
‘No pain, no gain' is the motto of the new Trump economy
If you really want to know, all you have to do is look at this map. Created by economist Mark Perry, it shows the relative size of the economy of each U.S. state compared to countries with commensurate GDP.
It's eye-opening.
California's economy is bigger than the United Kingdom's. Pennsylvania's is bigger than that of South Korea. Mexico, with a population of 130 million, its economy is only the size of Florida's (23 million). Canada's economy is smaller than that of Texas.
In fact, for all their bluster, it's no secret to the leaders of both Mexico and Canada that the U.S. economy is eight times larger than both of their countries' economies combined.
Trump knows this map very well. He knows that America's economy is huge. He's fully aware that it's the biggest, most stable and most judicial in the world. It's bigger than China. It dwarfs Russia'. And it certainly dominates all the European countries (even combined), not to mention Canada and Mexico.
To him, something doesn't make sense. Why should the world's biggest economy be treated unfairly?
Trump doesn't think it's fair that German's tariffs on American cars are 10 percent compared to the 2.5 percent rate we charge on theirs, so he wants reciprocity. He's not amused over the fact that dairy products purchased from Canada can be priced as much as 200 to 300 percent higher than what we're selling back. Or that Mexico has a 16 percent 'value-add' tax to most imported products.
Trump wants parity. Like any business person, he doesn't want to see costs go up. In fact, he wants to bring them down.
His aim is for other countries to simply lower the artificially raised prices of their goods so that American companies and consumers can buy them cheaper — just like the citizens in their countries can do with the products we sell them. And if countries aren't going to level the playing field, then he's prepared to make our goods more expensive for their businesses and consumers. Sometimes you have to endure some pain to get to that goal.
To level the playing field, Trump wages a tariff war. He bumps up the tax charged on foreign products to discourage consumers from buying them and corporations from using them to build their products. By doing so, he encourages companies to buy and make those products in the U.S., which in turn rebuilds the infrastructure we have lost over the past five decades and adds jobs.
Of course this will take time. But have patience.
Trump can wage this war because he has the world's largest weapon: the U.S. economy. When a consumer of our size changes its buying patterns, it can have a devastating effect on others. Canada and Mexico can talk a big game. But the U.S. has all the resources to outlast them in the long run.
Of course, higher tariffs will cause higher prices. Yes, they will generate disturbances in supply chains. They're disruptive to markets. They create uncertainty, and even anger our partners. But Trump asks: shouldn't we be angry too?
Is it right that we pay so much more for products when we're in such a position of power? Usually it's the big guy — the large corporations — that squeezes the smaller guy (I know this. I'm the smaller guy). So why is that not happening with international trade?
Will Trump's trade war work? Economists hate it. Academics hate it. But business people? Well, that depends.
My clients in the construction industry aren't too happy about potentially paying more for Canadien lumber. Some farmers aren't thrilled either. But those I work with in the steel industry are cheering. So are companies that manufacture furniture and cabinets in the U.S. that have been faced with the dumping of competing products from China. Automakers are thrilled. Unions like it. Equipment and material manufacturers want more.
Long term, U.S. businesses will adapt. They will bring more work back here. They will re-invest in infrastructure particularly, as Trump also plans, by taking advantage of tax incentives to be soon passed. U.S. businesses will find new trading partners located in countries that offer a fairer playing field. They will re-negotiate terms with existing overseas suppliers who are facing a serious slowdown in orders from these biggest customers spiked by higher tariffs. They will pivot and adjust and alter their buying patterns.
They can do this freely, legally and with minimal interference because they operate in the world's largest and most powerful economy. And they can do this with more ease than their counterparts in most other countries that face more regulations and bureaucracy. What will ultimately happen is that these countries will come, hat in hand, to the negotiating table.
Tariffs will never be eliminated. But they will be corrected, and more in the favor of U.S. interests. There will be no choice. This will happen. If you don't believe me, just look at the map.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Wildly Claims Wall Street Journal And China Are In Cahoots Amid Epstein Lawsuit
President Donald Trump alleged in a bizarre rant that The Wall Street Journal wants to see China 'WIN, BABY, WIN' on Thursday. 'The reason that The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board is always negative on 'TRUMP,' and the Hundreds of Billions of Dollars we're bringing into our Country through Tariffs, numbers that the U.S.A. has never seen before, is because they are China centric or, at a minimum, Globalists, and they would rather see China and the World, for reasons unknown, 'WIN, BABY, WIN,' the POTUS wrote in a Truth Social post. Trump then insisted that if 'the United States were not able to charge Tariffs to other Countries, it would be Economically defenseless and, of no further force or effect. The only thing that can destroy our Country are Crooked, Radical Left Judges, of which there are many!' The president has faced scrutiny over his sweeping global tariffs, which went into effect Thursday, subsequently raising the prices of household goods for Americans. The tariffs are projected to affect imports from more than 60 countries. The WSJ — which has grilled the president's efforts during his second term in office — and Trump have been embroiled in an ongoing feud. The dispute ignited further after the outlet published a report about an alleged, racy birthday cardthat Trump sent to convicted sex offender and disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. The letter was said to contain a drawing of a naked woman and a strange message about secrets, according to the WSJ. Trump, who is suing the WSJ over its report on the letter, has denied writing the letter. 'I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women,' he told the Journal. 'It's not my language. It's not my words.' The president added: 'I'm gonna sue The Wall Street Journal just like I sued everyone else.' Trump further slammed the WSJ over their report in a separate Truth Social post, calling the article a 'false, malicious, and defamatory story.' Related... Trump Fires Back At Reporters Over 'Bulls**t' Epstein Question Trump Lashes Out At 'Racist Sleazebag' Charlamagne Tha God After Epstein-MAGA Comment Trump's Sleight-Of-Hand On The Jeffrey Epstein Scandal


The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump slams WSJ amid Epstein lawsuit, claiming it's ‘China centric'
President Trump on Thursday slammed The Wall Street Journal's editorial board for routinely criticizing his trade policy with 'China-centric' rhetoric. 'The reason that The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board is always negative on 'TRUMP,' and the Hundreds of Billions of Dollars we're bringing into our Country through Tariffs, numbers that the U.S.A. has never seen before, is because they are China centric or, at a minimum, Globalists, and they would rather see China and the World, for reasons unknown, 'WIN, BABY, WIN,'' the president wrote in a Truth Social post. 'If the United States were not able to charge Tariffs to other Countries, it would be Economically defenseless and, of no further force or effect,' he added. In recent months, the Journal's editorial board has published a series of op-eds critiquing the president's fluctuating trade rates while alleging measures that violate federal law. 'He's treating the North American economy as a personal plaything, as markets gyrate with each presidential whim,' the board wrote in March. 'It's doubtful Mr. Trump even has the power to impose these tariffs, and we hope his afflatus gets a legal challenge.' Months later, the outlet published an article detailing a birthday letter allegedly signed by the president and sent to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump denied the correspondence and responded with a lawsuit naming Rupert Murdoch, the Journal and NewsCorp, accusing the paper of relying on 'sources that don't even exist.' As the legal battle plays out in court, the president has continued to reject disapproval from the conservative outlet. 'The only thing that can destroy our Country are Crooked, Radical Left Judges, of which there are many!' Trump wrote on Thursday.


The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Questions loom over potential Trump-Putin summit
Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with Putin in recent months as Russia pounds Ukraine despite U.S. calls for a pause in the fighting. The administration on Wednesday announced tariffs on India over its purchases of Russian oil, and additional sanctions on Russia are expected Friday. Much is still unknown about the meeting, including when, where — and even whether — it will happen. Both the White House and the Kremlin have indicated the meeting will take place soon, potentially as early as next week. But officials did not offer details on where it would take place, how long it would last or who would be involved. Trump told European leaders on a call on Wednesday that his idea was to meet with Putin and then have a trilateral meeting with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. It was unclear if all parties would agree to such a setup, or who else might attend. Trump told reporters Thursday that Zelensky's attendance was not a prerequisite for him to meet with Putin. Possible venues could include Turkey, which has served as a mediator for U.S.-Russian prisoner swaps. The United Arab Emirates has also mediated between Russia and Ukraine for prisoner swaps. Qatar is a mediator the U.S. has relied on heavily in negotiating between Israel and Hamas and between warring parties in Africa. One key piece of any potential summit is Ukraine's role. Trump indicated to European leaders that his idea would be to meet with Putin, then host a meeting with Putin and Zelensky. The Kremlin had earlier dismissed the possibility of a meeting between Putin and Zelensky unless negotiators had reached the final stages of a deal to end the war. Zelensky has not publicly commented on a potential meeting with Putin, and such a meeting would be the first time the two leaders have come face-to-face since the war began in 2022. But he has been adamant that there should be no decisions about Ukraine without Ukrainian input. Such a high-stakes meeting could yield a historic diplomatic win for Trump if he stops the war — but it also carries risks for all parties involved. Trump has repeatedly demurred on whether Putin is stringing him along, and an in-person meeting could buy the Russian leader more time without producing concrete results toward a ceasefire in Ukraine. White House officials have indicated they are going into the potential meeting with eyes open about Putin's lack of commitments thus far.