Drone operations command raided in Yoon's martial law probe
Led by Special Counsel Cho Eung-seok, the raid was part of a broader investigation into whether Yoon orchestrated a drone operation over North Korea in an attempt to fabricate a pretext for declaring martial law on Dec. 3.
The special counsel team reportedly seeks evidence that drone units based in Pocheon, Gyeonggi Province, carried out a mission over Pyongyang in October under the direct orders of Yoon and then-Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun.
Investigators are also looking into whether the military engaged in a coordinated effort to conceal the operation.
Monday's raid marked a sign that the insurrection probe has expanded into treason charges.
At the time, North Korea claimed that South Korean drones had entered its airspace and dropped anti-regime leaflets over the capital. It released photos of an uncrewed aircraft, saying it had been recovered after crashing.
South Korea's military initially denied the claim, later declining to confirm or deny whether the operation took place.
A fire later broke out at the drone command's facility, fueling suspicions of a cover-up. The military said it was a routine incineration of documents unrelated to the case. Investigators are examining whether there were coordinated efforts within the military to conceal the operation, including the destruction or withholding of key records.
The drone operations command, launched in 2023 as a joint unit of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps, operates under the authority of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Monday's search covered 24 military-related sites, including the Defense Ministry, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the National Security Office and the Defense Counterintelligence Command.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Conservative leadership race begins amid far-right push for power
South Korea's main opposition People Power Party is heading into a turbulent leadership race — with a far-right firebrand gaining ground and threatening to upend the party's future, while the party is still reeling from its June 3 presidential defeat. Kim Moon-soo, the presidential candidate who was labor minister in the Yoon Suk Yeol administration, declared his candidacy on Sunday in the party's Aug. 22 leadership election. In his announcement, Kim echoed far-right talking points, blaming the Lee Jae Myung administration for what he called a collapse of Korea's three branches of power and labeling Lee a 'criminal' and 'autocrat' — rhetoric popular among Yoon's most ardent supporters. Kim rose to prominence within pro-Yoon circles last year when he refused to apologize for the December martial law declaration during a parliamentary hearing — a rare show of defiance among Yoon's former Cabinet members, most of whom expressed regret under pressure. That act solidified his image as a faithful standard-bearer for Yoon's legacy. But even before Kim's announcement, attention had already turned to a far more polarizing figure: Jeon Han-gil, a far-right YouTube personality and former history lecturer. On Friday, Jeon suggested he would enter the race if no other Yoon-aligned candidate stepped forward, speaking in an interview with local broadcaster Channel A. Despite having no formal political experience or electoral record, Jeon has built a loyal following among hard-line conservatives through the dissemination of conspiracy theories — including allegations that the Democratic Party of Korea came to power through election fraud — and by calling on voters to rally behind candidates loyal to Yoon. Observers say Jeon's popularity stems from his perceived role as a megaphone for the party's most extreme supporters. 'He gives voice to the hardcore pro-Yoon base — and like it or not, that translates into real votes,' said a source who previously served on the People Power Party's June 3 campaign team. 'Other lawmakers stage sit-ins and nobody cares. But when Jeon speaks, his far-right remarks go viral. He's someone the party can no longer simply ignore.' On Saturday, Jeon further escalated his rhetoric, questioning whether he himself or Han Dong-hoon — the party's former leader — was the 'true leader of the conservative right.' He declared, 'We must take over the People Power Party,' signaling his intent to run and calling on tens of thousands of party members to unite behind a pro-Yoon candidate. The next day, Han — a key reformist voice who has emphasized the need for the party to distance itself from Yoon — issued a sharp response, warning against the normalization of extremism. 'Freedom of speech is not a license for hate and anti-intellectual extremism,' Han wrote on Facebook. 'Our party cannot become a joke — a white dwarf shrunk into a far-right sect that alienates the public and hands long-term power to the liberals.' Jeon's eligibility to run, however, remains in question. Under People Power Party rules, leadership candidates must have paid party dues for at least three months before registering. With registration set for July 30–31, Jeon — who joined on June 9 — falls short of this requirement. Still, some believe party leadership may bend the rules. 'The game of rules can change,' the same source said, noting that the party had recently attempted to replace its presidential candidate even after the final primary — referring to former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo. Other prominent reform-minded figures have refrained from directly confronting Jeon, instead keeping their distance from the Yoon-aligned faction. Rep. Na Kyung-won, a former presidential primary contender and one-time front-runner for the party leadership, announced Sunday she would not run, citing responsibility for the party's recent electoral defeat. Rep. Ahn Cheol-soo, another former presidential candidate who declared his bid for party leader earlier this month, reportedly had lunch with Han on Saturday — a meeting that sparked speculation of a centrist alliance. The discussion was widely seen as focusing more on how to navigate the party's internal discord than on coordinating a joint campaign. Meanwhile, the People Power Party's internal reform effort — once seen as a critical path to restoring public trust — is also being eclipsed by the leadership race. Officially launched on July 2 and led by Rep. Yoon Hee-sook, the reform committee proposed revising the party charter to include formal apologies for Yoon's martial law declaration and impeachment. The proposals are expected to be discussed at the party's emergency meeting on Monday, but they are also expected to face immediate internal backlash and remain unresolved.
Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Sudan PM vows to rebuild Khartoum
KHARTOUM, Sudan (AFP) -- Sudan's Prime Minister Kamil Idris on Saturday pledged to rebuild Khartoum, ravaged by more than two years of war, as he made his first visit to the capital since assuming office in May. Touring Khartoum's destroyed infrastructure earlier, the new premier outlined mass repair projects in anticipation of the return of at least some of the over 3.5 million people who fled the violence. "Khartoum will return as a proud national capital," Idris said, according to Sudan's state news agency. Sudan's Army chief and de facto leader Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, who appointed Idris, landed Saturday at Khartoum's airport, recaptured by the army in March after nearly two years of occupation by their rival paramilitary Rapid Support Forces. The war between the Sudanese army and the RSF began in the heart of the capital in April 2023, quickly tearing the city apart. Tens of thousands are estimated to have been killed in the once-bustling capital, and reconstruction is expected to be a herculean feat, with the government putting the cost at $700 billion nationwide, with Khartoum alone accounting for around half of that. The army-aligned government, which moved to Port Sudan on the Red Sea early in the war and still operates from there, has begun to plan the return of ministries to Khartoum even as fighting rages on in other parts of the country. Authorities have begun operations to properly bury the bodies still missing around the city, clear thousands of unexploded ordinance and resume bureaucratic services. On a visit to Sudan's largest oil refinery, the Al-Jaili plant just north of Khartoum, Idris promised that "national institutions will come back even better than they were before." The refinery -- now a blackened husk -- was recaptured in January, but the facility which once processed 100,000 barrels a day will take years and at least $1.3 billion to rebuild, officials told Agence France-Presse. The UN expects some two million people will return to Khartoum this year, but those coming back have found an unrecognizable city. The scale of looting is unprecedented, aid workers say, with evidence of paramilitary fighters ripping copper wire out of power lines before they left. Vast areas of the city remain without power, and the damage to water infrastructure has caused a devastating cholera outbreak. Health authorities recorded up to 1,500 cases a day last month, according to the UN. "Water is the primary concern and obstacle delaying the return of citizens to their homes," Idris said on Saturday. A career diplomat and former UN official, Idris is building a government that critics warn could put up a veneer of civilian rule, in addition to facing challenges within its own camp. In 2020, during a short-lived transition to civilian rule, the government in Khartoum signed a peace agreement with Sudanese armed groups, allocating a share of cabinet posts to signatories. All but three cabinet posts are now filled, and armed groups currently fighting alongside the army have retained their representation in Idris's government. But reports that Idris had sought to appoint technocrats in their place have created tensions. Some of the armed groups, known together as the Joint Forces, have been integral in defending North Darfur state capital El-Fasher, which has been besieged by the paramilitaries since May of last year. If the RSF succeeds in taking El-Fasher, it will control all of the vast western region of Darfur, cementing the fragmentation of the country. Despite the army securing the capital, as well as the country's north and east, war still rages in Sudan's west and south, where the RSF is accused of killing hundreds of civilians in recent days. Sudan is suffering the world's largest hunger and displacement crises, with nearly 25 million people in dire food insecurity and over 10 million internally displaced across the country. A further four million people have fled across borders.
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Renowned human rights lawyer urges Korea to adopt forced labor import ban
No company is free from forced labor in global supply chain, stresses Vandenberg, founder of Human Trafficking Legal Center American human rights lawyer Martina Vandenberg has called on South Korea, an important economy in the global supply chain, to enact an import ban on goods made with forced labor during her recent visit to Seoul, saying such a measure would benefit not only exploited workers abroad but Korean workers as well. "Forced labor is ubiquitous, and it is so frequently found in global supply chains" said Vandenberg, president of Washington-based Human Trafficking Legal Center, in an interview with The Korea Herald. It is 'a feature, not a bug' in the global economic system, and 'it's systematic.' She visited Seoul earlier this month to speak at a forum on the forced labor issue, co-hosted by the National Assembly Labor Forum, the National Human Rights Commission and the Korean Bar Association. The Human Trafficking Legal Center, founded by Vandenberg, is a nonprofit that trains pro bono lawyers to seek restitution for human trafficking victims. She has trained more than 4,000 pro bono attorneys. 'At this point in the global economy, if you want a job and you're coming from a poor country, you have to buy that job,' she said. 'You pay recruitment fees, fees for medical tests, fees to travel. And when workers arrive at the job site, they discover they're not being paid the rate they were promised. Their debt back home keeps growing. They may be victims of deception, violence or even sexual violence.' "When so many workers across the globe are experiencing forced labor, we have to ask how the system is so broken," she added. She explained that many firms build layers of subcontractors — "subcontractors, and subcontractors and subcontractors" — to distance themselves from legal responsibility. 'They're trying to avoid liability, both criminal and civil.' But the real pressure, she emphasized, comes from the top. 'It's the companies in developed economies putting enormous pressure on supply chains to lower prices.' 'No company is free from this,' Vandenberg said. 'American companies are not free from this. South Korean companies are not free from this.' US import ban model To address the issue, the United States has enforced Section 307 of the Tariff Act, which prohibits the import of goods made with forced labor. Although the law has existed since 1930, it became enforceable only after loopholes were closed in 2016. 'This enforceability has had an enormous impact,' she said. 'Before, companies operated with total impunity. No one would prosecute them. No one would stop them. But now they realize someone is watching. Someone is investigating. And if their supply chain is tainted with forced labor, they may not be able to sell their goods in the US, the EU, Canada or Mexico.' Vandenberg said, 'We hope someday they won't be able to bring their goods into South Korea — when South Korea has an import ban.' 'South Korea is a very important economy, a key player in the global economy,' she added. According to a 2023 report by international human rights group Walk Free, South Korea imports up to $20 billion worth of goods each year that are at risk of being linked to forced labor. Many of these products originate from regions where Uyghur workers and others are forced into labor in the lowest tiers of global supply chains. While Korea has not yet proposed such a bill, The Korea Herald has learned that Rep. Kim Tae-seon of the ruling Democratic Party is preparing to introduce legislation following a series of public discussions. Import bans, she noted, do more than protect workers abroad. 'They also protect workers at home. There's no way a Korean or American worker can compete with someone earning almost nothing. A US steelworker, who testified in a hearing before the Senate Finance Committee several years ago, said 'There's no way I can compete with someone held in slavery.' So US and South Korean workers can't compete when other workers aren't being paid." Vandenberg suggested that import bans can be incorporated into bilateral trade agreements. Canada and Mexico, for example, adopted import bans as part of the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, negotiated under the Trump administration in 2020. 'It's a very good way for countries to negotiate with the US — agree to adopt import bans and reach mutually beneficial trade deals,' she said. Korean sea salt under scrutiny The US has already taken action against a Korean company. In April, US Customs and Border Protection issued a withhold release order against products from Taepyung Salt Farm, one of Korea's largest sea salt producers, citing evidence of forced labor. The action followed a 2022 petition from Korean civic groups urging a ban on Korean sea salt allegedly produced under forced labor conditions. According to Vandenberg, the action against the Korean company is highly unusual. 'It's one of only three issued this year -- alongside actions against frankincense from Somaliland and seafood from a Chinese fishing vessel, Zhen Fa 7, which had Indonesian fishers onboard.' 'We don't believe any withhold release order should be modified or revoked until there is proof that workers have been compensated and that conditions have changed,' she said. 'The whole point is not just to block goods — but to change the reality for workers on the ground.' She added, 'There's still a long way to go. It will take attention and effort from the company and Korean authorities before any modification or revocation would be justified.' shinjh@
