Five G+6 towers on AAI radar again after Gujarat tragedy
1
2
3
4
Kolkata: The Ahmedabad plane crash has again prompted the Kolkata airport authorities to raise concerns about unauthorised structures in high-rises as threats to flights moving in and out of the city.
They have turned their focus on a high-rise complex at Bablatala, which is right across the airport wall, claiming the two top floors of the five towers pose a risk.
The airport officials said they had served seven notices on Loharuka Green Complex, asking the office-bearers to pull down the two top floors at the earliest, which included lift rooms and water tanks, as they were potential hazards in the take-off funnel.
Residents of the complex, which has 102 2 BHK and 3 BHK flats spread across five towers, said the developers had repeatedly shown documents to the airport authorities, proving none of the floors was illegal. "The top floors were sold at a higher price as they offer a view of the airport and flights landing and taking off. Why should we suddenly raze them? They are all legal. We moved the High Court last month, seeking protection and clarity," said Dhrubajyoti Biswas, president of Loharuka Greens RWA.
The AAI last sent a notice to Loharuka Green Residency Association of Apartment Owners in Jan, saying a building was constructed 357m from the original location, a site for which the airport had granted the NOC in March 2014. "Airports Authority of India, NSCBI Airport Kolkata, has identified a structure (top of the building) that is penetrating the Obstacle Limitation Surface/Obstacle Free Zone and is violating the norms against the ministry of civil aviation - (Height Restrictions for Safeguarding of Aircraft Operations) Rules, 2015, and is a potential hazard for safe aircraft operations," the order states.
It advised the association to reduce the "obstacle" height from the top —10.7 m for blocks A and B, 11.2m for blocks C and D and 6.9m for Block E.
But residents said before the construction, builders had applied for height clearance from AAI in 2013, and the NOC for the particular site was granted in March 2014 "with permissible top elevation AMSL of 35.6 m, including 6m above mean sea level, for five years". "It was only after getting the NOC that the work was completed by June 2018.
BMC issued the CC in Nov 2019. The Co-ordinate Survey of India checked and said our buildings did not come in the aircraft funnel path," said Biswas.
"Our case in the HC will be heard after the vacation."
Residents said that before the project started, by an HC order in Dec 2012, the area was demarcated by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, North 24 Parganas in Barasat, in the presence of AAI. It was only upon a demarcation and issuance of revised sanctioned plan and other documents that AAI issued a height clearance NOC. "If our buildings are an obstruction for safe aircraft operations, why did they give the NOC? This project has 100-plus flats, all of which have been sold.
The request for reducing the height is not maintainable against the developer after the CC was issued. Let the court decide," said an official.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Five G+6 towers on AAI radar again after Gujarat tragedy
1 2 3 4 Kolkata: The Ahmedabad plane crash has again prompted the Kolkata airport authorities to raise concerns about unauthorised structures in high-rises as threats to flights moving in and out of the city. They have turned their focus on a high-rise complex at Bablatala, which is right across the airport wall, claiming the two top floors of the five towers pose a risk. The airport officials said they had served seven notices on Loharuka Green Complex, asking the office-bearers to pull down the two top floors at the earliest, which included lift rooms and water tanks, as they were potential hazards in the take-off funnel. Residents of the complex, which has 102 2 BHK and 3 BHK flats spread across five towers, said the developers had repeatedly shown documents to the airport authorities, proving none of the floors was illegal. "The top floors were sold at a higher price as they offer a view of the airport and flights landing and taking off. Why should we suddenly raze them? They are all legal. We moved the High Court last month, seeking protection and clarity," said Dhrubajyoti Biswas, president of Loharuka Greens RWA. The AAI last sent a notice to Loharuka Green Residency Association of Apartment Owners in Jan, saying a building was constructed 357m from the original location, a site for which the airport had granted the NOC in March 2014. "Airports Authority of India, NSCBI Airport Kolkata, has identified a structure (top of the building) that is penetrating the Obstacle Limitation Surface/Obstacle Free Zone and is violating the norms against the ministry of civil aviation - (Height Restrictions for Safeguarding of Aircraft Operations) Rules, 2015, and is a potential hazard for safe aircraft operations," the order states. It advised the association to reduce the "obstacle" height from the top —10.7 m for blocks A and B, 11.2m for blocks C and D and 6.9m for Block E. But residents said before the construction, builders had applied for height clearance from AAI in 2013, and the NOC for the particular site was granted in March 2014 "with permissible top elevation AMSL of 35.6 m, including 6m above mean sea level, for five years". "It was only after getting the NOC that the work was completed by June 2018. BMC issued the CC in Nov 2019. The Co-ordinate Survey of India checked and said our buildings did not come in the aircraft funnel path," said Biswas. "Our case in the HC will be heard after the vacation." Residents said that before the project started, by an HC order in Dec 2012, the area was demarcated by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, North 24 Parganas in Barasat, in the presence of AAI. It was only upon a demarcation and issuance of revised sanctioned plan and other documents that AAI issued a height clearance NOC. "If our buildings are an obstruction for safe aircraft operations, why did they give the NOC? This project has 100-plus flats, all of which have been sold. The request for reducing the height is not maintainable against the developer after the CC was issued. Let the court decide," said an official.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Chandigarh administration initiates process to construct verandah outside Chief Justice's courtroom
1 2 Chandigarh: The administration has initiated the tender process for the construction of a verandah outside Courtroom No. 1 in the Punjab and Haryana high court, following directions issued by the court on June 6. The estimated cost of the project is Rs 14 lakh, according to a UT official. The decision comes in compliance with the high court's directive to complete the construction in front of the Chief Justice's courtroom within four weeks. The court emphasised the urgency of the matter, especially with the monsoon season approaching. "In light of the fact that the orders passed by this court on Nov 29, 2023, and Dec 13, 2024, were upheld by the apex court on May 28, this court is of the considered view, especially in the face of the ensuing monsoon season, which will start in a month's time, urgency arises and therefore, the UT administration is directed to construct the verandah in front of courtroom no. 1, preferably within a period of four weeks," the court stated. Earlier, in its order dated Nov 29, 2023, the HC had directed the administration to begin construction of the verandah, matching the design and structure of the verandahs already existing in front of courtrooms no. 2 to 9. The administration was given a two-week deadline to begin the work. However, the Chandigarh administration challenged the directive before the Supreme Court. On May 28, the apex court dismissed the administration's plea and upheld the HC order, paving the way for the construction. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Over 100 obstacles in Thiruvananthapuram airport approach funnel: AAI data
Thiruvananthapuram: There are over 100 listed obstacles, including trees, buildings, hoardings, cellphone towers and overhead water tanks, in the approach funnel of airport here, as per the electronic terrain and obstacle data published by the Airports Authority of India (AAI). They may not pose an immediate danger, but they can become a serious problem in the event of an emergency, such as a loss of thrust or engine failure suspected in the recent Ahmedabad air crash. In such cases, a pilot will have very little space to manoeuvre the stricken aircraft. Many of these obstacles are 5m to over 15m above the permissible limit in the area. At least 16 of the 131 listed obstacles have been removed, including chimneys, buildings, mobile signal towers, overhead water tanks and communication antennas. The data is meant to serve as a live guide for airlines, pilots and air traffic controllers on the take-off and landing conditions at the airport. A pilot said the obstacles on the approach path do not typically interfere with normal flight operations, but could be a problem if an aircraft faces some emergency and loses altitude. "Obstacles exist around every airport due to residential areas. We have to be careful while flying in," he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo An air traffic controller explained that obstacles can reduce the usable length of a runway because planes are given specific routing and altitude clearance during approaches to avoid the obstacles. "It's not as serious an issue as bird strikes at Thiruvananthapuram," he said. The airport operator, through AAI, issues no-objection certificates (NoCs) in accordance with the permissible height limits for constructions near the airport. An AAI official said, "People never used to apply for NoCs. That has changed now. But it's still difficult to determine if there's a violation." Pilots often report towers or new constructions that pose a safety risk to air traffic controllers. There is a need to create awareness about obstacles being a potential hazard to air safety and the lives of people living near airports, he added. An airport official said, "Many groups of trees and some buildings were cleared. We have issued notices to several other buildings." Air safety expert and former pilot Capt Mohan Ranganathan stressed that air safety issues must be addressed seriously, given the potential consequences. "...Simply listing obstacles and informing pilots or urging local authorities to act is not enough. Airport authorities must use modern technology to conduct terrain mapping frequently and ensure obstacle removal," he said. In 2019, AAI launched electronic terrain and obstacle data for five airports, including Thiruvananthapuram, to provide accurate information for flight safety. The system helps air traffic controllers design efficient procedures and routes, while allowing airlines to reduce fuel consumption and emissions. However, the govt is yet to expand it to other airports. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
