BOJ may paint less gloomy view, signal rate-hike resumption
Receding global trade tensions following Sunday's agreement between the U.S. and the European Union add relief for BOJ policymakers on the outlook of Japan's export-heavy economy.
But the BOJ is likely to warn of lingering uncertainty on how U.S. tariffs affect business activity with the hit to exports seen intensifying later this year, analysts say.
"It's very big progress that reduces uncertainty for Japan's economy - but obviously, some uncertainty remains," BOJ Deputy Governor Shinichi Uchida said last week on the Japan-U.S. trade deal.
Uchida noted questions around how soon Washington strikes trade deals with other countries, how the tariffs affect domestic and global economies and how long it could take for the tariffs' effects to be seen in hard data.
At the two-day meeting ending on Thursday, the BOJ is widely expected to keep short-term interest rates steady at 0.5%.
Markets are focusing on the bank's quarterly outlook report and Governor Kazuo Ueda's post-meeting news conference for clues on the timing of the next rate hike.
A Reuters poll, taken before last week's Japan-U.S. trade deal announcement, showed a majority of economists expect the BOJ to raise rates again by year-end.
In the quarterly report, the BOJ is likely to revise up this fiscal year's inflation forecast due to persistent rises in rice and other food costs, sources have told Reuters.
The BOJ may also tweak its current view that risks to the price outlook were skewed to the downside, and offer a less gloomy view on the economy compared with the current one focused on tariff-induced risks, according to separate sources.
The board is likely to maintain its view that inflation will durably hit its 2% target in the latter half of its three-year projection period running through fiscal 2027, they said.
In current projections made on May 1, the BOJ projects core consumer inflation to hit 2.2% in fiscal 2025, before slowing to 1.7% in 2026 and 1.9% in 2027.
Japan struck a trade deal with President Donald Trump last week that lowers U.S. tariffs for imports of goods including its mainstay automobiles, easing the pain for the export-reliant economy and clearing a key hurdle for further BOJ rate hikes.
The positive development contrasts with the gloom that surrounded the economy on May 1, when the BOJ produced its current estimates amid heightened market volatility caused by Trump's April announcement of sweeping "reciprocal" tariffs.
The BOJ exited a decade-long, massive stimulus last year and raised its short-term policy rate to 0.5% in January on the view Japan was progressing towards durably achieving its price goal.
With rising food costs hurting households and keeping inflation above its 2% target for three years, some hawkish board members have highlighted mounting price pressures that could justify resuming rate hikes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Trump taking on Modi risks worst of both worlds
Secondary tariffs on countries buying Russian oil were meant to be the bunker buster in Washington's sanctions armoury, a weapon so devastating it would cripple Moscow's economy. Yet by appearing to punish India alone, Donald Trump risks squandering its impact. He may end up with the worst of all worlds: dropping a bomb too small to do significant damage to Russia while alienating a vital ally and counterweight to China. After months of resolutely refusing to punish Russia, the US president has changed tack. Convinced that Vladimir Putin has no interest in ending the war in Ukraine, Mr Trump has concluded that targeting Russia's energy sector – which generates a third of government revenue – is the key pressure point. 'If energy goes down, Putin is going to stop killing people,' he said this week. India has undeniably helped prop up the Kremlin's war machine, buying £42bn of Russian oil last year. But other nations have also helped fund Putin's invasion. China buys more than India, while Turkey, Brazil, the United Arab Emirates and even some European Union states are significant consumers. It is possible that Mr Trump may widen his net in the coming days. He has given Putin until Friday to agree to a ceasefire or face consequences. Until now, Russia has faced a 10 per cent tariff, the lowest level Mr Trump applies. That figure is almost certain to rise, but with bilateral trade at £3.9bn last year, such a move will barely trouble the Kremlin. More direct sanctions on Russia's banks or its shadow tanker fleet could follow, but these too seem unlikely to force a change of course. Secondary tariffs on countries buying Russian oil could, in theory, bite harder. Yet, by singling out India with a 25 per cent penalty, the weapon has been fired half-cocked. Analysts speculate that Mr Trump may extend the measures to other countries. If that is his intent, it is curious he would shame India rather than wait 48 hours to announce a broader policy. The strategy risks misfiring. Narendra Modi, India's prime minister, has endured repeated humiliations from a man he once called a friend. Yet in recent months Mr Trump has imposed higher tariffs on India than on most of its Asian competitors and caused anguish by courting Pakistan, which is closely aligned with China. With public anger in India growing over Washington's perceived high-handedness, Mr Modi would find it politically tricky to halt all Russian oil purchases, even if he wished to. Given the importance of the US market for Indian exports, he may have to find a fudge. Any concession, however, will come at a cost. Analysts say India is now likely to edge closer to China and Russia, weakening one of Washington's most valuable relationships in Asia. Even if India reduces imports, it is unclear whether losing a single buyer – even one as important as Delhi – will seriously dent Russia's war economy. A policy that leaves Putin undeterred while estranging India is hardly a triumph of statecraft – though final judgment must wait until Mr Trump reveals the rest of his plan.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Kashkari: Fed needs to respond to slowing economy, two cuts this year would be reasonable
WASHINGTON, Aug 6 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Reserve may need to cut interest rates in the near term in response to a slowing U.S. economy, even though it remains unclear whether tariffs will continue to push inflation higher, Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari said on Wednesday. "The economy is slowing, and that means in the near term it may become appropriate to start adjusting," Kashkari said in an interview on CNBC's Squawk Box, adding that two quarter-percentage-point rate cuts by the end of the year "seems reasonable to me." Kashkari said concerns about rising inflation remain valid, but that it will take time to know whether that poses a problem for the Fed reaching its 2% inflation target or not. Meanwhile a weak jobs report and downward revisions to prior months' employment data add to a developing set of statistics that show the economy slowing to a degree the Fed cannot ignore, Kashkari said. Recent data "suggests the real underlying economy is slowing. I've got confidence that that is happening," Kashkari said. "How long can we wait until the tariff effects become clear? That's just weighing on me right now." Kashkari does not have a vote on interest rate policy this year, but his arguments are similar to those voiced by two Fed governors who dissented at the Fed's decision last week to hold the policy rate steady while awaiting more clarity on how rising import tariffs will feed through to consumer prices. A slowdown in job creation and rise in the unemployment rate in July have begun shifting the narrative, however, to put more focus on risks to the Fed's other goal of maintaining maximum employment.
Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
Trump says Japan to import huge Ford F-150 trucks
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. The developments come just two years after the autoworker union secured landmark contracts with Detroit automakers. If your daydreams look more like blockbuster action movies, you're in luck. This LS3-swapped 1972 Chevy Chevelle is for sale right now on Exotic Car Trader. View post: Walmart Is Selling an 'Efficient' $220 Chest Freezer for Only $119, and Shoppers Say It 'Has Plenty of Room' The 2026 Corvette ZR1X has an official price as Chevrolet reveals the Quail Silver Limited Edition package. Seems Like Wishful Thinking For The Land Of The Kei Car President Donald Trump on Tuesday said Japan would import massive Ford F-150 pickup trucks following the most recent trade deal between the two countries. That seems unlikely considering Japan's preference for smaller vehicles, but the statement was typical of a president who's often cited as being fast and loose with the truth. 0:08 / 0:09 Honda may move the next-generation Civic production from Mexico to the U.S. Watch More 'They're taking our cars,' Trump said in a CNBC phone interview Tuesday. 'They're taking the very beautiful Ford F-150, which does very well. And I'm sure it'll do well there too, along with other great products.' This statement came as Japan's lead trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, traveled to the United States to see that the Trump Administration honored its commitment under the revised trade deal, which lowers tariffs on Japanese automotive imports to the U.S. from 25% and 15%. Trump's Trade War Continues Trump has been threatening tariffs on most countries since taking office in January, with the auto industry a particular target. While the U.S. and Japan negotiated lower tariffs, they're still much higher than before and, according to Seeking Alpha, there's no official timeline for when the lowering of tariffs will take effect. Akazawa is expected to push for an executive order to formally implement the new tariff rates. In the interview, Trump also reiterated claims that the trade deal includes a $550 billion 'signing bonus' from Japan, although Tokyo has reportedly downplayed this, saying only 1-2% of that amount represents direct investment in the U.S. economy, while the rest consists of loans and guarantees from private firms. Ford Isn't Happy With Trade Deal Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Japan suddenly deciding to import F-150 trucks seems implausible given Ford CEO Jim Farley's recent negative comments about the trade deal. Farley said last week that the deal would actually benefit Ford's Japanese rivals, claiming lower labor costs and favorable exchange rates would make Japan-manufactured vehicles cheaper than Ford's U.S.-built vehicles with the lower 15% tariff. Ford has claimed that as much as 80% of its U.S. sales volume is domestically assembled, but that hasn't helped it avoid the impact of tariffs. During the automaker's second-quarter earnings call, Farley said Ford faced a tariff bill of $2 billion. Ford is just one of several automakers releasing dour financial results as the tariffs hit—with no relief in sight. About the Author Stephen Edelstein View Profile
