logo
Palm Beach asks West Palm to reconsider fireworks in Fourth of July celebration

Palm Beach asks West Palm to reconsider fireworks in Fourth of July celebration

Yahoo13-03-2025
Palm Beach's town council recently approved its sponsorship of West Palm Beach's annual 4th on Flagler Fourth of July celebration — and asked its neighbor city to consider doing away with fireworks for the popular event.
Mayor Danielle Moore sent a letter to West Palm Beach Mayor Keith James imploring the city to reconsider its use of fireworks, about which council members shared concerns regarding environmental and noise pollution.
"Traditional fireworks, while visually appealing, have well-documented environmental consequences," Moore wrote in the letter dated March 5. She pointed to air and water pollution, plastic and metal waste, and effects on wildlife and domesticated animals.
"As environmental stewardship remains a priority for our community, we encourage the exploration of sustainable alternatives" including drones, rice paper confetti cannons and bubble displays, Moore wrote.
Council President Bobbie Lindsay raised the issue at the March 4 meeting as council members approved Palm Beach's annual sponsorship — which is $12,000 for this year's event — and was the lone dissenting vote. Council member Julie Araskog was absent.
Lindsay watched last year's 4th on Flagler display and said she left the celebration wondering about the effects of the fallen fireworks debris on wildlife in and near the Intracoastal Waterway.
Citing additional concerns about noise pollution and concerns for dogs and people who are affected by loud noises, she suggested the town should take a stronger stance to 'lead and not follow' on the issue, pointing to other places where drones or lasers are used instead of fireworks to celebrate Independence Day.
West Palm Beach at this point most likely is moving forward with fireworks for this year's event, Moore noted during the meeting.
In her letter to James, Moore said that Palm Beach's council is willing to offer a larger annual contribution for the 4th on Flagler event, given the potential increase in costs should West Palm Beach switch to a fireworks alternative such as drones.
During the council meeting, President Pro-Tem Lew Crampton suggested that a letter from Moore could remind West Palm Beach 'of how great they are on environmental issues, but pointing out the incongruity of these polluting fireworks.'
Council members Ted Cooney and Bridget Moran said that they would support increasing the town's contribution in future years to cover the possible additional cost of a non-fireworks option.
Fireworks explode and release lung-damaging gases such as sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide, according to the American Lung Association. Fireworks also can startle wildlife and birds, leading to serious injuries or deaths, according to an NPR report.
But fireworks companies, supporters and advocates, including the National Fireworks Association, have said that fireworks have value for entertainment and other purposes, while emphasizing the importance of following safety guidelines.
Many large cities throughout the U.S. have transitioned to drone shows instead of fireworks because of concerns for the environment. The drones, which have LED lights, can be programmed to create myriad shapes and patterns in a range of brilliant colors, CBS News reported in 2023.
Florida cities including Miami Beach, Lauderhill and Ocala now use drones instead of fireworks during Fourth of July celebrations, according to multiple media reports.
Some places that are dry and prone to fires — Salt Lake City, Utah, and Boulder, Colorado, among them — also transitioned to drones because of concerns about falling fireworks debris causing blazes, Newsweek reported.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Palm Beach asks West Palm to consider not using fireworks on July 4
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palestine Action's violent criminality is not lawful protest
Palestine Action's violent criminality is not lawful protest

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Palestine Action's violent criminality is not lawful protest

Faced with the intolerable scenes of suffering and devastation in Gaza, people across the country are feeling desperate and angry about what is happening and many have joined protests on the street. Each month, the police work with organisers to facilitate safe, lawful protests, and will continue to do so. Over the last 18 months, hundreds of thousands of people have joined pro-Palestinian protests, while only a tiny minority have been arrested for breaking the law. Protest and free speech are an important part of our democracy and those freedoms will always be protected. So anyone who wants to protest against the catastrophic humanitarian situation and crimes against humanity in Gaza, to oppose Israel's military offensive, or to criticise the actions of any and every government, including our own, has the freedom to do so. The recent proscription of the group Palestine Action does not prevent those protests, and to claim otherwise is nonsense. That proscription concerns one specific organisation alone – a group that has conducted an escalating campaign involving not just sustained criminal damage, including to Britain's national security infrastructure, but also intimidation, violence, weapons, and serious injuries to individuals. The clear advice and intelligence given to me earlier this year from the UK's world-leading counter-terrorism system, based on a robust assessment process, was that Palestine Action satisfies the relevant tests in the Terrorism Act 2000 and should be proscribed. Some may think it is just a regular protest group known for occasional stunts. But that is not the extent of its past activities. Nor does it reflect disturbing information given to me that covered ideas and planning for future attacks. Many of those important details cannot yet be publicly reported because of criminal proceedings. But if stunts were the only concern, its proscription would never have been considered in the first place, and it certainly wouldn't have become the unanimous recommendation to ministers from the cross-government security expert review group. Palestine Action has claimed responsibility for – and promoted on its website – attacks that have seen those allegedly involved subsequently charged with violent disorder, grievous bodily harm with intent, actual bodily harm, criminal damage and aggravated burglary. Charges that include, in the assessment of the independent Crown Prosecution Service, a terrorism connection. Many people will also know about the attack on RAF planes at Brize Norton, but fewer will have read about the Jewish-owned business in north London badly vandalised in the dead of night by masked men just three weeks before. Or the attack on a Glasgow factory that caused the sentencing sheriff to say: 'Throwing pyrotechnics into areas where people are being evacuated could hardly be described as non-violent.' 'For a home secretary to ignore all the security assessments, advice and recommendations on Palestine Action would be irresponsible' Or the 'underground manual' that encourages the creation of cells, provides practical guidance on how to identify targets to attack and how to evade law enforcement. These are not the actions of a legitimate protest group. For a home secretary to ignore all those security assessments, advice and recommendations would be irresponsible. Protecting public safety and national security are at the very heart of the job I do. Were there to be further serious attacks or injuries, the government would rightly be condemned for not acting sooner to keep people safe. Public protests on the Gaza crisis will continue through the summer, and the overwhelming majority of those involved do not and will not endorse violent and criminal tactics. That is why the proscription of this group is not about protest or the Palestinian cause. In a democracy, lawful protest is a fundamental right but violent criminality is not. Some of those holding placards in direct support of Palestine Action may not know the kind of organisation they have been promoting: its violence, intimidation, or future plans and aspirations. But that is all the more reason why no one should allow desperate calls for peace in the Middle East to be derailed into a campaign to support one narrow group involved in violence here in the UK. Because it is those calls for peace that should be the most urgent focus now. Each day the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsens, the conditions for hostages deteriorate, the prospects for peace are diminished, and the scenes of children being shot and starved get ever more horrific. An immediate ceasefire, release of the hostages and urgent humanitarian aid are vital. So too is the pathway the prime minister has set out to the recognition of a Palestinian state, now supported by Australia and Canada as well as France. Yvette Cooper is home secretary. Photograph by @FLO360aero

White House responds to report of Alaska summit papers left on public printer: ‘Hilarious'
White House responds to report of Alaska summit papers left on public printer: ‘Hilarious'

The Hill

time5 hours ago

  • The Hill

White House responds to report of Alaska summit papers left on public printer: ‘Hilarious'

The White House responded to an NPR report revealing that U.S. government papers about the President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin summit in Alaska were left on a public hotel printer, dismissing it as 'hilarious.' 'It's hilarious that NPR is publishing a multi-page lunch menu and calling it a 'security breach,'' White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said in a Saturday statement to The Hill's sister network, NewsNation. 'This type of self-proclaimed 'investigative journalism' is why no one takes them seriously and they are no longer taxpayer-funded thanks to President Trump.' NPR reported that the eight papers, which contained information about meetings and locations of the summit, along with phone numbers of three U.S. government workers, were found on a hotel printer before the Friday Trump-Putin meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson near Anchorage. The first page of the papers showed the sequence of meetings for Friday, including information that the president would give Putin a gift. Pages two through five showed the names of the top U.S. and Russian officials in Alaska on Friday. Page two showed the phone numbers of three U.S. advance staffers. Pages six and seven showcased the lunch seating chart and the menu. The planned lunch did not take place on Friday, but it would have included a three-course meal, including a salad, filet mignon and or halibut olympia, according to documents obtained by NPR. The documents appear to be produced by the Office of the Chief of Protocol, part of the State Department that seeks to 'advance the foreign policy goals of the United States by creating an environment for successful diplomacy. Our team extends the first hand that welcomes presidents, prime ministers, ruling monarchs, and other leaders to our country.'

Couple gets married in midst of wild anti-Israel protest in NYC: ‘Nothing can stop love'
Couple gets married in midst of wild anti-Israel protest in NYC: ‘Nothing can stop love'

New York Post

time6 hours ago

  • New York Post

Couple gets married in midst of wild anti-Israel protest in NYC: ‘Nothing can stop love'

A couple from Queens proved 'nothing can stop love' — not even a protest — as they wed amidst a raucous political demonstration in midtown Manhattan Saturday. Nicole and Richard Uraga, both 30, tied the knot at the main branch of the New York Public Library in Bryant Park, slipping into the iconic building just before over 700 anti-Israel protesters swarmed with signs, loud music and bombastic political chants. 'When we came out, the whole protest was going on and they were banging and screaming up.' Advertisement 'But nothing can stop love,' the dashing groom told The Post. Nicole and Richard Uraga, both 30, celebrated their wedding at the iconic New York Public Library as protesters raged. Marie Pohl The Uragas entered the building, said their 'I do's' and remerged outside as husband and wife into a dense and rowdy anti-Israel protest swarming the entrance of the library. Advertisement As the newlyweds took pictures near the steps celebrating their love, the angry crowd chanted 'From the River to the Sea' and banged pots, pans and metal bowls. But the shrill shrieks of the demonstrators could not disturb their newly minted marital bliss. 'We did not let the protest get in the way of our marriage,' Nicole said. Pro-Palestine rally and march through midtown Manhattan during the 'Stand with Gaza: Mass March for Humanity.' Michael Nigro Advertisement 'It's a day we've planned and we've hired a photographer and officiant and it's a day that means something to us, August 16. So we decided to keep going on with our ceremony,' she said. The couple have been together for over 11 years and saved this particular date four months in advance. Regarding the protest, mother of the bride Nancy Cando told The Post, 'I pray for peace.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store