Alex Salmond did not read independence white paper, Nicola Sturgeon claims
The 670-page long paper was prepared by the Scottish Government in the run-up to the 2014 referendum, with the aim of answering questions about independence ahead of the crucial vote.
But in a TV interview ahead of the publication of her memoir Frankly, Ms Sturgeon, who was deputy first minister at the time, insisted that Mr Salmond 'really didn't engage in the work of the drafting or the compilation of the White Paper at all'.
Speaking about her former boss, Ms Sturgeon said: 'He was the leader, he was the First Minister, and he hadn't read it.'
She went on to tell ITV News at Ten presenter Julie Etchingham that she did 'not even know if he had read bits of it'.
Ms Sturgeon recalled: 'I knew I was going to have to sit him down and say: 'Look, you're going to have to read this, and you're going to have to tell me now if there are bits you want to change, because it has to be signed off.'
'He told me he was going on a trade mission to China. I don't think I'd ever felt as much cold fury at him as I did in that moment. It just seemed to me like an abdication of responsibility.'
Speaking about the white paper, which was published in November 2013, Ms Sturgeon said there had been an evening where she 'just suddenly had this overwhelming sense of impossibility'.
She recalled thinking: 'I can't get this to the point it needs to be at. It's so unwieldy. It's so difficult.'
Ms Sturgeon, who succeeded Mr Salmond to become first minister when he stood down after Scots voted to remain in the UK, continued: 'I just remember having what I can only describe as a panic attack.
'I was sobbing on the floor of my office at home and my heart was racing.'
Her comments came as she told how she still misses Mr Salmond – who she was deputy first minister to for over seven years – 'in some way'.
The pair had formed one of the most successful political partnerships in UK at the top of the SNP, but their relationship deteriorated and then broke down after sexual misconduct allegations against Mr Salmond emerged.
Following a trial at the High Court in Edinburgh in 2020, Mr Salmond was cleared of all 13 charges, which included attempted rape and sexual offences.
In an exclusive interview with ITV News before the publication of her memoir Frankly on Thursday, Ms Sturgeon said she misses the relationship she used to have with him.
And she said she was hit by a 'wave of grief' after hearing of Mr Salmond's death in October last year.
Ms Sturgeon said: 'Even today I still miss him in some way – the person that I used to know and the relationship we used to have.
'But I thought I had made my peace with it, that I'd got to a point where I felt nothing.
'And then I got a call to tell me that Alex Salmond had died. I started crying on the phone and I just was hit by this wave of grief … and it was complicated because obviously we weren't just no longer friends, we were political enemies.
'There was no prospect I was going to be able to go to his funeral or anything like that and it was a kind of strange, strange feeling.'
Mr Salmond went on to become leader of the Alba Party, which became a frequent critic of his former party the SNP.
He died suddenly of a heart attack in October in North Macedonia at the age of 69.
Ms Sturgeon had not spoken to him 'for years' at that point.
She said: 'I felt really deeply the loss of the relationship with him. I suddenly didn't have him. He wasn't there. I couldn't talk to him. And I went through this period of, I would still talk to him in my head.
'I would have vivid dreams that we were still on good terms. And then I'd have this feeling of such sadness when I remembered the reality.
'So, I went through that process. I still missed him in some bizarre way.'
During the interview Ms Sturgeon is also asked by Ms Etchingham about her description of Reform UK leader Nigel Farage as 'odious' in her memoir.
She said: 'This is my impression, other people might have a different view of him. He just comes across as somebody who's got a very, very fragile ego.
'Somebody who's not particularly comfortable, particularly around women.
'In the 2015 leaders' debate just before we went on air that night, I just remember hearing him tell somebody how much he'd had to drink, in the green room area beforehand, and it just felt this kind of bravado and just not very pleasant.'
Nicola Sturgeon: The Interview will broadcast on Monday August 11 at 7pm on ITV1, ITVX and STV.
An extended version of the interview will be available on ITVX in the following days.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN DAISLEY SKETCH: Imagine Frost/Nixon with all the depth of an Instagram post
With a book to peddle, Nicola Sturgeon is popping up all over, including on ITV last night, where she sat down with Julie Etchingham. Ah, the tough interview. Once time was deducted for some introductory ambling along a windswept coast, the proceedings lasted about 25 minutes, and even then it dragged on. Nicola Sturgeon somehow seems incapable of providing any insight into Nicola Sturgeon. What was it like being arrested during the SNP finances investigation? 'Utterly traumatic,' she told Etchingham. Naturally. What was it like seeing her husband arrested and led away? She hadn't seen it happen, and didn't have a clear memory of how she felt about it. OK, then. Once the police had left, she fled to her parents' house and watched the news, where she saw her house 'looking like a murder scene'. Sure, everyone said that at the time. It was the forensic tent and the police tape. That's Netflix serial killer documentary stuff. The only thing missing was the old dear next door saying: 'She didn't seem the type to have 15 bodies buried under the patio.' What could she tell us about the experience? About how it affected her? Very little, in truth. Every attempt to elicit a description of her feelings at the time brought the same staccato, one-word responses: 'Horror', 'upset', 'shame'. The whole point of book interviews is to dole out enough meaty little morsels of information that people will be driven to buy and read. She provided nothing like that in her conversation with Etchingham. If she can't manage 25 minutes of vaguely compelling chat, what must the book be like? Nothing new that she said was interesting, and nothing interesting was new. The SNP hadn't done enough prep work when David Cameron granted the referendum, and the White Paper needed more research. (We noticed.) She used to talk to Alex Salmond inside her head. (Well, he was living there rent-free, after all.) We were treated to a discussion of her new tattoo, a self-designed infinity symbol tipped with an arrow and etched onto her right wrist. 'Midlife crisis alert!' Sturgeon yelped. 'Midlife crisis alert,' Etchingham purred. Imagine Frost/Nixon but with all the depth of an Instagram post. On matters of politics and policy, it was as though she had done no self-reflection since leaving office. Asked why she failed to deliver in government, she cited the pandemic. Nasty old pandemic. Ms Sturgeon revealed a new infinity symbol with an arrow tattoo on her wrist Not only did it confine us all to our homes in 2020 and 2021, it went all the way back to 2014 to stop Scotland's First Minister keeping any of her promises. For the briefest of moments, she seemed to acknowledge her error in refusing to say that Isla Bryson, who was briefly placed in a women's prison, was in fact a man. Rapists, she said, 'forfeit their right' to self-identify their gender, then, under the lightest of pushbacks from Etchingham, she took it back. Under questioning about her sexuality, she remained coy, which was fair enough. Her private life is her own affair. What was infinitely more difficult to watch, and the only section of the programme that actually carried any weight, was her memories of the miscarriage, of the guilt that burdens her still. Nicola Sturgeon was a terrible First Minister, a serial breaker of promises, a spinner without substance, and for all that I'm happy to decry her. But she is also the mother of a little girl who never was – 'she would be 14 now,' she mused – and a lifelong bearer of the ungodly pain that comes with baby loss. She told Etchingham she was 'happy being my own person now'. On that, at least, I'm glad for her.
The Guardian
44 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on the Trump-Putin summit: European leaders must help Zelenskyy resist a carve-up
In recent weeks, as Russia continued its assault on Ukraine in frank disregard of White House deadlines and demands, there was hope in Kyiv and European capitals that the scales might finally be falling from Donald Trump's eyes. Last month, Mr Trump noted that although his conversations with Vladimir Putin repeatedly led him to believe that a ceasefire deal was in reach, the Russian president then routinely went on to 'knock down a building in Kyiv'. More bluntly, he has accused Mr Putin of stringing him along with 'bullshit'. It was ostensibly on those grounds that the US president set an 8 August deadline for Mr Putin to agree to a peace deal with Ukraine, on pain of 'significant' sanctions. Yet instead of being punished for ignoring this injunction too, Mr Putin has been rewarded with a summit with Mr Trump in the United States, and apparently allowed to veto any suggestion that Volodymyr Zelenskyy should also attend. Suddenly, and alarmingly, it feels a little like February again, when Mr Trump and his vice-president, JD Vance, treated Mr Zelenskyy with outrageous disrespect in the White House, and appeared disposed to pursuing a peace agreement on Mr Putin's terms. There are conflicting accounts of discussions between Mr Putin and the US presidential envoy, Steve Witkoff, last week. But there is no evidence that Mr Putin has any intention of compromising on his maximalist goals in Ukraine, including the annexation of eastern regions, demilitarisation and the abandoning of Ukraine's aspiration to Nato membership. Morally and practically speaking, the Ukrainian president's absence on Friday will mean that any 'deal' struck by Mr Trump and Mr Putin in Alaska lacks all legitimacy. But Kyiv understandably fears a carve-up in which Ukraine is pressured by Washington and Moscow to unilaterally surrender land in its east, and make other concessions, in exchange for a pause in the fighting. This would be, of course, to reward Mr Putin's illegal invasion and betray a nation whose fate is tied up with Europe's security as a whole. The very fact of Friday's summit, from which European leaders are also excluded, is already a wholly unearned diplomatic win for Mr Putin. Mr Trump is driven by mercantilism and ego: he may be persuaded that if Ukraine could be bullied into accepting the unacceptable, opportunities relating to Russian oil and gas could be unleashed, and the Nobel peace prize he covets become a genuine possibility. After frantic mediation, it emerged on Monday that Mr Zelenskyy and European leaders may take part in a joint call with Mr Trump on Wednesday. The Ukrainian president has already made it clear that there will be no concession of further territory to Russia's occupying forces. In the lead-up to Alaska, and afterwards, Europe must ensure that his words are lent weight by a unified and robust stance on what would constitute a just peace, as opposed to one imposed against Ukraine's will. Ultimately, that will need to include credible security guarantees for Kyiv from Europe and the US, and an agreed sanctions regime to be enacted should Russia renege on its commitments. But the first priority must be pressuring Mr Putin to agree to a ceasefire immediately in order that meaningful negotiations can begin. Until last week, that appeared to be the approach Mr Trump had decided to adopt. It was the right one. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Shocking moment politician suffers stroke during live TV appearance
This is the shocking moment that a Serbian politician suffers a stroke whilst appearing on live TV. Minister for Public Investments Darko Glišićfell appeared on a local morning show on Tuesday (5 August) when he started stumbling over his words. The hosts quickly became worried as Glišićfell's eyes began twitching and his face started to droop, with the broadcast quickly being cut short. The politician reportedly was rushed to surgery and as of Saturday (9 August), was still in a serious condition, having been placed on a ventilator briefly.
