&w=3840&q=100)
World is witnessing trade policy dislocation, says finance ministry
The ministry cited the presence of these risks to the world economy for its inability to present a Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) 2025 under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act, 2003. '…The required projections cannot be made with any degree of certainty,' it noted in a statement on half yearly review of the trends in receipts and expenditure in relation to the budget at the end of the financial year 2024-25, tabled in Parliament.
'The Government while presenting the Union Budget for FY 2025-26 had informed Parliament through the Medium-Term Fiscal Policy Statement (MTFPS) and the Fiscal Policy Strategy Statement (FPSS) that rolling targets for FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28 could not be provided mainly on account of continuing global uncertainty and visible benefits of retaining flexibility in conducting fiscal policy operations,' the statement noted.
'To prepare the MTEF Statement, certain assumptions are made regarding the growth rate of the economy, buoyancy of various taxes, trajectory of non-tax receipts of the Government, etc. These variables are then used to estimate the overall resource position of the Government which in turn is used to make meaningful expenditure projections and rolling targets for the upcoming fiscal years,' it pointed out.
However, the finance ministry said the government remains committed to achieving the glide path of fiscal consolidation.
'Since FY 2021-22, adoption of an operationally flexible fiscal consolidation path has served the country well. India is now set to attain the goal outlined in the Budget for FY 2021-22 and reach fiscal deficit level below 4.5 per cent of GDP in FY 2025-26,' it said. The FY26 Budget has laid down a path for fiscal consolidation for FY 2026-27 to 2030-31.
'Sans any major macro-economic disruptive exogenous shock(s), and while keeping in mind potential growth trends and emergent development needs, the Government would endeavour to keep fiscal deficit in each year (from FY 2026-27 till FY 2030-31) such that the Central Government debt is on declining path to attain a debt to GDP level of about 50±1 per cent by 31st March 2031 (the last year of the 16th Finance Commission cycle),' the finance ministry said in the statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
3 minutes ago
- Hans India
India is ready for it
New Delhi: Sending a strong message the day after US President Donald Trump ratcheted up the tariff war against India, Prime Minister Narendra Modi stressed that India will never compromise with the interests of its farmers and fishermen. Modi said that while he knows he will 'have to pay the price', he was ready to do it for farmers. Addressing the MS Swaminathan Centenary International Conference at Delhi, the Prime Minister said, "The interest of farmers is our top priority. India will never compromise with the interests of its farmers, livestock holders, and fishermen. And I know that I will have to pay a huge price for this personally, but I am ready. India is ready, for the sake of the country's farmers, fishermen and livestock holders," the Prime Minister said, minutes after Trump's tariffs kicked in. Paying his respects to MS Swaminathan, the architect of the Green Revolution, Modi said, "Building on the legacy of food security, the next frontier for our agricultural scientists is ensuring nutritional security for all." India exports a wide variety of agricultural products to the US and is one of the sectors set to bear the brunt of Trump's tariffs. Trump on Wednesday announced an extra 25 per cent tariff on Indian exports as 'penalty' for New Delhi continuing to import Russian crude oil. Earlier, US had imposed 25 per cent tariffs on Indian exports on July 20. With the total tariffs on Indian exports to the US rising to 50 per cent, the Ministry of External Affairs responded that the US targeting India over Russian oil imports is "unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable". "We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India. It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest," it said, stressing that India "will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests". Ties between India and the US have been uneasy in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, India's counterstrike after the Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam that left 26 innocents dead. Trump has repeatedly claimed that he brokered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, a claim denied by the Narendra Modi government. "We had said from day one that our action was non-escalatory. No leader in the world asked us to stop Operation Sindoor," Prime Minister Modi said during the Operation Sindoor debate in Parliament. Tariff hikes have followed these claims. Trump's tariffs also play out against the backdrop of the pause on talks on an India-US trade deal.
Hindustan Times
3 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC, Centre spar over examining unopposed election of legislators
The Supreme Court and the Union government were at odds on Thursday on the issue of whether courts should examine the issue of 'unopposed' legislators getting an easy walk-through into Parliament and assemblies as the top court said the issue raises an interesting question worth examining while the Centre dismissed it as an 'academic' exercise not meriting interference by courts. The Supreme Court was considering this issue in a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, which threw up questions on whether the law allowing an unopposed candidate to enter Parliament or Assembly defeats the right of voters to choose their elected representatives or even exercise the option of NOTA provided by the court. (ANI) A bench headed by justice Surya Kant said, 'This issue slightly appears to be an extension of the NOTA principle. If there is only one candidate and electors don't want him to be elected through NOTA, that is a silent expression of the electorate which is an interesting question.' The none of the above (NOTA) option is provided by the Election Commission (EC) for voters who do not choose to endorse their support to any of the candidates in the fray. The bench, also comprising justices Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh, further deliberated, 'The election of unopposed candidate is not in the hands of the people. So, they may want to go and vote for NOTA as well. This is an issue which will require some examination.' The observations came after attorney general R Venkataramani, appearing for the Union government, informed the court that the Centre has reflected on the issue and found it to be an 'academic' question that need not be interfered with at the instance of the courts. He said: 'After 1991, there is hardly any instance of candidates getting elected unopposed. Why should the court go into such an academic question?' Section 53(2) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 provides for direct election of candidates in an uncontested election. The court was considering this issue in a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, which threw up questions on whether the law allowing an unopposed candidate to enter Parliament or Assembly defeats the right of voters to choose their elected representatives or even exercise the option of NOTA provided by the court. The petitioner disputed the Centre's version terming the issue 'academic' and mentioned 26 instances of unopposed or uncontested candidates making it to Parliament since 1952. Additional solicitor general (ASG) SD Sanjay, also appearing for Centre, pointed out going by the logic that if NOTA option is exercised against the lone candidate in fray, the elections would be countermanded. 'If fresh elections are to be held, same situation will again arise. There will be no end,' the ASG said. The bench replied, 'That situation won't arise as by the next election, all political parties will set up candidates.' Earlier this year, the court had sought a response from EC, which had said that no election had been decided with a majority of NOTA votes since 2013 when the Supreme Court directed this option to be provided on the electronic voting machines. It further stated that since the coming of the 1951 Act, there were only nine such instances. The petitioner argued that the issue can be decided for the future as voters cannot be deprived of choosing their elected representatives due to section 53(2) of the 1951 Act. In April, the court observed that any candidate getting elected should be able to get a minimum threshold of votes of his/her constituency, which could range from 5-15% of the total votes in the parliamentary/assembly segment. The court had then observed: 'We have to create a mechanism that may or may not be utilised. Keeping the growing trend and dimensions in the political field, there is a possibility of some affluent candidate getting elected unopposed when those who are contesting withdraw. Voters may suddenly realise they have no choice, and they cannot oppose as he will be elected. In such a situation, both EC and the voters are helpless.'
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Centre okays T to reschedule Rs 25k cr high interest loans
Hyderabad: In a significant financial relief for Telangana, the Centre has reportedly agreed to restructure high interest loans taken by the state over the past decade. Sources said the Reserve Bank of India has approved the repayment of nearly Rs 25,000 crore in fresh borrowings over the next two years — at lower interest rates and with longer repayment periods. The move is expected to save Telangana around Rs 2,000 crore annually, compared to the burden under previous terms. On Aug 5, the RBI disbursed Rs 5,000 crore, which the state govt immediately used to clear old, high interest loans availed from the Rural Electrification Corporation (REC). You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad The state had long raised concerns over loans contracted at steep interest rates from private financial entities, often routed through various government-owned corporations. These borrowings, scheduled for repayment over 10 years, placed a heavy fiscal load on the state exchequer due to their high servicing costs. In contrast, RBI loans come with lower interest rates (7% to 7.5%) and longer tenures of 25 to 30 years, offering significant relief. By comparison, loans from the REC carried an 11% interest rate and a 10-year repayment term, which became increasingly unsustainable. Chief minister A Revanth Reddy had repeatedly urged the Centre to allow rescheduling of such liabilities. Following a detailed review of Telangana's fiscal health, the Union finance ministry agreed to the proposal. In a parallel development, the Centre had earlier brought all off-budget borrowings under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) framework, which reduced Telangana's eligibility to raise funds from the RBI during 2020–21. After these corporate loans were clubbed under FRBM, the state govt intensified its push for rescheduling, which was now accepted by the Centre. The state has raised funds through monthly bond issuances. With the RBI's green light, it can now rework the Rs 25,000 crore loan burden over two years. Funds raised from bond issues, such as the Rs 5,000 crore obtained recently, will be used solely to retire high-interest loans, not for new programmes or expenditure. Financial analysts said this restructuring will ease fiscal pressure and save nearly Rs 2,000 crore per year, giving the state room to stabilise its economy. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and s ilver prices in your area.
