Constitute top panel to manage Puri temple
The new Jagannath temple in West Bengal's Digha finds itself at the centre of a controversy soon after opening. Right from its consecration on Akshaya Tritiya, the temple funded by the WB Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation drew the ire of Jagannath devotees and politicians in equal measures.
While Mamata Banerjee's opponents have called it a cultural centre—and not a temple—built to garner political capital ahead of the 2026 assembly elections, it has led to outrage in Odisha, home to the Shree Jagannath Temple of Puri, one of the country's four dhams. A top servitor of the Odisha temple triggered the controversy when he told a Bengali TV channel that the idols for the Digha temple were made with surplus neem wood from the Puri shrine.
His claim, which he later refuted under growing criticism, snowballed into a political storm, prompting the Mohan Charan Majhi government to order an inquiry. The probe eventually revealed that neem wood from the Puri temple was not used, but the participation of the senior servitor in the consecration rituals at Digha raised questions. Two servitor bodies had cautioned its members against taking part in the rituals of the Digha temple on the grounds of dilution of tradition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
'Creation Of Bangladesh Justified?: Himanta Hits Out At Indira Gandhi Govt Over Illegal Immigrants
Last Updated: While Himanta Biswa Sarma said Indira Gandhi deserves credit for India's 1971 victory over Pakistan, he raised doubts on whether the creation of Bangladesh was justified. Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Monday criticised former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's government in 1971 for 'squandering the opportunity" to reclaim occupied Indian territories, after the Indian Armed Forces 'crushed" the Pakistan Army during the Bangladesh Liberation War, and not dealing with illegal immigration. Speaking in the Assam Assembly, Sarma said, 'In 1971, under the leadership of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, India won the war. The Indian Army achieved victory, and Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister, she rightly deserves credit." 'However, after the victory, 93,000 Pakistani prisoners of war (POWs) captured by India were returned to Pakistan, but we could not secure even nine POWs from Pakistan." Though Indian Forces crushed the Pakistani Army in 1971, the Govt of the day could not secure Indian interests and squandered the opportunity to reclaim back occupied Indian territories. #AssamAssembly — Himanta Biswa Sarma (@himantabiswa) June 9, 2025 He further said, 'Yes, we won the war but what exactly did we achieve. We created Bangladesh. But are we satisfied with that decision today? It's worth asking in 2025: Was the creation of Bangladesh the right move?" He said Indira Gandhi could have at least demanded the return of all illegal migrants in exchange for supporting the creation of Bangladesh. 'Though Indian Forces crushed the Pakistani Army in 1971, the Govt of the day could not secure Indian interests and squandered the opportunity to reclaim back occupied Indian territories," he said. India initially provided humanitarian aid and extended support to the Bengali resistance force, the Mukti Bahini. After Pakistan launched pre-emptive strikes on Indian airbases, India declared a full-scale war and engaged Pakistani forces across land, air and sea. In collaboration with the Mukti Bahini, India defeated Pakistani forces in just 13 days, capturing 93,000 Pakistani soldiers and leading to the creation of Bangladesh. India and Pakistan signed the Simla Agreement in 1972, with both sides agreeing to resolve issues peacefully. India agreed to repatriate Pakistani soldiers in exchange for Pakistan's formal recognition of Bangladesh. However, this move has been criticised by several political leaders, who said India missed an opportunity to reclaim Pakistan-occupied Kashmir without getting adequate concessions. First Published: June 09, 2025, 19:57 IST
Scroll.in
9 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Odisha bans sale of liquor in 2-km radius of Puri's Jagannath temple
The Odisha government has banned the sale of liquor within a 2-km radius of the Jagannath temple in Puri, state law and excise minister Prithviraj Harichandan said on Monday. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party in the state also planned to ban the sale of meat along the 2.5-km Grand Road, or Bada Danda, where the idols of four deities are placed on chariots and pulled during the annual Rath Yatra, The Telegraph reported. The road, which connects Jagannath temple to Gundicha temple, is lined with hundreds of hotels. In a social media post on Monday, Harichandan said: 'The government is taking several steps to make the world-famous Puri a pilgrimage or tourist city and to awaken the religious sentiments of the people.' A day earlier, the minister said that the decision to enforce the ban was part of the state government's broader initiative to preserve the sanctity of the holy town, PTI reported. 'There will be no liquor shop or bar on the Grand Road,' PTI quoted Harichandan as having said. 'Besides, sale of meat…will also be banned on the Grand Road, which connects Jagannath temple to Gundicha temple.'
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
Bengal govt files case against BJP's Koustav Bagchi over remarks on CM Mamata
Kolkata: The West Bengal government has filed a case against Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Koustav Bagchi at the Calcutta City Sessions Court over his alleged statements against chief minister Mamata Banerjee. According to the court order, a copy of which was seen by HT, Bagchi has 'repeatedly made derogatory comments and defamatory statements against Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee.' Bagchi, however, argued that whatever he mentioned is from a book written by retired Indian administrative service officer and former All India Trinamool Congress (TMC) legislator Dipak Ghosh, who died in March this year. 'The book is not banned. I mentioned some of its contents. I will prove in court that the charges hold no water,' Bagchi told HT. The state's petition was heard earlier this week by the court's chief judge Sukumar Ray, who passed the order on June 5, saying Bagchi — who is also a Calcutta High Court lawyer — will be heard on June 18. The public prosecutor told the court that Bagchi made the comments against Banerjee 'with the sole intention to traduce her malevolently and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 356(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.' Section 356(2) deals with proclaimed offenders who can be tried in absentia. Also Read: BJP leader moves HC against plan for 100 civic volunteers at new Jagannath temple The state has also added Section 222(2) of the BNS, which deals with acts of defamation committed against high-ranking public servants such as the President, Vice-President, governors, and Union and state ministers. 'I have carefully perused the petition of the complainant including evidence, documentary and electronic... the complainant, being a public servant, is exempted to be examined on solemn affirmation,' the court order said, referring to videos on YouTube and a Bengali news channel that were produced as evidence. '...the accused should be given an opportunity of being heard,' the order added. No TMC leader commented on the case, saying it was an administrative matter.
