Banksying is the latest toxic dating trend, and you've probably already experienced it.
You may have already been a victim of banksying and didn't even know it. If you've had a partner who seems to slowly disappear from your life in strange but deliberate and perceptible ways – going as far as even destroying the evidence of your relationship, it's already been happening to you.
So what really is this toxic relationship term all about? "Banksying is when someone you like creates a strong romantic connection with you, and then vanishes without explanation. It's like a hit-and-run, but the car was a Bentley, and it left you spinning," said Connell Barrett, a dating coach and founder of Dating Transformation, "It comes from the street artist Banksy, who's famous for creating haunting murals—then he's gone without warning," said Barrett, who explained that in dating, it's the same move. "Someone makes you feel something special, and then vanishes," said Barrett.
'Copperfielding' might be the better name, he allows. "Because this isn't art—it's an illusion. They made you feel something magical, and then they made themselves disappear," said Barrett.
It's really rough and for those going through this, Banksying is more of a mind crush than even ghosting – which is terrible in its own right. "One minute you're thinking, 'This could be the one.' They seem very into you. Then suddenly… nothing. No closure. Just silence," said Barrett.
Barrett shared it happened to him once with a woman with whom he took improv classes. "On our first date, we were holding hands, cuddling, kissing. The bartender thought we were boyfriend-girlfriend. It felt like the beginning of something real. And I never heard from her again, and I was stunned. So yeah, I've been Banksy'd," said Barrett.
Barrett cautions that no matter how much you feel like you may need to, try to avoid the urge to ask, 'What did I do?' The truth is, you probably didn't do anything wrong. "Banksying is usually about the other person's fear. Flip the story," said Barrett. Try this mindset: 'I want someone who shows up fully, not someone who disappears.' This makes what happened about your higher standards, not about being rejected.
So why do people choose this way to end things? "It's conflict avoidance with a side order of self-protection. People who Banksy don't want the discomfort of telling you, 'We aren't a good fit.' Silence feels easier to them. They don't have to be the bad guy," said Barrett.
But to Barrett. It's even more than that. Banksying reflects a deeper dysfunction in dating today: "We perform intimacy without committing to emotional accountability. Apps and swipe culture have trained people to prioritize connection over consistency," said Barrett.
For Barrett. banksying is what happens when dating becomes a game of impression over intention—ghosting after making someone feel special. "That kind of dissonance is exhausting for anyone trying to date seriously," he said.
But there's good news: When someone Banksys you, they're actually doing you a favor. "In a way, their disappearing act is a gift. It saves you from months of mixed signals, letdowns and eventual heartache," said Barrett.
The right person won't vanish. "Together you'll create a lasting work of art. And unlike Banksy, you'll both be there to see it," said Barrett.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geek Tyrant
an hour ago
- Geek Tyrant
Super7's THUNDERCATS Thundertank with Panthro Now on Pre-Sale — GeekTyrant
Super7 has revealed is ThunderCats Thundertank vehicle, which comes with a Panthro 7″ scale action figure. The vehicle and figure are inspired by the original 80s toy line and Panthro includes two portraits, a few swap out hands, and nunchucks. The set is priced at $500, with a release scheduled for November 1. Super7 is one of the more pricy collector companies out there and for the price and quality of what you get, it just doesn't seem worth it. But, some collectors obviously like spending the big bucks on them! Super7 Thundercats ULTIMATES! Thundertank with Panthro, Toy – Vintage Thundertank Design 'ThunderCats, Ho! Get ready to relive the thrill of the ThunderCats' adventures across Third Earth—because the battle against Mumm-Ra and the Evil Mutants is back in a big way! The ULTIMATES! ThunderTank is roaring onto the scene with a bold, toy-accurate color scheme that perfectly matches the one we all grew up loving. 'This beast of a vehicle is packed with fan-favorite features: opening cargo bay doors, an articulated jaw, rolling wheels, and most exciting of all—an all-new Panthro figure! That's right, the ThunderCats' tough-as-nails mechanic is back, decked out in classic '80s toy-inspired colors, complete with an exclusive head sculpt and his signature nunchuks! But that's not all—this version of Panthro is a brand-new sculpt, the very first with pin-less knees and elbows, giving fans the most dynamic, poseable Panthro ever. 'Whether you're completing your ULTIMATES! ThunderCats lineup or diving into the Thundercats nostalgia for the first time, this toy-accurate Panthro and ThunderTank combo is the ultimate tribute to the legends of your childhood. Measuring 27' long and 17' wide, the ULTIMATES! ThunderTank can carry up to six ThunderCats ULTIMATES figures!'
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
‘Superman' Box Office Topping $400 Million Total Worldwide Box Office
After excellent weekday numbers, DC Studios is celebrating as Superman is on its way to saving the day with a big $400 million total after its second weekend at the worldwide box office. Rachel Brosnahan and David Corenswet star in "Superman." While slightly lower than more bullish estimates, including my own, the primary question was whether Superman had enough power to make it past $400 million this second weekend of release, which puts it on a steady course to cruise past $500 million and prove 'DC is back.' We'll see precisely how far beyond that figure Superman can climb, but for now this is two weekends in a row of good news and good numbers for the studio. Superman Saves The Day Writer-director and DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn should be flying high on not only the successful debut of a new era for DC, but also the widespread critical and mainstream public embrace of Superman. He made Superman likeable, relatable, and relevant again, and gave us a helluva fun time doing it. But it was always going to be hard for one film to revive not just Superman's own suffering brand, but also DC's entire cinematic reputation and financial future. This was almost a job for a Mission: Impossible team, but despite all of the baggage and odds, Gunn made the right choices and trusted people's hearts to respond to the innate goodness and kindness of the character. It was a leap of faith, and there was no guarantee anyone would be there to catch him. But that's what was on the line, however much it was understandably necessary to downplay that reality ahead of opening weekend (for one's own emotional sanity alone, let alone from a business perspective to manage expectations). Had Superman failed to gain altitude and wound up somewhere in similar box office territory with the previous nine failed DCEU cinematic efforts, it's unlikely that everything would have proceeded according to plan. A $400-450 million finish would've been a sign of such deep global mainstream audience rejection of DC and Superman that even what is arguably the best possible cinematic version to win everybody over again couldn't overcome the disinterest and distrust. And at that point, I suspect any projects not already in production would've been 'paused' while a big reassessment took place, potentially for example pivoting toward Matt Reeves' The Batman franchise as a last chance to lay some foundations for a larger cinematic world around the character and the superheroes around him (Batgirl, Robin, Nightwing) as well as villains worthy of their own films and HBO series. Meanwhile, they could halt further development on the rest of the DC slate and decide to license some bundled characters off to various other studios, or just take the pain of waiting for Reeves to complete his first Batman trilogy and then attempt to introduce a smaller slate of DC heroes – Superman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, Flash, and a few others – as the basis for a smaller new DCU founded on The Batman world. Which would be akin to an alternate reality where 2013's Man of Steel was released to expand The Dark Knight Trilogy into an entire DCEU, which would've all but certainly have made at least the first few films much bigger grossers and potentially provided a stable enough and lucrative enough DCEU to have survived. The chance for a do-over at that approach, if the DCU launch with Superman had failed, would seem too tempting to ignore. Perhaps even trying to keep David Corenswet in the Superman role and merely retooling the world around him and the rest of the DCU toward something more like The Batman. Or maybe it's more likely they'd decide to expand out The Batman into a bat-world, but without too many other heroes. Some characters like Batgirl, Robin, Nightwing, Catwoman, Green Arrow, Black Canary, and similar non-powered heroes could work as spinoffs. Then, they could simply treat Superman and others as standalone solo franchises instead of a shared world, which might mean a lot of licensing deals for those characters instead of further attempts at reboots that drown in red ink. That all means of course that, had Superman not enjoyed so much acclaim and family love translating into the box office numbers it needed to claim success, DC Studios still had some strong go-to options in their bag of tricks. That wouldn't erase the financial pain involved, nor would it make up for the rejection of Superman despite doing pretty much everything exactly right – I will say again, if audiences aren't going to show up and reward this Superman movie, there's probably no movie the studio could've made and released that would've worked at this point. Superman Luckily for the studio, none of that happened (although many of us still also hope Matt Reeves is allowed to continue his bat-world and expand it as long as WBD and DC Studios can convince him to do it), and Superman is off to a good start with lots of room to build and score much higher box office in the future. So with $400 million under his belt, DC's iconic hero has risen to the first two challenges, and faces just one more weekend to confirm how bright an already sunny future will be. The next big test to see if Superman has fully regained his box office powers comes next weekend, with Fantastic Four headed for what appears to be opening around $120 million in my estimations. While most tracking points to a roughly $105 million debut for Marvel's 2025 tentpole, I expect it to overperform against expectations similar to Superman, but with much better international ticket sales. Superman needs to hold well against the MCU's challenger, if it wants to do more than just dive across the $500 million finish line. After this weekend, it needs at least another $100 million globally, so a third weekend total cume of about $465-475 is where we want to see it if there's to be any chance at reaching $600 million. Superman should easily pass $500 million at this rate, so now we wait to see it's hold against Fantastic Four: First Steps next weekend, and whether the Man of Steel can fly higher toward $600 million or wind up at still safe but less impressive $550 million territory. Stay tuned for updates and check this space again soon.
New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
The Benson Boone Crumbl Cookie and Our Ultraprocessed Culture
A few weeks ago I overheard my daughters talking about 'the Benson Boone Crumbl cookie.' This collection of words made no sense to me. It sounded like some kind of sinister incantation. They kept saying it over and over, and I told them that if they said it one more time into a mirror, they would probably summon a demon. I later discovered that they were talking about the branded baked good Benson Boone's Moonbeam Ice Cream Cookie and its garbage can of flavors: cookies and cream, lemon, berry and marshmallow. Boone is a pop singer, and the cookie is named for his latest hit, 'Mystical Magical,' which has the lyrics 'You can feel like / Moonbeam ice cream, taking off your bluejeans.' Crumbl is the store, which sold the 920-calorie cookie. The cookie was a viral sensation, though the reviews have been mixed. The Times's Madison Malone Kircher described it as 'cloyingly sweet and frosted with notes of lemon, berry and an unnameable processed aftertaste that lingers on the tongue as if you've just woken up and have yet to brush your teeth.' A TikTok wag said it tasted like eating a chocolate cookie and then chasing it with a glass of lemonade, and it made her ask, 'Ugh, why would I do that?' She added, 'Weirdly enough, it does taste like how the song sounds.' I think the song sounds as if you had given Hall and Oates lobotomies. I am again cranking up my inner Andy Rooney to tell you that this product is an example of the strange drift of pop culture in the year 2025. We're inundated with hollow, cash-grabbing cross-promotion, leading to an ultraprocessed, endlessly self-referential jumble, devoid of quality or even any meaning. It's bad enough when the brand collaboration originated with a genuinely good performance. Sabrina Carpenter parlayed the success of the ear worm 'Espresso' into a partnership with Dunkin', which last year released Sabrina's Brown Sugar Shakin' Espresso. I preferred the song before its association with 'the Dunkin' cinematic universe,' a phrase invented by the Dunkin' comms team that I find almost as upsetting as 'Benson Boone Crumbl cookie.' Crumbl isn't a stranger to the collaboration game. Previously, Dove partnered with it, because I guess people were clamoring to have their armpits smell like 'notes of warm sugar cookie topped with pink buttercream frosting.' Just today I got an email from a cosmetics store about a new collaboration between the luxury lip mask brand Laneige and Baskin-Robbins. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
