Would-be football agents complain Fifa's faulty online exam causes one-year delay
New regulations on agents introduced at the start of this year mean candidates must complete 20 multiple‑choice questions online rather than attend a test in person, usually at their national federation's headquarters. It is understood the change was made by Fifa to provide consistency over the cost, with candidates now paying $100 (or the equivalent in pounds or Euros) to sit the annual exam, which took place for the first time on 18 June.
The Guardian has been contacted by applicants from several countries, including the United Kingdom, who have complained that they were unable to complete the one-hour test owing to the technical difficulties. It is understood candidates were asked before their test to download software, which was then checked by an online invigilator. But issues with the software meant they were often left with insufficient time to answer the questions or found some answers had not been recorded.
'I attempted several times to fix the issue by disconnecting and reconnecting, but it took over 25 minutes before the connection was restored,' wrote one candidate from Niger in a letter to Fifa seen by the Guardian. 'Once I was allowed to resume, there were only about 10 minutes remaining on the exam. On July 3, 2025, I received my results and was surprised to see that I had failed with a score of 11 out of 20. However, among the nine questions marked as incorrect, seven were shown as blank, even though I clearly remember answering them before submission, one displayed a choice that I am certain I never selected, and it does not match the answer I intended to choose.'
Another candidate from the UK said he had been told by his invigilator that 'the issue was not related to my device or internet connection, but rather to the platform itself. After several unsuccessful attempts, the invigilator advised me to disconnect and assured me that she would submit a detailed report to Fifa, explicitly stating that I had been unable to participate due to a force majeure situation, as defined in article 12 of the Fifa football agent exam rules (March 2025 edition). It is particularly frustrating to now see my application rejected without any clarification, despite having fulfilled all requirements, acted diligently, and paid the full registration fee.'
It is understood that some candidates were allowed to resit the exam on 30 June but that many have been informed, in an email that stated they had no right to appeal, they will have to wait until next year. 'This disparity raises serious concerns regarding consistency and equal treatment,' the UK candidate said.
The Guardian has forwarded all the complaints to Fifa. World football's governing body declined to comment but it is understood to be aware of some complaints that are being handled on a case-by-case basis and it is satisfied that the majority of the candidates were able to take the exam with no technical problems. Fifa is believed to be monitoring the situation but is understood to have been reassured by providers that there is no issue with the exam platform.
Sign up to Football Daily
Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football
after newsletter promotion
A candidate from Turkmenistan, who says he had 27 minutes to complete their exam owing to technical difficulties and the failure of the system's translation tool, described the experience as 'extremely upsetting'. 'The examiner promised to submit an official report and inform Fifa of the situation,' he wrote. 'She also told me that Fifa would contact me shortly regarding this incident. However, two weeks have now passed, and I have not received any response.' It is understood that a further fortnight later the situation has not changed.
A source told the Guardian: 'The system hasn't been working properly and there have been so many complaints but they aren't really doing anything about it. Lots of people have put loads of time and effort into revising and to not be able to take the exam is really unfair. It's a shambles.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Car crashes into a barn's roof in Germany, seriously injuring 2
Police in northwestern Germany on Sunday said that several people were injured when a car veered off a road, hit a 7-year-old boy on a trampoline and went flying into a barn roof on its side. Police said that the car first collided with a parked vehicle in the town of Bohmte, broke through a hedge and drove into a garden where it hit the boy. The car then went over uneven ground and it was apparently catapulted into the air and ended up crashing into the roof of a neighboring barn about 3 meters (10 feet) off the ground. The boy was seriously injured, the police statement said. The driver was an unidentified 42-year-old man, and his wife was also seriously injured. Their two sons, ages 11 and 12, and a 13-year-old passenger were also on board, who like the driver emerged with minor injuries. Dozens of firefighters, as well as a dozen ambulances and two rescue helicopters were among the emergency services deployed in response. Images from the scene showed rescuers cutting through the roof, and wreckage of a playground that the car ran through. The car had to be removed from the roof with a crane and was carted away by police. An investigation was underway.
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Hamas lawyer called for ‘copycat' Palestine Action groups
A lawyer who represented Hamas called for 'copycat' direct action groups to spring up to replace the banned Palestine Action. Franck Magennis was one of three lawyers who worked on an unsuccessful application to remove Hamas from the Home Office's list of proscribed organisations. It has now emerged that Mr Magennis spoke at a conference in the days before Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist group, and called for copycat groups to pick up the mantle. Mr Magennis, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers, reposted a video of himself making the speech at the Socialist Workers' Party's Marxist Festival on the day the ban came into effect. In the video he calls for: 'Copycat direct action groups… to spring up everywhere… We mustn't let the British Empire, that is participating in this genocide, push us around. They do not have the power to stop us.' He also tells the audience Zionism is in a 'serious crisis' and encouraged supporters to 'kick it to death' He said: 'It [Zionism] is in a serious crisis; it looks like it is not long for the world, but that doesn't mean that we can be complacent. We must assure that we kick it to death. It must not be allowed to survive this crisis.' The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism has made a complaint against Mr Magennis to the Bar Standards Board alleging that is conduct diminishes public trust in him as a barrister. The group alleges that posts on his social media amount to a criminal offence, namely the support of a proscribed organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000. In the complaint, they say: 'We take it as axiomatic that a barrister who commits criminal offences under the Terrorism Act 2000, which are potentially punishable by up to 14 years' imprisonment, is not a fit and proper person to remain a barrister. 'It follows that it is your duty as his regulator to pursue this matter vigorously and without delay'. The complaint went on: 'He is experienced in the practice of criminal law, in addition to which the very words he used both in his offending posts and in the speech he gave at the Marxist meeting, a video of which he chose to embed and republish on X, prove that he knew exactly what he was doing. He acted flagrantly.' The organisation said that alongside the video calling for copycat groups to spring up, Mr Magennis also posted other inflammatory messages. On July 5, he posted 'Escalate!' in response to fellow lawyer Fahad Ansari, who posted: 'The organisation may be banned. The action isn't. Escalate.' Mr Ansari and Mr Magennis are behind a law firm that says it is 'dedicated to understanding and confronting the racist ideology of Zionism' through 'strategic litigation'. The name of the organisation, Riverway to the Sea, is a reference to the slogan 'from the River to the Sea, Palestine shall be free', which has been interpreted by some Jewish groups as a call for the elimination of Israel. That same weekend, Mr Magennis also posted : 'They're not powerful enough to stop us. Elbit Systems UK Limited, you'd better be terrified of what's coming. We're gonna fucking destroy you. We're only getting started. Tiocfaidh ár lá [Irish for 'Our day will come'], you Zionist scum.' A spokesman for Garden Court Chambers said: 'The barrister concerned made the statements and publicised them in their individual capacity. 'Those statements do not represent the views of Garden Court Chambers, and they should not be treated as reflecting any position held by Garden Court Chambers. Furthermore, Garden Court Chambers does not endorse the language and tone used to express them. 'We take this opportunity as a chambers to make clear that we unequivocally condemn racism and anti-Semitism in all its forms.'
BBC News
5 minutes ago
- BBC News
More abuse as women's football grows
England defender Lucy Bronze says players are getting more abuse the bigger women's football becomes after team-mate Jess Carter revealed she has been sent racist messages during Euro has said she will take a step back from social media after experiencing "a lot of racial abuse" during the tournament and the Football Association has confirmed "working with police to ensure those responsible for this hate crime are brought to justice".The Lionesses will also stop the anti-racism move of taking a knee before matches, saying it was "clear we and football need to find another way to tackle racism".And Bronze, an ever present in England's run to face Italy in Tuesday's semi-final, said players have had to deal with "more abuse" since achieving international success."The bigger the game gets, the bigger the noise becomes, the more fans there are but the more critics there are," said Bronze."We're obviously open to critics, that's why we love the sport, but we're not open to abuse. Especially in women's football, the online abuse seems to be getting worse and worse. "We see it more in the stadiums in men's football and online, but I think with women's football there seems to be a real target online. "It's something that we're very aware of. There is a way to make a change. There is a solution. I don't have the answer, but I'm sure that there is one." 'We're never helpless as players' Bronze said Sarina Wiegman's squad held meetings before the tournament to discuss abuse and how it has become a "huge factor specifically in women's football".Before travelling to Switzerland, England striker Alessia Russo spoke of preferring to stay off social media because of how "damaging" the abuse can Chelsea forward Lauren James, who received racist abuse during the 2023 Women's World Cup and the following Women's Super League season, has said abuse "never really stops".Their comments came after British tennis player Katie Boulter spoke to BBC Sport about being subjected to online abuse and death 2021, football clubs, players and sporting bodies began a four-day boycott of social media platforms to tackle abuse and Bronze said she hoped that by standing before kick-off instead of taking a knee "noise will be reached around the world"."We know the people higher up are the ones who can ultimately put in things to make change. But I think we know we're never helpless as players," she added."Our voices are loud enough to be heard by people around the world, whether that's social media platforms or federations like Uefa and Fifa. "That's something we're very proud of as a Lionesses team, that we've created this voice and a platform so we can reach the highest of heights. We're willing to use that platform and that voice to make differences.""People need to be held accountable," she added and also called for more action from social media team-mate Carter's attempt stand-up to racist abuse and to call it out publicly, Bronze said: "For her to speak out is so empowering to our whole team in general, especially to the likes of someone like Michelle [Agyemang] who is in her first tournament. "It gives people more power to be brave, stand up and speak up and see all the team-mates and the country are behind [Carter]. That means a lot in moments like this. "A lot of players have known that this has always been an issue in football. To hear Jess talking about it yesterday, we're all just so disappointed in so-called fans writing these messages. "For Jess herself, she probably wouldn't put it out to the world, but it's obviously difficult for her to go through. We know it's not just Jess as well."
