logo
Rs 2.51 lakh nursery class fee: Justified or not? For some it's the price of an 'elite bubble'

Rs 2.51 lakh nursery class fee: Justified or not? For some it's the price of an 'elite bubble'

Economic Times30-07-2025
A Hyderabad school's reported nursery fee of Rs 2.51 lakh per year has sparked widespread debate online, raising questions about the rising cost of early education in India. While some view it as an investment in premium schooling and social capital, others criticize it as a status-driven expense that reflects deeper inequalities.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Prestige, Not Pedagogy?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Social Pressure and Status Symbol
As the cost of private education continues to rise in India, a growing number of parents and observers are questioning what exactly they're paying for. In major cities, fees for preschool and nursery classes are reaching levels once associated only with higher education. This has reignited debate around affordability, access, and whether elite private schools are offering genuine value — or simply selling social prestige at a premium.The latest round of public scrutiny was sparked by a post on X (formerly Twitter), where a user highlighted that a well-known school in Hyderabad charges Rs 2.51 lakh per year for nursery admission, which works out to around Rs 21,000 a month. The user questioned what kind of education at the nursery level could possibly justify such a high fee, pointing out that this amount was being spent just for children to start learning the alphabet.The post drew a flurry of responses. Several users argued that such schools are not merely about education, but about positioning children within a specific social class. One pointed to an elite Indian school, where they said the fees for early education crosses Rs 14 lakh annually. The argument is that parents are paying for exclusivity, not just academics — mirroring trends seen in elite private schools globally. The high cost, some said, is a gateway to an 'elite bubble' where children grow up isolated from the rest of Indian society.Many social media users defended the fee structure as a simple matter of supply and demand. They argued that just as consumers choose to pay premium prices for luxury goods or services, schools with strong brands and perceived advantages are free to set their rates. From their perspective, education is a service like any other, and parents voluntarily opting in means the market is functioning as intended. One user likened it to MBA programs, where students pay for access to networks as much as for the curriculum itself.On the other side of the conversation, critics were quick to point out how social validation plays a large role in these choices. Several users mentioned that many parents proudly broadcast the high fees they pay — not as a complaint, but as a badge of honour. The school a child attends is often seen as an extension of the family's status, and some believe that the rising demand for such institutions is driven more by image than educational merit.Beyond the optics, there were serious concerns raised about the regulatory environment. Legally, schools in India are required to operate as not-for-profit entities, but some users noted that many manage to generate significant profit through indirect channels. Others criticised the government's role in this trend, arguing that weakening support for public education has pushed more families into the private sector, where fees are unchecked and rising rapidly.Some commenters suggested that parents should consider more affordable but academically strong schools, rather than getting caught up in the status race. A few proposed community-based models, such as cooperative home-schooling by parents, to ensure quality education without exorbitant fees. The broader point echoed by many was that India needs to rethink its educational priorities — moving from image-based schooling to models that focus on meaningful learning and skill development.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's 50% tariffs fail to hit $30 bn of Indian exports: Pharma, smartphones exempted
Trump's 50% tariffs fail to hit $30 bn of Indian exports: Pharma, smartphones exempted

First Post

time29 minutes ago

  • First Post

Trump's 50% tariffs fail to hit $30 bn of Indian exports: Pharma, smartphones exempted

Despite US President Donald Trump's decision to double tariffs on Indian goods to 50% from August 6, a major chunk of Indian exports worth nearly $30 billion remains untouched for now. Key sectors like pharmaceuticals and electronics including smartphones and semiconductors continue to enjoy exemptions under a carve-out list that shields them from higher duties. The tariff hike, justified by the Trump administration as a response to India's continued procurement of Russian energy and arms is expected to impact India's labour-intensive export segments. However, shipments of critical products such as medicines, mobile phones and energy supplies have been spared at least for the moment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In FY25, India exported pharmaceuticals and electronics worth $10.5 billion and $14.6 billion respectively to the US, together accounting for over 29% of its total exports to America which stood at $86.5 billion. Interestingly, India's petroleum exports amounting to $4.09 billion have also been excluded from the latest tariffs due to their placement in the energy exemption list. These high-value categories had previously escaped the initial 25% tariff announced on July 30 as well. While these exemptions offer temporary relief, uncertainty remains. Trump has warned of tariffs going as high as 250% on foreign-manufactured pharmaceuticals and the status of smartphones may shift depending on future policy decisions. The executive order signed on August 6 clarified that all goods currently listed under exemptions would continue to receive preferential access to the US market at lower or zero tariffs. The original 25% tariff was introduced after talks to finalise a limited trade deal between the two countries collapsed. That move, which takes effect on August 7, paved the way for this latest escalation. India and the US are still working towards concluding a broader Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), targeted for finalisation by the end of the year.

'Economic blackmail': Rahul Gandhi slams Trump's 50 per cent tariff on India
'Economic blackmail': Rahul Gandhi slams Trump's 50 per cent tariff on India

New Indian Express

time29 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

'Economic blackmail': Rahul Gandhi slams Trump's 50 per cent tariff on India

NEW DELHI: Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday said US President Donald Trump's 50 per cent tariff on Indian goods is "economic blackmail" to bully India into an unfair trade deal. Soon after Trump announced a penalty of another 25 per cent on India for buying Russian oil, the former Congress president said Prime Minister Narendra Modi should not let Indian interests be overridden. "Trump's 50% tariff is economic blackmail - an attempt to bully India into an unfair trade deal. "PM Modi better not let his weakness override the interests of the Indian people," Gandhi said in a post on X.

India Unites Against Trump's ‘ECONOMIC BLACKMAIL': PM Modi, Rahul Gandhi, Tharoor BLAST US Tariffs
India Unites Against Trump's ‘ECONOMIC BLACKMAIL': PM Modi, Rahul Gandhi, Tharoor BLAST US Tariffs

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

India Unites Against Trump's ‘ECONOMIC BLACKMAIL': PM Modi, Rahul Gandhi, Tharoor BLAST US Tariffs

India's SHOCK Reply To Trump's 50% Tariffs; Fires 'Will PROTECT National Interests' Warning In a strongly worded statement, India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) sharply rejected the United States' new 25% tariff on Indian imports tied to Russian oil purchases—calling it 'unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable.' The MEA clarified that India's energy imports are driven by market dynamics and national interest, aimed at securing reliable, affordable energy for its 1.4 billion citizens. India noted that many other countries—including China, Turkey, and the EU—are also continuing trade with Russia, yet are not being targeted in the same way. 7.1K views | 1 hour ago

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store