logo
Adams' $115B ‘Best Budget Ever' is chocked full of freebies fit for an election year — but critics say it doesn't prepare NYC for the worst

Adams' $115B ‘Best Budget Ever' is chocked full of freebies fit for an election year — but critics say it doesn't prepare NYC for the worst

Yahoo02-05-2025

The 'Best Budget Ever' may not prepare for the worst.
Mayor Eric Adams served up a $115 billion election year spending plan Thursday that's stuffed with voter-pleasing goodies, but that was still slammed by critics for squirreling away relatively little for a rainy day.
Hizzoner, who faces an uphill re-election battle, unveiled his 2026 executive budget during a campaign-like event from his alma mater Bayside High School in Queens, rather than City Hall, from which such announcements have traditionally been done.
'This is not a budget that favors the few. It is budget for all of you,' Adams said, while flanked by students. 'In fact, it is no exaggeration to say that our fiscal Year 2026 executive budget is the best budget ever.'
The budget lavishes $1.4 billion on programs and services that had faced cuts — such as libraries, early child education and the City University of New York.
It also launches a universal after-school program and increases education funding by $376 million.
The spending plan is the largest Adams has proposed since taking office in 2022, with last year's executive budget proposal coming in at $111.6 billion.
'Welcome to the election year!' said veteran campaign strategist Hank Sheinkopf, adding that incumbent mayors usually throw caution to the wind when seeking a second term.
'An election year means living in the moment. Tomorrow, next year is a long time away,' Sheinkopf told The Post. 'It's 'spend whatever we can now.' It's like a bank robbery.'
Critics quickly pounced on Adams seemingly failing to plan for the possibility of tough economic times in the near future, from President Trump's tariffs, a widely anticipated upcoming recession and potential federal funding cuts.
'Despite being flush with cash, Mayor Eric Adams' Fiscal Year 2026 Executive Budget fails to address the dual threats of looming federal budget cuts and a possible recession,' said Andrew Rein, president of the nonpartisan fiscal watchdog group Citizens Budget Commission.
'Instead of wisely adding $1 billion in next year's General Reserve to soften the first blows of federal cuts and $2 billion to the Rainy Day Fund, the budget increases spending to an unaffordable level.'
Rein said the city should have between $8 and $10 billion in reserves for potential choppy economic waters — a sum that city budget Director Jacques Jiha agreed would be needed, if the Big Apple were in a 'doomsday' scenario.
'We're not looking at doomsday, we're looking at a slowdown in the economy,' he said.
'We believe we have adequate reserves.'
Adams' preliminary budget, released in January, was blasted by opponents, including in the progressive City Council, for needlessly cutting services.
But his administration maintained those slashes were necessary due to skyrocketing costs from the migrant crisis — which Jiha said has now cost the city more than $7 billion.
The mayor had begged Albany lawmakers in February for $1.1 billion to deal with the migrant crisis, contending then that the city needed it in 12 weeks.
City Hall officials offered nary a peep about the ask since then — and the supposed shortfall apparently has been covered by savings, with Jiha saying only 'Money is fungible' as an explanation.
The budget announced Thursday is Adams' first since the crisis largely subsided, and includes these spending increases and reversed cuts:
$15.7 million for libraries
$96 million restoring CUNY savings
$298 million for school nurses
An overall near-$18 million increase to the parks budget
$92 million in annual funding for citywide 3-K
$20 million for new universal after-school programs
A $3 billion contribution for the MTA's capital plan
'Adams is using this budget to promote his re-election. He doesn't want to have much of a fight with the council,' said Nicole Gelinas, senior fellow at the conservative think tank the Manhattan Institute.
'It's pre-emptive capitulation to the council,' she added, noting Adams was proposing $1.7 billion more in spending compared to his preliminary budget.
'Adams is blowing out the agency spending,' Gelinas said. '[He] is squandering the last of his budget credibility.'
Not all programs and departments saw a funding increase. The following budget cuts were included in the plan:
$308 million for NYPD
$111 million for FDNY
$1.57 billion for Department of Social Services
$1.19 billion for Health + Hospitals
$840 million for Department of Homeless Services
$801 million for Administration for Children's Services
Talks with City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, who is not related to Hizzoner and is running for the Democratic mayoral nomination, will continue until the June 30 deadline to pass the budget.
Adams' plan offered plenty of fodder from candidates hoping to boot him from Gracie Mansion, such as City Comptroller Brad Lander — who claimed the mayor was 'failing to protect New Yorkers' by not putting more cash in reserves.
Former city comptroller and current mayoral candidate Scott Stringer also blasted Adams for failing to prepare for a potential 'extraordinary loss of funding for New York City.'
Adrienne Adams offered less gloom and doom — though she still cautioned against getting too comfortable.
'I think that the budget right now is good, but we can never be too certain about what is coming around the corner with this Trump administration,' she said.
Adams, who boasted of confronting then-President Joe Biden for migrant funding, hasn't been nearly as vocal about his growing ally Trump.
He said he hasn't been in contact with the White House, even as he acknowledged that the current global climate was creating 'uncharted waters.'
Adams' top deputy, however, was quick to put a positive spin on the potential financial woes.
'We are best positioned to address with Washington those issues going forward,' said First Deputy Mayor Randy Mastro. 'Even asking a question about a doomsday scenario is to be with those pessimistic and political opportunists who don't bet on New York, who are saying, 'The sky is falling.'
'The sky isn't falling.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fighting for the Orthodox vote
Fighting for the Orthodox vote

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

Fighting for the Orthodox vote

Presented by With help from Cris Seda Chabrier Some of New York City's most influential Orthodox Jewish leaders are flexing their political might in this month's mayoral primary — while also being courted as general election powerbrokers. Andrew Cuomo was endorsed this week by Hasidic leaders in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, including both sides of the Satmar community. City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams was their second pick. Adams was endorsed Monday by more than two dozen Hasidic groups in Borough Park, Brooklyn — with Zellnor Myrie their nod for No. 2 on the June 24 ballot. Adams additionally received Orthodox tenant leaders' support Tuesday. In the primary, the Orthodox vote appears to be largely splitting between Adams and Cuomo, though the latter has a distinct advantage. The former governor was endorsed last week by Bobov sect leaders in Borough Park and Orthodox leaders in Crown Heights, Flatbush and Far Rockaway. But in the general election, Mayor Eric Adams will weigh very, very heavily into the equation, POLITICO reports. The incumbent isn't a primary candidate but plans to run in November on two independent ballot lines — one of which is EndAntiSemitism, meant to emphasize his support for Jews. Eric Adams has already been competing with Cuomo in shaping perceptions over who more fiercely defends Israel and condemns antisemitism. The scope of their clash depends on whether Cuomo wins the Dem nomination — he is also poised to run as an independent — but the mayor and former governor both have long been allies of Orthodox New Yorkers. Take Satmar Rabbi Moishe Indig as an example. He backed Adams in 2021 and works closely with the mayor, appearing publicly with him as recently as late May for a town hall on public safety in Jewish communities. 'In November, you'll see … with God's help,' he said Sunday at an event on antisemitism featuring Adams and TV host Dr. Phil, as the Forward's Jacob Kornbluh noted. 'We will come out and show our great support for our great mayor and brother, Eric Adams.' But after endorsing Cuomo on Tuesday, Indig told Playbook, 'I don't know what's going to happen in November.' The work of trying to steer Hasidic leaders away from Cuomo and toward Adams is well underway both behind the scenes — as the New York Times reported — and from the bully pulpit. The mayor accused Cuomo point-blank Tuesday of over-inflating his support among Orthodox Jews. 'He'll go and identify one or two people in the community and say, 'I have the community,'' Adams told reporters at an unrelated event. 'He has what, three or four people who endorsed him in Crown Heights?' Cuomo campaign spokesperson Rich Azzopardi rebutted that characterization: 'Governor Cuomo's relationship with the Jewish community is deep, strong and stretches back decades,' he said. 'We're not surprised the mayor is trying to play games behind the scenes.' — Emily Ngo, Jeff Coltin, Joe Anuta and Cris Seda Chabrier HAPPY WEDNESDAY: Got news? Send it our way: Jeff Coltin, Emily Ngo and Nick Reisman. WHERE'S KATHY? In Albany and Washington D.C. with no public schedule. WHERE'S ERIC? Public schedule unavailable as of 10 p.m. Tuesday. QUOTE OF THE DAY: 'Great decisions are made on the golf course. … There's an informal connection when you are on the golf course. … A lot of great deals have been made on the golf course.' — Eric Adams, on two top appointees meeting with Trump at his New Jersey golf course — and securing a promise he wouldn't send in the military or National Guard for anti-ICE protests as long as the NYPD keeps demonstrators in line, the New York Post reports. ABOVE THE FOLD DEMS' LA CHALLENGE: New York Democrats are grappling with their responses to the rapidly evolving Los Angeles clashes over Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids and arrests. Their through-line is clear enough: Condemn President Donald Trump as authoritarian for deploying the National Guard and threatening to arrest California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Charge that the president is generating a distraction from his controversial 'big, beautiful bill.' And keep the focus on how his enforcement efforts are netting everyday migrants, not violent criminals. But the Dems' messaging gets more muddled when they're asked if the anti-ICE protests have been peaceful or violent. The party is faced with a more complex juggling act than the Republicans, who have uniformly denounced the demonstrations as anti-law enforcement hooliganism enabled by Democratic officials. Democratic Rep. Yvette Clarke said Trump's escalation through the National Guard is illegal and meant to stoke chaos. 'Let's be clear about how this began: with peaceful protests, peaceful protests sparked by the unlawful and inhumane targeting, detention and deportation of our immigrant neighbors,' she said. She was later asked about the statistics on officers injured and property damaged as of Tuesday. 'I don't believe there's an insurrection taking place,' said Clarke, who represents Brooklyn. 'And I'd like to see the statistics around those who are ill and sickly, who are currently being detained.' Reps. Grace Meng and Adriano Espaillat contrasted the Los Angeles conflict to the Jan. 6, 2021 storming of the Capitol by Trump supporters, with Meng noting the president didn't send in the National Guard when that situation spiraled into violence. 'You have heard all of us say and ask protesters to be peaceful,' Meng said of Los Angeles. 'This is not a violent mob chanting 'hang Mike Pence,' 'where's Nancy' in the Capitol,' Espaillat said. 'For the most part, the protesters are peace-abiding people that are concerned about the aggressiveness of ICE.' Meanwhile, Cuomo released a plan Tuesday on how New York City should respond. He called the conflict in California 'manufactured' by Trump — the same word his rival Adrienne Adams used earlier in an MSNBC interview. 'We must not play into Trump's hands,' the former governor said in a statement. 'Peaceful protest is enshrined in the Constitution, but looting and destruction of property is unlawful and cannot be tolerated.' Earlier Tuesday, Zohran Mamdani — running in second place — said at a news conference, 'There is no room for violence. And ultimately, what has troubled me greatly is the cherry-picking of very few incidents to then justify the deployment of National Guard.' — Emily Ngo CITY HALL: THE LATEST FROM A TO Z: Adrienne Adams criticized Mamdani's call to abolish ICE on Tuesday — in a rare show of public disagreement between two members of the Working Families Party slate. 'A lawless president does not mean we abolish entire agencies and our laws,' the council speaker posted on X Tuesday. 'I've taken on Donald Trump and ICE — and won. People elect us as leaders to solve problems, not pledge allegiance to rigid ideologies.' Adams' post included a video clip of Mamdani — when asked Monday on MSNBC if ICE should be abolished — saying 'I believe it should.' In the clip, Mamdani notes that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — who backed him with her top endorsement last week — agrees with his stance. So Adams' post doesn't just draw a distinction between herself and Mamdani, but also with AOC, who gave Adams her second-ranked endorsement. 'There was going to come a point and a time when we are going to have to double down on the fact that Adrienne is a moderate, and this WFP shit is going to have to go sideways,' said a consultant familiar with Adams' thinking who was granted anonymity to discuss private conversations. 'The divorce is coming,' they added. The WFP didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. All the top contenders challenging Cuomo have assiduously avoided criticizing each other and have instead relentlessly attacked the front-runner. But with two weeks until the primary and polling showing Mamdani closing in on Cuomo, Adrienne Adams seems to have decided it was time for a tactical change. Mamdani, however, is sticking with the plan, his spokesperson Andrew Epstein said: 'Zohran has said it over and over again since launching this campaign: he will only criticize disgraced New York executives past and present.' — Jeff Coltin CASINO BATTLE ROYALE: A bid to build a casino in the Bronx became the subject of dueling lobbying efforts Tuesday, hours ahead of Bally's last shot to overcome a key hurdle in the City Council. The proposal for a casino at the former Trump golf course at Ferry Point — now called Bally's Golf Links — needs an added layer of approval from the state Legislature since the site is classified as public parkland. Before Albany lawmakers can take up that measure, the Council must pass a resolution permitting the move. Bally's last shot to secure that so-called home rule message before the end of Albany's legislative session is during the Council meeting Wednesday. Cue the eleventh-hour drama. As the Bronx bidder tried to whip votes in favor of the resolution, and over the objections of the local lawmaker representing the area, the team behind a competing casino bid backed by Mets owner Steve Cohen embarked on a lobbying effort of its own, according to several people familiar with the calls. 'Their large army of lobbyists is going very hard,' said one Council member familiar with the matter who requested anonymity to speak freely. Council Member Kristy Marmorato, who represents the area, presents a major challenge for Bally's: She is resisting its plans for a gaming facility in her district, according to people familiar with her position. That's made the company's effort to win over some of her fellow lawmakers more difficult, as they'd be breaching unwritten protocol by overriding a colleague on a local matter, the people said. Marmorato did not return requests for comment. Karl Rickett, a spokesperson for Metropolitan Park — the name of Cohen's proposed complex at Citi Field, which would include a casino — declined to comment. Meanwhile, other Council members have expressed reservations that if Bally's won a casino license, it would have to pay $115 million to the Trump Organization, per the companies' purchase agreement reported by the New York Times. Bally's is one of eight bidders competing for one of three New York City-area casino licenses. The field has narrowed in recent months as other bidders — including Related Companies, which had planned a gaming facility at Hudson Yards — have scrapped casino plans amid political headwinds. — Janaki Chadha CORRECTING THE RECORD: A mailer from the New York City Campaign Finance Board hit New Yorkers' mailboxes this week, correcting the record about the 11 mayoral candidates appearing on the Democratic primary ballot. The initial voter guide sent to 3.5 million registered voters last month wrongfully included Eric Adams in the Democratic primary, among other errors, POLITICO first reported. — Jeff Coltin ATTACK AD: A new super PAC funded by business executives is tying Mamdani to the man accused of murdering two Israel embassy employees in an antisemitic shooting last month. The 30-second digital ad from Sensible City, first reported by the Daily News, includes a brief clip of Elias Rodriguez getting arrested, among other shots of anti-Israeli graffiti and street protests, while a voiceover says 'it's not safe.' The ad then shows Mamdani and says he wants to defund the police. 'It's disgusting, slanderous and desperate,' Epstein said about the ad. Cuomo has also used recent anti-Israel attacks to take an indirect swipe at Mamdani, POLITICO reported. A spokesperson for Sensible City didn't return a request for comment. — Jeff Coltin EVENING IT OUT: Seven mayoral candidates told a government reform group they support moving city elections to even-numbered years, which would put those races on the ballot alongside state and federal elections. Cuomo, Adrienne Adams and Brad Lander were among those backing the reform in a Citizens Union candidate questionnaire, the organization announced in a press release Tuesday. Mamdani didn't respond. Almost 90 percent of council candidates surveyed also support the proposal. Citizens Union is among the groups pushing a city charter revision commission to consider the change — which would also require a state constitutional amendment. — Jeff Coltin More from the city: — A measure banning most broker fees goes into effect today, after a federal judge cleared the way. (Gothamist) — The City Council requested an investigation into the NYPD sharing information with federal authorities amid Trump's immigration crackdown. (The New York Times) — Council support for legislation clearing the way for a casino in the Bronx is still up in the air. (City & State) NEW FROM PLANET ALBANY FILTERING FEARS: Democratic state lawmakers are trying to change New York's forthcoming automatic voter registration system with last-minute adjustments to a bill that's meant to ensure non-citizens are not accidentally added to the rolls. New York's automatic voter registration system — which will take effect this year — allows people to register to vote when applying for Medicaid benefits or a driver's license. There's an opt-out choice for people who do not want to be voters. But as the Trump administration takes a hard-line immigration stance and seeks greater control over state-administered elections, Democrats proposed a 'secure' process to filter out people who are not citizens and cannot legally vote. The bill is being considered in the final days of the legislative session. It was previously approved in the Senate, but is yet to come up for a vote in the Assembly amid concerns it does not include sufficient safeguards for undocumented immigrants as they apply for driver's licenses. Democrats in recent days have moved to change the bill to require a filter that can recognize documents like birth certificates so that ineligible voters — such as undocumented immigrants — would not be able to register to vote when applying for a driver's license. It's not yet clear if the change is enough to assuage the concerns of some Democrats, who fear that automatic voter registration would put undocumented people at greater deportation risk. A coalition of lefty groups — including Make the Road New York and the New York Immigration Coalition — pressed top lawmakers in a letter this week to pass the measure with the amendment. 'In this moment, when immigrant and voter rights are under attack across the country, New York has the responsibility to do everything to protect immigrant New Yorkers from being deported by the Trump administration,' the coalition, New Yorkers for Inclusive Democracy, wrote in the letter. 'Passing the Enhanced Automatic Voter Registration bill is a necessary step to ensure that no immigrant New Yorkers are unjustly deported.' — Nick Reisman More from Albany: — Top state Democrats are eager to blame Washington Republicans for federal funding problems. (City & State) — Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado's bid to take on Gov. Kathy Hochul could be hobbled by his lack of name recognition. (Spectrum News) — Hochul and fellow Democratic governors will be grilled by Congressional Republicans over their states' immigration policies. (Times Union) KEEPING UP WITH THE DELEGATION GOING AFTER 'SANCTUARIES': Rep. Nick Langworthy has introduced congressional Republicans' latest effort to target cities that limit cooperation between federal immigration officers and local law enforcement. On Tuesday, the Buffalo-area Republican unveiled the Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act of 2025, legislation that would block federal funding for 'sanctuary' jurisdictions. It's the House companion to a measure previously introduced by GOP Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas. 'The violence we are seeing happen in LA right now is a cautionary tale for New York, another sanctuary state catering to criminal illegal immigrants and left-wing extremists,' Langworthy said in a statement. The bill's cosponsors include North Country Rep. Elise Stefanik, who's mulling a run for governor. It's being introduced as three Democratic governors, including Hochul, prepare to testify Thursday before the House Oversight Committee on their blue states' policies protecting immigrants. Defenders of 'sanctuary' jurisdictions have noted that federal and New York officers work together on violent crimes or in instances where a warrant is proffered, but that local and state resources are not used for civil infractions, freeing them up to focus on more serious offenses. — Emily Ngo More from Congress: — Thirty-eight House Republicans are warning Senate leaders against using 'budget gimmicks' as they revise President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' (POLITICO) — Rep. Yvette Clarke, the chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, said Trump should be impeached over the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles. (POLITICO) — Rep. Ritchie Torres wants federal contractors to reevaluate and potentially revise degree requirements for their job offerings. (NY1) NEW YORK STATE OF MIND — Jack Ciattarelli will get another shot at becoming the next governor of New Jersey. (POLITICO) — Attorney General Letitia James is investigating a police shooting that killed a sword-wielding man. (Times Union) — A former state assemblymember has opened a cannabis dispensary. (Watertown Daily Times) SOCIAL DATA MAKING MOVES: Ryan Birchmeier, former communications director to Eric Adams, has launched Williams Street Strategies, a communications consultancy named for the address of his first job in government at NYCEDC … Nick E. Smith is now president of Polaris New York, a consulting firm focused on fundraising, government relations and communications. He was previously executive director of Communities Resist and was first deputy public advocate under Jumaane Williams … Alex Gleason is returning to the New York City Central Labor Council as policy and campaigns director, after five years at Mercury Public Affairs. MEDIAWATCH: Mark Guiducci is taking over as top editor of Vanity Fair, per NYT's Katie Robertson. The 36-year-old Guiducci 'takes over a job that is very different from the one held by previous editors of Vanity Fair. He will be the first 'global editorial director' at Vanity Fair — gone is the editor-in-chief title — and will oversee Vanity Fair in the United States as well as editions across the world.' HAPPY BIRTHDAY: Assemblymember Khaleel Anderson … former NYC Public Advocate Betsy Gotbaum … Deandra Khan of 32BJ SEIU … Jonathan Yedin … Lucas Acosta … Reid Pillifant … Greta Van Susteren … Mehmet Oz … Will Rahn … Wendy Teramoto … CNN's Morgan Rimmer … Juliette Medina … Bob Brockmann … (WAS TUESDAY): Dovid Efune Missed Tuesday's New York Playbook PM? We forgive you. Read it here.

Mayor Lurie made ‘painful' cuts in his S.F. budget proposal. The hurt is far from over
Mayor Lurie made ‘painful' cuts in his S.F. budget proposal. The hurt is far from over

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Mayor Lurie made ‘painful' cuts in his S.F. budget proposal. The hurt is far from over

San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie said he made 'painful decisions' when assembling his recent budget proposal that would slash nonprofit contracts and shrink the City Hall workforce. But the hurt is far from over. Lurie recently told the Chronicle that he is still eyeing a more ambitious overhaul next year as he tries to erase a deficit that's projected to reach as much as $700 million in the 2028 fiscal year. Complicating Lurie's plans to rein in city spending is the fact that the Trump administration has already moved to claw back federal funds from San Francisco and could try to take more money away. And a Tuesday report from the city controller's office warned that proposed Medicaid cuts advanced by Congressional Republicans could further hurt city revenue — as could a potential recession. Lurie's city spending plan would eliminate about $185 million in grants and contracts over two years and cut about 100 filled jobs from the government payroll. The proposal would help Lurie close a massive budget shortfall, but unions and nonprofits quickly decried what they view as an unwarranted assault on community groups that provide crucial services to residents and businesses. Despite the early resistance, however, Lurie's inaugural budget blueprint does not represent a massive reorganization of the San Francisco bureaucracy, nor does it compare to the layoffs the city last experienced during the Great Recession. Next year could be a different story. In an interview with the Chronicle last week, Lurie indicated that he sees the current budget negotiations as a prelude to his plans for 2026. This year, his budget proposal was all about 'right-sizing,' he said. For next year, he has a different word in mind: 'restructuring.' 'This was a really focused budget on delivering core services (and) right-sizing our government,' Lurie said. 'And it does not mean the work is over. It was never going to be that way. … We have a lot of work to do ahead of us.' It's not yet clear what Lurie's promised restructuring will look like. The mayor's budget plan this year already proposed combining two city departments beset by scandals into one agency. And a February executive directive that Lurie issued on permitting reform said the city should explore how it might merge 'key permitting functions' into one department. Just how difficult Lurie's budget calculus will be in the coming year depends heavily on what happens at the national level. San Francisco's nearly $16 billion budget relies on more than $2 billion in operating revenue from the federal government, the vast majority of which comes in the form of Medicaid reimbursements. Funding changes under consideration in Congress could hurt the city, but it's how much it might lose. The controller's Tuesday report said the proposed federal budget bill 'represents the biggest set of cuts to Medicaid since inception and could result in thousands of San Francisco residents disenrolling from the Medi-Cal program and reduced funding for the Department of Public Health.' Lurie has proposed setting up a $400 million reserve that the city could tap into to offset any major funding cuts from President Trump or Congress. The controller found that the reserve amount was 'commensurate to risk.' Another unknown is the extent to which any national economic downturn could harm San Francisco's budget, and Lurie's ability to bring city spending in line with revenue. The controller's report noted that, while unemployment in the city is stable and office attendance has risen, technology and hospitality companies continue to lay people off. Trump's tariffs and immigration crackdowns could further strain the economy. Regardless of what happens nationally, Lurie has said he is already trying to end 'the era of soaring city budgets' and wants city officials to 'start living within our means.' His proposed cuts represent a reckoning for nonprofits after years of flush city budgets that saw millions flow to third parties in exchange for providing crucial social services. Now, many of those organizations are reeling from deep cuts that could force layoffs and the shuttering of programs. Some San Francisco legal aid organizations are facing deep cuts that they say could lead to more homelessness and less access to legal services for the needy. One legal aid organization's director is going on a hunger strike to protest the cuts. The Latino Task Force, Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco, the Chinatown Community Development Center and dozens of others are facing cuts that will impact services. The People's Budget, a coalition of city advocacy groups that every year proposes changes to the mayor's budget, has a 'walkthrough' of all the groups they have heard from that are losing funding. Anya Worley-Ziegmann, lead coordinator for the San Francisco People's Budget Coalition that advocates for nonprofits facing cuts, said in a statement that Lurie's budget proposal threatens 'essential services for food security, workforce development, legal aid, and children and families facing homelessness.' 'We cannot balance the budget on the backs of working class and marginalized communities while at the same time claiming to be a city that cares for all its residents,' Worley-Ziegmann said. Lurie also is being slammed by fiscal conservatives who believe he should have made deeper cuts to the city's 33,000-person workforce and take on the city's 'nonprofit industrial complex,' a moniker critics have given to the large contractors that do work on behalf of the city. A previous Chronicle analysis found that San Francisco has an unusually high amount of public sector workers per capita, especially among public health and library employees. Marie Hurabiell, founder of the neighborhood advocacy group Connected SF, praised Lurie for taking on the city's nonprofits and contractors as well as his effort to 'right-size' the budget after years of what she said was 'overspending' related to the pandemic. But she said those changes will only get San Francisco to the level of spending it had before COVID, and there are many more cuts to be made to downsize the government so it better reflects the city's relatively small population. One way to do that is by doubling down on accountability, she said. 'For years there's been a lot of money flowing and our services have not been great,' she said. '(Lurie) is probably trying to be very thoughtful and methodical (about future cuts), but I'm hoping he will be more impactful.' The existing job cuts in Lurie's proposed budget also drew some criticism from the executive committee of the San Francisco Democratic Party, which is controlled by moderates who generally share Lurie's politics. Committee members said in a statement that Lurie's budget overall 'demonstrates bold leadership during a time of unprecedented fiscal challenge.' But party leaders said they were 'very concerned about the proposed reduction of city jobs currently held by San Francisco employees.' 'Cutting these roles not only disrupts lives and livelihoods but also risks weakening the long-term capacity of government to meet the needs of its residents,' the statement read. Party chair Nancy Tung said the committee doesn't have a position on where budget cuts should come from if those 100 jobs were preserved. But she said the committee hoped Lurie and supervisors would be able to find a way to prevent any city employees from being laid off. She also acknowledged that the city's financial condition had put Lurie in a tough spot and praised him for issuing a hiring slowdown on his first day in office. 'I don't envy where the mayor is in terms of having to do this,' Tung said. 'I also know that this is very hard for him, too. He is trying to do it as humanely as possible.' Tom Li contributed reporting.

NYC law ending broker fees for renters takes effect today
NYC law ending broker fees for renters takes effect today

CBS News

time3 hours ago

  • CBS News

NYC law ending broker fees for renters takes effect today

New York City's new broker fee law takes effect Wednesday, shifting the financial burden of paying brokers from renters to landlords. The Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses, or FARE, Act was passed by the New York City Council in November and became law in December after Mayor Eric Adams declined to sign the bill. Supporters say the measure will make living in New York more affordable, while real estate groups say the cost will still be passed on to tenants through rent increases. What is a broker fee? A broker fee is a payment made to an agent who helps a prospective tenant find their rental unit. Apartment hunters often pay thousands of dollars in fees before they sign a lease. New York, where 70% of the population rents, was one of the last cities in the country where passing broker fees on to renters was still allowed. Broker fees typically add up to about 12-15% of the annual rent. The fees were not capped under New York law. What is the FARE Act? The FARE Act says the person who hires the broker - which is the landlord in most cases - has to pay them. It bans brokers who represent landlords from charging broker fees to tenants. "What other industry does that exist where someone else orders something, and then someone else has to pay for it?" said City Councilmember Chi Ossé, who sponsored the legislation. On the other side, the Real Estate Board of New York, which represents brokers, previously told CBS News New York that in many cases tenants will see rents go up as a result of the new law. "The landlord is going to have to pay us in some way," broker Janna Raskopf said. "It's just going to be baked into the rent." The Department of Consumer and Worker Protection has proposed fines of up to $2,000 for repeated violations of the law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store