US House Panel Subpoenas Clintons In Epstein Probe
The Clintons were among multiple former Democratic and Republican government officials -- as well as the Justice Department -- targeted by investigators in a major escalation of the controversy surrounding the investigation into the disgraced financier, who died in 2019 awaiting trial for sex trafficking.
The White House has been facing increasingly intense demands to be more transparent after the Justice Department angered Trump supporters -- many of whom believe Epstein was murdered in a cover-up -- when it confirmed last month that he had died by suicide and that his case was effectively closed.
The department also said Epstein had no secret "client list" -- rebuffing conspiracy theories held by Trump's far-right supporters about supposedly high-level Democratic complicity.
Trump has urged his supporters to drop demands for the Epstein files, but Democrats in the Republican-led Congress -- with some support from majority lawmakers -- have also been seeking a floor vote to force their release.
"By your own admission, you flew on Jeffrey Epstein's private plane four separate times in 2002 and 2003," Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer wrote to former president Clinton.
"During one of these trips, you were even pictured receiving a 'massage' from one of Mr. Epstein's victims.
The White House has been seeking to redirect public attention from uproar over its handling of the affair with a series of headline-grabbing announcements including baselsss claims that former president Barack Obama headed a "treasonous conspiracy" against Trump.
Epstein was a financier and friend to numerous high-profile people -- for years, including Trump -- who was convicted of sex crimes and then imprisoned pending trial for allegedly trafficking underage girls.
His 2019 prison cell death supercharged a conspiracy theory long promoted by many Trump supporters that Epstein had run an international pedophile ring and that elites wanted to make sure he never revealed their secrets.
After Trump returned to power in January, his administration promised to release Epstein case files.
Several of Trump's most effective promoters over the years -- including new FBI Director Kash Patel and his deputy Dan Bongino -- made careers of fanning the rumors about Epstein.
But when Attorney General Pam Bondi announced on July 7 that she had nothing to release, Republicans were furious -- and Trump has attempted to control the scandal ever since.
Yet it has dominated headlines through the summer, showing just how hard it is for 79-year-old Trump to maintain his usual mastery of driving news agendas -- even within his fervently loyal "MAGA" base.
Things got even more complicated for him after a Wall Street Journal report that Trump had written a lewd birthday letter to Epstein in 2003. Trump denies this and has sued the Journal.
The Journal then dropped a separate story, saying Bondi had informed Trump in May that his name appeared several times in the Epstein files, even if there was no indication of wrongdoing.
The president recently raised further questions about his past relationship with Epstein when he told reporters he fell out with his former friend after Epstein "stole" female employees from the spa at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.
Other officials targeted by the panel include former FBI director James Comey, former special counsel Robert Mueller and ex-attorney generals Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Merrick Garland, Bill Barr, Jeff Sessions, and Alberto Gonzales.
Their depositions will take place between mid-August and mid-October.
Comer also issued a subpoena to the Justice Department for records related to Epstein -- including its communications with Trump's predecessor Joe Biden and his officials.
Lawmakers have also been seeking testimony from Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving 20 years in prison for her role in his alleged crimes -- although her cooperation is considered unlikely.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Trump tariffs: India faces 25% hike as deadline looms – DW – 08/06/2025
US President Donald Trump has increased the tariffs to be imposed on Indian imports to a total of 50%. This comes a day before many of Trump's vaunted tariffs targeting various countries are due to come into effect. Many of Trump's tariffs are due to come into effect on Thursday, with varying rates being imposed on different countries. The US president has announced that India will face an extra 25% tariff on their imports to the US, bringing the total rate to 50%. Trump said the steep rate was over India's continued purchase of Russian oil. New Delhi has called the move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable."Donald Trump is tightening sanctions loopholes that fund Moscow's war machine. What does a crackdown on Russia's oil trade mean for global markets — and economic heavyweights like China and India? DW has some of the answers here. US President Donald Trump's pressure on India to halt its oil imports from Russia and comply with sanctions on Iran has strained ties between Washington and New Delhi, who have enjoyed a healthy strategic partnership for decades. India has already said it saw the tariffs are "unjustified and unreasonable" and that it would take "all necessary measures" to safeguard its "national interests and economic security." Trump has claimed Indian authorities "don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine" and are helping fund Russia's war effort in Ukraine through their purchases of Russian oil. The tougher rhetoric is a marked shift in relations between India and the US. Ties have deteriorated in recent months, despite the display of personal warmth and symbolic friendship when Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with President Trump earlier this year in Washington. Experts believes that despite Trump's "intimidatory" approach, India "does not seek a confrontation." Read the full story on the tense relations between the US and India over Trump's tariffs. Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter said she had a "very good meeting" with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday, discussing the incoming US tariffs on Switzerland. In the meeting, the pair "discussed bilateral cooperation between Switzerland and the US, and the tariff situation, and international issues," Karin-Sutter said. "We had a very friendly and open exchange," Keller-Sutter told reporters after the meeting in Washington, yet stopped short of mentioning whether it would help the country avert the 39% tariff set to come into effect on Thursday. A US State Department spokeswoman said the talks included "the importance of a fair and balanced trade relationship that benefits the American people." On July 31 last week, Trump announced a new set of "reciprocal tariffs," affecting some 67 countries. The levies, due to kick in on August 7, include a 10% so-called baseline tariff on countries where the US sells more products than it imports. The US president argued in a White House statement that "conditions reflected in large and persistent annual US goods trade deficits constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and economy of the US that has its source in whole or substantial part outside the US." Leading trading partners including the European Union, Japan and South Korea will be subject to a 15% tariff. All are engaged in trade negotiations with Washington. Countries which meanwhile reached tentative trade agreements with the US, such as the Philippines, Vietnam and Indonesia, will be subject to tariffs ranging from 19% to 20%. Much higher rates will fall on smaller economies such as Syria (41%, the highest on the list), which is just getting out of a civil war which spanned over a decade. Myanmar (40%), is still grappling with a civil war. Similar rates will also be applied to Laos (40%) and Iraq (35%). Despite being a significant trading partner, Switzerland is set to face a whopping 39% tariff. The latest tariff announcement means India is facing the highest US levy along with Brazil. This could put New Delhi at a significant disadvantage, particularly against regional competitors such as Vietnam and Bangladesh. The move could also shatter India's image as an alternative for US companies to Chinese manufacturing. Trump had already criticized tech giant Apple for its efforts to shift iPhone production to India to avoid the tariffs that had been planned for China. "I don't want you building in India," Trump said he told Apple CEO Tim Cook earlier this year. However, smartphones are on a list of exempted products for now, shielding Apple from a major hit, even as it moves production from China to India. On Wednesday, Trump is expected to celebrate a commitment by Apple to increase its US investments by an additional $100 billion over the next four years. Other exemptions include goods targeted under sector-specific tariffs such as steel and aluminum, and sectors that could be hit later, such as pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. India's government spokesperson has defended New Delhi's purchase of Russian oil, saying that "imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India." "It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest," the spokesperson said in a statement. "We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable. India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video US President Donald Trump promised in his inaugural address this year to "tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens." By setting new tariff rates, Trump aimed at reducing the country's trade deficit, which is when the US imports more from a country than it exports to that country, and first announced plans for a "reciprocal" tariff on February 13. But experts have warned that tariffs could cause chaos for global markets and disrupt the US economy at home. April 2: Trump's so-called "Liberation Day" when he announces long-promised "reciprocal" tariffs, declaring a 10% baseline tax on imports across the board starting April 5, as well as higher rates for dozens of countries that have a high trade deficit with the US. The calculations for the tariff rates cause widespread confusion. April 5: Trump's 10% minimum tariff on nearly all countries and territories takes effect. April 9: Trump's higher "reciprocal" rate goes into effect, but his administration says just hours later it is pausing higher rates while maintaining the 10% levy on most global imports. April 10: EU suspends its steel and aluminium tariff retaliation measures for 90 days — those measures were a response to Trump's 25% tariffs on imported steel and aluminium that took effect in March. May 23: Trump threatens a 50% tax on all imports from the EU as well as a 25% tariff on smartphones unless those products are made in America. Trump says frustrated by lack of progress in talks with EU, writing on Truth Social: "Our discussions with them are going nowhere!" May 26: Trump says the US will delay implementation of a 50% tariff on goods from the EU from June 1 until July 9 to buy time for negotiations with the bloc. July 7: Trump signs an executive order to push the deadline for higher tariffs to August 1 and sends his first letters telling 14 countries' leaders that their exports to the US would face a new tariff rate. July 8: Trump says he's not going back on his word and insists that the August 1 deadline is the final one. July 9: Trump sends more letters, hitting Brazil with a 50% tariff rate. Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva promises to reciprocate. July 12: Trump announces a 35% tariff on Canadian goods, claiming Canada had "financially retaliated" to earlier duties. He says the EU will receive a similar letter soon. July 13: Trump announces a 30% tariff rate on the EU and Mexico, telling both that "whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added on to the 30% that we charge." July 31: Trump signs an executive order delaying the tariff deadline for the EU and other partners from August 1 to August 7. August 6: Trump announces a further 25% tariff rate on India's imports due to their purchase of Russian oil, bringing the total to 50%. US President Donald Trump said Wednesday he signed an executive order to impose an additional 25% tariff on India. He cited India's continued purchase of Russian oil. The order comes just a day before a separate 25% tariff on Indian goods was due to take effect. The latest decision is set to come into force in three weeks. Trump had threatend allies of Russia to stop importing oil from Moscow or face high tariffs. Ties between the US and India have taken a downturn as they failed to reach a trade agreement to avert Trump's tariffs. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video US President Donald Trump's tariffs on the EU and other trading partners are set to finally come into effect on Friday, following numerous delays since his first "Liberation Day" announcement back in April. The tariff threats have triggered widespread uncertainty and concerns about the impact on the global economy. Countries facing heavy tariff rates have sought to make deals with the Trump administration, but have also threatened to impose their own counter tariffs. Stick with our Trump tariffs blog for the latest updates, analysis and explainers.
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Brazil Seeks WTO Relief Against Trump Tariffs
Brazil on Wednesday approached the World Trade Organization (WTO) for relief against a hefty trade tariff imposed by President Donald Trump on more than a third of US-bound exports from the Latin American powerhouse. The 50-percent tariff on several Brazilian goods went into force Wednesday over what Trump has termed a "witch hunt" against his far-right ally Jair Bolsonaro, the former president on trial for plotting a coup. Sources in the government of incumbent President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told AFP Brasilia had filed a request for consultations with the US mission to the WTO -- the first formal step in the trade body's dispute settlement process. Trump's latest tariff salvo raised duties on Brazil from 10 percent to 50 percent for key exports including coffee, beef and sugar. Exempt were nearly 700 other exports including civilian planes, orange juice and pulp, Brazil nuts, and some iron, steel and aluminum products. Brazil's Vice President Geraldo Alckmin previously told journalists the new tariff would apply to about 36 percent of the country's exports to the United States, equal to trade of about $14.5 billion last year. Trump's Brazil tariff is among the highest imposed on US trading partners and was framed in openly political terms, sweeping aside centuries-old trade ties and a surplus Brasilia put at $284 million last year. In an executive order last week, the Trump administration lashed out at Brazilian officials for "unjustified criminal charges" against Bolsonaro, on trial for allegedly plotting to wrest back power after losing the 2022 presidential election to Lula. Trump's order also charged that the Lula government's recent policies and actions threatened the US economy, national security, and foreign policy. US tensions with Brazil are not likely to dissipate soon, with a Brazilian judge on Monday placing Bolsonaro under house arrest pending the outcome of his trial for contravening a social media ban. The judge, Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, presides over Bolsonaro's trial and was himself hit with financial sanctions this week as Washington claimed he had "taken it upon himself to be judge and jury in an unlawful witch hunt." Moraes has clashed repeatedly with the far-right in Brazil, and with tech titan Elon Musk over the spread of online misinformation. Bolsonaro risks decades in prison if found guilty on the coup charges that had allegedly also included discussions to assassinate Lula and other senior officials. The tariff hike on Brazilian goods came a day before a separate wave of higher duties on dozens of economies ranging from the European Union to Taiwan. Analysts at Pantheon Macroeconomics estimate the pending increases would boost the average effective tariff rate for US imports to nearly 20 percent. This marks the highest level since at least the 1930s, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University.
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Gerrymandering in the US — why Democrats fled Texas – DW – 08/06/2025
Texas Democrats have fled the state to halt a redistricting vote aimed at cementing Republican power. President Donald Trump wants an electoral map that will help him in the 2026 midterms. Donald Trump has been back in the Oval Office as 47th president of the United States for a little over six months. In that time, he has kept the world economy busy with ever more punitive tariffs, hammered away at the foundations of American democracy, severely limited the rights of minorities such as the LGBTQ+ community in the US and militarized immigration policy. Opposition to the policies of Donald Trump and his fellow Republicans (GOP) has been voiced loud enough to be heard on the international stage on only a few occasions. Things have to be pretty spectacular to cut through the din, like the No Kings Day marches on June 14 — when millions of people across the country hit the streets to protest what they said was Trump acting more like an all-powerful monarch than a democratically elected president. Now, Texas' Democratic lawmakers are taking a stand. More than 50 Democratic members of the Texas House of Representatives — the lower house of the state's bicameral legislature — fled the state on Sunday in order to halt a key vote. Votes in the Texas House require two thirds of legislators to be present. There are a total of 150 seats in the Texas House of Representatives in Austin, Democrats hold 62 of them — and according to media reports, at least 51 of those politicians are currently out of state. No quorum, no vote. At the center of the fight is an issue that never fails to make waves in US politics — the drawing of political districting maps. President Trump wants Texas Republicans to redraw theirs while they have the chance — and he wants it done before the November 2026 midterm those elected in the midterms are all members of the US House of Representatives in Washington, D.C. Republicans have a lot of power in Washington these days; not only do they have the presidency, they also control both chambers of Congress — the US Senate and the US House of Representatives — where laws are written and passed, and important government positions filled. Whereas all 50 states each send two senators to Washington, things get more complicated when it comes to the number of representatives — with each state sending a different number, proportionate to their population. Texas has the second-highest number of representatives: 38 of them hailing from 38 different electoral districts. Each district operates on a simple majority, winner-take-all principle, meaning that the candidate with 51% of the vote wins the district and the seat — gaining the right to represent the district's citizens in Washington despite as many as 49% of them possibly voting for someone else. The GOP currently holds a 219-212 majority in the US House of Representatives with four seats vacant. When those seats are filled, Democrats could win back control of the US House by picking up just three seats. With an eye to the midterms, Trump began leaning on Texas Republicans to redraw voting maps to break up Democrat-leaning districts back in June. Although redistricting usually takes place every 10 years, following a census, this move after just five years has sparked a state battle with national implications — with Governor Greg Abbott calling a special legislative session scheduled to last until August 19 to force through the measure, and Democrats fleeing the state to keep it from happening. Right now, 25 of Texas' 38 US House seats are held by Republicans. Trump and his GOP want to maintain that dominance and even add seats. One way to make that a reality is to redraw electoral districts in a way that would benefit Republican candidates — a practice known as "gerrymandering." The term gerrymandering dates back to the year 1812, when Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry ordered new lines be drawn to define voting districts. One of the new districts drawn up at the governor's behest looked like a salamander to some observers, leading newspapers to run cartoons and editorials featuring the portmanteau Gerry-mander — combining the governor's name with the animal. In establishing a district's borders, those drawing them can determine whether it will be populated by likely Republican voters (conservative, largely white Americans, without college degrees) or those more likely to vote Democrat (progressive, often Black voters, with college degrees). Our chart makes clear how one party can gain an outsized advantage depending on how districts are drawn. With Republicans in control of both chambers of the Texas State Capitol as well as having Greg Abbott in the governor's mansion, it is a foregone conclusion that they will do all they can to see Trump's plan through — if they can vote on it. Gerrymandering isn't illegal, on the contrary, it is part of the political process in the US. In 2019, the US Supreme Court ruled that federal courts have no power to weigh in on whether or not a state's districting maps are fair to both parties. Some state courts have also ruled that they have an obligation to stay out of the fray because they cannot decide political arguments. That usually leaves the drawing of district maps to state politicians, as is the case in Texas. Other states, like California and Michigan, have established non-partisan districting commissions to carry out the task. Others still do leave districting to their courts, and six states have a population so small that they only have one House representative anyhow — so they do not have to worry about the stress that would go into drawing district lines. Governor Abbott recently told Fox News that Democrats had forfeited their seats in the Texas House of Representatives "because they are not doing the job they were elected to do." Abbott criticized his Democratic colleagues' behavior as "un-Texan" adding, "Texans don't run from a fight." Whether the governor can legally vacate Democratic seats in the Texas House is not entirely clear. But the breach of legislative rules can, for instance, trigger financial penalties. Moreover, Abbott can continue to call special sessions in the Texas State House, meaning that he can demand a vote as soon as Democrats return — or can be brought back — to Texas. Abbott has also tasked state law enforcement with tracking down and arresting Democratic lawmakers. But Texas State Troopers have no authority beyond state lines and most Democrats who fled the state are reportedly hunkered down in Democratic strongholds like Chicago, New York and Boston. It looks like it could take some time to resolve the deadlock.
