 'minded to recommend' an investigation, telling the Commons the 'whole data breach situation is a mess and is wholly unacceptable'.
Yesterday Mr Justice Chamberlain ruled: 'There is no tenable basis for the continuation of the super-injunction.'
But the Mail and other media were hit with a second injunction brought by the MoD – this time to ban sensitive details from the database itself from being published.
Additional reporting: Mark Nicol