logo
Mike Johnson calls for 'great pause' on a Ghislaine Maxwell pardon, pushes for life sentence instead

Mike Johnson calls for 'great pause' on a Ghislaine Maxwell pardon, pushes for life sentence instead

First Post28-07-2025
US Speaker of the House Mike Johnson disagreed with Republicans who are floating the idea of granting a pardon or commutation to Ghislaine Maxwell as the Epstein scandal continues to rock the White House. read more
US Speaker of the House Mike Johnson disagreed with Republicans who are floating the idea of granting a pardon or commutation to Ghislaine Maxwell as the Epstein scandal continues to rock the White House. While speaking to NBC News, Johnson said that he would have a 'great pause' about taking such measures.
The remarks from the Republican speaker are coming at a time when many of the House representatives from his party suggested that the option to pardon Maxwell should be considered as part of an effort to obtain more information about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. For weeks, US President Donald Trump and his allies, including Johnson himself, have been under immense pressure to disclose more information about Epstein.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Johnson's take on the matter came after Todd Blanche, the deputy attorney general, met with Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking, over two days last week. The former British socialite was Epstein's close confidante for years and his partner-in-crime, literally. The case became more complicated after Epstein killed himself in jail in 2019.
I think she should have a life sentence: Johnson
While speaking to NBC News on the matter, the House Speaker pushed for a life sentence for Maxwell instead. 'If you're asking my opinion, I think 20 years was a pittance. I think she should have a life sentence at least. I mean, think of all these unspeakable crimes,' he said.
'It's hard to put into words how evil this was, and that she orchestrated it and was a big part of it, at least under the criminal sanction, I think, is an unforgivable thing. So again, not my decision, but I have great pause about that, as any reasonable person would,' he added.
When pressed further about whether he would favour a pardon, Johnson deferred to Trump. 'Obviously, that's a decision of the president. He said he had not adequately considered that. I won't get it in front of him. That's not my lane,' he said.
It is pertinent to note that House Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who has been pushing for disclosure of more Epstein information, said a pardon should be on the table for Maxwell. 'That would be up to the president. But if she has information that could help us, then I think she should testify. Let's get that out there. And whatever they need to do to compel that testimony, as long as it's truthful, I would be in favour of,' he told Welker on Meet the Press.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
California Democrat Ro Khanna, who has joined Massie's effort to release more information, said he did not support a pardon for Maxwell, who was charged with perjury in connection with a civil deposition in 2016. However, prosecutors did not move forward with those charges once they obtained her sex-trafficking conviction.
'I'm concerned that the deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, is meeting with her supposedly one-on-one. Look, I agree with Congressman Massie that she should testify. But she's been indicted twice on perjury. This is why we need the files. This is why we need independent evidence,' Khanna told NBC News. Hence, it will be interesting to see how the Trump team would approach the matter.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistan batter arrested on rape allegations, PCB suspends him with immediate effect
Pakistan batter arrested on rape allegations, PCB suspends him with immediate effect

Hindustan Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Pakistan batter arrested on rape allegations, PCB suspends him with immediate effect

Pakistan cricketer Haider Ali was arrested by Greater Manchester Police following a rape allegation, prompting the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) to suspend him with immediate effect. Pakistan batter Haider Ali The 24-year-old batter, who was on tour in England with the Pakistan Shaheens, was taken into custody after a report was filed on Monday alleging that a rape had taken place at a premises in Manchester on July 23, 2025. Greater Manchester Police confirmed the arrest of a 24-year-old man in connection with the report. 'A report of a rape was made to police on Monday 4 August 2025. It's alleged that the incident occurred on Wednesday, 23 July 2025, at a premises in Manchester. We have arrested a 24-year-old man. He has since been bailed pending further enquiries,' the police said in a statement. British police typically do not name individuals at this stage of an investigation. In response, the PCB confirmed that it was aware of the ongoing criminal investigation involving Haider Ali and announced his provisional suspension. 'In line with its duty of care and responsibility to ensure the welfare and legal rights of all its players, the PCB has ensured that Haider Ali has received appropriate legal support to protect his rights throughout this process,' the PCB said in a statement. 'The PCB fully respects the legal procedures and processes of the United Kingdom and acknowledges the importance of allowing the investigation to run its due course. Accordingly, the PCB has decided to place Haider Ali under provisional suspension, effective immediately, pending the outcome of the ongoing investigation.' Ali, who made his international debut in 2020, has played two one-day internationals and 35 T20Is for Pakistan. He was part of the Pakistan Shaheens squad, the country's A team, on a 15-day tour of England that began on July 22. The PCB added that it reserves the right to take further action under its Code of Conduct once the legal process is complete.

Trump may order colleges to prove they don't consider race in admissions
Trump may order colleges to prove they don't consider race in admissions

Business Standard

time14 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Trump may order colleges to prove they don't consider race in admissions

President Donald Trump plans to sign an executive order requiring colleges to submit data to prove they do not consider race in admissions, according to a fact sheet shared by the White House ahead of the Thursday signing. In 2023, the Supreme Court ruled against the use of affirmative action in admissions but said colleges may still consider how race has shaped students' lives if applicants share that information in their admissions essays. Trump's Republican administration is accusing colleges of using personal statements and other proxies to consider race. The executive order is similar to parts of recent settlement agreements the administration negotiated with Brown University and Columbia University, restoring their federal research funding. The universities agreed to give the government data on the race, grade point average and standardised test scores of applicants, admitted students and enrolled students. The schools also agreed to an audit by the government and to release admissions statistics to the public. Conservatives have argued that despite the Supreme Court ruling, colleges have continued to consider race through proxy measures. The planned executive order makes the same argument. "The lack of available admissions data from universities paired with the rampant use of diversity statements' and other overt and hidden racial proxies continues to raise concerns about whether race is actually used in admissions decisions in practice," the fact sheet said. The first year of admissions data after the Supreme Court ruling showed no clear pattern in how colleges' diversity changed. Results varied dramatically from one campus to the next. Some schools, such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Amherst College, saw steep drops in the percentage of Black students in their incoming classes. But at other elite, selective schools such as Yale, Princeton and the University of Virginia, the changes were less than a percentage point year to year. Some colleges have added more essays or personal statements to their admissions process to get a better picture of an applicant's background, a strategy the Supreme Court invited in its ruling. "Nothing prohibits universities from considering an applicant's discussion of how race affected the applicant's life, so long as that discussion is concretely tied to a quality of character or unique ability that the particular applicant can contribute to the university," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in 2023 for the court's conservative majority. As an alternative to affirmative action, colleges for years have tried a range of strategies to achieve the diversity they say is essential to their campuses. Many have given greater preference to low-income families. Others started admitting top students from every community in their state. Prior to the ruling, nine states had banned affirmative action, starting with California in 1996. The University of California saw enrollment change after the statewide ban in 1996. Within two years, Black and Hispanic enrolments fell by half at the system's two most selective campuses Berkeley and UCLA. The system would go on to spend more than $500 million on programs aimed at low-income and first-generation college students. The 10-campus University of California system also started a program that promises admission to the top 9 per cent of students in each high school across the state, an attempt to reach strong students from all backgrounds. A similar promise in Texas has been credited for expanding racial diversity, and opponents of affirmative action cite it as a successful model. In California, the promise drew students from a wider geographic area but did little to expand racial diversity, the system said in a brief to the Supreme Court. It had almost no impact at Berkeley and UCLA, where students compete against tens of thousands of other applicants. Today at UCLA and Berkeley, Hispanic students make up 20 per cent of undergraduates, higher than in 1996 but lower than their 53 per cent share among California's high school graduates. Black students, meanwhile, have a smaller presence than they did in 1996, accounting for 4 per cent of undergraduates at Berkeley. After Michigan voters rejected affirmative action in 2006, the University of Michigan shifted attention to low-income students. The school sent graduates to work as counselors in low-income high schools and started offering college prep in Detroit and Grand Rapids. It offered full scholarships for low-income Michigan residents and, more recently, started accepting fewer early admission applications, which are more likely to come from white students. Despite the University of Michigan's efforts, the share of Black and Hispanic undergraduates hasn't fully rebounded from a falloff after 2006. And while Hispanic enrollments have been increasing, Black enrollments continued to slide, going from 8 per cent of undergraduates in 2006 to 4 per cent in 2025.

Speaker refers matter to Privileges Committee, Kejriwal, Sisodia to be summoned
Speaker refers matter to Privileges Committee, Kejriwal, Sisodia to be summoned

Indian Express

time44 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Speaker refers matter to Privileges Committee, Kejriwal, Sisodia to be summoned

Maintaining that there was no phansi ghar (execution room) on Delhi Assembly premises, Speaker Vijender Gupta on Thursday referred the matter to the Privileges Committee, which will summon former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, and former deputy CM Manish Sisodia, for an inquiry. He also directed the Privileges Committee to summon former Speaker Ram Niwas Goel and Deputy Speaker Rakhi Birla for allegedly hurting the sentiments of the members of the House and the people of Delhi by 'distorting' history. Earlier, the Speaker had dismissed the claims of the previous AAP government that the structure, which was renovated and inaugurated in 2022 by then chief minister Kejriwal as a phansi ghar was actually a 'tiffin room' as per records. Displaying a 1912 map of the Assembly complex, he had said on Wednesday that there was no documentation or evidence indicating that the space was used for executions. 'We gave the Opposition three days to present their position, but their silence proves that this was a deliberate fraud. After consulting the Indian Council for Historical Research, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi University, National Archives, and historians, the House has come to the conclusion that there was neither a hanging room nor a tunnel,' the Speaker said. 'As the matter is related to patriotism and emotions, the House has decided to remove the phansi ghar and restore the Assembly premises. I am sending the matter to the Privileges Committee to investigate… It will summon the former CM, Deputy CM, Speaker, and Deputy Speaker, as the so-called phansi ghar was inaugurated under their guidance and presence,' he added. He also said that the plaque of the 'fake' phansi ghar should be removed. 'The plaque bearing Kejriwal and Sisodia's names outside phansi ghar will be removed. The 1912 map depicting it as tiffin room will also be displayed,' he said in the House. Gupta reiterated his allegation that 'falsehood' was spread in the name of Phansi Ghar and history was distorted. 'When we were in the Opposition, we were led to believe that there was an execution room here. We were also emotionally connected to the site,' he recalled. However, after becoming the Speaker, he conducted a thorough research and it was discovered that the structure in question was actually a 'tiffin ghar' (lunch room), which was 'deeply upsetting', Gupta said. He further said that the previous AAP government spent crores on this 'fake' phansi ghar and its advertisement. Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa said it was 'highly condemnable' that a place where people would have consumed non-vegetarian food was called phansi ghar. 'This was a place where the British used to eat meat… AAP has hurt the sentiments of people by connecting it to martyrs… this is an insult to the martyrs.' Built in 1912, the Delhi Assembly premises was originally meant to house the Imperial Legislative Council. It later served as the Central Legislative Assembly after 1919.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store