'Justice Varma Impeachment Motion Reflects Collective Will Of MPs': Arjun Meghwal Interview
News18
Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal clarified that the potential impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma is a collective initiative by Members of Parliament, and not just the government. Varma has been under scrutiny following the alleged recovery of large sums of cash from his residence and has approached the Supreme Court, claiming he was denied a fair hearing.
Meghwal told CNN-News18 that Justice Varma is entitled to challenge the process in court. He noted that a Supreme Court-led committee formed by the then Chief Justice submitted its findings to the Prime Minister and the President. However, he stressed that proceedings in Parliament are separate and independent from legal proceedings in court.
Regarding the motion expected to be tabled in the upcoming Monsoon Session of Parliament, Meghwal reiterated that the government has no role in this process. 'Under the Constitution, MPs can initiate a motion to remove a judge on grounds of proven misconduct or corruption, requiring the support of at least 100 Lok Sabha MPs or 50 Rajya Sabha MPs. This process is entirely within their parliamentary privilege," he said.
Meghwal acknowledged that many in the opposition were disturbed by the visuals that surfaced during the alleged incident. He emphasised that this issue transcends politics, stating that both treasury and opposition benches have reacted strongly. The sentiment and anger of MPs have led to the motion.
Government sources revealed that the impeachment motion, referred to as a 'removal motion," has already garnered over 100 signatures from members of the ruling BJP and its allies. Opposition members are also expected to submit their signatures shortly. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju has reportedly engaged with several opposition leaders, including Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin, and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, to build consensus.
Once the motion is formally submitted, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha will decide whether to admit it. If admitted, a three-member committee will be formed, comprising a sitting Supreme Court judge, a High Court judge, and a distinguished jurist. This committee will investigate the charges against Justice Verma and submit a report to Parliament.
Initially, the committee will have three months to complete its inquiry, though extensions can be granted if needed. The Monsoon Session of Parliament, scheduled from July 21 to August 21, with a brief recess in between, is expected to focus significantly on the impeachment proceedings.
view comments
First Published:
July 18, 2025, 13:36 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Alleged hate speech against Christian community in Andhra Pradesh: SC to hear plea on Monday
NEW DELHI: Enraged by certain anti-religious remarks and hate speeches delivered by certain members of an organisation against the Christian community in Andhra Pradesh, the petitioner has moved the Supreme Court by filing an appeal by challenging the State High Court's order refusing to take action against the accused persons. A two-judge bench of the top court, headed by Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi is scheduled to hear the appeal filed by lawyer, Rana Sandeep Bussa in the case. The alleged hate speech was delivered on 01, September last year by certain members of one Siva Shakti Foundation, which organised its 9th Anniversary function in AP. The event saw a gathering of around 1,000 people and 10,000 viewership on live telecast of the programs on social media. It was titled as, 'Which religion is good for the nation." The host and the guests on the Dias mocked the Christian Religion, the Bible, the crucifix and enraged the sentiments of Christian's in the state of AP. Thereafter the President of the foundation on 08, September made certain further alleged and gross comments on YouTube live instigating the followers to trample the bible and urinate over the Bible.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
11 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Nitish may stay as Bihar CM, but should step down as JD(U) chief: Kushwaha
Former Union minister Upendra Kushwaha, who had quit the JD(U) two years ago, on Sunday said Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar should give up the reins of the party, which has new hope in the supreme leader's son Nishant. Kushwaha, who has now floated his outfit Rashtriya Lok Morcha, came up with a post on his X handle, extending birthday greetings to his former mentor's son. Learnt from social media that it is the birthday of Nishant, the son of big brother (bade bhai), respectable Nitish Kumar. On this occasion, heartiest greetings to Nishant, the new hope of JD(U). May God always keep him happy and healthy, said the Rajya Sabha MP. I take this opportunity to make a humble request to Shri Nitish Kumar ji that it is no longer feasible for him to run both the government as well as the party, said Kushwaha, who has been in and out of the JD(U) at least thrice. The NDA partner, however, made it clear that he was not suggesting that the 75-year-old, whom the coalition has declared as its face for the upcoming assembly polls, discontinue as chief minister. Kushwaha said Kumar has a long experience in running the government, and it is in the interests of the state that he continues. But there must be a concrete decision on passing over the mantle of the party. This is not just my opinion but that of thousands of workers of the JD(U). Any delay in taking a decision will cause irreparable harm to the party, he asserted. "I am saying something that most JD(U) leaders cannot think of directly communicating to the Chief Minister, said Kushwaha, who was the party's parliamentary board chairman until his exit in 2023, when he alleged that Kumar had struck a deal for merger with arch rival Lalu Prasad's RJD. A year later, Kumar did yet another political volte-face, snapping ties with the RJD and returning to the BJP-led coalition. Reacting to Kushwaha's statement, JD(U) chief spokesman and MLC Neeraj Kumar said, Each and every worker of the party is standing with Nitish Kumar, having full faith in his leadership. As regards Nishant, only he and his father can take a decision in the matter. Kushwaha had been in the JD(U) since its inception in 2003, when Kumar backed him for the post of leader of the opposition in the state assembly. A few years later, after Kumar became the chief minister, Kushwaha parted ways and formed the Rashtriya Samata Party. In 2009, he merged Rashtriya Samata Party with the JD(U) and Kumar rewarded him with a Rajya Sabha berth. However, Kushwaha again fought with his mentor and quit the JD(U) in 2013 to form Rashtriya Lok Samata Party (RLSP). In 2014, contesting as an NDA ally and riding the Modi wave, Kushwaha made his Lok Sabha debut and was inducted into the Union Council of Ministers. However, he gave up the ministerial berth in 2018 and quit the NDA to join the RJD-led Mahagathbandhan. Two years later, he left the coalition and contested the 2020 assembly polls as Chief Ministerial candidate of an alliance that included Asaduddin Owaisi's AIMIM and Mayawati's BSP. The RLSP drew a blank in the assembly polls, and a few months later, Kushwaha merged the party with the JD(U), and was again rewarded by Kumar with the post of parliamentary board chairman and a berth in the state legislative council. In last year's Lok Sabha polls, Kushwaha finished third in Karkat, after CPI(ML) winner Raja Ram Kushwaha and runner-up Pawan Singh, Bhojpuri superstar who contested as an Independent candidate after refusing a BJP ticket from West Bengal. In the more than 20-year-long journey of JD(U), Kumar has retained full control over the organisation, even though the post of national president, which he currently himself occupies, has been held by his trusted aides at different points in time.
News18
24 minutes ago
- News18
What's On Monsoon Session Agenda? Centre's Bills & Opposition Debates On Sindoor, Bihar, AI Crash
A look at the agenda of the session that will end on August 21. On the Centre's agenda Income Tax Bill, 2025: It was introduced in the Lok Sabha on February 13 and referred to a joint parliamentary committee (JPC) led by BJP MP Baijayant Panda. News18 had reported that it is expected to be brought to Parliament for passage during this session. Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2025: It aims to align the state GST law with the central legislation. Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2025: It seeks to promote ease of doing business and improve regulatory compliance. Indian Institutes of Management (Amendment) Bill, 2025: It proposes to bring IIM Guwahati under the formal fold of the IIM Act, giving it statutory recognition. Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2025: It brings in tax reforms and streamlines current laws. Geoheritage Sites and Geo-relics (Preservation and Maintenance) Bill, 2025: It aims to protect geologically important sites Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025: It seeks to regulate the scientific exploration of deep-seated and critical minerals. National Sports Governance Bill, 2025: It proposes ethical and governance reforms to improve accountability in sports bodies. National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025: It aligns India's anti-doping regulations with global standards set by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and ensures the institutional independence of the National Anti-Doping Appeal Panel. President's rule in Manipur: Under other business, the government has listed a resolution for the extension of President's Rule in Manipur, originally imposed on February 13, 2025. On the opposition's agenda The opposition is expected to demand discussions on: Air India crash in Gujarat: The preliminary probe report has created a stir by attributing blame to the two deceased pilots and raising concerns over accountability and transparency.
