
Reform mayor Andrea Jenkyns storms out of Sky News interview after spiky speech
New Reform mayor Dame Andrea Jenkyns stormed out of a Sky News interview after being challenged over her decision to refer to a rival's accent in a spiky acceptance speech
New Reform UK mayor Dame Andrea Jenkyns stormed out of a TV interview after igniting a racism row moments after her election win.
The divisive former Tory MP, pushed away a Sky News microphone after being challenged over remarks in a spiky acceptance speech. The mayor of Greater Lincolnshire was questioned after she hit out at a rival "with a South African accent" while moaning about "dirty tricks" by opponents.
Dame Andrea had moaned about allegations she was "parachuted in" - and mentioned that the complainant had a foreign accent. Asked why she had referred to this in a heated live TV exchange, Dame Andrea said: "Because the irony of saying someone's being parachuted in who's not even from the country."
She was then asked to clarify if she thought someone with an overseas accent could not be from the county. The Reform mayor cut the interview short, saying: "I think actually, I'm not even going to answer any more of your questions.
"I think that your questioning is quite divisive. You're looking into things when it was a little play with words, it was a little joke because of the irony. Do you not understand irony?"
It came after Dame Andrea complained about her opponents' conduct during the campaign. She was accused of breaking election rules by standing despite not living in the area - a complaint that was dismissed.
In her acceptance speech the Reform mayor said: "I've never experienced such negativity and soul destroying campaigns against me like this one.
"It was soul destroying. The dirty tricks in the US politics, I believe it's now being imported here into Britain. The Conservatives called the police on me and implied I slept with political friends.
"They contacted the mainstream media to smear me. The Independent's husband pushed for a hearing at the council. My barrister had to represent me. The case was dismissed."
And she chuckled as she referred to the rival's accent, saying: "The campaign was also filled with irony. As one of the candidates stated, I was parachuted in. She said, you know, in her South African accent.
"Now they, undemocratically try to remove me from the ballot, but I will say no more on this and I wish them all well."
Dame Andrea, who switched to Nigel Farage's party last year after being kicked out at the general election, won 104,133 votes. She comfortably beat the Tories, who came second with 64,585.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
26 minutes ago
- The National
SNP could have got the votes to win had they backed this petition
In the run-up to the by-election the SNP leadership played the well-worn Westminster political 'first past the post' tactic. That is, not to try to promote your own policies but to claim that a vote for your candidate will prevent the 'much worse' party winning the seat. That way there's no need to make any promises or commitments to the electorate, you just claim to be much better than the party you claim is likely to win the seat if your party fails to win it. READ MORE: Israel launches second wave of major strikes on Iran John Swinney insisted on claiming that the outcome of the election would be a win for either SNP or the unknown Reform UK candidate, so that voting SNP was required to stop the neo-fascist Farage bunch from taking the seat, and in doing so, getting a foothold in Scotland. He offered no evidence to back this up, just his own political wisdom and in following this strategy, allowed Labour's 'invisible man' to quietly take the seat with practically no campaign – Labour were probably looking on and thinking it would be rude to interrupt! We now know that John's political wisdom was widely off the mark, indeed his claim that Reform was doing so well probably played into the Farage media hype, which is the core of the Reform organisation, and to that extent helped them in the election. This was a disaster for the SNP, losing a seat that they've held since its introduction in 2011. So again, the only winner was political apathy and disillusionment, with a turnout of only 44.2% compared to 63.2% in 2021, John Swinney seemed to imply this was a reasonable result? I know that in the run-up to this election, the SNP candidate Katy Loudon asked SNP members and the wider constituency for their support. Andy Anderson, the national convener of the Respect Scottish Sovereignty movement, responded to Katy, asking her to give her support to petition PE2135 on Scottish human rights which is currently before the Scottish Parliament. Andy said if she would do this, he would talk to RSS supporters in the constituency and seek their help to get her elected. RSS has about 7000 supporters in Scotland and hundreds of these supporters are in that constituency, so getting their active support for the SNP candidate could have been decisive in the outcome of this election. So how did Katy respond? She didn't. Andy prompted her again. No response. It seems it was more important to the SNP leadership to keep their options open to undermine the UN human rights of the Scottish people than to win a by-election. The Scottish people will not tolerate this, we will persist in our struggle for Scottish human rights and for direct democracy, and this RSS petition is an important part of that struggle. Apathy and political disillusion will not continue to dominate our electoral system. So, if the SNP want a viable political future in Scotland, they had better pay attention to the human rights of the Scottish people and start to respond to this issue. Paddy McCarthy via email IT is always a good way to finish the working week, witnessing the complete meltdown with associated frothing at the mouth of the extremists, those whot love to label themselves as 'Reform'. The followers of Farage – yes, he that is nothing more than a 'market-stall Trump' – dislike having their twisted ideology questioned. Which is in itself a classic reaction by those with leanings towards the totalitarian state. Their disdain for human rights, obsession with national security, and want of suppression of workers' rights all point to the fascist way of thinking. Yet if you were to ask them what their goal is? Their answer is that all they crave is their country back? They are, of course, unable to state where they wish to bring their country back from. But they know that the problems facing the UK could be solved by putting machine guns on the Channel crossing points, kicking out everyone who does not look the same, speak the same, or prays to a different god! After all, are they nothing more than an invasion force sitting in our midst just waiting for the call? Which is similar to the scaremongering used before the start of the First World War. Then it was directed at the German waiters in London, who were supposedly all serving officers in the Kaiser's army. The rancid press also stated that thousand of rifles with even more ammunition had been pre-placed in the UK for use by the waiters/officers! Oh, how they crave to have the country returned to a time of smartly dressed obedient children, with housewives equally smartly dressed doing their daily shopping at local shops. A time that did not exist outside of the BBC. The fascists will not accept that they are being manipulated by politicians who are, by their nature, dangerous, corrupt of ideology, and vile in deed. Scotland as a matter of urgency must separate from that breeding ground of rancid thought that is Westminster. Only through independence and rejoining our friends in Europe (in whatever form) shall we halt this goose-stepping into the abyss of intolerance and authoritarianism. Cliff Purvis Veterans for Scottish Independence 2.0 AN excellent article by Dr Mark McNaught on the advantages of the Efta/EEA over the EU for an independent Scotland (Jun 11). In particular, he calls out the EU's now blatant and highly dangerous military ambitions. What he doesn't mention, however, is that Scotland would be a net contributor to the EU. Latterly the UK was paying around £9 billion annually, the equivalent of more than £150 per adult. Given that Von der Leyen and co are hell-bent on admitting the ultimate basket case, Ukraine, that figure would be a lot higher. George Morton Rosyth


South Wales Guardian
43 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Government ‘focused' on tackling smuggling gangs after minister's boats claim
Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said on Thursday's Question Time that 'the majority of the people in these boats are children, babies and women'. PA news agency analysis of Home Office data indicates that adult males made up 73% of small boat arrivals from January 2018 to March 2025 where details of age and sex were recorded. A further 9% of these arrivals were adult females and 16% were under 18. Speaking on the BBC programme, Mr Jones said that the Government had been returning people, and also spoke about a visit to the Border Security Command. 'When you're there on the site seeing these dinghies put together by these organised criminal gangs which are clearly not safe, and when you see that the majority of people in these boats are children, babies and women…' he said. He later added: 'When there are babies and children put into that position by human trafficking gangs who are coming across on the Channel with skin burns from the oil from those boats mixing with the salt seawater. 'I would ask any of you to look at those babies and children and say 'go back where you came from'.' He also said that the immigration system was 'left out of control' by the Conservatives. Asked about Mr Jones's comments, a Number 10 spokesman said on Friday: 'The Government is absolutely focused on tackling these vile smuggling gangs that risk lives in the Channel.' Asked if the Prime Minister had confidence in Mr Jones, the spokesman said: 'Yes.' The Conservatives have accused Mr Jones of being 'completely out of touch with reality'. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'No wonder this is shaping up to be the worst year on record for small boat crossings. If this is what passes for reality inside the Labour Government, Britain is in serious trouble.' People were pictured arriving in Dover on Friday. Figures up to Thursday indicated that 15,264 people have arrived on small boats so far in 2025. The most on a single day this year was recorded on May 31, when 1,195 people arrived across 19 boats.


South Wales Guardian
43 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Minister agrees small boats crossings mainly men after Question Time claim
The Chief Secretary to the Treasury faced criticism for his remarks on the BBC's Question Time and sought to clarify that he was referring to a single boat that arrived when he visited the UK Border Security Command. Writing on social media site X, Mr Jones said: 'Of course the overall majority of people arriving illegally on small boats are men – but not 'north of 90%' as Reform claimed. Of course the overall majority of people arriving illegally on small boats are men – but not 'north of 90%' as Reform claimed. On @bbcquestiontime I shared a story from my visit to the Border Security Command about a dinghy that arrived mostly carrying women, children and… — Darren Jones MP (@darrenpjones) June 13, 2025 'On BBC Question Time, I shared a story from my visit to the Border Security Command about a dinghy that arrived mostly carrying women, children and babies who had suffered horrific burns. 'I'm happy to clarify this given how this is now being misrepresented.' Mr Jones said on Thursday's Question Time that 'the majority of the people in these boats are children, babies and women'. PA news agency analysis of Home Office data indicates that adult males made up 73% of small boat arrivals from January 2018 to March 2025 where details of age and sex were recorded. A further 9% of these arrivals were adult females and 16% were under 18. Speaking on the BBC programme, Mr Jones said that the Government had been returning people, and also spoke about a visit to the Border Security Command. 'When you're there on the site seeing these dinghies put together by these organised criminal gangs which are clearly not safe, and when you see that the majority of people in these boats are children, babies and women…' he said. He later added: 'When there are babies and children put into that position by human trafficking gangs who are coming across on the Channel with skin burns from the oil from those boats mixing with the salt seawater. 'I would ask any of you to look at those babies and children and say 'go back where you came from'.' He also said that the immigration system was 'left out of control' by the Conservatives. Asked about Mr Jones's comments, a Number 10 spokesman said on Friday: 'The Government is absolutely focused on tackling these vile smuggling gangs that risk lives in the Channel.' Asked if the Prime Minister had confidence in Mr Jones, the spokesman said: 'Yes.' The Conservatives accused Mr Jones of being 'completely out of touch with reality'. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'No wonder this is shaping up to be the worst year on record for small boat crossings. 'If this is what passes for reality inside the Labour Government, Britain is in serious trouble.' People were pictured arriving in Dover on Friday. Figures up to Thursday indicated that 15,264 people have arrived on small boats so far in 2025. The most on a single day this year was recorded on May 31, when 1,195 people arrived across 19 boats.