logo
‘We don't want to be climate refugees': Torres Strait uncles fear for their islands and their people

‘We don't want to be climate refugees': Torres Strait uncles fear for their islands and their people

The Guardian12-07-2025
Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai are afraid for the future of their ancestral homelands.
Their country on the outer islands of Zenadth Kes (Torres Strait), less than 10km off Papua New Guinea, is under siege from the impacts of the climate crisis.
The two men fear the loss of their islands, their culture and their way of life, forcing their families and communities to become Australia's first climate refugees.
The uncles have taken the federal government to court in the landmark Australian climate case, seeking orders which would require the commonwealth to undertake steps to prevent further harm to their communities.
This would include cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science.
The commonwealth has argued it is not legally required to consider the best available science or the impacts of climate change when setting emissions reduction targets.
On Tuesday, the federal court is due to make a decision in the case and the men hold hope that their fight might safeguard the future of their people.
Uncle Pabai and Uncle Paul launched the action against the federal government in 2021.
They are arguing that the commonwealth owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to take reasonable steps to protect them from harm.
During on-country hearings in 2023, witnesses described how devastating their loss of culture due to climate change had been.
'We don't want to be climate refugees,' Uncle Pabai, who has spent his life on the low-lying island of Boigu, says.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Uncle Paul remembers a time when his family would hunt, fish and eat produce from gardens grown by the community. But that has all changed, he says.
The beaches on his island, Saibai, have receded, turning to mud and mangroves.
Its river system is inundated with saltwater and, alarmingly, even the island's cemetery has been affected by flooding.
'Even our cultural sites are being destroyed by rising seas,' he laments.
'We're both very worried about what we are losing, our hunting grounds are being destroyed by strong currents.
'Where can we show our culture to the younger generation?' he asks. 'In this way we are losing our culture, everything that belongs to our ancestors.'
Drawing closer to a decision in the case is a significant milestone for the men.
It has been an emotional journey for them, their communities and supporters, but as the uncles approach the end of this battle, they hold close the reasons they began such a long fight.
Pointing to the example of fellow Torres Strait Islander Eddie Mabo – whose lifetime of campaigning resulted in a landmark high court ruling, recognising the rights of First Nations people to their lands, countering the idea of 'terra nullius', asserted by the British at colonisation – Uncle Pabai says the battle has been waged for his ancestors.
'I'm standing firm on his shoulders,' he says.
'If we come to winning this case, this is a victory for my family and communities on Boigu and all the community around the country and around the world.'
As much as this is about the people who came before and protecting what they've left, Uncle Pabai says his two-year-old son and the generations to come – in the Torres Strait and further afield – are front of mind.
'My main focus is on the new generation,' he says. 'This is why I'm doing it – for the love of my son, for all the people in my community in the Torres Strait, for bushfire and flood survivors, for the farmers and the children and grandchildren.'
No matter the legal outcome, Uncle Paul says he believes the action he and Uncle Pabai have taken will make a difference.
'We will be very proud, even if we win or if we lose,' he says. 'The government is listening now, they know what is happening and they must do something about climate change.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Morning Mail: Coalition's net zero standoff; pope condemns Gaza ‘barbarity'; fears of a superbug surge
Morning Mail: Coalition's net zero standoff; pope condemns Gaza ‘barbarity'; fears of a superbug surge

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Morning Mail: Coalition's net zero standoff; pope condemns Gaza ‘barbarity'; fears of a superbug surge

Good morning. Today we survey the latest skirmishes in the Coalition's climate wars, where the net zero issue threatens to permanently fracture the decades-old alliance between the Liberals and the Nationals. Pope Leo XIV has condemned the 'barbarity' of the war in Gaza after scores of Palestinians were reportedly killed while queueing for food. And: a new study has revealed how superbugs could kill millions of people across the globe as the US and UK make cuts to projects that combat antibiotic resistance. 'It felt irrelevant' | A training organisation has been criticised for using chatbots to help teach a course to adult jobseekers, using 'chat-style delivery' in classes on topics such as writing emails. Set to go off | The Nationals' opposition to net zero policies threatens to fracture the Liberals' decades-old alliance – and leave Labor the ultimate victor. Explainer | Labor's election promise to cut 20% of all student debt will be among the first pieces of legislation the federal government introduces when parliament returns this week. Here's what it means for you. The Agenda | Amid reports of alleged abuse at childcare centres, Josh Butler outlines the challenge facing the education minister, Jason Clare, as he tries to safeguard a system where he doesn't control all the levers. Tasmania election | Tasmania's premier and opposition leader have both reached out to independent MPs in the hope of forming government; minority government is the new normal in Tasmania, Kevin Bonham writes. Gaza crisis | Pope Leo XIV has condemned the 'barbarity' of the war in Gaza and the 'indiscriminate use of force' as Gaza's health ministry said at least 93 Palestinians had been killed queueing for food. 'Threat is increasing' | Superbugs and antimicrobial resistance could cause millions more people to die worldwide and cost the global economy trillions by 2050, new global modelling shows. Immigration raids | US agents secretly deported a Pennsylvania grandfather who misplaced his green card, it has emerged, as the Ice chief says he will continue to allow agents to wear masks during arrest raids. Syria violence | An uneasy calm has returned to southern Syria's Sweida province, after Bedouin fighters withdrew following a week of violence estimated to have killed more than 1,000 people. Japan votes | Japan's PM accepts a 'harsh' election result, as exit polls show the shaky ruling coalition is likely to lose control of the upper house – potentially heralding political turmoil. Why the Texas floods are fuelling far-right conspiracy theories The floods in Texas earlier this month swept away entire homes and holiday camps, claiming more than 130 lives. As authorities try to piece together how it happened, conspiracy theories have flourished. Ben Makuch speaks to Reged Ahmad about why so many – including elected representatives – are turning to misinformation in an attempt to understand the tragedy. Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ Sydney's Rainbow Lodge is a home for men who are on bail or who have just been released from prison. It presents an alternative option, a chance for change – and sees cultural workers, psychologists and men with lived experience run programs for the residents such as art and music therapy. Jordyn Beazley visits the facility helping to break cycles of trauma, violence and jail. Sometimes, it feels as if you can't turn on a TV without seeing news bulletins devoted to interest rate updates, fake-tanned celebrity realtors hawking white McMansions or middle-aged men stroking their chins at a tasteful mid-century reno. In his new one-hour special for Foxtel and Binge, satirist Mark Humphries talks with realtors and squatters – and puts Alan Kohler in a bathtub – to explore Australia's toxic real estate obsession. Sign up to Morning Mail Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Rugby union | Sione Tuipulotu believes the 'stars have aligned' for him as Lions arrive in Melbourne, Gerard Meagher writes; Lions face a challenge to deliver a display that can stand the test of time, Robert Kitson writes. Golf | Scottie Scheffler claims the 2025 Open Championship title with a majestic four-shot win at Royal Portrush. AFL | Fremantle keep their heads as Collingwood get the wobbles in close finishes, Jonathan Horn writes. Cycling | Julian Alaphilippe celebrates on stage 15 of the Tour de France … but then discovers Tim Wellens won long before him. Cricket | Two-division Test cricket is on the agenda in a potential radical shakeup, as the ICC considers a World Test Championship expansion. Management of Healthscope's failed private hospital business is mulling an alternative option even as bidders line up for its 37 hospitals, the Age reports. The federal government is facing pressure to add dental to Medicare amid 'overwhelming' wait times, ABC News reports. Defence officials are remaining tight-lipped about the 'hard landing' involving an Australian army helicopter last week, reports NT News. Researchers at the University of Sydney's Fisher Library have unearthed a treasure trove of work by artist Norman Lindsay, the Sydney Morning Herald reports. ACT | The prime minister is set to attend a Last Post ceremony at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra. Defence force | The multinational military exercise Talisman Sabre continues off the Queensland coast. If you would like to receive this Morning Mail update to your email inbox every weekday, sign up here, or finish your day with our Afternoon Update newsletter. You can follow the latest in US politics by signing up for This Week in Trumpland. And finally, here are the Guardian's crosswords to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword

Trump fossil-fuel push setting back green progress decades, critics warn
Trump fossil-fuel push setting back green progress decades, critics warn

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Trump fossil-fuel push setting back green progress decades, critics warn

Ever since Donald Trump began his second presidency, he has used an 'invented' national energy emergency to help justify expanding oil, gas and coal while slashing green energy – despite years of scientific evidence that burning fossil fuels has contributed significantly to climate change, say scholars and watchdogs. It's an agenda that in only its first six months, has put back environmental progress by decades, they say. Trump's skewed and unscientific energy priorities have come even as climate-change related weather disasters from huge floods in Texas to giant California fires have increased, and as Trump regulators are clamping down on spending for alternative fuels and weather research. As the death toll from the Texas floods rose to over 100 on 7 July, Trump signed an executive order that added new treasury department restrictions on tax subsidies for wind and solar projects. That order came days after Trump signed his One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included provisions to gut big tax credits for green energy contained in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act legislation Congress passed during Joe Biden's presidency In another oddly timed move, underscoring the administration's war on science, its proposed budget for the coming fiscal year would shutter 10 labs that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration runs – specifically ones that conduct key research on ways weather changes are affected by a warming earth. Trump also signed four executive orders in April to help revive the beleaguered and polluting coal industry, which he and key cabinet members touted more at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh as they promoted plans by private companies to spend $92bn on AI projects and expand coal and natural gas in Pennsylvania. The blinkered focus that Trump and his key regulators place on their energy policies reflect the administration's denigration of science, while posing dangers to public health and scientific progress. And, critics say, this is all happening as university research and government labs face big cutbacks in funding and staff. Trump has pushed for more fossil-fuel production, rhapsodized about 'beautiful coal', dubbed climate change a 'hoax' and invoked his 'drill, baby, drill' mantra to promote more oil and gas projects after receiving $75m in campaign donations in 2024 from fossil-fuel interests. Scholars have hit out at the administration for firing hundreds of scientists and experts working on a major federal report detailing how climate change is impacting the country. The administration has also systematically deleted mentions of climate change from federal websites while cutting back funds for global warming research. 'Trump's actions are a patent attempt to roll back decades of environmental progress, not because it makes any sense, economically, but because it does two things that Trump wants,' Naomi Oreskes, a Harvard historian of science, told the Guardian 'First, it helps his cronies in the oil, gas and coal industries, who we know he met with a Mar-a-Lago before the election, and who gave substantial sums to his election campaign.' Oreskes said it's also 'part of a larger attempt to deny the credibility of environmental protection, tout court'. 'Look at Trump trying to force uneconomic coal fired power plants to stay open,' she continued. 'That makes no economic sense, and defies the principles of free market economics that Republicans claim to support. But like the guys who jack up their trucks to make more pollution, Trump is trying to deny the necessity and credibility of environmental concerns.' Oreskes stressed that much of the science Trump 'is in the process of destroying forms the basis for environmental and public health protection in this country: the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the US Geological Survey and the EPA, plus all the federally funded science at universities across the country, including my home institution, Harvard. None of this makes economic sense.' Many scientists echo Oreskes's concerns as do Democratic attorneys general, who filed a lawsuit in May challenging the legality of the Trump administration's declaration of a national 'energy emergency' to justify its radical policies. Meanwhile, regulatory and spending shifts at the Environmental Protection Agency, including staff and research cuts, have revealed the administration's disregard for scientific evidence – particularly about climate change and its adverse economic effects. In response to the cuts and policy shifts, a total of 278 EPA employees signed a letter in July denouncing the agency's politicization and decrying policies that 'undermine the EPA mission of protecting human health and the environment'. The EPA then put 144 of the employees who signed their names to the letter on leave for two weeks while an 'administrative investigation' was conducted. 'This isn't quite at the level of the 17th-century church's persecution of Galileo for saying the Earth goes around the Sun, but it's in a similar spirit of ideology trying to squelch science,' Michael Gerrard, who heads the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University, told the Guardian. 'Trump's use of an invented 'energy emergency' to justify more fossil-fuel production defies not only physics but arithmetic. The numbers show that the US is producing more oil and gas than any other country, and that Trump's actions in knifing the wind and solar industries will raise the energy prices paid by US consumers.' Gerrard stressed too that, on the Texas flooding, 'the lack of sufficient warnings highlight how short-sighted are Trump's drastic cuts to the National Weather Service and other federal scientific work'. He added it was 'especially so since climate change is intensifying extreme weather events, and Trump's attacks on green energy and support of fossil fuels will make those worse'. Such criticism has not seemed to faze Trump or top agency appointees like EPA administrator Lee Zeldin. Last month, 1,500 staffers who work in EPA's office of research and development (ORD) were told in a staff meeting that they would have to apply for about 400 new posts in other EPA offices. What will happen to employees who don't land new positions is unclear. 'Gutting the … [ORD] is a loss for health,' warned Laura Kate Bender, assistant vice-president of nationwide healthy air at the American Lung Association. Further experts and watchdogs have stressed that the health of millions of Americans was threatened by Zeldin's May announcement of plans to cut its budget by $300m in fiscal year 2026 – a move that's part of a makeover to reduce spending levels to those of the 1980s under Ronald Reagan. On Friday, the EPA doubled down on the cuts and say it would be reducing its entire workforce by at least 23% through voluntary retirements and layoffs. Gerrard noted that the administration's misguided energy moves and rejection of science are having enormous societal costs: 'Laboratories are being shut down around the country, experiments that might be on the cusp of great discoveries are being halted, and young aspiring scientists are rethinking their career paths. Other countries are recruiting US scientists and offering them friendlier environments.' Looking ahead, Oreskes, too, warns that the Trump administration's denigration of science will do long term damage to public health, the environment and scientific progress 'The scientific agencies that Trump is destroying, such as the National Weather Service, save the American people and American business billions of dollars in avoided property damage and health costs,' she said. 'But if you want to deny the true costs of climate change, then you may be motivated to destroy the agency that documents these costs [Noaa]. And if you want to deny the need for environmental and public health protection, then an effective way to do that is to destroy the scientific agencies and academic research that for decades have proven that need.'

Britain makes profit on Indian aid for first time
Britain makes profit on Indian aid for first time

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Britain makes profit on Indian aid for first time

Britain is finally making a profit out of the aid it sends to India, 78 years after the country gained independence. The Telegraph understands that figures to be revealed for the first time on Tuesday will show that the UK is making a financial return on development funding sent to the country. It follows years of criticism that Britain is giving aid money to India at all, given that it can afford its own space programme. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) annual report will confirm that the UK spends millions on climate-related projects in India, which it is able to make a return on. But in what is believed to be the first time since the end of the Raj in 1947, these investments have brought a £13m profit in 2024/25. This is because the spending has created new markets and jobs for the UK, at the same time as helping to tackle climate change. The year before, Britain sent £37m to New Delhi. Sir Keir Starmer announced earlier this year that the aid budget will drop to 0.3 per cent of national income from 2027 to fund increased defence spending. This is less than half the 0.7 per cent target Britain is signed up to. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, wants to see the UK secure more of a return on its investment as part of a new modernised approach. Both he and Baroness Chapman of Darlington, the development minister, have spoken in recent weeks about how the UK is moving from its role as an aid donor to one as a partner and investor. The FCDO accounts will show that most of the UK's aid spend on tackling global poverty around the world up until now does not lead to a financial return. India will be the only country listed in the FCDO's accounts to have a negative aid spend. It is expected that later this week, Lady Chapman will outline plans to make sure every penny of the aid budget has an impact, such as by saving lives through vaccines or creating economic growth, which benefits both the UK and its aid recipients. Projected aid spend for countries for 2025/26 is also due to be published in Tuesday's annual accounts, although these figures are provisional and could change over the year. But the aid spent for India in 2025/26 is also ultimately expected to be negative. While the FCDO hands out the vast majority of aid money, some other departments, such as business, also hand out aid cash. In 2012, Pranab Mukherjee, the then-Indian finance minister, sparked anger when he described British aid money as 'peanuts'. In the same year, the British government pledged to end bilateral aid to India by 2016 as part of a move away from funding middle-income countries. Despite this, millions of pounds have still poured in. In 2023, India launched a spacecraft to the far side of the moon, making it only the fourth in the world to land an object on the lunar surface.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store