Brits back cuts to foreign aid, benefits and Net Zero to fund the NHS and police - amid fears Rachel Reeves is plotting tax hikes instead
Brits back cuts to foreign aid, benefits and Net Zero to bolster spending in other areas, according to a poll.
YouGov research has given an insight into the public's priorities as Rachel Reeves prepares to unveil departmental budgets for the next three years.
Fears are mounting that the Chancellor will have to impose more tax hikes later in the year, as the stalling economy and demands for more defence cash squeeze the government finances.
According to the survey, foreign aid was the most popular target for cuts - despite having already been slashed by billions of pounds to bolster defence.
Some 65 per cent endorsed trimming the development budget, including a majority of supporters of all major parties.
More welfare cuts were the preference of 41 per cent, although 18 per cent wanted higher spending, The Times reported.
Despite a brewing revolt by Labour MPs, even among the party's voters 31 per cent were behind trimming benefits costs. Just over a fifth supported higher spending and 40 per cent said the level was about right.
Curbing spend on Net Zero was backed by 40 per cent, but 30 per cent said those budgets should be maintained and 20 per cent said they should be higher.
Ms Reeves is due to lay out departmental allocations running up to 2029 - the likely timetable for the next general election - on Wednesday.
But the generous fiscal envelope set at the Budget last Autumn has been put under massive pressure by the economic slowdown, calls for more defence cash, and Labour revolts on benefits.
Ms Reeves has been signalled she will announce real-terms increases to budgets for police as she tries to quell Home Office resistance.
However, that is likely to be offset by cuts to other areas, with the NHS and defence sucking up funding.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's sanctions on Israel are disgraceful folly
It is one thing for the UK to impose sanctions on autocratic enemies like Russia. But to do the same to a democratic ally is reprehensible. The decision to pick out two members of the Israeli government for prohibition is extraordinary from a Government which refuses to proscribe Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps or the Muslim Brotherhood. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, has banned Itamar Ben-Gvir, the National Security Minister, and Bezalel Smotrich, the Finance Minister, from visiting the UK over comments they made on Gaza. Any assets in this country will be frozen. It is true that these individuals are on the extremes, even in Israel where their support for expanding West Bank settlements is controversial. Both politicians are ultra-nationalists whose continued presence in Benjamin Netanyahu's Cabinet is preventing the collapse of the coalition. But after initially declaring support for Israel after the October 7 2023 atrocities, Labour is in danger of being seen to side with Hamas. Backbench MPs are agitating for a far tougher line than the suspension of trade talks or curbs on arms sales. They want the UK to recognise a Palestinian state at a conference in New York later this month. That would be a serious mistake and perhaps Mr Lammy thinks he can head off party critics with limited action against individuals. But where does it stop? The two ministers are not being targeted for something they have done but for what they have said. It is unprecedented for Britain to treat politicians serving in the government of a friendly power in this way. How will Mr Lammy feel if Israel now bans him for the criticism he has voiced?
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
World Bank predicts worst decade for global growth since 60s
The global economy will see the slowest decade for global growth since the 1960s as the effect of Donald Trump's tariffs are felt, the World Bank has two thirds of countries in the world had their growth forecasts cut from the bank's last set of predictions six months bank predicts global growth of only 2.3% in 2025, which is 0.4% lower than was forecast in January, and for 2027, it predicts growth of 2.6%Japan, Europe and the US were among those downgraded in the bank's twice yearly report. The bank's last set of forecasts in January were made before Donald Trump took then, his introduction of a universal 10% tariff on all imports into the US, as well as higher tariffs on steel and aluminium, caused financial markets to plunge in early April.A trade ruling found the bulk of his global tariffs to be illegal in May, although the Trump administration won an appeal to keep them in place for World Bank downgraded its growth forecast for the US in both 2025 and 2026, because of escalating trade tensions rattling investor confidence as well as private it not downgrade the US's main rival, China, which the bank said had enough financial stability to weather the "significant headwinds" from global political uncertainty."Against the backdrop of heightened policy uncertainty and increased trade barriers, the global economic context has become more challenging," the report said, adding that more "sentiment-sapping policy uncertainty" would come because of the potential for "further rapid shifts" in trade-restrictive moves by bank said there would be further cuts in growth if the US increased tariffs, and warned of rising could lead to "global trade seizing up in the second half of this year, accompanied by a widespread collapse in confidence, surging uncertainty and turmoil in financial markets," the report it stopped short of predicting a global recession, saying the chances of that were less than 10%.The report comes after the OECD also downgraded its outlook for the world economy. It said global growth is now expected to slow to a "modest" 2.9%, down from a previous forecast of 3.1%.In the mean time, a new round of talks aimed at resolving the trade war between the US and China has taken place in central London.
BreakingNews.ie
34 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Retired civil servants and ministers to have pension deductions checked
Around 13,000 current and former civil servants and ministers are to have their pension deductions assessed for possible anomalies, Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers said. Mr Chambers said that serious and systemic operational issues in the National Shared Services Office (NSSO) were brought to his attention in late March, after which further issues were found. Advertisement Because of administrative errors in the NSSO, members of the current Government, some members of previous governments and a number of office holders have had incorrect application of pension deductions. Retired civil servants who were in receipt of allowances prior to retirement were also the subject of miscalculations. The NSSO provides services such as human resources, payroll, pension, and finance management services to public service bodies. The full scale of the issues, relating to payroll and pensions, and the number of people impacted is still being assessed. Advertisement The Cabinet was briefed on the administrative errors in the NSSO on Tuesday. There are three cohorts impacted by these errors: current and former ministers and office holders, Civil Service retirees with work-sharing patterns, and retired senior civil servants. The Department of Public Expenditure said the issues were not the fault of any of the individuals impacted. A pool of 13,000 retired civil servants is being assessed, a small fraction of whom are expected to be affected by the anomaly. Advertisement One issue relates to the miscalculation and under-payment of pensions for some work-sharing Civil Service retirees who were in receipt of allowances prior to retirement in the last 20 years or so. Another issue relates to the incorrect application of pension deductions for most members of the current Government, Ministers of State, some members of previous governments and recent office holders. This relates to superannuation deductions and Additional Superannuation Contributions (ASC) with respect to salaries, allowances and gifted income. The NSSO is starting a process to contact ministers to outline the issue to them and to make arrangements for the recoupment of monies owed or to issue refunds as appropriate. Advertisement The amounts involved range from hundreds of euros to the low 30,000s of euro, in terms of monies to be recouped. A number of ministers are due refunds ranging from hundreds of euros up to the low 20,000s of euro. The third issue relates to the administration of Chargeable Excess Tax (CT) and Withholding Tax (WHT) in respect of senior grade Civil Service pensioners. Chargeable Excess Tax is a tax on pension funds at retirement which exceed the Standard Fund Threshold, which is currently €2 million. Advertisement In a small number of cases, this tax was not correctly applied by the NSSO. Similar to the CET issue, withholding tax is deducted from retirement lump sums over €200,000 and most likely applies to those from principal officer level upwards. In total between CET and WHT, NSSO has identified 30 cases. The liabilities for this cohort range from a few hundred euros to €280,000. Ireland Nationwide rent controls planned as Government loo... Read More Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers said the issues brought to his attention are 'completely unacceptable'. 'The NSSO has responsibility for the essential function of the provision of pay and pensions to public and civil servants and it has failed in this fundamental duty. 'I have instructed the CEO of the NSSO that the multiple errors must be corrected by the NSSO as a matter of urgency, particularly regarding the treatment of retirees who had been on a work-sharing pattern in the Civil Service.'
