Europe has been ‘free-riding' on US security, says Merz
The German Chancellor met with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in the UK on Thursday to sign a treaty on a range of issues, such as defence and immigration.
On his first trip to London as chancellor, Mr Merz described the Kensington treaty as historic. It is the first major bilateral agreement between the UK and Germany to deepen defence cooperation and boost economic growth in both nations.
Russia's war in Ukraine has defined the first two months of Mr Merz's chancellorship, as has Donald Trump 's tariffs on the EU.
The German Chancellor said he has met with the US president three times now and they are 'on the same page' on Ukraine – both wanting to bring an end to the war.
But he admitted that Europe had not historically funded its own security in the past.
"We know we have to do more on our own and we have been free-riders in the past," he told the BBC. 'They're asking us to do more and we are doing more."
Asked about his relationship with Mr Trump, he said: "We are on the phone once a week; we are coordinating our efforts. One issue is the war in Ukraine, and the second is our trade debates and tariffs."
"We are seeing a big threat, and the threat is Russia. And this threat is not only on Ukraine. It's on our peace, on our freedom, on the political order of Europe," he told the Today Programme.
Mr Merz said he would do 'whatever it takes' to boost Germany's defence spending and increase the size of its army.
At a press conference on Thursday, Mr Merz and Sir Keir discussed ways to boost European support for Ukraine, following Trump's announcement to bolster Kyiv 's stockpile by selling American weapons to Nato allies who would in turn send arms to Kyiv. This includes Patriot air defence missiles Volodymyr Zelensky has urgently sought.
Mr Merz said they had discussed Ukraine's need for long-range strike systems, which he called "long range fire". "Ukraine will soon receive substantial additional support in this area," he told the press conference.
The treaty includes a clause on mutual assistance which, "in light of the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, is highly significant", a German official said this week.
He said that 'above all, we need clarity on how weapons systems that are given up from the European side will be replaced by the US.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Belfast Telegraph
10 minutes ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Fighting over the scraps: Are big-bucks global food chains pushing local players out of business?
Deep-pocketed foreign brands such as The Ivy and Popeyes are muscling in as local restaurants are hit by cost-of-living slowdown A wave of high-end international restaurants and fast-food brands is breaking through the Irish market, despite domestic players feeling the heat of an industry 'slowdown' amid the cost-of-living crisis. Several global foodie newcomers have targeted Ireland for expansion in recent years. Fine-dining groups like UK-based steakhouse Hawksmoor, French group Big Mamma and The Ivy have either opened or announced expansion plans in Ireland and Northern Ireland.
Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
John Lewis considers awarding staff bonus for first time in four years
John Lewis is poised to reinstate its prized staff bonus for the first time in four years after upbeat trading put it on course for higher profits. The retail partnership, one of Britain's largest mutuals, is considering paying out the bonus to 69,000 workers after a turnaround in performance at its flagship stores. According to internal documents, the group's board will be asked to recommend reinstating the payout if pre-tax profits reach £200m for the year to February 2026. Profits last year totalled £126m, up from £42m, and sales are expected to have increased in the first half of 2025 – leaving it well positioned to hit the milestone. The documents, seen by the Financial Times, said John Lewis expected to pass the £200m threshold and added 'to get there we need to keep focused on the right things and deliver our plans'. Bringing back the payout would mark a major win for Jason Tarry, the new chairman who joined the retailer last September replacing Dame Sharon White. The former UK chief of Tesco has steered a turnaround drive at the partnership, with bosses saying they are now 'relentlessly focused' on retail again having dabbled in financial services and housing. John Lewis, which also owns grocer Waitrose, first cancelled the prized payout in 2020 having paid the bonus every year since 1953. It was briefly reinstated in 2022 but has not been paid since amid a tougher trading environment. Despite tripling profits last year, the group said it had 'prioritised' higher pay for staff as well as other investments instead of paying the bonus. The move prompted anger from members, who campaigned to get the payout reinstated. A staff petition launched earlier this year said that workers were 'working harder than ever' but many were 'getting less recognition'. 'The bonus meant something more than just money. It was a sign that the company saw and appreciated us,' the letter said. John Lewis has faced a variety of struggles in recent years, including navigating the pandemic as well as rising levels of online shopping destroying trading in its bricks-and-mortar stores. In 2021, under Dame Sharon, it suffered a £648m loss because of a significant write-down on the value of its shops as well as restructuring costs. On the back of this, the retailer launched a five year cost-cutting plan to try and return to profit. The partnership paid a record £116m in salaries last year and raised its minimum pay to £11.55 an hour. Reviving the payout hinges on trading remaining successful for the rest of the year. A John Lewis spokesman said: 'As we said at our full year results in March, we expect to increase our profitability in the coming year.'
The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pete Hegseth is skirting law by bringing back Confederate names of army bases
Since Donald Trump returned to office this year, his secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, has ripped the new names off a series of US army bases and brought back their old traitorous Confederate names. His actions have angered Democrats and even some Republicans in Congress, prompting a rare rebuke of the Trump administration by the Republican-controlled Congress last Tuesday. The GOP-led House of Representatives Armed Services Committee voted on 15 July to block Hegseth from renaming the bases after Confederates. Two Republicans voted with the Democrats on the committee to pass the measure, which was an amendment to the Pentagon's budget bill. 'What this administration is doing, particularly this secretary of defense, is sticking his finger in the eye of Congress,' said Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican representative who voted to stop Hegseth. Hegseth's move elicited bipartisan anger because it flouted the law; Congress passed legislation in January 2021 to create a commission to choose new names for the bases named for Confederates and mandated that its recommendations be implemented by the Pentagon. That law was passed over a veto by Trump in the final days of his first term, and the name changes were later implemented by the Pentagon during the Biden administration. The law is still on the books, and so in order to return to the old Confederate names, Hegseth has openly played games with their namesakes. The secretary claims he has renamed the bases after American soldiers from throughout US history who were not Confederates. But they all conveniently have the same last names as the original Confederate namesakes of the bases. For example, Fort Bragg is now supposedly named for Roland Bragg, who was an army paratrooper in the second world war; Fort Benning is now supposedly named for Fred Benning, a soldier who served in the army in the first world war. Before the House vote, Hegseth's efforts to skirt the law were also challenged in the Senate. In a hearing in June, Angus King, a senator from Maine, told Hegseth that he was returning the bases to the names of 'people who took up arms against their country on behalf of slavery'. Hegseth insisted that the Pentagon had found non-Confederates with the same names to stay within 'the limits of what Congress allowed us to do'. But during the same hearing, Hegseth briefly dropped the pretense that he wasn't returning to the original Confederate names. He argued that 'there is a legacy, a connection' for veterans with the old names. King replied that Hegseth's actions were 'an insult to the people of the United States'. Above all, Hegseth's actions show a troubling ignorance of the lives of the original Confederate namesakes; their easily-researched backgrounds reveal what terrible role models they make for modern American military personnel. Braxton Bragg was one of the most incompetent Confederate generals of the civil war. His subordinates repeatedly and clandestinely tried to get him fired, with one writing to the Confederate secretary of war that 'nothing but the hand of God can save us or help us as long as we have our present commander'. Bragg finally lost his command after he was out-generaled by Union General Ulysses S Grant and his army was routed at the Battle of Chattanooga in 1863. One of the few biographies written about him is entitled Braxton Bragg, the Most Hated Man in the Confederacy. And yet Bragg lives on today as the namesake of the largest and most important military base in the United States Army. Fort Bragg, in Fayetteville, North Carolina was originally built in 1918, as part of a rushed effort by the army to construct new bases after the United States entered the first world war. The site offered the army cheap and abundant land, and it quickly built a base and surrounding military reservation totaling 251 sq miles. Eager to win local white support, the army agreed to name the new base after a Confederate; Bragg was chosen because he was originally from North Carolina. By the time the base was built, the civil war had been over for more than 50 years, yet the south was still in the grips of the 'the Lost Cause' theory of the war, which romanticized the civil war and held that the south had fought for state's rights, not slavery, and that the Confederacy had fielded better officers and men and had only lost because of the overwhelming resources of the north. By 1918, when Bragg's name was attached to the base, the generation of Confederate officers who hated him were gone, along with the memory of his military blunders. That pattern held for a series of major bases built throughout the south during the first and second world wars. Fort Benning was also built in 1918 near Columbus, Georgia. At the request of the Columbus Rotary Club, the army named it for Henry Lewis Benning, who was best known as a pro-slavery political firebrand from Columbus who helped draft Georgia's ordinance of secession. Benning was one of the pre-eminent white supremacists of his day, and he openly admitted that his state seceded because of slavery, not states rights. In one speech, he said that his state seceded because of a 'deep conviction on the part of Georgia that a separation from the North was the only thing that could prevent the abolition of her slavery … If things are allowed to go on as they are … we will have black governors, black legislatures, black juries, black everything. Is it supposed that the white race will stand for that?' Benning served in the Confederate army, but it was his political role as a proponent of a southern slavocracy that first brought him fame and prominence. By the 21st century, there were still 10 army bases that were named for Confederates, and the Pentagon repeatedly resisted efforts to change their names, arguing that tradition outweighed the fact that the bases were named for traitors who had fought to preserve slavery. The Confederate base names were finally changed after the 2020 George Floyd protests; Fort Bragg became Fort Liberty, while Fort Benning became Fort Moore, named for Vietnam War hero Hal Moore and his wife, Julia Moore. (Mel Gibson played Hal Moore and Madeleine Stowe played Julia Moore in the 2002 movie We Were Soldiers.) But those new names didn't survive Trump's return to office. Hegseth hasn't stopped with army bases. The Pentagon has announced it will strip the name off the US navy ship Harvey Milk, which was named for the gay rights pioneer who was assassinated in 1978, and rename it for Oscar V Peterson, a sailor who won the Congressional Medal of Honor during the second world war. But one thing is certain: Braxton Bragg's civil war contemporaries would be shocked to discover that a man so widely derided as a loser and a martinet during his lifetime is still at the center of a national debate 160 years after the war ended. During the war, one Confederate newspaper editor described him as a man with 'an iron hand and a wooden head'. Grant, the man who so badly beat Bragg during the war, took great pleasure in making fun of Bragg and his ridiculous behavior when he later wrote his memoirs. Grant recounted one infamous episode involving Bragg from the time before the civil war when both men served in the small, pre-war US army. 'On one occasion, when stationed at a post … (Bragg) was commanding one of the companies and at the same time acting as post quartermaster … As commander of the company he made a requisition upon the quartermaster – himself – for something he wanted. As quartermaster he declined to fill the requisition and endorsed on the back of it his reasons for so doing. As company commander he responded to this, urging that his requisition called for nothing but what he was entitled to, and that it was the duty of the quartermaster to fill it. As quartermaster he still persisted that he was right … Bragg referred the whole matter to the commanding officer of the post. The latter exclaimed: 'My God, Mr. Bragg, you have quarreled with every officer in the army, and now you are quarrelling with yourself!' In his memoirs, Grant wrote that Bragg was 'naturally disputatious'. So maybe Braxton Bragg would fit in perfectly with Donald Trump after all.
