
Suffolk split over revised plan for northern bypass
Villager Josephine Debnam, 83, said: "If it was direct from Felixstowe, then it might make a difference and stop the town from getting clogged up."But, no, I don't support a northern bypass because we have enough traffic around this area already without adding more to it – it's chaos."
Shaun Farrell, who moved to the village two years ago from Ipswich, feared his house would have to be taken away from him if the project went ahead."It would help the town, I suppose, but I wouldn't want it to affect me," the 48-year-old told the BBC."We've just done loads to the house and we are doing it up, and if they were to just give us a set price and tell us to get out, then I wouldn't be very happy - I'd be gutted."
Another villager, who has lived in the area for 20 years but did not wish to be named, said a northern bypass would "cause a lot of problems for an awful lot of people".She also raised concerns over the impact it could have on fauna and wildlife in the village."Why don't they build something under the bridge, something simple?" the 60-year-old said."Because this is going to be irreversible once they start putting concrete down and the traffic starts booming through."Nobody gives two monkeys about us, the people who have lived here for donkey's years – we'll just get kicked out basically."
Some motorists have been particularly keen for the plans to be revisited since joint repair works started on the Orwell Bridge last month.The scheme has resulted in lengthy delays for drivers going to and from work, and some businesses have also reported suffering financial losses.National Highways, however, said the work, costing £6m, was essential, but appreciated that disruption had been caused.
"It's really frustrating because at the moment we are prisoners in our own homes [because of the traffic]," said Roger Mayhew, 73, who lives in Ipswich but spoke to the BBC while in Witnesham."This morning, coming here, there were queues all around, and there's all these big developments going on and extra traffic with no infrastructure."So something has got to give soon, but nothing is going to happen overnight."
The bypass was welcomed by some business owners who travel to and from the village of Witnesham, and believed it was the best way forward.Carpenter Michael Hancock, 64, said: "I have been coming from north Ipswich to here and back every day for years, and when the bridge is closed, it is laughable."But you can solve this problem, so I have never understood why they wouldn't do a northern bypass."Roads are built all around the UK and at some point they will disadvantage some people and advantage other people – but you don't want to be in a traffic jam your whole life."
Neil Austin, who has been the owner of the village's Barley Mow pub for eight years, also believed the road is needed to put an end to the gridlock."I travel through Ipswich to get to work, and it is an absolute nightmare, and it's only going to get worse, so I think we should have the bypass," the 56-year-old said."People don't want to move with the times, and things are moving fast around here, but wherever they put it, it's going to impact someone somewhere – but that's life."
The plan for a northern bypass had been discussed for a number of years, but confidence in it grew when Suffolk County Council seriously considered it several years ago.In 2019, the county council launched a public consultation to gauge public interest in the relief road, which it hoped would mitigate traffic issues.Three possible routes were proposed that would link the A14/A140 and the A12, but, in order to gain government funding, 15,000 new homes needed to be built.When local authorities failed to agree on housing, the plans were abandoned.But the road could still come to fruition, after councillor Sandy Martin put a motion before Suffolk County Council calling for it to be reconsidered.It was then amended to include a "suite of options", not just a "binary" northern bypass solution, before it was ultimately approved. "We cannot afford to have Ipswich brought to a complete standstill every time the bridge is shut, we cannot afford as a county to see Felixstowe downgraded," said Martin."We cannot afford as a country to see the expensive delays and disruptions to this nation's major trade route without any mitigation measures taken."
What happens next?
While the motion has been approved and singles a renewed cross-party commitment to finding a solution to traffic issues in Ipswich, nothing will happen overnight. A new mayor-led authority for Norfolk and Suffolk is in the process of being established as part of Downing Street's local council devolution plans.The mayor will not be elected until May 2026, so it is unlikely any progress will be made until after that happens.As part of the motion, a letter will also first have to be sent to the government, and it will have to consider whether it is willing to fund the project. A Department for Transport spokesperson said: "We are committed to supporting reliable, safe transport links in Suffolk and beyond, and are investing £24bn over the next four years to maintain and improve roads across the country."While works to improve safety on the Orwell Bridge have increased congestion, some closures remain necessary to protect road users and maintain vital routes.".
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
NHS managers who silence whistleblowers to be banned from senior health roles
NHS managers who silence whistleblowers will be banned from taking up other senior health service roles, the Government has announced. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said the proposals will ensure those who commit serious misconduct are no longer able to work in senior NHS management positions. Legislation is set to be put forward to Parliament next year to introduce professional standards and regulation of NHS managers. Tens of thousands of clinical and non-clinical managers work in the NHS but there is currently no regulatory framework specifically for managers, as there is for doctors and nurses. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the reforms will 'slam the door in the face of unsuitable managers'. Mr Streeting added: 'I'm determined to create a culture of honesty and openness in the NHS where whistleblowers are protected, and that demands tough enforcement. 'If you silence whistleblowers, you will never work in the NHS again. 'We've got to create the conditions where staff are free to come forward and sound the alarm when things go wrong. Protecting the reputation of the NHS should never be put before protecting patient safety. 'Most NHS leaders are doing a fantastic job, but we need to stop the revolving door that allows managers sacked for misconduct or incompetence to be quietly moved to another well-paid role in another part of the NHS.' DHSC said a public consultation launched in November last year received more than 4,900 contributions on ways in which managers and leaders could be regulated. The statutory barring system will be for board-level directors and their direct reports within NHS bodies. Further legislation will set out new statutory powers for the Health and Care Professions Council to disbar NHS leaders in senior roles who have committed serious misconduct. Separate NHS England professional standards for managers will establish a 'consistent, national set of expectations about NHS management and leadership competency and conduct', DHSC said. Tom Kark KC, author of the Kark Review into the effectiveness of the fit and proper person test within the NHS, said: 'I am pleased that the recommendation made in my report into the application of the NHS fit and proper person test to create a power to disqualify board directors found guilty of serious misconduct is being implemented. 'Along with the ongoing implementation of my other recommendations for improving board competence, this is a positive move to strengthen management in the NHS by weeding out poor leadership. 'This is good news for whistleblowers and those looking for accountability in senior management which has long been lacking.' Rachel Power, chief executive of the Patients Association, said patients expect NHS managers 'to be held to the same high standards as clinical staff, and that should include consistent regulation'. Ms Power added: 'A clear, fair process to prevent those who commit serious misconduct from returning to senior roles will be an important step forward, and it's vital that patient involvement continues to shape proposals as further regulation is considered.' Saffron Cordery, deputy chief executive of NHS Providers, said the membership organisation for hospital, mental health, community and ambulance services thought 'only 'fit and proper' people should be running NHS services'. Ms Cordery added: 'Many big, complex NHS trusts employ thousands of people therefore we want to attract the very best to lead them. 'So we welcome the Government's commitment to developing and accrediting managers alongside proposals for disbarring those whose performance falls short.' Sam Allen, NHS national director for leadership and management, said: 'Managers will welcome this new regulatory framework, as part of the broader package of actions set out in the plan to attract, develop, and retain the best possible leaders for the NHS of today and tomorrow.'


The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour minister says he is ‘not at all surprised' by Reform's lead in the polls
Steve Reed has said he is 'not at all surprised' Reform UK is consistently beating Labour in the polls. The environment secretary said Nigel Farage 's party poll lead is a ' reflection of people's disenchantment with politics'. ' I am not at all surprised, because we just had 14 years where people were promised so much, and all of those promises were broken,' he told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg. Mr Reed said: 'Through austerity, through Brexit, after the pandemic with build back better, none of it actually happened. 'The public want to see the change they actually voted for become real.' He went on to outline Labour's plan to leave Britain with the cleanest rivers on record by rebuilding crumbling sewage pipes and overhauling the regulation of water firms. Reform is currently leading in the polls with 29 per cent of the vote, with Labour trailing in second place on 23 per cent. A recent so-called mega poll by YouGov put Mr Farage's party on course to comfortably gain the most MPs in a general election, winning 271 seats compared to Labour on 178. Reform would not have a majority, but would by far be the largest party and unseat cabinet ministers Angela Rayner, Yvette Cooper, Bridget Phillipson and Jonathan Reynolds. Asked about the poll deficit and how Labour plans to turn it around, Mr Reed said: 'This government is making change for this country, but it takes time for that to feed through. 'I'm proud of what we're doing. I'm proud of this government and the British public will see the change they voted for over the coming months and years.' Labour's first year in power ended disastrously, with headlines dominated by the chaotic U-turn over Sir Keir Starmer 's planned £5bn benefit cuts. And polling guru Sir John Curtice said Sir Keir had " the worst start for any newly elected prime minister, Labour or Conservative". He said Labour's landslide victory last summer had masked vulnerabilities in the party's support and its policies. 'Labour only won 35 per cent of the vote – the lowest share ever for a majority government. Keir Starmer was never especially popular, and the public still don't know what he stands for,' he told Times Radio. 'The only vision he's really presented is: 'We'll fix the problems the Conservatives left us.' But it's not clear how he wants to change the country.'


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Showing his true colours? What Union Jack dress row family REALLY think of stepfather who thrust girl into spotlight and triggered political storm
The family of the 12-year-old girl who was banned from wearing a Union Jack dress to her school's 'Culture Day' are furious over her stepfather's decision to thrust her into the national spotlight. Year Seven pupil Courtney Wright was prevented by Bilton School in Rugby in Warwickshire from wearing the flag dress and the resulting row dominated the national media conversation and was even discussed in Parliament.