What happens next in US court battle over Trump's tariffs?
Here is what you need to know about the dispute, which Trump has called 'America's big case,' and how it is likely to play out in the months ahead.
What is the case about?
The litigation challenges the tariffs Trump imposed on a broad range of US trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. It centers around Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the president the power to address 'unusual and extraordinary' threats during national emergencies. Trump has said that trade imbalances, declining manufacturing power and the cross-border flow of drugs justified the tariffs under IEEPA.
A dozen Democratic-led states and five small US businesses challenging the tariffs argue that IEEPA does not cover tariffs and that the US Constitution grants Congress, not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. A loss for Trump would also undermine the latest round of sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries that he unveiled late Thursday. Trump has made tariffs a cornerstone of his economic plan, arguing they will promote domestic manufacturing and substitute for income taxes.
What's the status of the litigation?
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments on Thursday in the case. The panel of 11 judges sharply questioned the government about Trump's use of IEEPA, but did not rule from the bench. The Federal Circuit has not said when it will issue a decision, but its briefing schedule suggests it intends to move quickly. Meanwhile, the tariffs remain in effect after the Federal Circuit paused a lower court's ruling declaring them illegal.
Will Trump's tariffs be blocked if he loses in court?
A Federal Circuit ruling would almost certainly not end the litigation, as the losing party is expected to appeal to the Supreme Court. If the Federal Circuit rules against Trump, the court could put its own ruling on hold while the government appeals to the Supreme Court. This approach would maintain the status quo and allow the nine justices to consider the matter more thoroughly. The justices themselves could also issue an 'administrative stay' that would temporarily pause the Federal Circuit's decision while it considers a request from the Justice Department for more permanent relief.
Is the Supreme Court likely to step in?
The Supreme Court is not obligated to review every case appealed to it, but it is widely expected to weigh in on Trump's tariffs because of the weighty constitutional questions at the heart of the case. If the Federal Circuit rules in the coming weeks, there is still time for the Supreme Court to add the case to its regular docket for the 2025-2026 term, which begins on October 6. The Supreme Court could rule before the end of the year, but that would require it to move quickly.
How might the supreme court rule?
There is no consensus among court-watchers about what the Supreme Court will do. Critics of Trump's tariffs are optimistic their side will win. They point to the Supreme Court's decision from 2023 that blocked President Joe Biden from forgiving student loan debt. In that ruling, the justices limited the authority of the executive branch to take action on issues of 'vast economic and political significance' except where Congress has explicitly authorized the action. The justices in other cases, however, have endorsed a broad view of presidential power, especially when it comes to foreign affairs.
Can importers seek refunds for tariffs paid?
If Trump loses at the Supreme Court, importers are likely to seek refunds of tariffs already paid. This would be a lengthy process given the large number of anticipated claims. Federal regulations dictate that such requests would be first heard by US Customs and Border Protection. If that agency denies a refund request, the importer can appeal to the Court of International Trade.
There is precedent for tariff refund requests being granted. Since May, CBP has been processing refunds to importers who inadvertently overpaid duties because of tariff 'stacking' — where multiple overlapping tariffs are applied to the same imports. And in the 1990s, after the Court of International Trade struck down a tax on exporters that was being used to finance improvements to US harbors, the court set up a process for issuing refunds. That decision was upheld by both the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court.
Would a courtroom defeat unravel Trump's trade deals?
Trump has used the threat of emergency tariffs as leverage to secure concessions from trading partners. A loss at the Supreme Court would hamstring Trump in future negotiations. The White House, however, has other ways of imposing tariffs, like a 1962 law that allows the president to investigate imports that threaten national security. Trump has already used that law to put tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, and those levies are not at issue in the case before the Federal Circuit.
Some legal experts say a loss for Trump at the Supreme Court would not impact bilateral trade agreements the US has already inked with other countries. Others say that the trade deals alone might not provide sufficient legal authority for taxes on imports and may need to be approved by Congress. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
42 minutes ago
- Kuwait Times
German firms bet on know-how to beat Trump tariffs
FRANKFURT: While Germany's big companies groan under the US tariff burden, many small and midsize firms, the backbone of Europe's top economy, are confident their highly-specialized goods will just keep selling. The hope is that, in niche areas where American customers have no obvious alternatives, buyers across the Atlantic will just have to accept paying higher prices for their high-tech machines and products. 'The customer in America pays the tariff,' said Thorsten Bauer, co-head of laser maker Xiton Photonics, based in the western city of Kaiserslautern. 'We don't notice a thing.' Bauer's firm of about 20 workers is in this respect typical of the often family-owned enterprises that make up the German 'Mittelstand', Deutsche Bank executive Jan-Philipp Gillmann said. 'German Mittelstand companies are somewhat protected since they are often very specialized, sometimes the only firm that makes a particular part,' said Gillmann, Deutsche Bank's Head of Corporate Bank Europe. 'The cost of the tariff will often be borne by the consumer.' Under a framework deal agreed in late July, EU exports are set to face across-the-board US tariffs of 15 percent from Thursday—higher than traditional duties but much lower than Trump's threatened 30 percent. While German corporate titans such as automaker Volkswagen have grabbed headlines by taking tariff hits measured in the billions, many of the smaller firms hope to weather the headwinds. Brian Fuerderer, head and founder of Microqore Medical, a high-end surgical equipment maker with 32 employees, agreed. 'It's not possible to just copy 'Made in Germany,'' he said. 'There's not much comparable to what we in Germany do when it comes to medical technology.' He added that US tariffs would have to rise to 30 or even 40 percent before American customers got cold feet. 'For Volkswagen, for big business, it's hard,' he said. 'But if you have a real niche, something only certain specialists can do, demand will carry on as before.' The Mittelstand's rugged optimism defies Trump's repeated statements that foreign companies—not American importers or consumers—will pay the tariffs. That does not mean the levies—and the past months of uncertainty around them—have left the small and medium enterprises entirely unscathed. The United States is Germany's largest trading partner and Trump's on-again, off-again tariff blitz has already had an impact. 'When all the tariffs started, I made no US sales for three months,' Bauer said. 'You don't spend money if you don't know how things will look in the next six months.' He hopes the latest agreement fixing duties at 15 percent, up from a provisional 10 percent in the lead-up to an August 1 deadline, will at least give American companies the confidence to place orders again. But he is not entirely sure, pointing to Trump's highly changeable tariff policies. 'There's no legal certainty, basically,' Bauer said. 'I am trying to push up sales in Europe with discounts and things like that, to be less dependent on the international market.' About a quarter of Xiton Photonic's sales are exports to the United States and it would be hard to diversify, Bauer said, since his high-tech customers are more often found in Japan, China or America than in Europe. Wider geopolitical tensions mean there is no easy answer. 'China could equally turn around tomorrow and say: 'We are not importing anything from the EU,'' said Bauer. 'In that case I'd be just another leaf blown about by the wind.' Fuerderer, whose company makes half its sales in the United States, said that relocating production there could make sense for some firms in the sector over the long term, particularly given high energy costs and burdensome bureaucracy at home. 'The US government wants companies to manufacture in the United States and they have tax breaks, grants and subsidies to make it happen,' he said. In Europe, by contrast, Fuerderer said 'we are regulating ourselves to death. People are afraid to put money on the table and try something new.' — AFP
Kuwait Times
42 minutes ago
- Kuwait Times
Trump targets tariff evasion, with eye on China
WASHINGTON: As the United States ramps up tariffs on major trading partners globally, President Donald Trump is also disrupting strategies that could be used—by Chinese companies or others—to circumvent them. Goods deemed to be 'transshipped,' or sent through a third country with lower export levies, will face an additional 40-percent duty under an incoming wave of Trump tariffs Thursday. The latest tranche of 'reciprocal' tariff hikes, taking aim at what Washington deems unfair trade practices, impacts dozens of economies from Taiwan to India. The transshipment rule does not name countries, but is expected to impact China significantly given its position as a manufacturing powerhouse. Washington likely wants to develop supply chains that are less reliant on China, analysts say, as tensions simmer between the world's two biggest economies and the US sounds the alarm on Beijing's excess industrial capacity. But 'it's a little more about the short-term effect of strengthening the tariff regime than it is about a decoupling strategy,' said Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council. 'The point is to make countries worried about it and then have them err on the side of not doing it, because they know that Trump could then jack up the tariff rates higher again,' he added, referring to tariff evasion. The possibility of a sharply higher duty is a 'perpetual stick in the negotiations' with countries, said Richard Stern, a tax and budget expert at the conservative Heritage Foundation. He told AFP that expanding penalties across the globe takes the focus away from Beijing alone. Experts have noted that Vietnam was the biggest winner from supply chain diversions from China since the first Trump tariffs around 2018, when Washington and Beijing engaged in a trade war. And Brookings Institution senior fellow Robin Brooks pointed to signs this year of significant transshipments of Chinese goods. He noted in a June report that Chinese exports to certain Southeast Asian countries started surging 'anomalously' in early 2025 as Trump threatened widespread levies. While it is unclear if all these products end up in the United States, Brooks cast doubt on the likelihood that domestic demand in countries like Thailand and Vietnam rocketed right when Trump imposed duties. 'One purpose of the transshipment provisions is to force the development of supply chains that exclude Chinese inputs,' said William Reinsch, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'The other purpose is to push back on Chinese overcapacity and force them to eat their own surpluses,' he added. But Washington's success in the latter goal depends on its ability to get other countries on board. 'The transshipment penalties are designed to encourage that,' Reinsch said. Lipsky added: 'The strategy that worked in the first Trump term, to try to offshore some Chinese manufacturing to other countries like Vietnam and Mexico, is going to be a much more difficult strategy to execute now.' Lipsky noted that Beijing could see the transshipment clause as one targeting China on trade, 'because it is.' 'The question is, how China takes that in the broader context of what had been a thawing relationship between the US and China over the past two months,' he added. While both countries temporarily lowered triple-digit tariffs on each other's exports, that truce expires August 12. The countries are in talks to potentially extend the de-escalation, although the final decision lies with Trump. It will be tough to draw a line defining product origins, analysts say. Customs fraud has been illegal for some time, but it remains unclear how Washington will view materials from China or elsewhere that have been significantly transformed. The burden lies with customs authorities to identify transshipment and assess the increased duties. 'That will be difficult, particularly in countries that have close relations with China and no particular incentive to help US Customs and Border Protection,' Reinsch added. – AFP
Kuwait Times
43 minutes ago
- Kuwait Times
Taiwan's orchid growers dig in as US tariffs shoot up
HOUBI: Since the start of US President Donald Trump's global trade war, Taiwanese orchid grower Lee Tsang-yu has watched tariffs on his seedlings shoot from nothing to 20 percent. But, after weathering many economic crises, the 61-year-old seasoned farmer is digging in. Lee is cultivating new markets in Thailand and expanding in Vietnam, Indonesia and Brazil, while cutting back shipments to the United States. 'The US is such a huge market, we can't pull out, and we won't,' said Lee, whose company, Charming Agriculture, operates four rugby field-sized greenhouses in Houbi, a district of the southern city of Tainan. Taiwan's more than 300 orchid growers rank among the world's biggest producers of the thick-leaved plants, with Phalaenopsis orchids, also known as moth orchids, dominating exports. The island's orchid shipments reached NT$6.1 billion (US$204 million) in 2024, with about NT$2 billion worth of plants sent to the United States, its biggest market, official data shows. Until now, most growers have been absorbing the cost of the 10 percent tariff that Trump slapped on nearly every trading partner in April, said Ahby Tseng, 53, secretary-general of the Taiwan Orchid Growers Association. But 'no one can bear' all of Trump's temporary 20 percent levy on Taiwan announced last week, he said. Tseng said Taiwan's main rival in the United States was The Netherlands, which has been hit with a relatively lighter 15 percent tariff. The five percentage point difference is significant, he said. 'It is actually very difficult to immediately pass the cost on to consumers because consumers can choose not to buy, or they can choose to buy other types of flowers,' Tseng said. And stockpiling orchids in a warehouse wasn't an option given that the plants 'keep growing'. While the higher tariff would erode his bottom line, Lee said he was more concerned about the general state of the US economy since Trump took office. 'Everything has become more expensive in the US, and consumer spending is shrinking—that's what worries me,' he said. 'Since late May, we've already cut shipments by 15 percent. Before that, the US accounted for 45 percent of our exports.' Lee said he was optimistic his efforts to expand into other markets, though slow and not always as lucrative, would 'gradually offset this impact'. Taiwan's orchids also had a competitive edge, he said—their flowers could last longer than Dutch plants. And, he reasons, 'Trump won't be president forever.'—AFP
