logo
Who's a clever boy: the average dog has a mental age of about two. But what are they really thinking?

Who's a clever boy: the average dog has a mental age of about two. But what are they really thinking?

The Guardian26-04-2025

The thing that made me think my dog may be a genius was the word monkey. We'd developed a game where I'd hide her monkey toy – a sad, lifeless being, long lobotomised by my golden retriever puppy – and, when I asked her to find it, I realised she could differentiate the word monkey from other objects. A woman in the park had a similar story. On holiday in an unfamiliar cottage, she had misplaced the car keys. After hunting for them for over an hour, her dog, a border collie, overheard her and her husband talking about it, recognised the word 'keys' and immediately went and found them.
So maybe my dog, Rhubarb, isn't a genius after all. Dogs, says Vanessa Woods, director of the Puppy Kindergarten project at Duke University in North Carolina, US, and writer of several books including Puppy Kindergarten: The New Science of Raising a Great Dog, can know hundreds of words for objects. 'Over 1,000, probably,' she says. 'And actually it's more interesting than that, because they learn words the way children learn words, and that's not by repetition.' Psychology professor Juliane Kaminski showed back in 2004 that a dog called Rico (another border collie), could learn, as children do, by inference – he didn't need to know the name of a new toy, he could work it out by excluding the toys he did know the names of.
We share our homes (sometimes our beds) with them, but how much do we really know about what dogs think and feel? Whether chihuahua or husky, domestic dogs descended from wolves, but their behaviour, says Clive Wynne, psychology professor at Arizona State University and director of its Canine Science Collaboratory research lab, is 'substantially different. You can tame wolves, and they can be really affectionate. But taming wolves is quite challenging, whereas taming dogs is so easy that you hardly ever talk about 'taming' dogs.'
There are about 13 million dogs in the UK. In the US, there are about 90 million. 'Whereas there are only a few thousand wolves left [in the US],' says Wynne (in the UK, they're extinct). 'In a world that's totally dominated by human beings, living alongside human beings was a good choice. Dogs evolved capacities to find it easier to live with humans.' Some researchers think dogs have 'evolved special forms of cognition, what you could call special forms of intelligence, to make them better at understanding people,' but Wynne says he's sceptical about this idea. 'I take the view that [the higher capabilities] are almost entirely in the emotional domain.'
Dogs seem to be born with the ability to read human emotions, says Woods: 'Like in human babies, reading our thoughts and intentions seems to be one of the first cognitive skills that comes online in puppies.' The ability to read our body language, she says, is something 'that really not even our closest living relative, the great apes, have'.
Dogs are social animals, and are very tuned into the humans around them. 'They watch humans and they pick up cues from humans, because by being observant, they get an easy life,' says Daniel Mills, professor of veterinary behavioural medicine at the University of Lincoln. 'The more I study dog cognition, actually the less 'smart' I think dogs are. But they are incredibly observant, really fine-tuned, and so they tend to do very smart things because they're very good at making associations.'
If dogs are brilliant at reading humans, we are terrible at reading dogs. A recent study by Wynne and Holly Molinaro, his colleague at Arizona State University, showed that people interpreted a dog's emotions based on external situations, rather than 'reading' the behaviour of the dog itself. Researchers recorded videos of a dog in 'positive' and 'negative' scenarios, for example being offered a treat or being gently told off, and asked particpants to assess the dog's emotions. They then edited the videos to remove the external scenarios, showing just the dog's reaction. People who saw the edited videos assessed the dog's emotions differently to those who saw the dog's reaction in context. They even found that our own emotions affect how we read dogs – people who considered themselves happier before the test were more likely to rate the dog's emotion positively.
Charges of anthropomorphism have dogged canine researchers, including Stanley Coren, professor emeritus in the department of psychology at the University of British Columbia, and a dogfather of dog science. The prevailing idea that dogs have similar cognitive and emotional capabilities to a human toddler goes back to research Coren did in the 90s – but this bit of anthropomorphism is quite useful for our poor human brains to relate to.
Coren adapted tests used for human infants to research dogs' language-learning abilities. 'We found that the average dog has a mental age of between two and two-and-a-half years [in human terms],' he says, one of his dogs barking in the background. 'The super-dogs, the upper 20% in terms of intelligence, have a mental age of between two-and-a-half and three.' We can extrapolate this, he says, to other mental and emotional capabilities. 'If an average two-and-a-half-year-old is expected to have these abilities, then the first guess would be that a dog would have those abilities.'
Young children recognise when the number of objects they've been looking at changes; dogs do too. Coren says dogs can count up to five. Between the ages of one and three, a child will learn to respond to a pointing gesture. 'At about age two, the average child will know there's something interesting there, and will usually look in that direction.' Dogs will do the same. But, he says, 'wolves don't have that response, even if they've been reared with a human family'.
One area where dogs beat toddlers is memory. Think of how much you remember from when you were around two (probably nothing). 'However, dogs have a good memory and there are lots of examples,' says Coren. He recalls a colleague's dog that had previously been owned by the colleague's Czech father, who had taught the dog commands in his native language. The colleague inherited the dog when it was about 18 months old, and it lived with him and his English-speaking family. Around seven years later, when a relative from the Czech Republic visited, the dog still responded to commands in Czech.
In terms of emotions, Coren says that the average two-and-a-half-year-old human 'will have all of the basic emotions – fear, aggression, love, surprise and disgust, but complex social emotions like guilt don't show up until a child is about four'. Many dog owners will claim that they can instantly recognise their dog's 'guilty face' – and there are numerous pictures and videos online of dogs apparently looking remorseful – but this is anthropomorphism at work again, as a study by Alexandra Horowitz, an expert in canine cognition, has shown. 'Dogs don't feel guilt, and those expressions you see are really fear, because they know that when they see their owner and the evidence of their transgression, then bad things happen,' says Coren.
'What does it take to feel guilty?' asks Wynne. 'You have to know that there are rules in your society, and you need to know that you've broken the rules, and you need to know that you've been found out. That's layer upon layer upon layer, and dogs just don't have all of that. They can tell you're upset with them, but that's as far as it goes.'
So, do our dogs really love us, or just view us as a provider of resources? 'I think they do,' says Mills. 'They have an incredible loyalty to humans. But is it the same as the sort of love that the human shows them? No, I don't think so. I think it's probably a purer form.' Wynne says he doesn't use the word 'love' in his scientific research papers, but adds: 'I think that's a perfectly reasonable way to capture the nature of the bond between people and dogs – a nurturing, caring type of love.' Woods, who says '100% they love you', points to a 2015 study by Takefumi Kikusui, a professor of animal behaviour, and others at Azabu University in Japan. It showed that both dogs and their owners experienced a surge of oxytocin – the love and bonding hormone – when they gazed into each other's eyes. Some dogs, like some children, 'are more demonstrative than others,' says Woods. 'If a dog is not particularly tactile, they tend to make a lot of eye contact – they're 'hugging' you with their eyes.'
Why do they seem to like or dislike certain people, or other dogs? When Wynne introduced dogs at rehoming shelters to two women who looked similar and dressed alike, 'the dogs very rapidly developed strong preferences for one stranger over another, but we don't know why'. At my puppy training class, two dogs took an instant and mutual dislike to each other. 'Maybe it's learned associations,' says Mills. 'It's not uncommon that, as a puppy, they may have been bowled over by a labrador, so they don't now like big dogs.' It could be our fault – we misread their caution about a new experience as fear and jerked them back on the lead, thinking we were keeping them safe, 'so now they have a learned association between that type of dog or person and punishment'. There is also research, says Mills, around excluding group members who threaten the integrity of the pack. It may be that some dogs 'do not like certain other dogs because they don't want them to be part of their group'. Because they view them as undesirable in some way? 'Yes, or they think that they're a freeloader, or they think their group is very good at the moment and they're closely bonded, and they don't want somebody else potentially joining it.'
If my dog does love me as much as I love her, why then does she ignore me so often? Her absolute favourite thing to do is lull me into letting her off the lead in the park, then race off into the distance as soon as she spots another dog/squirrel/muddy puddle, with me running after her, shouting manically while she completely ignores me. Even when I ask her to do something at home, without distractions, she often deliberately ignores me. 'When you say 'deliberately', you've immediately interpreted her behaviour, and we do this effortlessly – that's part of the problem,' says Mills. 'We think we know what's going on in their heads and, actually, she's probably just interested in something else. She's not deliberately ignoring you, because that implies she's thinking about it and choosing an action. She's doing her own thing.'
Wondering what your dog is thinking about is probably futile. They can analyse situations, says Mills, but they aren't capable of abstract thought in the way we are. Rather than being able to plan ahead, 'they're capable of goal-directed behaviour, but again, it doesn't require complex thoughts – you just have to have, in your brain, some sort of model'.
What makes dogs happy? 'Being with you,' says Woods. 'I think the happiest dog is when they're spending quality time with their owners.' Wynne says he's always on the verge of writing a paper 'called 'What is a good life for a dog?', and I don't suppose for a moment that it's the same for every single dog.' Every dog he's ever known loved going for walks, but his new dog prefers to go for a ride in the car. 'Discover through experience what makes a good life for your dog.' Aside from the obvious things – food, water, shelter, security and veterinary care – Wynne says 'almost all dogs need strong emotional connections to the people they live with'. It's the reason he dislikes the term 'separation anxiety' because 'it makes it sound like the dog is wrong [to miss you]. It is not reasonable to leave dogs alone for six, eight, 14 hours a day.'
I write as Rhubarb, my 10-month-old golden retriever, is staring at me. Is she simply telling me she loves me, as Woods suggests, or is it because she thinks it's time to stop work and pay her some attention? I'll take it as the latter.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How AI could help stop the next pandemic before it starts
How AI could help stop the next pandemic before it starts

The Independent

time5 days ago

  • The Independent

How AI could help stop the next pandemic before it starts

Could artificial intelligence tools be used to stop the next pandemic before it starts? During the Covid pandemic, new technology developed by researchers at Johns Hopkins and Duke universities didn't exist. But, for the first time, researchers there say they've devised a revolutionary large language modeling tool - the type of generative AI used in ChatGP - to help predict the spread of any infectious disease, such as bird flu, monkeypox, and RSV. That could help save lives and reduce infections. 'Covid-19 elucidated the challenge of predicting disease spread due to the interplay of complex factors that were constantly changing,' Johns Hopkins' Lauren Gardner, a modeling expert who created the Covid dashboard that was relied upon by people worldwide during the pandemic, said in a statement. 'When conditions were stable the models were fine. However, when new variants emerged or policies changed, we were terrible at predicting the outcomes because we didn't have the modeling capabilities to include critical types of information,' she added. 'The new tool fills this gap.' Gardner was one of the authors of the study published Thursday in the Nature Computational Science journal. The tool, named PandemicLLM, considers recent infection spikes, new variants, and stringent protective measures. The researchers utilized data that had never been used before in pandemic prediction tools, finding that PandemicLLM could accurately predict disease patterns and hospitalization trends one to three weeks out. The data included rates of cases hospitalizations and vaccines, types of government policies, characteristics of disease variants and their prevalence, and state-level demographics. The model incorporates these elements to predict how they will come together and affect how disease behaves. They retroactively applied PandemicLLM to the Covid pandemic, looking at each state over the course of 19 months. The authors said the tool was particularly successful when the outbreak was in flux. It also outperformed existing state-of-the-art forecasting methods, including the highest performing ones on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's CovidHub. 'Traditionally we use the past to predict the future,' author Hao 'Frank' Yang, a Johns Hopkins assistant professor of civil and systems engineering, said. 'But that doesn't give the model sufficient information to understand and predict what's happening. Instead, this framework uses new types of real-time information.' Going forward, they are looking at how large language models can replicate the ways individuals make decisions about their health. They hope that such a model would help officials to design safer and more effective policies. More than a million Americans have died from Covid. It's not a matter of if there will be a next pandemic, but when. Right now, the U.S. is dealing with the spread of H5N1 bird flu, RSV, HMPV, pertussis, and measles, among other health concerns. Vaccination rates for measles have plunged since the pandemic, and general vaccine hesitancy has increased. That has resulted in fears that the nation could see decades of health progress reversed. Furthermore, U.S. health officials have acted to separate from global efforts to respond to pandemics, withdrawing from the World Health Organization earlier this year. Last month, they limited access to Covid vaccines for certain groups. 'We know from Covid-19 that we need better tools so that we can inform more effective policies,' Gardner said. 'There will be another pandemic, and these types of frameworks will be crucial for supporting public health response.'

Devastating blow in race for vaccine against deadly disease that affects millions
Devastating blow in race for vaccine against deadly disease that affects millions

Daily Mail​

time31-05-2025

  • Daily Mail​

Devastating blow in race for vaccine against deadly disease that affects millions

A major US research program to develop a vaccine against HIV has been abruptly canceled by the Trump administration, sparking outrage as infections rise and global prevention efforts stall. The administration's termination of the promising $258million research program stunned scientists, whose years-long project had also benefited the development of treatments for COVID-19, autoimmune conditions, and even snakebite antivenom. Researchers at Duke University and the Scripps Research Institute were informed on Friday that their funding would be cut. 'The consortia for HIV/AIDS vaccine development and immunology was reviewed by NIH leadership, which does not support it moving forward,' a senior official, who asked not to be named, told the New York Times. 'NIH expects to be shifting its focus toward using currently available approaches to eliminate HIV/AIDS.' 'I find it very disappointing that, at this critical juncture, the funding for highly successful HIV vaccine research programs should be pulled,' Dennis Burton, an immunologist who led the program at Scripps, told the New York Times. For decades, the United States has led the world in HIV research, pouring billions into cutting-edge science that turned a once-fatal virus into a manageable condition for millions. American labs were the first to crack the genetic code of HIV, to develop life-saving antiretroviral drugs, and to pioneer global initiatives like PEPFAR that saved more than 25 million lives worldwide. The now-axed vaccine program was another shining example of US scientific leadership, bringing together top researchers from coast to coast and pushing the boundaries of immunology. The cancellation is part of a broader rollback of federal HIV efforts. The NIH has also paused funding for a separate clinical trial of an HIV vaccine developed by Moderna. HIV rates remain high. In 2023 alone, the World Health Organization reported 1.3 million new infections, including 120,000 children. More than 32,000 people in the US contracted the virus last year and there was another 4,000 new cases in the UK. 'This is just inconceivable,' Mitchell Warren, executive director of the HIV prevention organization AVAC, told the New York Times. In some parts of the US, the effects are already being felt. In Texas, the state's Department of Health Services told grantees to pause HIV prevention activities 'until further notice.' In Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, 10 health department staffers have been laid off. Across Africa, several countries are reporting major disruptions in prevention work after delays in US aid. 'The HIV pandemic will never be ended without a vaccine, so killing research on one will end up killing people,' John Moore, an HIV researcher at Weill Cornell Medical College, said. 'The NIH's multiyear investment in advanced vaccine technologies shouldn't be abandoned on a whim like this.' Trial after trial has failed to produce a traditional HIV vaccine, but the Duke and Scripps teams had been taking a new approach: studying broadly neutralizing antibodies shown in animals to protect against multiple strains of the virus. That promising pipeline may now run dry. 'Almost everything in the field is hinged on work that those two programs are doing,' said Warren. 'The pipeline just got clogged.' During his first term, President Trump had supported efforts to curb the HIV epidemic. But in his second term, his administration has slashed prevention efforts, terminated several PrEP-related grants, and shut down the HIV prevention division at the CDC. While officials say the work may be transferred to a yet-to-be-formed federal agency, no details have been shared.

An experimental painkiller could be the key to solving the opioid epidemic
An experimental painkiller could be the key to solving the opioid epidemic

The Independent

time19-05-2025

  • The Independent

An experimental painkiller could be the key to solving the opioid epidemic

An experimental drug developed by researchers at Duke University could be a key component in solving the nation's opioid epidemic. Known as 'SBI-810,' the drug avoids the 'high' that is tied to addiction to the pain-relieving drugs. The need for such a breakthrough is great, even as U.S. overdose deaths decline. Recent data showed they fell by 30,000 last year, but more than 80,000 people still died from the drugs. Drug overdose deaths have been increasing in the U.S. since the 1990s, mostly due to the use of opioids. 'What makes this compound exciting is that it is both analgesic and non-opioid,' Dr. Ru-Rong Ji, an anesthesiology and neurobiology researcher who directs the Duke Anesthesiology Center for Translational Pain Medicine, said in a statement. Well-known drugs like Advil and Tylenol are analgesic drugs, which are also known as painkillers. Ji was the senior author of the related Department of Defense- and National Institutes of Health-funded research, which was published on Monday in the journal Cell. Duke said the drug has undergone trials in mice, working well on its own. When used in combination with opioids, it made them more effective at lower doses, the authors said. Opioids increase levels of dopamine in the brain, which is often referred to as the 'happy hormone.' In turn, that dopamine and opioids work together to generate the high. But, over time, the body needs higher doses to feel the same effect. Like opioids, SBI-810 works on the nervous system to relieve pain. The experimental compound is designed to target a receptor – the brain receptor neurotensin receptor 1 – found on the spinal cord and nerve cells that function to transmit information to the central nervous system. The difference between opioids and SBI-810 is that Duke's drug takes a more focused approach than opioids. Instead of flooding multiple cellular pathways at the same time, the researcher noted, it activates only one specific pain-relief pathway that avoids that euphoric high. Furthermore, the researchers say it can prevent the common side effects that often force patients to need stronger and more frequent doses of opioids, including constipation and tolerance. It also outperformed the nerve pain drug gabapentin, and didn't cause sedation or memory problems often reported with that drug. Gabapentin is the seventh most commonly prescribed medication nationally. The authors have compared SBI-810 to oliceridine, a newer type of opioid used in hospitals. However, they found that SBI-810 worked better in some situations. It also effectively relieved pain from surgical incisions, bone fractures, and nerve injuries better than some existing painkillers, reducing signs of discomfort on a mouse's face. They hope to do human trials soon and have locked in multiple patients. Although the drug is still in early development, the authors said it could be a safer option for treating both short-term and chronic pain for those recovering from surgery or living with diabetic nerve pain. More than a third of Americans are living with chronic pain. 'The receptor is expressed on sensory neurons and the brain and spinal cord,' Ji added. 'It's a promising target for treating acute and chronic pain.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store