Israel spy chief seeks US help to expel Palestinians from Gaza: Axios - War on Gaza
Citing 'two sources with knowledge of the issue,' the report said Barnea met with US special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff and named Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Libya as countries that had shown initial openness to receiving Palestinians.
Barnea reportedly urged the US to offer incentives to those countries and help Israel secure their agreement.
One source told Axios that Witkoff was non-committal, and it remains unclear whether the Biden administration will support the plan.
In early February, US President Donald Trump sparked international outrage when he proposed that the United States 'take over' Gaza and forcibly displace more than two million Palestinians to Jordan, Egypt, and other Arab countries—an idea he described as turning Gaza into the 'Riviera of the Middle East.'
At the time, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised Trump's proposal, telling reporters that Tel Aviv was willing to carry it out unilaterally: 'Trump never said he wants American troops to do the job. Guess what? We'll do the job."
However, US officials said the White House later backed away from the plan after facing strong resistance from Arab nations.
Egypt has repeatedly rejected any plan involving the forced displacement of Palestinians, emphasizing that it will not be party to 'liquidating the Palestinian cause,' even temporarily.
President Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi responded swiftly to Trump's colonialist-style proposal: 'Egypt cannot participate in the injustice of displacing the Palestinian people.'
Palestinians themselves have insisted they do not wish to leave their homeland. Additionally, international rights groups condemned the proposal as a violation of international law and the Geneva Conventions, amounting to ethnic cleansing.
Following opposition from Arab and European countries, the US and Israel reportedly discussed relocating Palestinians to Sudan, Somalia, and its breakaway region of Somaliland, according to US and Israeli officials cited by the Associated Press (AP).
Israeli officials said Washington told Netanyahu that if Israel were to proceed, it would first need to find countries willing to accept large numbers of Palestinians from Gaza.
That responsibility, the report added, was then handed to Mossad.
Follow us on:
Short link:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al-Ahram Weekly
an hour ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
El-Sisi, Arab League Secretary-General discuss Gaza crisis, regional developments - Foreign Affairs
President Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi met on Sunday with Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit to discuss regional developments, with a primary focus on the Israeli war on Gaza and the military escalation in the occupied West Bank. According to a presidential statement, the talks highlighted ongoing efforts by Egypt and Qatar to secure a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, and ensure the delivery of humanitarian aid to the besieged Strip. Both sides reaffirmed their commitment to a just and comprehensive resolution to the Palestinian cause, based on the establishment of an independent Palestinian state per international legitimacy. They also stressed the importance of preserving Palestinian rights and preventing displacement or harm to the Palestinian people. On the same day, the Israeli military issued new evacuation warnings for central Gaza, cutting off access between Deir al-Balah and the southern cities of Rafah and Khan Younis. On Friday, Hamas accused Israel of obstructing progress in negotiations aimed at securing a temporary ceasefire and the release of Israeli captives held in Gaza. Indirect talks between the two sides have been ongoing in Qatar since 6 July, aiming for a 60-day truce that would include the release of 10 Israeli hostages. Nearly two weeks into negotiations, no agreement has been reached, with both parties blaming the other for the impasse. Last Wednesday, Qatar and the United States presented a revised ceasefire proposal to Israel and Hamas, calling for a 60-day truce, the release of 10 live captives and the remains of 18 others, the release of Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails, and a significant increase in humanitarian aid to Gaza. Israeli forces have killed more than 58,000 Palestinians—primarily women and children—and injured nearly 140,000 others since launching their genocidal war on Gaza in October 2023. Broader regional crises The meeting also addressed developments in Syria, Libya, and Sudan, with a focus on efforts to restore security and stability in those countries. On Sunday, the Syrian government announced a halt in fighting in the southern city of Sweida, after Druze fighters regained control and state forces redeployed to the area. More than 900 people have been killed in the city amid ongoing sectarian violence. The talks also addressed the political and security dynamics in the Horn of Africa, emphasizing the strategic importance of Red Sea security. According to the presidential statement, El-Sisi reaffirmed Egypt's full support for the Arab League and its role in promoting joint Arab action and unity in the face of escalating regional challenges. For his part, Aboul Gheit praised Egypt's 'wise and balanced' foreign policy, stating that it plays a crucial role in restoring stability in the Middle East, particularly through its support for a just and final resolution to the Palestinian issue, which he described as the only path to lasting peace in the region. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
See - Sada Elbalad
an hour ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Israel's Expanding Footprint: From Gaza to Suwayda : A Strategy of Sectarian Division and Strategic Dominance
Monica William Recently, the Middle East has witnessed a dangerous escalation in Israeli military actions, most notably in Syria's Suwayda province and the Gaza Strip. These seemingly distinct flashpoints are deeply interconnected, reflecting a broader Israeli strategy aimed at reshaping the regional order along sectarian and ethnic lines to solidify long-term strategic dominance. Post-Assad developments reveal a sensitive phase in which Israeli security calculations overlap with Syrian political transformations. Despite the pretext of security concerns, Israeli military intervention threatens to ignite a wider conflict and complicate the chances for stability, especially with the entry of Turkey and perhaps other countries on the front line. Suwayda, a predominantly Druze province in southern Syria, has become the epicenter of a new internal conflict between local Druze militias and Sunni Bedouin tribes. Following clashes sparked by a personal incident, the Syrian government deployed forces to stabilize the area. This move, however, was swiftly met with Israeli airstrikes, with Prime Minister Netanyahu declaring that Israel would not tolerate the presence of any 'Islamist-oriented' government forces in Suwayda. the Israeli airstrikes targeting Syrian military positions near Suwayda and even in Damascus appear to be in response to immediate security concerns namely, Israel's stated intention to 'protect the Druze community' in Syria from both government forces and militias. But beneath the rhetoric lies a deeper political calculus. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu framed the strikes as a moral necessity to protect the Druze community in Suwayda from the encroachment of a radical Syrian administration, which can be seen as a Humanitarian Cover for Strategic influence. His language was deliberate, evoking memories of October 7th in Gaza and presenting the Druze crisis as a mirror image. But analysts and regional actors saw a different picture: one in which Israel was not merely responding to violence but actively shaping Syria's post-war map. Yet Netanyahu's government appears unmoved. In fact, some Israeli commentators suggest the strikes are designed not just to 'protect' the Druze but to provoke Syria into overreaction, justifying deeper Israeli entrenchment in the south. Meanwhile, the Syrian government's partial withdrawal from Suwayda under the terms of a fragile ceasefire raises questions: was this a retreat in the face of Israeli pressure, or a tactical pause in a broader struggle for sovereignty? This also raises a critical question: Why is Israel becoming entangled in the unrest in Suwayda, a province whose Druze population makes up just 3% of Syria's total? The reasons behind Israel's involvement seems to depend on three main objectives. First, to prevent Syrian government forces from reestablishing a firm presence in Suwayda and across southern Syria areas considered critical due to their proximity to the Israeli border. Second, to strengthen Syria's Druze community as a potential ally or buffer zone against Iranian-backed militias and other hostile factions operating near Israel's northern frontier. Third, to respond to domestic political pressure from Israel's own Druze minority, which has called on the government to act in defense of their Syrian kin. These motivations combine strategic calculations with identity politics, illustrating how Israel's regional interventions often serve multiple overlapping agendas. Then, what's happening in Suwayda cannot be seen in isolation. At the same time, Gaza remains under siege, with its infrastructure devastated, its leadership fragmented, and its people trapped in cycles of war and temporary ceasefires. The connection between these fronts lies not in shared borders but in shared Israeli strategy: weaken unified national identities, empower local actors with specific sectarian loyalties, and maintain a fractured region incapable of coordinated resistance. Hence, political logic is simple: a fragmented enemy cannot pose an existential threat. For instance, in Syria, this strategy translates into supporting or at least tolerating Druze autonomy even as it undermines the central government. In Gaza, it involves ensuring Hamas remains isolated from the Palestinian Authority. What Israel is executing is not merely military doctrine , it is the unfolding of a broader geopolitical project. Echoing the 1980 Bernard Lewis plan, which envisioned the fragmentation of the Middle East along sectarian and ethnic lines, this strategy seeks to redraw the region not through diplomacy, but through targeted airstrikes, calculated proxy alliances, and the deliberate weakening of central states. Its logic thrives on sustained instability creating minority enclaves, autonomous zones, and national capitals too fractured to assert real sovereignty or regional influence. Yet such fragmentation rarely ends in peace. It creates vacuums, invites radicalization, and punishes civilian populations trapped between competing agendas. As in Iraq and Libya, internal conflict brings not stability but collapse. Already, signs of this are visible: tensions between Druze leaders, Sunni backlash in nearby provinces, and international scrutiny of Israeli motives. Briefly , From Suwayda's embattled hills to Gaza's shattered neighborhoods, Israel's expanding influence is reshaping the regional chessboard. But it is a dangerous game. In seeking to divide and dominate, Israel may indeed secure tactical victories. Yet the long-term consequences which include regional chaos, diplomatic isolation, and moral erosion could outweigh the gains. What the region needs is not another airstrike, but a coherent vision one grounded in respect for sovereignty, inclusive dialogue, and a shared framework for collective security. Without this, the cycle of violence will persist, and the map of the Middle East will continue to be not merely redrawn, but burned into fragments by the division and fear. read more Analysis- Turkey Has 0 Regional Allies... Why? Analysis: Russia, Turkey... Libya in Return For Syria? Analysis: Who Will Gain Trump's Peace Plan Fruits? Analysis: Will Turkey's Erdogan Resort to Snap Election? Analysis: What Are Turkey's Aspirations in Iraq? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Mercenaries In Libya... Who Should Be Blamed? Opinion & Analysis Analysis- How 'Libya Nightmare' Takes Erdogan to Algiers Opinion & Analysis Analysis: What Happens After Brexit? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Strategic Significance of Libya's Sirte, Jufra! News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle News "Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence" Sports Get to Know 2025 WWE Evolution Results News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks
Al-Ahram Weekly
2 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Iran says replaced air defence systems damaged during Israel war - Region
Iran has replaced the air defence systems damaged during its 12-day war with Israel last month, a senior army general said on Sunday according to state media. Israel launched an unprecedented surprise bombing campaign against Iran in mid-June, prompting Tehran to respond with drone and missile attacks. Israel's strikes dealt a significant blow to the Islamic republic's air defences, which were repeatedly activated in the capital Tehran and across the country throughout the war. "The Zionist enemy sought to destroy Iran's defense capabilities, and some of our defense systems were damaged in that war," army operations chief Mahmoud Mousavi was quoted as saying by the official IRNA news agency. "The damaged defence systems have now been replaced," he added. Iran's air defence network includes systems like the domestically built Bavar-373 and Khordad-15, designed to counter missiles and aircraft. Iran also installed Russia's S-300 air defense systems in 2016. The war with Israel killed more than 1,000 people in Iran, while Iranian fire killed at least 28 people in Israel, according to authorities in each country. Israel's attacks targeted military infrastructure and nuclear facilities across Iran. On June 22, Israel's ally the United States also carried out unprecedented strikes on Iranian nuclear sites at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz. The full extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear programme remains unclear. US President Donald Trump has insisted the sites were "completely destroyed", but US media reports have cast doubt on the severity of the damage. On Friday, NBC News, citing a military damage assessment, reported that only one of the three sites was mostly destroyed. A ceasefire between Iran and Israel has been in effect since June 24. After the truce was announced, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear capabilities, raising the prospect of renewed conflict. Earlier in July, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said Israel was formulating a plan to "ensure that Iran cannot threaten Israel again." Katz said the military had to maintain its "air superiority over Tehran, the ability to enforce restrictions on Iran and prevent it from rebuilding its capabilities". Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
