EU to ban airlines from charging extra for hand luggage: What does this mean for passengers?
'Today's vote marks an important step toward fairer and more transparent travel,' Matteo Ricci, vice-president of the EU Committee on Transport and Tourism and the bill's lead sponsor, said in a press release.
He added that clearly defined rules for free hand luggage were 'a fundamental right to avoid unjustified extra costs', ensuring a 'fairer and more efficient system'.
The measure comes in addition to wider reforms proposed by the European Commission in 2023 on passenger rights. It would require airlines to disclose total flight costs earlier in the booking process and affect compensation rights.
Here's how the ruling will affect air passengers and when the changes could come into effect.
Air passengers should have right to free carry on luggage
Under the new rules, travellers taking a flight in the EU will have the right to carry a personal bag, such as a handbag or rucksack, and a small hand luggage item on board at no extra cost.
Personal bags can have maximum dimensions of 40x30x15 centimetres, and hand luggage items will be allowed maximum dimensions of 100cm and a weight of 7kg.
Airlines will not be allowed to charge passengers any additional fees for carrying these items.
It follows a ruling from more than a decade ago by the European Court of Justice that decreed that the carriage of hand luggage cannot be subject to a surcharge, provided that it meets reasonable requirements in terms of weight and dimensions and complies with the applicable safety requirements.
Recently, a group of consumer organisations asked national consumer watchdogs and the European Commission to conduct an inquiry into what they allege are unfair hand luggage charges imposed by budget airlines.
The low-cost carriers levy extra charges for luggage they claim is 'oversized' but which should come under the size and weight measurements considered 'reasonable' by the EU, the consumer groups say.
Will new hand luggage rules make air fares more expensive?
While the vote seems a win for air passengers, a spokesperson for industry association Airlines for Europe (A4E) warned that it could mean paying higher air fares overall, especially those who want to travel light.
'Today's vote on enforcing passenger rights and multimodal passenger rights has seen the Transport Committee (TRAN) finally take action against online freeriding by spelling out the duties and liabilities of every business that sells travel,' the spokesperson said.
'Unfortunately, this is overshadowed by the Committee using this vote to add air travel specific amendments by the backdoor that remove choice from passengers and their ability to decide what services they want to pay for and, most importantly, what service they don't.'
More support for vulnerable travellers
The vote for hand luggage regulations has been added to the European Commission's 2023 proposal to bolster passenger rights. As part of the proposal, MEPs want to ensure children under 12 years old are seated next to their accompanying passenger free of charge.
They also want more protections for passengers with reduced mobility by making sure an accompanying person can travel with them free of charge, and adding a compensation right in case of loss or damage to mobility equipment or injury to an assistance animal.
Lawmakers push for clarity around compensation
The 2023 draft rules also clarify the role of intermediaries (ticket vendors or retailers) in reimbursing air passengers for cancellations, long delays or denied boarding.
MEPs want these companies to inform passengers at the time of booking about the full cost of an air ticket, intermediation or service fees, and the reimbursement process, which should not take longer than 14 days.
Should an intermediary fail to respect this deadline, it would be up to the air carrier to process the reimbursement within seven days.
Related
Are flights to Dubai and Qatar still cancelled? US strikes on Iran add to global travel disruption
Flight cancelled to the Middle East? Here are your passenger rights and travel insurance advice
Lawmakers also supported the proposal to introduce a common EU-wide form for compensation and reimbursement requests.
They want to add a provision tasking air carriers with sending passengers the pre-filled form, or activate alternative automatic communication channels, within 48 hours following a disruption.
To get the green light, the various proposals will now go to a vote by the full parliament.
This might see modifications made to the rulings as they will need to be negotiated and approved by member states before they can come into force.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JPMorgan Downgrades Enphase Energy (ENPH) Stock to Neutral
Enphase Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:ENPH) is one of the JPMorgan downgraded the company's stock to 'Neutral' from 'Overweight' with a price objective of $37, down from the prior target of $64, as reported by The Fly. The firm has updated its US residential solar growth assumptions in an effort to reflect the impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill. The firm noted expected share loss and margin pressure, as the industry is shifting towards third-party owned systems, which led to the downgrade of Enphase Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:ENPH)'s stock. A solar panel array stretched across a large open field, its glimmering panels reflecting the sun. However, the company has a strong US manufacturing presence as it shipped ~1.21 million microinverters and 44.1 MWh of IQ Batteries in Q1 2025. Enphase Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:ENPH)'s total revenue came in at $356.1 million as compared to $382.7 million in Q4 2024. Furthermore, Enphase Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:ENPH) announced that production shipments of its newest EV charger, the IQ® EV Charger 2, have been expanded throughout Europe to now include Greece, Romania, Ireland, and Poland. To give a brief overview, the IQ EV Charger 2 is a smart charger that has been designed to work seamlessly with Enphase solar and battery systems or as a powerful standalone charger. While we acknowledge the potential of ENPH as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 13 Cheap AI Stocks to Buy According to Analysts and 11 Unstoppable Growth Stocks to Invest in Now Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Britain's gas storage site threatened with closure this winter
Britain's largest gas storage site risks closure by the end of the year unless the Government steps in to provide financial support. Centrica, which owns the Rough storage facility, has warned of the potential shutdown this winter as it battles steep losses at the site. Rough represents half of Britain's gas storage capacity and its closure would be a significant blow to the resilience of the country's energy system. The UK remains reliant on gas to help back up intermittent wind and solar, particularly over winter. Chris O'Shea, the chief executive of Centrica, which owns British Gas, warned the storage site was expected to lose £100m this year and said: 'We can't sustain that.' He told The Telegraph. 'I would be willing to close it. My job is clear. It is to grow the company, grow jobs, grow profits, and I take that seriously. 'We've made money over the past couple of years. But we're now pouring £100m into this asset that we could invest in other things.' Centrica aims to redevelop the 40-year-old site to be able to store hydrogen alongside natural gas. However, Mr O'Shea said: 'The market at the moment is not giving the right signals to invest in storage.' The company has asked ministers for a so-called cap-and-floor mechanism to help fund the £2bn project. While Centrica would provide the investment up front, the mechanism would effectively mean guaranteed funding underwritten by a levy on consumer bills. 'I want a mechanism that encourages investment in Rough,' Mr O'Shea said. 'We have seen it in nuclear, but let's extend that to other assets that are needed to bring energy resilience.' Mr O'Shea said he had been encouraged by recent talks with the Government. He praised Rachel Reeves and Ed Miliband for highlighting the importance of gas storage as part of the Government's industrial strategy. However, the call for state support comes at a delicate time for Labour. Ms Reeves's Budget has been left in tatters by a series of policy about-turns and poor economic data, forcing her to find billions rather than consider further spending. Meanwhile, Mr Miliband is under pressure to demonstrate progress towards meeting his promise of lowering energy bills by £300 this parliament. It suggests the Energy Secretary may be wary of signing off on a measure that add more levies on to bills. Mr O'Shea warned the issue of support for Rough was urgent and could not be put off. He said: 'I think we've got to see something [from the Government] probably this year. If we get towards the end of the year and we've got a situation whereby we've got no prospect of making a profit, then we're just throwing good money after bad. 'It would be like a charitable donation and that's not our business. If we were to do that, then the shareholders would act quite quickly.' 'No one likes a freeloader' Centrica has already stopped filling the facility off the Yorkshire coast amid concerns about the site's financial viability. Mr O'Shea said Government intervention was key to safeguarding Britain's energy security. He said: 'If Rough closes, then the UK has just six days of gas storage available, compared to 100 in France, Netherlands and Germany. 'If we get into a crisis and the UK hasn't invested in gas storage, then I am not sure it will flow from the Continent. 'Politically, if you're the prime minister of France, Germany, and you look at a country that hasn't invested in gas storage, then I am not sure that will work. There is a need for us to recognise the risk that no one likes a freeloader.' The potential closure of Rough risks reviving concerns over Britain's strained energy supplies, particularly as the country moves to a system more reliant on intermittent renewables. Gas power stations remain crucial for backstopping Britain's energy system when wind and solar generation fall short, something that happens during so-called 'dunkelflaute' periods of low wind and limited light that occur over winter. 'We have had pretty warm winters in the past couple of years, and that has helped us,' said Mr O'Shea. 'If we'd had cold winters, then we would have struggled. Would you feel comfortable driving in the red zone in the revs all the time? I don't feel comfortable with an energy system that has such a small margin for error.' The closure of Rough would lead to the potential loss of hundreds of jobs at the site. A Government spokesman said: 'The future of Rough storage is a commercial decision for Centrica, but we remain open to discussing proposals on all gas storage sites, as long as it provides value for money for taxpayers.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Natural Gas Dominance Unchallenged in Global Energy Landscape
With much of the world's attention focused on wind turbines, solar panels, and electric vehicles, natural gas has grown in importance as the backbone of modern energy systems. It fuels power plants, heats homes, drives industry, and—through liquefied natural gas (LNG)—connects continents. The newly released 2025 Statistical Review of World Energy highlights just how indispensable natural gas has become, despite mounting pressure to decarbonize. Following the previous article on global oil production and consumption trends, let's dig into the numbers behind the global gas market, with a focus on production, consumption, and the increasingly critical role of LNG exports. U.S. Still Leads the Pack in Production In 2024, global natural gas production reached a record-breaking 398.0 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d). The United States alone accounted for 25% of that, producing just under 100 Bcf/d. That marked a slight decline from the record output in 2023, but still more than five times Canada's output, its closest North American peer. Much of this strength comes from the shale gas revolution that began about 20 years ago, turning the U.S. into both the world's largest natural gas producer and ultimately the world's top LNG exporter. Russia, which the U.S. overtook for first place among gas producers in 2011, remains the world's second-largest producer, with 60.8 Bcf/d of output in 2024. But that figure remains below its pre-sanction highs as exports to Europe dried up and pipeline projects faced delays. Moscow has attempted to pivot to Asian markets, but logistical and political hurdles have slowed progress. Other top producers include: Iran and Qatar, which remain vital players in the Middle East, producing around 25 and 17 Bcf/d, respectively. China, whose domestic gas output has doubled over the past decade, now stands at 23 Bcf/d—an impressive feat as the country pushes to displace coal with cleaner-burning alternatives. Australia, at 14 Bcf/d, has carved out a global leadership role in LNG, although future growth may be constrained by aging fields and regulatory pressure. Africa's contributions are modest in comparison. Algeria leads the continent with 9.1 Bcf/d, followed by Egypt and Nigeria. Infrastructure bottlenecks and underinvestment have limited the continent's broader potential. Notably, over the past decade, more than half of global natural gas production growth has come from OECD countries, albeit production in the EU has declined by two-thirds. This underscores that despite a global push toward renewables, countries continue to seek flexible energy supplies that balance affordability with lower carbon intensity. Consumption: Asia Rises, OECD Stabilizes Global consumption of natural gas in 2024 hit an all-time high of 398 Bcf/d, more than double the level seen in 1990. Much of this growth has been driven by non-OECD nations—and especially Asia. The U.S. remains the world's largest consumer at 87 Bcf/d, accounting for about 22% of global demand in 2024. Russia is in second place at 46 Bcf/d, although growth has slowed over the past decade. China is third, with consumption more than doubling over the past 10 years to reach 42 Bcf/d. This reflects both rapid industrialization and government efforts to reduce air pollution by shifting growth away from coal. Other notable consumers include: Iran: 24 Bcf/d, largely for domestic use. Canada and Saudi Arabia: Around 12 Bcf/d each, largely for petrochemicals and power. Japan and Germany: Just under 9 Bcf/d each, with both showing signs of decline as efficiency measures and renewables gain ground. India: 6.8 Bcf/d, growing gradually, especially in fertilizer and power sectors. Regionally, Asia-Pacific has nearly caught North America in total consumption. As of 2024, the region accounts for 23.6% of global demand—led by China, India, and Japan. OECD nations still make up over 43% of the total but there has been essentially no overall growth there since 2018. Even Africa, long a minor player in gas demand, is beginning to scale. Countries like Algeria and Egypt are seeing stronger growth, both due to improved energy access and the local development of gas resources. The data tells a compelling story: over the past decade, 74% of the 70 Bcf/d in global demand growth came from non-OECD nations—a reversal from the early 2000s when the developed world drove expansion. LNG: The Real Game-Changer If there's one segment that has transformed global gas dynamics in the past decade, it's liquefied natural gas. In 2024, global LNG exports hit nearly 546 billion cubic meters—or roughly 53 Bcf/d—tripling since 2010. The United States now leads the world in LNG exports, shipping more than 11 Bcf/d in 2024. Just 15 years ago, the U.S. was building LNG import terminals. Today, it's not only energy self-sufficient, but also helping allies diversify away from Russian supply. Qatar, the long-time global leader, is now second at 10.3 Bcf/d. While its export volumes have plateaued, Qatar is investing heavily in capacity expansion and could reclaim its crown in coming years. Australia is close behind, also at 10.3 Bcf/d, but faces declining output from mature fields. Other notable exporters include: Russia: 4.3 Bcf/d of LNG exports—limited by sanctions and slow infrastructure development. Nigeria and Algeria: The backbone of Africa's with 4.9 Bcf/d of LNG exports between them. Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei: Significant Asia-Pacific suppliers, though overshadowed by newcomers. Papua New Guinea: A rising player, with over 1.1 Bcf/d in LNG exports despite only recently entering the market. Trinidad & Tobago: The Caribbean's major LNG supplier, though its output has declined from previous highs. Europe remains mostly a consumer of LNG rather than a supplier. Norway contributes modestly, while the rest of the continent plays a marginal role in exports. Perhaps the most important observation here is how the LNG trade has shifted from a few key producers to a broad mix of suppliers across five continents. That diversification has created a more liquid and flexible gas market. Looking Ahead: Natural Gas in a Decarbonizing World Despite widespread climate commitments, natural gas remains essential to global energy stability. Its role as a bridge fuel—replacing coal while enabling the growth of intermittent renewables—has only grown in recent years. Still, challenges remain. Price volatility, infrastructure constraints, and mounting regulatory pressure—particularly in Europe—are reshaping how gas is produced, moved, and consumed. The regulatory push toward carbon capture, hydrogen blending, and lower methane emissions will continue to evolve the landscape. But if the past decade is any guide, natural gas is far from becoming obsolete. It's global, flexible, and adaptable—and if anything, it has cemented itself as the quiet giant of the energy world. By Robert Rapier More Top Reads From this article on
