logo
‘We're not going to ease off': NRL accepts calls have been 'frustrating' for fans, but warns tough stance won't change for Magic Round

‘We're not going to ease off': NRL accepts calls have been 'frustrating' for fans, but warns tough stance won't change for Magic Round

West Australian28-04-2025
The NRL's head of football has warned players and fans that officials won't back down from the league's strict head high contact policy during Magic Round.
But Graham Annesley did concede the bunker should only be getting involved for more serious incidents after outrage over several incidents during last round.
High contact has been debated everywhere you look over the past few days after
18 players were sent to the sin bin
in round eight, with some players fined or suspended, while others weren't even charged.
Most fans can live with penalties or players being put on report after the fact for high contact, but there's been a growing frustration around the bunker getting involved a set later to stop play and ask the referee to sin bin a player for contact that didn't seem overly forceful.
'From our perspective, there hasn't been a crackdown,' Annesley told NewsWire, reminding fans of four missed sin bins in round four that led to the NRL sending out a memo to clubs about high contact.
'About a month ago, there were a number of fairly obvious sin bins that didn't happen. We had to remind referees and clubs of what the expected standard was for tackles of that type under existing policy that's been in place for the past three years.
'There was no new policy, there was no new directive. It was just that there were a number of misses that should have been acted upon, and we didn't want it to be seen that it was the new standard.
'We've reviewed all of the high tackles from the weekend, and it's fair to say that most of them should have been sent to the sin bin, but maybe a couple shouldn't have been. Then there were a couple that maybe should have been that weren't.
'It was an unusual weekend with the high number of incidents that the match officials had to deal with, but I'm not walking away from the fact that we have to be better at getting the right outcome for these incidents when they take place.'
While most fans would agree that shoulder charges to the head deserve harsh penalties, it's equally hard to accept when a player is sent to the sin bin for minimal contact that happened two minutes earlier.
Annesley explained that on-field officials may miss foul play and that there's always someone in the bunker going back to review potential high contact.
'We understand that it's frustrating for fans and players to see the game stopped for a prior incident, and then a player gets sent to the sin bin,' he said.
'These incidents where the bunker intervenes for something that happened a number of tackles previously, we understand that it's disruptive to the flow of the game and it's frustrating. We get that.
'But by the same token, we have to make sure that we are always protecting players wherever possible.
'When we go back to a previous play, we have to make sure that we're only doing it for the most serious of incidents.
'If there's no question that a player should not remain on the field after a tackle that's been missed by the match officials, then that player deserves to go to the sin bin.
'But if we get any marginal incidents where the player could be placed on report for the incident rather than stopping the game, then we need to be better at that.'
Annesley had a simple message to players that referees have nothing to rule on if they don't hit rivals in the head, with the NRL concerned about a sharp rise in foul play this year.
'We're the first to acknowledge that there have been some inconsistencies with how some of these matters have been dealt with,' he said.
'The large majority have been justifiable because we've actually seen a pretty significant increase in high tackles this year.
'We've seen a 90 per cent increase in the number of high tackles being reviewed by the match review committee, we've seen a 95 per cent increase in the number of charges for head high tackles and a 71 per cent increase for high tackles.
'It is a concern for us that we're seeing an increase in this type of tackle, and a disturbing number of shoulder to the head types of tackles which can be quite serious.
'We're not backing away from our existing and past policy of contact with the head and neck.
'However, we do need to ensure that we have all our match officials on the same page.'
It's why the NRL won't be altering its stance for Magic Round, with fans worried that we could see a repeat of the mass sin bins and send offs from four years ago.
'Our position on contact with the head and neck hasn't changed. It hasn't changed this year, and it hasn't changed for the past three years.' Annesley warned.
'I don't know why, but we have seen a dramatic increase in the number of high tackles this year.
'We're not going to ease off on players going to the sin bin when they deserve to go to the sin bin because it's our responsibility to try to make sure that it's a deterrent for players to not make contact with the head and neck.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lehrmann returns to court to clear name
Lehrmann returns to court to clear name

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

Lehrmann returns to court to clear name

FOR 6AM Bruce Lehrmann will return to a Sydney court on Thursday as his lawyer attempts to argue that he was 'surprised' by the findings made against him in his damaging defamation suit loss to Network 10 and Lisa Wilkinson. Lehrmann has appealed to the Full Court of the Federal Court following his multimillion dollar loss to Ten and Ms Wilkinson last year. Justice Michael Lee found that Lehrmann – on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities – had raped his colleague Brittany Higgins inside Parliament House in 2019. Lehrmann sued over Ms Wilkinson's interview with Ms Higgins on The Project but Justice Lee made damning findings against him and he was subsequently ordered to pay $2m in Ten's legal costs. The former Liberal staffer has now appealed Justice Lee's decision and is being represented by solicitor Zali Burrows at a three-day hearing. Ten is being represented by Dr Matt Collins SC while barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC is appearing for Ms Wilkinson. Bruce Lehrmann leaves the Federal Court on Wednesday. NewsWire / Nikki Short. Credit: News Corp Australia 'Denial of natural justice' Ms Burrows told the court on Wednesday that Lehrmann was the victim of procedural unfairness because the findings of Justice Lee were different to the case put forward at trial. 'It's a really, serious unfair denial of natural justice if Mr Lehrmann goes through a trial where it's said 'you are accused of A, B, D, E to Ms Higgins, this is the way it happened. And the judge finds 'well I don't find any of those A, B, C, D, E',' Ms Burrows said. However Justice Michael Wigney replied: 'That's not what happened. He did a find … it was A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I … A number of the matters alleged and particularised were found.' Ms Burrows further argued that it was pleaded by Ten and Wilkinson as a 'violent rape' but Justice Lee found it was a 'non-violent rape'. Justice Craig Colvin replied: 'I'm not sure he found a non-violent rape and I'm not sure that's a concept that I understand.' Ms Burrows told the court that Lehrmann was 'taken by surprise' that Justice Lee made findings that differed from Ms Higgins' account and 'he came up with a different version, a softer version.' Bruce Lehrmann was branded Australia's most hated man by his solicitor. NewsWire / John Appleyard Credit: News Corp Australia 'Australia's most hated man' In his judgment, Justice Lee found that Lehrmann could have only been awarded $20,000 had he won the trial. However Ms Burrows said he should be awarded a substantial amount if he had the findings overturned on appeal. She has pointed to media coverage of the trial, 'social media insults he gets' and other 'harassment'. 'He's pretty much become the national joke,' Ms Burrows said. 'As I previously submitted to this court, he's probably Australia's most hated man.' Barrister Sue Chrysanthou and Lisa Wilkinson. NewsWire/Simon Bullard. Credit: News Corp Australia Ten attack's Lehrmann's 'astonishing' claim Dr Collins on Wednesday attacked Lehrmann's argument that he might have given different evidence had he known the findings that Justice Lee was going to make. At trial, Lehrmann told the court that he had no sexual contact with Ms Higgins at Parliament House. Ms Burrows told the court on Wednesday that he was the victim of procedural fairness and was surprised by Justice Lee's findings. But Dr Collins attacked that argument as 'astonishing' given that he has persistently claimed that he did not have sex with Ms Higgins. 'Our learned friend said today at the bar table that well the unfairness resides in the fact they might have called further evidence, although she backed away from that when questioned about that evidence might have been,' Dr Collins said. 'There were only two people in the room. 'But she said Mr Lehrmann's evidence might have been different. 'That's, with respect, an astonishing submission. 'It could only be that had the pleading alleged a sexual assault in which consent was in question, he would have conceded having sexual intercourse with her and argued that he had her consent or thought he had her consent.'

Judgment day for Brittany Higgins
Judgment day for Brittany Higgins

Perth Now

time10 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Judgment day for Brittany Higgins

A judgment in the long running defamation suit launched by former senator Linda Reynolds against her former junior staffer Brittany Higgins will be handed down next week. Justice Paul Tottle will deliver his verdict in the defamation case against Ms Higgins and her husband David Sharaz in the WA Supreme Court next Wednesday. Ms Reynolds sued the pair over a series of social media posts they made in 2022 and 2023, claiming they damaged her reputation. Ms Higgins relied on the truth defence claiming the social media posts were substantially true during the defamation proceedings. A verdict in former senator Linda Reynolds' defamation case against Brittany Higgins and David Sharaz will be handed down in the WA Supreme Court on August 27. NewsWire / Sharon Smith Credit: News Corp Australia Former senator Linda Reynolds brought the defamation proceedings after social media posts made by Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz. NewsWire / Sharon Smith Credit: News Corp Australia The posts were critical of Ms Reynolds' handling of Ms Higgins' allegation she was raped in the senator's office at Parliament House in 2019 by her then-colleague Bruce Lehrmann. He was charged with rape and faced trial in 2022, but the trial was aborted due to juror misconduct. The charge was dropped and Mr Lehrmann continues to maintain his innocence. Mr Lehrmann lost a subsequent civil defamation case in April last year when the Federal Court determined, on the balance of probabilities, that Mr Lehrmann had raped Ms Higgins at Parliament House. He is appealing the decision. Private text messages and emails between federal ministers, senators, staffers, press gallery journalists and lawyers were laid bare during the five-week blockbuster trial last year. Ms Higgins' defence team called for the action to be dismissed entirely at the end of the high-stakes legal battle. Brittany Higgins and David Sharaz sold the French chateau they called home to pay for legal fees. Credit: Supplied Ms Reynolds, who has retired from politics, mortgaged her home in a bid to clear her name. Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz sold their French home to pay for legal fees, as she maintained her version of events about what happened to her at Parliament House. It was revealed Ms Reynolds was seeking more than half a million dollars in damages. Her lawyer Martin Bennett asked the court to 'nail the lies' Ms Higgins allegedly perpetuated after making her rape allegation public in 2021. The court was told Ms Higgins 'grossly defamed' her former boss in social media posts shared years later. Ms Higgins' defence lawyer Rachael Young said it was a series of events in 2021 that led to the then-Senator Reynolds' distress and reputational damage, not social media posts created by her client two years later. Ms Young argued Ms Reynolds' decline was caused by backlash from her referring to Ms Higgins as a 'lying cow', a senate grilling over the allegations, her hospitalisation, losing the defence ministry and missing out on a shadow ministry under Peter Dutton. Ms Higgins' defence lawyer Rachael Young argued it was a series of events in 2021 that led to Ms Reynolds distress and reputational damage, not social media posts created by her client two years later. NewsWire / Sharon Smith Credit: News Corp Australia She said the former senator tried to besmirch the people she blamed for her political demise, namely Ms Higgins, who continued to face the heaviest burden in all this. Two dozen witnesses were called to give evidence including former prime minister Scott Morrison. A who's who of the nation's parliament, media and legal circles were dragged into the proceedings as diary entries, minutes and communications between senators, staffers, journalists, police officers and lawyers were exposed in court. The trial centred around what happened in the aftermath of Ms Higgins speaking out about her alleged rape in a article and The Project interview that were published on February 15, 2021, two years after the alleged incident. Ms Reynolds' lawyer Martin Bennett argued in court statements that Ms Higgins made in those media interviews and in her personal injury claim were wrong and that she had lied. Former senator Linda Reynolds lawyer Martin Bennett argued every fairytale needs a villain. NewsWire / Sharon Smith Credit: News Corp Australia He said his client had been cast as a villain in Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz's fictional story that alleged Ms Reynolds had tried to cover-up a rape. 'Every fairytale needs a villain, and in 2020 or 2021, Ms Higgins and her then-partner and now-husband, Mr Sharaz, cast Ms Reynolds in that role for their fictional story of a cover-up of the rape,' Mr Bennett told the WA Supreme Court. 'The fact she had been raped was traumatic and terrible but it needed something more to attract the attention, to attract media interest, to attract the promotion of Ms Higgins, so she made it a political sex scandal.' Ms Young argued the matter was not, and never had been, a 'fairytale' for her client saying the comments were misplaced, harassing and retraumitising. Ms Young told the court Ms Reynolds had picked the 'wrong target' for the hurt and distress and that her reputation was already 'baked in' when her client posted to social media in the years that followed.

Iszac Fa'asuamaleaui departs battling Titans for UK Super League club Catalans Dragons
Iszac Fa'asuamaleaui departs battling Titans for UK Super League club Catalans Dragons

7NEWS

time12 hours ago

  • 7NEWS

Iszac Fa'asuamaleaui departs battling Titans for UK Super League club Catalans Dragons

Tino Fa'asuamaleaui no longer has family ties to Gold Coast, with his younger brother Iszac leaving the struggling Titans for UK Super League club Catalans Dragons. It comes as Brisbane signed North Queensland's back-up halfback Tom Duffy for 2026. Prop Iszac has signed a two-year deal with the France-based club, which has also recently lured unwanted Bulldog Toby Sexton and Wests Tigers centre Solomona Faataape. Captain Tino started his NRL career in Melbourne, but Iszac came through the Titans development pathways and has played 25 matches over three seasons, including 11 off the bench this season. The 23-year-old told the Catalans club website he was looking forward to improving his game under their new coach, former England international Joel Tomkins. 'It's a great opportunity for me to improve my game, gain experience, and be a part of what Joel Tomkins is building within the playing group,' Iszac said. 'I'm also looking forward to living in such a beautiful part of the world in the south of France and experiencing it all with my family.' The elder Fa'asuamaleaui, who has notched 108 NRL games, 15 State of Origin caps with Queensland and has played six matches for the Kangaroos, is set to test the open market. He has a 10-year deal at the last-placed Titans until 2033 but has get-out clauses, the first at the end of next season. The superstar lock is believed to be in the sights of NRL newcomers the Perth Bears, Canterbury and St George Illawarra. The 25-year-old has also been linked back to competition heavyweights Melbourne after tasting premiership success with the Storm in 2020. Duffy will join the Broncos next season after falling down the pecking order in his rookie season at the underachieving Cowboys. The Cowboys' decision to re-sign fellow playmaker Jake Clifford spelt bad news for Duffy last month, with the 22-year-old Townsville product inking a one-year deal at the Broncos. Duffy has played six NRL games to date and is set to join Ben Hunt in providing depth behind first-choice playmakers Adam Reynolds and Ezra Mam. 'I think there's probably not a better club to go to at the moment as a half if you want to develop your game,' Duffy said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store