
As Trump Reveals 'Golden Dome', A Look At India's Shield, Israel's Iron Dome
Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed.
Donald Trump proposed a $175 billion "golden dome" missile defense system for the U.S., aiming to enhance protection against aerial threats. The plan includes advanced technologies similar to Israel's Iron Dome, focusing on multi-tiered defense capabilities.
New Delhi:
Donald Trump wants a ' golden dome ' - a ground- and space-based missile defence system - protecting the US and possibly Canada too, even if it doesn't want to be the 51st state.
The American President made his big announcement Tuesday, talking of an advanced shield to counter next-gen aerial threats, including ballistic and cruise missiles. He said his 'golden dome' - which will cost an estimated US$ 175 billion - would eventually "deploy next-generation technologies across the land, sea and space, including space-based sensors and interceptors".
Trump has been pitching the 'golden dome' idea for weeks now, including in March when he addressed a joint sitting of the US Congress and vowed to construct a system to rival Israel's famed Iron Dome and underscore the American military's position as "the most powerful".
He called out Israel on that occasion, saying, "Israel and other places have it... and the US should too. This is a very dangerous world. We're going to protect our citizens like never before."
The 'Protector In The Sky'
Missile defence systems are an increasingly critical part of a nation's military capabilities.
Basically, it consists of interlocked, multi-tiered systems designed to detect, track, and intercept incoming ballistic weapons at various stages of flight - boost, midcourse, terminal.
The goal is simple - to detect and shoot down a missile before it hits a target.
Consider Israel's Iron Dome (and Arrow) systems, which has intercepted thousands of rockets and missiles since it went online in 2011. Evidence of its importance was demonstrated in April and October last year, when it shot down most of over 100 missiles fired by Iran.
Israel's Iron Dome system intercepts missiles fired on Tel Aviv.
Iron Dome and Arrow were also in action the year before that - when it intercepted rockets fired by Hamas in the military conflict that broke out after the group's October 7 attack on civilians.
Yes, there were questions about the system reaching saturation point after the Hamas fired over 5,000 rockets in 20 minutes, and the Iron Dome failed to intercept several. However, the point remains - the missile defence shield has saved hundreds of thousands of lives over time.
NDTV Explains | Why The Iron Dome Failed To Defend Hamas Rocket Barrage
And then consider India's integrated air defence network, spearheaded by the indigenously developed Akashteer system that protected the country during Operation Sindoor in May, when Pakistan fired hundreds of drones and missiles at military bases and civilian centres.
So what is in each of these three systems?
US' 'Golden Dome'
The outermost layer will be the Space-Based Infrared System, or SBIRS, which will be paired with ground-based radars to red flag incoming aerial threats by relying on satellites.
Essentially, this provides early warning of missile launches.
It will also include the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense, or GMD, the backbone of the US' defence against intercontinental ballistic missiles. The GMD uses ground-based interceptors deployed at locations in Alaska and California to stop missiles during their midcourse phase.
Space-Based Infrared System
At sea, there is the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense, or BMD, which employs warships to engage short- to intermediate-range ballistic missiles. The Aegis initiative was implemented by President Barack Obama in 2009, when he shut down missile sites in Poland (much to Russia's relief and happiness) and fitted upgraded SM-2 surface-to-air missiles on US Navy warships.
NDTV Explains | "Israel Has It, US Should Too": Behind Trump's 'Golden Dome'
Sitting inside the BMD is the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, a mobile, land-based system that can intercept short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic missiles in their terminal phase. It is a hit-to-kill system; i.e., its missiles collide head-on with the threats.
Incidentally, the THAAD system is also in Israel; in December last year it was used to intercept a ballistic missile reportedly fired from Yemen by the Houthis, an Iran-backed rebel group.
Terminal High-Altitude Area Defence
For shorter range ballistic missiles and other air threats in the terminal phase, the US relies on the Patriot Advanced Capability-3, or PAC-3, interceptor missiles. These are also part of a plan to counter possible deployment of Chinese hypersonic weapons in the Pacific region.
With that in mind, the US and Japan have worked together to set up PAC-3 systems there.
Israel's Iron Dome
The Iron Dome is at the inner part of Israel's anti-missile system. The outer layers are ' David's Sling ' for mid- to long-range missiles, and Arrow-2 and Arrow-3, for long-range ballistic missiles.
It can intercept targets up to 70km away, and Israel claims the system has a 95 per cent 'kill rate'
Each Iron Dome battery is made up of three main sections: a radar detection system, a computer to calculate the incoming rocket's trajectory, and a launcher that fires interceptors if the rocket is deemed likely to hit a built-up or strategic area.
Explained | What Is The Iron Dome, Israel's Anti-Missile Cover Since 2011
'David's Sling' can intercept targets up to 300km away and the Arrow systems up to 2,400km; Arrow-3 can target long-range ballistic missiles even outside the Earth's atmosphere.
The former began operating in 2017 and the latter has been around since 2000, when the West Asian region was roiled after the First Gulf War of 1991.
And there is an upgrade coming for Israel - Iron Beam - a high-powered laser interceptor.
According to the Israelis.it can engage at the speed of light up to a range of several kilometers, has an unlimited magazine, almost zero cost per interception, and causes minimal collateral damage.
India's 'Guardians Of The Sky'
India's integrated air defence system - an automated system integrates data from forces to combat aerial threats, and includes systems operated by the Army, Navy and the Air Force - was brought together under the Integrated Air Command and Control System.
The multi-layered system has a section to counter drones, including by firing air defence guns.
READ | "Happiest Day...": Man Behind Akash System That Stopped Pak Missiles
This is followed by a second layer that includes to-a-point defence systems to protect specific areas or assets; these include short-range surface-to-air missiles like the Spyder, Pechora, and OSA-AK.
The third is the medium-range surface-to-air missiles like the Akash and Indo-Israeli MRSAM. And the fourth, for area-defence, are long-range SAMs fired from the Russian-made S-400 and the fighter jets.
The multi-layered AD system was in action during aerial engagements in Op Sindoor.
The defence systems destroyed Pakistani drones and PL-15 missiles on the nights of May 8, 9 and 10, preventing them from entering our airspace.
NDTV Explains | India's Integrated Air Defence That Outfoxed Pakistan
India has also integrated the Army's Akashteer air defence system to ensure "seamless integration of ground-based, airborne and space systems", the Air Force's doctrine states.
Other AD Systems?
Of course, India, the US, and Israel aren't the only countries on this list; Russia has the A-135 anti-ballistic system protecting Moscow and other major cities and the potent S-400 that can knock out multiple intermediate-range ballistic missiles.
India has three S-400 squadrons with two more to be delivered.
China has several options, including the HQ-9 long-range, surface-to-air, anti-ballistic-capable system that has been sold to Pakistan, Morocco, Egypt, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.
India has three squadrons of the Russian-made S-400 missile defence system (File).
Incidentally, the Indian government said it had disabled a Pakistani HQ-9 system - which had been based in Lahore - during Operation Sindoor.
Taiwan and Japan also have such systems; the former has the Sky Bow family of surface-to-air, anti-ballistic missile and anti-aircraft defense system, while the latter is set to operationalise surface-to-air interceptors called Patriot Advanced Capability-3 developed jointly with the US.
And the list of countries with tiered air-defence systems will likely only increase as diplomatic and military tension continues to tighten across the world.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
10 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What is Bela? Trump's four-letter post leaves internet baffled
President Donald Trump has sent the internet into a tizzy with his four-letter post on Truth Social. Amid a flurry of posts on Trump's own platform, regarding his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump wrote the word 'Bela'. Donald Trump is set to meet with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Washington on Monday, where several European leaders will also reportedly be present. (X/@WhiteHouse) Donald Trump's Truth Social post(Truth Social/@realDonaldTrump) Now, it has left everyone wondering as to what the president could possibly be trying to say. What is Bela and why did Trump write it? As far as any immediate connections can be drawn, 'Bela' does not seem to have any bearing on the President of the United States. In most likelihood, it is a typo from the POTUS amid the many posts he was putting out on the platform. Ahead of the seemingly incomprehensible word, Trump had written on Truth Social 'BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA. STAY TUNED! President DJT'. He also wrote 'If I got Russia to give up Moscow as part of the Deal, the Fake News, and their PARTNER, the Radical Left Democrats, would say I made a terrible mistake and a very bad deal. That's why they are the FAKE NEWS! Also, they should talk about the 6 WARS, etc., I JUST STOPPED!!! MAGA.' This has been the theme of Trump's posts for the day – taking it to the press for criticizing his handling of the meeting with Putin. 'Bela' leaves internet baffled Soon after Trump put 'Bela' out into the world, internet sleuths got onto the task. One person on Reddit went so far as to posit that perhaps Trump, or his social media team, might be referring to the Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) law in South Africa, which is reportedly controversial. The term even began to trend on X. Bela trends on X(X) With the term trending, it also sparked a series of posts online. One person recalled Trump's last word snafu, when he had said 'covfefe', and shared a post on it. Another quipped with a faux Trump-Putin conversation 'Trump: Please don't release the Kompromat on me. Putin: Then let us take over Ukraine! Trump: Ok let me think about it. Putin: You have until tomorrow. Just tweet 'Bela' so I know the deal is a on. Otherwise the videos will be released.' Yet another joked that due to 'Bela', Belarus was trending, and people would read up on the place, when trying to figure out what Trump meant. Meanwhile, the US president is set to meet with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Washington on Monday, where several European leaders will also reportedly be present.


India Today
10 minutes ago
- India Today
Zelenskyy hails US ‘historic decision' on security guarantees for Ukraine
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy hailed US President Donald Trump's 'historic decision' to offer Ukraine security guarantees if a peace deal is reached with Russia, while dismissing suggestions that Kyiv might cede territory to Moscow.''This is a historic decision that the United States is ready to take part in security guarantees for Ukraine. Security guarantees, as a result of our joint work, must really be very practical, delivering protection on land, in the air, and at sea, and must be developed with Europe's participation,' Zelenskyy said in a remarks came a day before Zelenskyy's scheduled meeting in Washington with US President Donald Trump, following Trump's surprise breakthrough with Russian President Vladimir Putin at a summit in Alaska. US special envoy Steve Witkoff said Trump and Putin had reached an unexpected understanding that the United States and European allies could extend NATO-style security guarantees to Ukraine.'We were able to win the following concession: that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO,' Witkoff told CNN. He added it was the first time Russia had agreed in principle to such an welcomed the shift, saying security guarantees must be 'very practical, delivering protection on land, in the air, and at sea, and developed with Europe's participation.' He emphasized that Ukraine's sovereignty and borders could not be negotiated away, insisting that talks with Russia should start from the current front leaders also backed the development. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron praised Trump's apparent willingness to provide guarantees and pledged support for a 'reassurance force' once hostilities and the European Commission joined Zelenskyy in affirming that borders cannot be redrawn by SEEKS OWN SECURITY GUARANTEES Meanwhile, Russia's envoy to international organisations in Vienna, Mikhail Ulyanov, said Moscow agreed that any peace agreement should include reliable guarantees for Ukraine, but insisted that Russia must also receive credible assurances.'Many leaders of EU states emphasise that a future peace agreement should provide reliable security assurances or guarantees for Ukraine,' Ulyanov wrote on X. 'Russia agrees with that. But it has equal right to expect that Moscow will also get efficient security guarantees.'Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty says that an attack on any of the alliance's 32 members in Europe or North America will be considered an attack on all. US officials indicated that a similar framework could be applied to Ukraine as an alternative to full NATO membership, which Putin has long Secretary of State Marco Rubio described the Alaska talks as 'progress,' but cautioned that a ceasefire was still unlikely in the near term. 'Ultimately, where this should lead is to a meeting between Zelenskyy, Putin, and President Trump, where we can finalize. But we've got to get this thing closer before we get to that point,' he told CNN.- EndsTune InMust Watch


India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
Putin agrees to explore NATO-style security guarantees for Ukraine: Trump envoy
Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed at his summit with his US counterpart Donald Trump that the United States and its European allies could extend NATO-style security guarantees to Ukraine as part of a potential peace agreement, Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff said on who took part in the Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska, called the development 'game-changing,' telling CNN's State of the Union: 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO."advertisement He added that it 'was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that.'Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, also known as the Washington Treaty, is the basis of NATO's principle of collective defence. It states that an armed attack against any of the alliance's 32 members in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them understanding, if carried forward, would mark a major shift in Moscow's stance and provide a possible alternative to Kyiv's long-sought NATO accession, which Putin has firmly of State Marco Rubio, who was also present at the Trump-Putin talks, stressed that details still need to be negotiated. 'How it's structured, what we call it, and what enforceable guarantees are included—that's what we'll be working on this week with our partners,' he also said Russia agreed in principle to legislate against further territorial expansion in Ukraine or elsewhere in Europe, pledging not to violate sovereign borders after any peace deal is celebrated the progress in a social media post, writing: 'BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA. STAY TUNED!'Rubio cautioned that neither side should expect to achieve all of its goals. 'If one side gets everything they want, that's not a peace deal—it's called surrender. And I don't think this is a war that's going to end anytime soon on the basis of surrender,' he told a separate interview with ABC, Rubio warned that if negotiations fail, existing US sanctions on Russia would remain in place and additional measures could be also addressed tensions surrounding Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's dealings with Trump. When Zelenskyy visited the White House in February, the talks ended in a heated shouting match. But Rubio rejected the suggestion that European leaders are travelling to Washington this week simply to shield Zelenskyy.'They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskyy from being bullied,' Rubio told CBS. 'They're coming here tomorrow because we've been working with the Europeans. We invited them to come.'- EndsWith inputs from agenciesMust Watch