Preserve CCTV footage or face action: Gujarat Information Commission to police
In an order issued on July 19, the commission clarified that if an RTI (Right To Information) application is received by a police station within 30 days of an incident, the CCTV footage of that matter must be preserved.
'Failure to preserve the recording will lead the commission to initiate proceedings for disciplinary action and penalty under Section 20 of the RTI Act and appropriate action under the Gujarat Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1971," the panel warned in its order.
A resident of Ahmedabad's Naroda area had filed an RTI application seeking CCTV footage from Shaher Kotda Police Station to obtain evidence of alleged misconduct against him.
When he did not receive the relevant information from the police station, he filed an appeal with the Information Commission.
During the hearing of the appeal, a representative of the Public Information Officer (PIO) claimed before the panel that the CCTV footage in question could not be provided to the applicant as it got deleted due to a 'technical fault".
The officer further claimed that though a technical expert was roped in to retrieve the data as directed by the commission, the footage could not be recovered.
'However, the Commission has observed that such CCTV footage is hardly provided to the applicants" the order said.
A 2022 circular issued by the General Administration Department (GAD) mandates that CCTV footage must be preserved until the disposal of the second appeal of an RTI applicant, it pointed out.
Furthermore, the commission noted the Gujarat Director General of Police (DGP) had also issued similar instructions in the past and directed police officials to preserve the footage till the disposal of the second appeal.
The commission stated that the purpose of installing CCTV cameras will only be served only if the GAD circular and departmental instructions are strictly followed.
'Despite such instructions, police station officers or staff refuse to provide footage by citing excuses, which is not proper," said the panel.
The commission directed the DGP to issue a fresh order asking police officials concerned to strictly adhere to the previous circular on preserving CCTV footage.
The commission warned the State Public Information Officer (PIO) and the First Appellate Authority (FAA) will be liable for penalty and disciplinary action under Section 20 of the RTI Act if they fail to provide the footage to applicants. PTI PJT PD RSY
view comments
First Published:
August 04, 2025, 21:00 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
CM orders mandatory retirement for nine police inspectors
Jaipur: Chief minister Bhajan Lal Sharma Wednesday ordered the mandatory retirement of nine police inspectors from the home department, in what was deemed as the govt's strict stance against "incompetence, indolence, and unsatisfactory performance" of state govt employees. Sharma also allowed initiation of proceedings under Rule 8 of the All-India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1969 against a Rajasthan cadre IAS officer in connection with a serious case of illegal land allocation. He also resolved old cases pertaining to retired officers, deciding to withhold pensions of five persons under the pension rules, ordering that 100% pension be withheld in the case of one officer convicted in a corruption case. Reviewing 37 cases of pending disciplinary action and prosecution approval, Sharma ordered action against 55 officers who are under investigation. He also approved investigation findings of certified charges against 14 retired officers. Among other actions, Sharma granted prosecution sanction against six officers and permitted detailed investigation under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act 2018 against two officers of the Rajasthan Administrative and Accounts Service. Thirteen serving officers were also slapped with orders to withhold annual salary increments pending departmental investigations.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Mumbai train blasts, an exoneration, the questions
The Bombay High Court's exoneration of all those convicted in the Mumbai train blast case of July 2006, has come as a rude shock for the families of the 189 people killed and around 800 people who were injured. The High Court has ripped apart the investigation, calling witnesses untrustworthy, deeming confessions gained as under duress, terming identification parades faulty and citing forensic evidence custody as not foolproof. It is a shocker because it was based on the same evidence that the trial court, in 2015, sentenced five of the accused to death and seven to life imprisonment. A long wait, lapses Who will answer for the inordinately long incarceration of the accused since 2006? The police, the prosecution, lawyers or the courts? Or all of them, that is the criminal justice system? It takes years for trials in courts. One of the defence lawyers said that the charge sheet filed by the Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) had 20,000 pages, while much lesser numbers would suffice. It is like schoolchildren taking their examinations and filling pages with answers, hoping to impress the teacher with volume rather than quality. But the nine years taken by the Special Court and 10 years by the High Court for their decisions make the waiting period so agonising to the point of being meaningless for the accused. Nineteen years is a lifetime and almost like a sentence itself. Admitted there is tremendous pressure on investigating teams and the police chief in a terrorist or any high-profile case. The government gets unsettled with the Opposition's relentless attacks and demand to arrest the accused within minutes. It impacts investigation severely, pushing investigating officers into a corner, taking hasty decisions and bypassing protocol and procedures. But some of the issues referred to by the High Court raise concerns. Despite two confessions taken by two different deputy commissioners of police, they appear to be not similar but actually the same, with even the ellipsis matching. The witnesses became untrustworthy because, on cross-examination, they did not remain true to their original statements. Guess no one can after a lapse of so many years. It was surprising that the drawer of the sketches of the accused was not called as a witness. The test identification parade became suspect because the special executive officer who conducted it was not authorised to do so. Strange, because the magistrate who conducted it should have known whether he was the right person to undertake the TIP. The investigation, however, is truly flawed if the forensic evidence purity and chain of custody cannot be vouched for faithfully. It is troubling to hear that even in such critical cases there could be lapses on this count. The use of RTI filings Perhaps the biggest message from this trial is how the Right to Information (RTI) Act, known as the sunshine legislation, enacted 20 years ago, has stood the test of time, bringing transparency and accountability in government functioning. Hundreds of RTIs were filed by the accused and the defence lawyers to elicit information from the police, hospitals, and the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited to build up their case and cross-examine the prosecution witnesses and prove them wrong on various counts. In one instance, it was the name of a non-existent person in a hospital, named by the prosecution witness or the shift in which one person was working was proven wrong. It is the noblest use of RTI, perhaps, if it is used to defend oneself. This is a fundamental aspect of free trial and constitution under Article 20(3). Perhaps most embarrassing for the Mumbai police would have been the discovery of an Indian Mujahideen (IM) module, busted by the crime branch Mumbai in 2008, which accepted its role in the series of blasts in Ahmedabad, Delhi and Jaipur between 2005 to 2008. The gang led by Sadiq Israr Sheikh also claimed responsibility for the series of blasts in suburban trains on that day in Mumbai at around 6.30 p.m. The charge sheet in the July 11, 2006 Mumbai train blast case had already been filed by then, and the Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) had announced it as the handiwork of the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). In fact, in 2008, the top man of SIMI, Safdar Nagori, general secretary, was arrested along with his associates in March 2008 in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, and was awarded life term in 2017. But how does this make any sense to the families of the victims of 7/11 or to a common man? How does it matter whether the police, the prosecution or the criminal justice system failed him? What matters is that 19 years later, he has no closure. For the accused who were incarcerated for 19 years, it is already a sentence served without proven guilty. They seek justice too. Reform must begin There are too many questions unanswered. The only way to answer them is to put the criminal justice system on track on a war footing. Formatting a new criminal law by changing a few old laws here and there is not enough. Every element of the criminal justice system should be reformed. Nineteen years for a decision is meaningless because the punishment has already been given. A prosecution overlooking basic issues is meaningless and an investigation overlooking the simplest of things is not worth it. Reform of the police, the judiciary, the prosecution and prisons cannot wait — we are sitting on a time bomb of people's expectations and frustrations, which may explode anytime. Yashovardhan Azad is a former IPS officer who has served as Central Information Commissioner, Secretary, Security, Government of India and Special Director, Intelligence Bureau
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Pay Rs 3.5L or face encounter,' cops threaten UP jeweller; 4 cops suspended
Agra: An inspector, a sub-inspector (SI) and two constables were suspended for allegedly extorting Rs 3.5 lakh from a local jeweller by threatening to kill him in an encounter if he did not pay up. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now An FIR has been also registered against the cops. The issue came to light in the last week of July when Ajay Kumar Verma, who owns a jewellery shop in Patiyali, Kasganj, wrote a complaint to the DGP against inspector Ramvakil Singh (Patiyali SHO), sub-inspector Vinay Sharma (Kasganj SOG chief), and constables Pawan Singh (Kasganj SOG) and Sobran Singh (Patiyali station), prompting an investigation into the matter. Last month, Kasganj police arrested Jayprakash, a local thief who carried a bounty of Rs 25,000 on his head. During interrogation, the thief told police that he had sold stolen goods at Verma's shop in Patiyali. In his complaint, Verma stated that on July 20 at around 2.45pm, constables Pawan and Sobran arrived at his shop asking to speak to him. "They put me inside the police vehicle and took me to Patiyali police station. Inside the vehicle was Jayprakash, who claimed I had bought stolen goods from him. At the station, inspector Ramvakil told me to return the stolen goods or face imprisonment. Despite denying the allegations, they detained me," Verma stated in his complaint. "That night around 10pm, constable Sobran threatened me, saying I would be released only if I paid Rs 50,000 in cash and surrendered my gold and silver items. I was harassed and asked to call someone to deliver the money and jewellery. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now At midnight, my son handed over Rs 50,000 in cash, a pair of anklets, (150 grams silver), a pair of gold earrings (2.5 grams), and other silver jewellery," Verma stated in his complaint. Verma added that even after handing over items, he was not released and was asked to pay an additional sum of Rs 3 lakh. "One of the policemen even told me they would kill me in an encounter if I did not pay up. I begged them not to ruin my life over a false accusation. I was forced to call my son again, who managed to borrow the amount and handed it over to Sobran near Sahawar Bridge at 3am on July 21. I was released at around 3.05am," Verma added in his complaint. Upon confidential investigation, the allegations were found prima facie true. ASP Rajesh Kumar Bharti said, "Four police officials, including inspector Ramvakil Singh, sub-inspector Vinay Sharma, constables Pawan Singh and Sobran Singh have been suspended and an FIR naming the two constables and two other men has been registered under BNS sections 140(2) (kidnapping), 308(6) (extortion) and relevant sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The investigation is being led by Patiyali DSP. Further departmental action is underway."
