
This Jurassic-era relic has survived 150 million years on Earth – now it's one big fire from extinction
The only known home of the critically endangered Kangaroo Island assassin spider is in the north-west of the island, where the Jurassic-era spider hides out in moist clumps of leaf litter.
In more than a month of searches, and with just a couple more weeks to go, Ogilvie and a few helpers have only found one tiny juvenile.
'We get so excited when we find a good area but then it's deflating. Everything is so dry – it's hardly rained for two years,' says Ogilvie, a conservation biologist working with the charity Invertebrates Australia.
Last year, scientists found just one mature female and six juveniles at six locations, all in a 20 sq km area that includes a block of land owned by mining billionaire Andrew Forrest.
Those same locations have come up blank this year. The spiders need the moist microclimate of the leaf litter to survive, but there's a trifecta of threats drying out their habitat and pushing them ever closer to extinction.
The spider's last remaining bolthole has been through near-record drought over the last 18 months, with rainfall among the lowest on record since 1900.
The black summer bushfires burned through large areas of potential habitat that have not yet recovered, and an invasive plant root disease known as phytophthora is damaging the forest canopy and the plants that hold some of the leaf litter where the spiders live, drying out the habitat even further.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'If we look at the risks and [are] realistic, they're potentially one big fire away from extinction,' says Dr Michael Rix, the principal scientist and curator of arachnology at the Queensland Museum, who collected the first specimens of the spider and, with scientific colleague Mark Harvey, formally described them.
'By all objective measures, its existence is phenomenally precarious.'
The Kangaroo Island assassin spider is one of 11 invertebrates on the federal government's priority list of threatened species.
The assassin family of spiders – which get their name from their habit of slowly stalking and then eating other spiders – are found only in Australia, Madagascar and parts of southern Africa.
Kangaroo Island's assassin was found in 2010 by Rix, who, along with Harvey, has described 37 of Australia's 41 assassin spiders.
'We collect this suspended leaf litter and shake it. The spiders close their legs and they drop down. I looked in the tray to see what's there – I knew it was undescribed. It was one of the really memorable moments of my field biology career. Very exciting,' he remembers.
Rix says they have the most unusual appearance of any spider, with 'incredible elevated heads and long spear-like mouth parts'.
'They're unmistakeable,' he says. 'They're an early branch in the spider's tree of life. Assassin spiders are ancient and those around today are survivors of 150m years of life on Earth.
'They were only known as fossils before any living ones were found in Madagascar in the 19th century.'
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Kangaroo Island's species was feared extinct after bushfires swept across the west of the island in the black summer bushfires of 2019 and 2020 until Dr Jess Marsh, a research fellow at the University of Adelaide and an invertebrate conservation biologist based on the island, found two specimens in 2021 in a small patch of unburned vegetation.
'It's being squeezed into smaller and smaller areas,' says Marsh. 'Each survey we do is increasing our confidence that its restricted to this patch of vegetation, and nowhere else.'
Marsh and colleagues are now discussing the idea of establishing a breeding program for the spiders in a zoo, creating an 'insurance population' – but removing individuals from the wild carries clear risks that Marsh says wouldn't be taken lightly.
'They've survived mass extinction events and past climate changes – a huge amount. Now in this short period of time, it's humans that are really testing them.'
Rix says the precarious situation the spiders find themselves in is part of a much bigger wave of largely unseen extinctions of invertebrates.
Officially, Australia lists only one invertebrate as extinct – the Lake Pedder earthworm.
But last year, Rix, Marsh and colleagues released research that estimated that since the European invasion of Australia, about 9,000 invertebrates had likely suffered a so-called ghost extinction – 'the loss of undiscovered species that have left no trace.'
'Some people might say, 'who cares about a tiny spider going extinct'?' says Rix. 'But this is part of the quantum of invertebrate extinctions that we're experiencing right now. This might be a problem that creeps up on us.
'There's a concept of conserving evolutionary significant units – retaining diversity that speaks deeply to Earth's evolutionary history. That is what these spiders are – a window into the past. They're survivors. Trying to conserve them is so important.'
Marsh and Rix were the only two people to have ever found a Kangaroo Island assassin spider, until this week's discovery – not by a scientist, but an enthusiastic 17-year-old volunteer called Jack Wilson who was filling his time during school holidays.
'It was probably my 10th sieve of the day,' he says.
'They can look like little blobs of dirt, but it's the big neck that gives them away. I'm pretty chuffed. It's crazy.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
16 hours ago
- BBC News
Darwin200 global voyage concludes in Falmouth after two years
A global voyage inspired by Charles Darwin's journey aboard HMS Beagle has finished in tall ship, Oosterschelde, sailed into Falmouth Harbour on Saturday, marking the end of the Darwin200 voyage, which began in Plymouth in ship was welcomed into Port Pendennis Marina after clocking up 43,000 nautical miles, 31 ports of call and two years at said the choice of Falmouth as the homecoming port was "deeply significant" due to Darwin's own arrival there in 1836. Darwin's original trip on board the Beagle inspired him to develop his theory of natural McPherson, who founded the Darwin200 project, said the mission had three before the Oosterschelde's departure in 2023 he said he wanted to train young conservationists "to change the world", create the "world's most exciting classroom" and undertake research projects to study nature and conservation around the planet. After arriving in Falmouth, Mr McPherson said Darwin200 had "shown what's possible when young people are given the opportunity to learn, to lead and to act". "Conservation isn't about what we've lost, it's about protecting what we still have. That's what this voyage has been about from the very beginning." 'Bridge between generations' More than 600 members of the public sailed the tall ship between ports and about 105 Darwin leaders - young people from 45 countries - were trained aboard and in the field, organisers Nab, captain of the Oosterschelde, said: "This was more than a sailing voyage, it was a bridge between generations, between science and the sea. "We've sailed through some of the world's most challenging waters and to some of its most breathtaking places, where nature remains much as Darwin would have seen it on his own voyage nearly two centuries ago."One of the Darwin leaders - Josh Clarke, 24, from Falmouth, whose had a project in the Falkland Islands to study threatened bird species, described the experience as "life-changing". "Not only have I developed new skills and knowledge, but I'm also now part of a global network of people determined to protect our planet," he Oosterschelde is set to sail again on Monday, bound for London on a "victory voyage" up the Thames. The ship will dock at Tower Bridge Quay where a special visit from HRH The Duke of Edinburgh is planned for Friday.


The Guardian
21 hours ago
- The Guardian
Dr Karl Kruszelnicki: ‘I took my hands off the artery – blood squirted up and hit the ceiling'
You're about to give a series of talks on the history and explosion of AI. Who is your favourite fictional robot? I guess the robots in general from Isaac Asimov. He came up with the three laws of robotics, which are basically that a robot has to obey a human, it can't harm itself, and it can't harm another human. My favourite robot is one [from Asimov's The Bicentennial Man] that served a family for many, many years – in fact, generations – and eventually became human. If you could change the size of any animal to keep as a pet, what would it be? To put a downer on it, we're full of children and nieces and nephews and grandkids, so we don't want pets. But I do see the value of a pet. It's tricky. In Australia, cats kill a million birds a day. Dogs are nice, but when I was a doctor in a kids hospital, once I realised that dogs would rip the faces off 15,000 kids every year, I kind of fell out of love with big dogs. So I reckon dogs. Shrink them down. A border collie, they're the smartest dog. What do you do when you can't get to sleep? Get up, work for a bit, then go to sleep again when I feel tired. If I'm awake enough to do stuff, I'll do stuff. I love reading. My job is to read the scientific literature and turn it into stuff that people can understand. I've been reading articles about how we've got this history of human diseases over the last 37,000 years, and how many diseases have actually invaded our DNA, or how some frogs will fake death to avoid sex, or how the French in the early 1800s had the great moustache wars, or the TV viewing habits of dogs. Or the word 'cool' – where did it come from, and what's the concept behind it? Or the amount of energy used from AI to make a single picture, as opposed to a human, or why you get traffic jams in the middle of nowhere, or how you use earwax as a diagnostic tool. Or, if you get a shark and turn it upside down, about half the species will just stop moving. And that's just today's reading! What is your most controversial scientific opinion? The two big ones would have to be climate change and vaccination, and the controversy behind them is just pointless. You know how insurance companies are making it more expensive in certain areas to insure because of extreme events caused by climate change? OK, so when do you think the insurance companies started doing that? 1973! [It wasn't until 1980 that] fossil fuel companies, with a budget of up to a billion dollars a year, started denying climate change. And that's why I've got this so-called controversy. What is the oldest thing you own, and why do you still have it? I've got a bit of rock from a mining site that was dated to 1bn years old. I've also a meteor that my father saw land in our front garden when I was a kid, and the next morning, we went out to dig it up. I reckon that'd be a couple of billion years old. It's about the size of a golf ball. It's now on the display shelf halfway up the stairs. Would you rather die at the bottom of the ocean or out in space? Probably space. But it depends how it happens. One thing I learned as a medical doctor is that everybody has to die, but you should have a good death. We had one patient who had cancer of the everything, and she was really going to die. We made it our personal project that she'd have a good death. We ended up cranking her morphine from 5mg a day to 30,000 – that's a big jump, isn't it? Her legs were the diameter of your wrist by the time she died, but she didn't die in pain. So that convinced me, I want to have a good death. Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning If you're in, say, a submarine, and then the pressure overcomes the structural integrity of the vessel's walls, then you're dead in about a tenth of a second, a hundredth of a second – whereas in space, it might take a while to die, maybe a few minutes. So whichever one was quicker. But the view's nicer in space. What is the strangest job you've ever had? I started working at the steelworks at Wollongong when I was about 19. I ran a little aluminium boat measuring the acidity or alkalinity of the water in this little creek inside the steelworks. Depending on whether it was green or orange, it varied between incredibly acid and incredibly alkaline. And either way, it would eat through the skin of the aluminium boat in about six months. Sign up to Saved for Later Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips after newsletter promotion Back then, I was taught 'the solution to pollution is dilution' – chuck it in the ocean, nobody will ever notice. It was pretty bad back then, and hasn't got much better since. What is the most chaotic thing that's ever happened to you at work? I was in an operating theatre. I was assisting. I was really tired. I'd done an incredibly long number of shifts, dozens of hours in a row, and I was instructed to lean on an artery. I started to fall asleep standing up, and the surgeon said, 'Hey, wake up, Karl!' I stood up with a jerk and took my hands off the artery – blood squirted up and hit the ceiling. If you had to add any colour to the rainbow, what would it be? Around the world, the number of colours that people see in the rainbow varies between four and 16. The reason we have seven colours in our rainbow is because of Isaac Newton. Besides being one of the true geniuses, he also spent more time on Bible studies than he did on science. And all the way through the Bible the number seven comes up all the time. Based on him following the work of some Muslim scientists, he did an experiment with a prism – like the Dark Side of Moon album cover, which, by the way, is wrong from a physics point of view. Anyway, he sees these colours. Six colours. But he loves the Bible, and the Bible has seven everywhere, so he sticks in stupid fucking indigo. What sort of colour is indigo? It's just blue! So I refuse to add another colour to the rainbow. I'll go the other way; I'll remove indigo and get back to six colours. Lastly, please settle this debate for us once and for all, scientifically: should tomato sauce be kept in the fridge or the cupboard? The problem that you want to avoid is bacterial or fungal infection of the tomato sauce. Now, the tomato sauce, I imagine, would be mostly water, and then it's got some varying mix of fat, protein and carbohydrate, which would be foods for bacteria and yeast. If you stick it in the fridge, you really lengthen the time before the bacterial or fungal overgrowth gets dangerous. But you end up in the terrible situation that you shake and shake and shake the bottle and first none will come, and then the lot will because it's been frozen to a solid lump. So the argument for not putting in the fridge is that it'll pour more easily. In that case, you need to actually observe, and if you start to see the first hint of bacterial or fungal contamination, feed it to the compost and get another bottle. It sounds like you're pro-cupboard, pro-observation. Well, life's complicated. Nothing's simple. I'm sorry. I'm probably overcomplicating life. Dr Karl will appear at three events at Tasmania's Beaker Street festival, 12-24 August


The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
How to reduce your food footprint: if it's better for you, it's better for the planet
Food production globally accounts for nearly 30% of greenhouse gas emissions, with the average Australian diet contributing more than 3kg of Co2 per person per day. And what's worse, we waste about 35% of the food we bring home. If we keep this up, it has been estimated the already unsustainable environmental cost of the food system will nearly double by 2050. Calculating the precise impact your individual food choices have on the environment isn't simple, but research suggests the actions we can take to bring that impact down are – and they aren't just better for the environment, they're better for our health too. A 2021 CSIRO study found that sticking to its healthy eating guidelines while choosing lower-carbon options could reduce the climate impact of our diets by as much as 42%. Another released last year, which conducted life-cycle assessments on more than 60 thousand products available on Australian shelves, found that switching to lower-emission options within similar categories could bring our food footprints down by an impressive 71%. Prof Simone Pettigrew, program director of food policy at the George Institute for Global Health and an author of the latter study, says: 'There's four biggies that sit at the top of the list for being the least sustainable: traditional red meats, dairy products, and then to a lesser extent – but perhaps more upsettingly – coffee and chocolate.' Consumers, she says, can make a 'massive, massive difference' to the sustainability of their entire food basket simply by limiting or switching out those items. In practical terms this might look like choosing poultry, seafood or kangaroo instead of lamb or pork, switching dairy milk for plant-based options, drinking just one less coffee a day or choosing sweet treats with low or no cocoa content. Even if we can do that some of the time, the difference can be significant, according to Pettigrew. When it comes to carbohydrates and fresh produce, Pettigrew says a solid rule of thumb is the better it is for you, the better it probably is for the planet. Choosing fresh fruits and vegetables to snack on rather than processed biscuits or bars, for example, will dramatically reduce your diet's carbon footprint. And while there are production and processing differences between more nutritionally similar items such as pasta and rice, Pettigrew says overall they are largely comparable in terms of sustainability. 'Anything that is plant based is going to be much less environmentally costly than anything animal based. 'We understand it's hard for consumers to make really big changes in one hit, but it is relatively easy to make small incremental ones.' If you already eat a healthy, plant-rich diet, limit your ultra-processed food intake and are keeping your coffee and chocolate habits in check, you've made a great start. Beyond that, Dr Lilly Lim-Camacho, principal research scientist with CSIRO Agriculture and Food, says one of the most helpful things consumers can do to maximise these gains is to 'shop with intent'. Food waste accounts for more than a third of all household waste, so only purchasing what you need combined with small efforts such as 'learning how to use up leftover veggies in the crisper' and resisting impulse buying will not only make your diet significantly more sustainable, but healthier and more economical too. She urges people to also keep in mind that wasting unhealthy food is doubly bad. 'Not only do discretionary foods create more emissions, our bodies don't actually need them.' Those emissions are essentially being wasted regardless of whether you consume the food or not, she suggests. If you'd like to take things a step further, apps such as ecoSwitch, developed by the George Institute, get into the nitty gritty of comparing the carbon ratings associated with more specific items. This can help if you want to know, for example, which brand of tinned tomatoes or tofu is best. The George Institute study found that opting for near identical but lower-impact options alone could bring your food footprint down by 26%. Neither Pettigrew nor Lim-Camacho want to take the fun out of food or expect consumers to forgo the odd burger or chocolate ice-cream, but agree that by prioritising our health we will naturally make better choices for the planet, and vice versa. 'It's a win-win,' says Pettigrew. 'There is always going to be an environmental cost to our food. But it's important for people to know that you actually can make an enormous difference if you want to.'