NSW political staffers to appear at Durl caravan plot inquiry after being threatened with arrest warrants
A senior staff member for the premier confirmed on Wednesday that they had been told by the president of the NSW Legislative Council, Ben Franklin, that he was planning to seek arrest warrants.
Franklin had sought legal advice from Bret Walker SC about his powers to seek the warrants after the staffers defied summonses to appear at the upper house inquiry.
They have now 'voluntarily' agreed to appear on Friday.
The inquiry – launched with the support of the Coalition, the Greens and crossbench MLCs – is examining the handling of information about the caravan plot amid concerns parliament may have been 'misled' before controversial laws aimed at curbing antisemitism were rushed through parliament.
In January, after it was announced that the caravan had been found, Minns said it had the potential to be a 'mass casualty event'. But in March, the Australian federal police revealed they believed it was a 'con job' by organised crime figures seeking to divert police resources and influence prosecutions.
The premier and the police minister refused to appear at the inquiry before the committee sought the appearance of their staffers.
Greens MP Sue Higginson, who is a member of the inquiry, also confirmed on Wednesday the political staffers would appear to give evidence on Friday.
The standoff had been sparked by the refusal of Minns and Catley to appear. Ministers from the lower house cannot be required to appear before an inquiry of the upper house.
Higginson said the staffers' decision to ignore the summonses 'put us all in a very difficult position'.
'We believe, as a committee … that these individuals hold information that could genuinely assist us in exercising our forensic capacity,' she told ABC radio.
'The lesson here is the parliamentary powers are strong powers. They're important powers. No one is above the law and don't challenge these powers.'
Higginson was asked on Wednesday if she thought the government had misled parliament before the hate speech and places of worship laws were passed.
'There was absolutely knowledge held by some and not presented to the parliament to assist us in understanding the full picture,' she said. 'This is a democracy, and how we pass laws is a very important matter for everyone.'
- Additional reporting by Jordyn Beazley
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Why 'Albo the activist' has more in common with Liberal hero John Howard than he'd care to admit - and what it says about the future of Australia: PVO
Anthony Albanese is edging towards a paradox: a Labor PM who could end up echoing John Howard. Not in ideology, but in method. The shape of what's unfolding is familiar: govern from the centre, bank incremental gains and let time in office do the heavy lifting. But nobody could accuse either PM of failing to pursue passion projects, and not always successfully.
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: The exact moment Australia passed 'peak woke' - as researchers uncover the plummeting popularity of identity politics among a VERY surprising age group
Australia has officially passed 'peak woke ', with the majority of Generation Z now rejecting divisive identity politics, according to new research and polling. Researchers at the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) examined the popularity of 20 prominent words and phrases associated with social justice or 'woke' concepts over the last 20 years. They tracked the frequency of Google searches in Australia for phrases such as 'decolonisation', 'body positivity', 'white privilege', 'invasion day' and 'pronouns', discovering an explosion in popularity for these terms since 2012. However, the average frequency for all 20 woke search terms - which also included 'cultural appropriation', 'non-binary' and ' critical race theory ' - reached a peak in March 2023. It has been rapidly declining ever since, leading Brianna McKee, the IPA's National Manager of Generation Liberty, to declare that Australia has passed 'peak woke'. 'Wokeness encompasses a range of critical social justice theories which demand individuals view the world through the prism of class, race, or gender, and to place their identity within the broader societal division between two groups: oppressors and the oppressed,' Ms McKee said. 'The IPA's research clearly shows Australians have had enough of this pernicious and divisive agenda, as well as identity politics that are pushed on them in schools, universities, at work and at sporting events.' 'The cultural correction underway reflects a broader realisation that society functions best when it shares a belief in objective truth, shared values, and moral norms.' The average frequency for 20 woke search terms, including 'decolonisation', 'body positivity', 'white privilege', 'invasion day' and 'pronouns', reached a peak in March 2023. But it has been rapidly declining ever since, leading the IPA's National Manager of Generation Liberty Brianna McKee to declare that Australia has passed 'peak woke' Of course, seven months after 'peak woke' was reached, Australians resoundingly rejected Anthony Albanese's Voice to Parliament. Prominent 'No' campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price had encouraged Aussies to reject the referendum as a way to stand against 'woke insidious cancel culture'. The IPA's research was backed up by a survey which showed, perhaps surprisingly, that those aged 18-24 were increasingly rejecting woke ideas, in contrast to the age group directly above them. Indeed, those aged 25-34 - an age group that straddles both Generation Z and Millennials - were far more likely to agree with 'woke' concepts than any other cohort. Abbie Chatfield, who at the age of 30 is slap bang in the middle of this age group, is often seen as the pin-up girl of the woke generation. The reality TV star-turned-podcaster recently took aim at US actress Sydney Sweeney amid the backlash to her American Eagle jeans campaign. But the research shows Chatfield runs the risk of turning off younger followers who are far less interested in woke issues and identity politics than Millennials. For example, 47 per cent of those age 25-34 said their race, gender, sex or ethnic background was an important or very important factor in their voting habits. However, only 38 per cent of those aged 18-24 agreed. The survey, which polled 1,027 Australians between 25 April and 28 April 2025, also found that only 34 per cent of Australians support affirmative action in the workplace - where some people are promoted or employed on the basis of their race of gender identity. Some 49 per cent of Australians oppose it and 17 per cent are unsure. However, a majority of those aged 25-35 - 55 per cent - support affirmative action in the workplace. Meanwhile, only 46 per cent of those aged 18-24 support it, suggesting that 'younger Australians are returning to a values system of individuality and egalitarianism', according to the IPA's Ms McKee. 'Gen Z have been berated more than past generations to see the world through the prism of race and gender, where every act is a potential trap for cancel culture police. It's no wonder younger Australians are turning away from this divisive agenda and its constant conflict,' she added. 'These findings are a lesson for our leaders that Australians understand full well that there is more that unites us and divides us. 'At a time when social cohesion is collapsing in Australia, there are welcome signs the divisive agenda of the political class is starting to be rejected.' The survey also found that 89 per cent of Australians explicitly support the principle of equality before the law, rather than making distinctions between groups to make up for alleged historical injustices. The IPA's report, entitled 'Peak Woke: The declining popularity of social justice ideas in Australia', defines 'peak woke' as the 'point at which woke ideas reach their most extreme and illogical conclusions, alienating even their original supporters'. 'This is the moment when progressive ideologies become so detached from practical realities that they become absurd,' Ms McKee adds. It highlights how the 'woke agenda' in Australia has suffered a backlash in recent years. For example, Woolworths faced calls for a boycott last year after it announced it would not stock Australia Day merchandise due to an apparent 'decline in demand'. The supermarket giant backflipped on the decision in January 2025 after the backlash. The report also highlights how this rejection of woke ideas has been evident across the Western world. 'The election of Donald Trump at the 2024 US Presidential election, the overwhelming rejection of the proposed Voice to Parliament at the 2023 referendum in Australia, and the rise of populist, anti-establishment parties in the UK and continental Europe, indicate a mainstream rejection of wokeness,' it adds. However, Ms McKee warned against complacency. 'Despite these encouraging trends, wokeness remains entrenched in much of Australia's big corporates, which are teeming with diversity, equity and inclusion departments and staff,' she added. 'It is time corporate Australia focused on productivity, not pitting their staff against one another.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Dramatic diplomatic update on Chinese man accused of pouring hot coffee on an Aussie baby
The man who allegedly threw hot coffee on an innocent baby in a Brisbane park is protected from extradition back to Australia under Chinese law. Nine-month-old Luka had boiling hot coffee poured over him in Brisbane's Hanlon Park on August 27, 2024. The man allegedly responsible poured an entire thermos of boiling water on Luka before fleeing the country from Sydney to China, evading capture. Ever since, Australian authorities have been urging China to return the man for prosecution, but the requests have constantly been denied. Chinese law dictates that no Chinese nationals can be extradited to face prosecution abroad for crimes allegedly committed overseas. Luka, who will turn two in October, is continuing his recovery. As the one-year anniversary of the attack approaches, officials remain determined to find the man responsible. It is understood that Queensland Police have forwarded their detailed evidence against the man to Chinese authorities for their consideration. Australian officers have said they were intent on 'finding a resolution to the matter', months after they were able to identify the suspect. Luka's parents said he was still undergoing treatment. 'Luka still has to have regular surgeries, he gets laser and skin needling to reduce the appearance of the scars,' they told The Australian. 'The scars are on his chin, shoulder and a little bit on his back. 'But otherwise, he's healed really well and is thriving in life.' Australian authorities have remained quiet on the fate of the man behind the attack. Detectives have continue to refuse to confirm what options they have at their disposal. This refusal of disclosure extends to what they may have offered their Chinese counterparts in exchange for the man responsible. CCTV footage captured the man fleeing the Brisbane park in the minutes following the incident. The man was said to have approached Luka slowly before emptying his beverage and breaking into a sprint as he fled the scene. Both his attack and escape were captured on CCTV. Following his departure, the man is believed to have driven to Sydney and immediately boarded a flight out of the country on August 31. Initially, Australian police provided the public with an incorrect name for the man and were unable to verify his true identity until he was already out of the country. It was revealed that the attack had been committed after the man learned his extension request for his visa in Australia had been denied. The 33-year-old had been in Australia since 2019, working in a warehouse and an abattoir at various times. The man is known to Chinese authorities and has been extensively covered by local media. Investigators from the Queensland Police Service and the Australian Federal Police have been in contact with China over the man's whereabouts.
