Headache over access and security at Nottingham train station
The right of way was put over the bridge after an earlier crossing further down the tracks was demolished.But this has left EMR with two seemingly opposing obligations - public passage and station security.It said fare evasion from Nottingham could total £1.1m annually and barrier-free access from the bridge facilitated this.Additionally, the firm said 62% of violent and anti-social behaviour occurred between 19:00 and 06:00.From 18 August, the time the stairs are fenced off will be extended from the current 23:00 to 05:00 to between 19:00 and 06:00.
Michael O'Callaghan-Staples, head of station experience for EMR, said the firm was always looking for longer term fixes. "It's a unique situation and this is the solution we have got available to us at the moment," he said."We will continue to work with stakeholders to work out a more rounded solution in the long term."He also admitted they had discussed the right of way itself with the city council."We have engaged with Nottingham City Council about the rerouting or closure of the public right of way," he added."But that is a complex process and we continue to work with our partners at Nottingham City Council to see what the opportunities are for that space."
Steve Jones from Rail Future, which campaigns for passenger rights and rail improvements, recognised EMR was in a difficult situation.He said: "It is rare in such a large station to have this right to public access."Nottingham station also has the issue that the main entrance is at the western end, but a lot of the train activity, especially with regional services, takes place at the eastern end."It's a long walk, which can be more than an inconvenience if you are changing trains and can't access the bridge."Those minutes can make the difference between catching your train or not, so it's a serious issue."However, Mr Jones accepted fare evasion losses are "unsustainable".He said: "Our solution, and one we have been calling for for some time, is there is a need for another bridge at Nottingham station, at the eastern end."This would be a big investment but if it avoids the £1.1m loss EMR claims, it has a good business case and it would, with lifts the current bridge lacks, be an enormous benefit to passengers."
Rail users also expressed reservations about the system.Martha Marigmen said: "I almost exclusively use this bridge because it's far more convenient to get a taxi or just walk home."It takes a lot longer when you have to go through the main entrance and if you want to crack down on fare evasion, check the tickets on every train."Carl Phillips added: "For the able bodied it's not much of an issue but for those with pushchairs or mobility issues it's more of an inconvenience."Fare dodging is a problem but I think a lot of that comes down to the cost of public transport, which is ridiculous."Nottingham City Council declined to comment on the issue.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
Fifth person charged with arson after Ferndale house fire
A 32-year-old man has become the fifth person to be charged in relation to a house fire in Rhondda Cynon house was badly damaged and others were evacuated following the blaze in Protheroe Street, Ferndale, on 28 were no serious injuries, but some residents were treated for smoke Manito, from Weston-super-Mare, has been charged with arson with intent to endanger life. Storm Truman, 19, Auryn Guster, 19, Connor Pitt, 23 and Alfie Wheeler, 18, all from Weston-super-Mare, appeared in Merthyr Tydfil Magistrates' Court on 30 July charged with arson with intent to endanger Wheeler was also charged with possessing a knife blade or a sharp pointed article in a public pleas were entered. All five remain in police custody ahead of their next court appearance.
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Killers must reveal where victims are before they are released, say devastated families
Killers must be locked up for life if they refuse to disclose the location of the body, the families of two high-profile murder victims have said. Relatives of Arlene Fraser, whose husband Nat Fraser has twice been convicted of her murder following her 1998 disappearance in Elgin, spoke of the 'mental torture' they are having to endure because no trace of her has ever been found. The family of Suzanne Pilley, who was murdered in 2010 by her work colleague David Gilroy, who was given a life sentence for murder, also condemned his lack of remorse or rehabilitation as he continues to refuse to disclose the location of her remains. They both welcomed a commitment secured from Justice Secretary Angela Constance that this 'must' be taken into account by the Parole Board when making decisions about release and that this will be delivered before next year's election. But they are now pushing her to go further still and introduce a 'no body no parole' rule which means killers who don't disclose the remains can never be released on parole. Ministers will consider whether to go further on 'Suzanne's Law' as part of a consultation on parole which will be published imminently. Gail Fairgrieve, Suzanne Pilley's sister, said: 'I think that people need to understand, the Parole Board need to understand, that this crime was still continuing. It is perpetrating the crime against us. We are still dealing with this every day. 'Everyday events - you go into a card shop and you can't buy anything for your sister. It's there constantly and he has information that could just put us at ease and bring Suzanne home. 'I feel that this ruling had to consider now that he can't possibly be rehabilitated or show remorse if he is continuing to withhold this information. This information is a full part of his crime and he needs to give us that information, otherwise life imprisonment means life imprisonment.' She added: 'They have to consider it and when they look at all the considerations that the Parole Board look at to release a prisoner, (by) withholding that information from us he is not rehabilitating, there is no remorse, there is nothing.' Carol Gillies, the sister of Arlene Fraser, said: 'I feel that he (Nat Fraser) controlled Arlene when she was alive, and he is controlling her when she's dead as well. 'If the Parole Board can almost give them a choice - tell us more information or stay in jail - so he needs to make a choice, it's his choice what he does.' On the emotional impact of Arlene's body never being discovered, she said: 'It is a form of mental torture for us, it really is. I don't like using dramatic words but it is. He has that information, there is no doubt about it.' The families of the two victims yesterday spoke to journalists at an event organised by Victim Support Scotland following a meeting with Ms Constance. During the talks, Ms Constance gave a firm commitment that an amendment to the Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform Bill, which was added at stage two and ensures the Parole Board 'must' take into account when killers don't disclose the location of their victim's remains when making decisions, will be delivered. Choking back tears yesterday, Ms Fairgrieve described the difficulty of family events like birthdays, Christmases and weddings, and went on: 'It's the same with my kids, she had a niece and a nephew... and she wasn't there for it. He denied her that. 'I think I sometimes feel guilty that I have a life. She was only 33 when she was taken. She wouldn't want me to feel guilty, she would want me to live my life. But she has missed out on so much.' Sylvia Pilley, mother of Suzanne: 'I know Suzanne had justice when he was put in prison but her life has been cut short. She really wanted a family and she has never been given that, and we miss her. That's really why we are doing this.' Under current legislation, Gilroy will be eligible to be considered for parole in March 2030, while Nat Fraser - who was found guilty of killing his wife Arlene - will be eligible in October 2028. Describing why the families are fighting to deliver 'Suzanne's Law, Ms Fairgrieve said: 'We may never find where she is, and he may get out of prison and that is something we will have to learn to live with. But we can challenge the rules and the regulations now and we've got people that are committed to changing those. We will just hopefully improve the life for people if it happens to them.' Now the families are pushing alongside Victim Support Scotland for a 'no body no parole' rule to be introduced as part of an upcoming consultation on parole. Ms Fairgrieve said: 'Parole regulations are something that will effect the perpetrators in these cases but we would like to see the law changed initially so that when they come to trial they are well aware that if they never disclose where their remains or a body is there is no chance of parole. That is where the law needs to stand, we need to move towards that.' During yesterday's talks, Ms Constance is said to have pledged to consider the idea, similar to a system currently in place in Australia. Ms Gillies said: 'I think it should happen because when Nat was sentenced Lord Bracadale said 'you instigated this, you instructed this' and he obviously knows what happened: he disposed of Arlene in a very ruthless, efficient way. To just have Nat Fraser in front of the Parole Board and all they are considering is the risk or how he behaved in jail is just not enough. 'If he was to get out then it would be gone forever.' Ms Constance said: 'I am grateful to the families of Suzanne Pilley and Arlene Fraser for meeting with me today. They have suffered heartbreaking losses, compounded by not knowing the final resting place of their loved ones. My deepest sympathies remain with them. 'In March, I supported an amendment to the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform Bill that will mean the Parole Board, when making decisions about release, must take account of whether a prisoner has information about the disposal of a victim's remains, but has not disclosed it. 'At today's meeting, I reiterated my firm commitment to this change, which will become law if the Bill is passed in Parliament.'
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Moment more than a dozen council officers abseiled down wall to clear man's homeless camp on Brighton's seafront
More than a dozen council officers scaled down a wall to clear a homeless man's encampment following a 'few weeks' of unsuccessful contact. Officials descended onto Madeira Terrace in Brighton 's seafront at around 9am today where they conducted their clean-up operation - still ongoing at around 3pm. Images show men donning red helmets as they clutch stacks of books and cling onto blankets. An aerial view of the camp itself shows a sorry sight as officers stand in the midst of stray boxes and other bits of rubbish. Items seized included a homemade green tent that housed multiple possessions including multiple bicycle wheels and piles of clothes. Brighton and Hove Council is thought to have been in contact with a man living there for 'a few weeks' since the camp was put in place at the start of summer, the Argus reports. It is believed the man residing in the camp, which has restricted access, had left the scene. Alistair McNair, leader of the Brighton and Hove Conservative Group, criticised the 'heavy handed' manner in which officers were seen to respond. He said: 'It usually takes days and days to relocate travellers from other sites such as Hove lawns and months to relocate occupied vehicles. 'Is this a new policy from the council? To move tents and vehicles using private companies as quickly as possible?' The council was approached for comment.
