1973 Chrysler crash sparks viral debate over car safety evolution
The Michigan-based owner shared that the vintage vehicle sustained minimal damage after being rear-ended by a modern car—drawing viral attention to the collision and prompting thousands to weigh in on whether older or newer vehicles are safer.
Many classic car enthusiasts praised the Chrysler's heavy steel frame, calling it a testament to the durability of older models.
My very boomer like opinion is cars simply were built better back then. https://t.co/ERa1L6Pv0b — 💀DeathMetalViking💀 (@DeathMetalV) July 17, 2025
However, automotive safety experts pushed back, pointing out that modern vehicles are designed to crumple on impact. These crumple zones absorb collision energy, reducing the force transmitted to occupants—ultimately saving lives even if the vehicle appears more damaged.
The amount of people who think this is a good sign is concerning. Y'all realize its the driver who absorbs the crash if the car doesn't😭 https://t.co/JW385eNwoj — kira 👾 (@kirawontmiss) July 17, 2025
One of the biggest midwit litmus tests for people is whether they understand that a car not taking visible damage in a crash is actually a bad thing https://t.co/0ZYxewfmtG — Rock solid (@ShitpostRock) July 17, 2025
Critics of the older vehicle noted the lack of key safety features like airbags, anti-lock brakes, and reinforced cabin structures. While the 1973 Chrysler may have fared well externally, experts emphasized that passenger safety in high-speed collisions would likely be much lower compared to today's standards.
The incident underscores the evolution in automotive engineering, which has shifted from preserving the car itself to prioritizing passenger protection. As viral discussions continue, safety professionals urge the public to understand that vehicle damage does not equate to poor performance—modern cars are designed to protect what matters most: the people inside.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
1973 Chrysler crash sparks viral debate over car safety evolution
A recent crash involving a 1973 Chrysler New Yorker has ignited an online debate over car safety standards then and now. The Michigan-based owner shared that the vintage vehicle sustained minimal damage after being rear-ended by a modern car—drawing viral attention to the collision and prompting thousands to weigh in on whether older or newer vehicles are safer. Many classic car enthusiasts praised the Chrysler's heavy steel frame, calling it a testament to the durability of older models. My very boomer like opinion is cars simply were built better back then. — 💀DeathMetalViking💀 (@DeathMetalV) July 17, 2025 However, automotive safety experts pushed back, pointing out that modern vehicles are designed to crumple on impact. These crumple zones absorb collision energy, reducing the force transmitted to occupants—ultimately saving lives even if the vehicle appears more damaged. The amount of people who think this is a good sign is concerning. Y'all realize its the driver who absorbs the crash if the car doesn't😭 — kira 👾 (@kirawontmiss) July 17, 2025 One of the biggest midwit litmus tests for people is whether they understand that a car not taking visible damage in a crash is actually a bad thing — Rock solid (@ShitpostRock) July 17, 2025 Critics of the older vehicle noted the lack of key safety features like airbags, anti-lock brakes, and reinforced cabin structures. While the 1973 Chrysler may have fared well externally, experts emphasized that passenger safety in high-speed collisions would likely be much lower compared to today's standards. The incident underscores the evolution in automotive engineering, which has shifted from preserving the car itself to prioritizing passenger protection. As viral discussions continue, safety professionals urge the public to understand that vehicle damage does not equate to poor performance—modern cars are designed to protect what matters most: the people inside.
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
Volvo Cars Q2 operating profit falls as tariffs bite
STOCKHOLM: Sweden-based Volvo Cars reported a steep fall in second-quarter adjusted operating profit on Thursday and said demand remain under pressure as tariffs hits. Its quarterly operating profit excluding items affecting comparability fell to 2.9 billion Swedish crowns ($297.89 million) from 8.0 billion a year ago.
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Nvidia to resume 'H20' AI chips sales to China
Nvidia logo is seen in this illustration taken, January 27, 2025. Photo: Reuters/ File US tech giant Nvidia announced Tuesday it will resume sales of its H20 artificial intelligence chips to China after Washington pledged to remove licensing restrictions that had halted exports. The California-based company produces some of the world's most advanced semiconductors but cannot ship its most cutting-edge chips to China due to concerns that Beijing could use them to enhance military capabilities. Nvidia developed the H20 — a less powerful version of its AI processing units — specifically for export to China. However, that plan stalled when the Trump administration tightened export licensing requirements in April. "The US government has assured Nvidia that licenses will be granted, and Nvidia hopes to start deliveries soon," the company said in a statement Tuesday, adding it was "filing applications to sell the Nvidia H20 GPU again." CEO Jensen Huang, wearing his trademark black leather jacket, told reporters in a video published by Chinese state broadcaster CCTV: "I'm looking forward to shipping H20s very soon, and so I'm very happy with that very, very good news." Defending the policy change, Trump's AI Czar David Sacks told CNBC the H20 was a "deprecated chip" that is "not anywhere close to the state of the art."
