
The Augusta Resolves and the Declaration of Independence
Seeking to quell resistance to British authority, the British Parliament instead awakened a sleeping giant. The implications of their laws reverberated throughout America's western frontier. The Coercive Acts became the impetus that led to the development of the Revolutionary War.
The Sons of Liberty protested "taxation without representation" by throwing chests of Britain's tea into the Boston Harbor during the Boston Tea Party. Library of Congress.
Public Domain
House of Burgesses
When news of the Boston Tea Party was first published in the Virginia Gazette, Virginia's legislators—members of the House of Burgesses—wondered what the Imperial retaliation might be. When they learned that the Parliament was essentially shutting down the Port of Boston, their response was strong and solemn.
A group of burgesses, including Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, and Francis Lightfoot Lee met in the Raleigh Tavern in Williamsburg to discuss their plan of action. Invoking language used by the House of Commons in the 1640s, they crafted a resolution calling Virginians to a day of 'fasting, humiliation, and prayer' on June 1, 1774—the day that Boston was to be closed.
(L) An illustration of Raleigh Tavern with the famous Apollo Room, 1880. The New York Public Library. (R) The resolution was signed by 89 members of the House of Burgesses and several 'clergymen and other inhabitants of the colony and dominion of Virginia.'
Public Domain
The burgesses
The day after the resolution passed, Dunmore dissolved the Burgesses. But they reconvened at Raleigh Tavern, where many of them lodged for the sessions. Here, they decided to return to their respective districts and sense the feelings of the people in the places they represented. Each district's 'Resolve' would help the banished Burgesses as they charted a course forward.
Related Stories
12/10/2023
11/13/2023
There were 64 Virginia representative districts, and 59 of them actually completed the assignment. Most were not so confrontational to the Crown, but then there was the county of Augusta.
A portrait of John Murray, fourth Earl of Dunmore, 1765, by Joshua Reynolds. Oil on canvas. National, Edinburgh.
Public Domain
The County That Stretched to the Mississippi
Augusta County, Virginia today is large, but it isn't the biggest county in the state. In 1770, however, it encompassed most of Virginia's claims extending to the Mississippi River. It was the essence of the wild frontier—the land where Daniel Boone roamed. Although other counties were carved out of it as settlement advanced, it was still the embodiment of a way of life that was tied far more to the new world than the old. It was in 1770 that the lower half of Augusta became Botetourt County. In 1774, the district of West Augusta was separated from Augusta County.
Since 1738, frontier business was conducted from Mill Place, later renamed Staunton. This group of people were more independent and used to providing for themselves. Their Resolve, while respectful of England, laid the groundwork for the case for independence.
The Resolves' six authors—Alexander Balmain, Sampson Mathews, Alexander M'Clenachan, Michael Bowyer, William Lewis (son of one of Virginia's first settlers John Lewis), and George Mathews—met in Staunton on Feb. 22, 1775.
Reflecting the western settlement's independent spirit, the resolves made it clear that the writers were making a commitment to risk 'life and fortune' to retain natural rights. If necessary, they would join with the colonies to secure those rights. They contained a commitment to bolster the militias as well.
The colonies at the time were largely providers of raw materials. They sent them to Britain and received manufactured goods in return. The authors of the Resolves called for instituting the domestic manufacture of salt, steel, wool cards, paper, and gunpowder for the use of the militias.
Making a Case for Liberty
The committee that drafted the Resolves chose Thomas Lewis (another son of founder John Lewis) and Samuel McDowell to carry the Resolves to a convention of colonies to be held in Richmond in March of that year.
A photograph of the St. John's Church in Richmond, Va., between circa 1860 and 1865, where the Second and Third Virginia Conventions met in 1775. National Archives, College Park.
Public Domain
Declaring themselves loyal subjects of King George, they nonetheless were direct in asserting: 'Many of us and our forefathers left our native land and explored this once-savage wilderness to enjoy the free exercise of the rights of conscience and of human nature. These rights we are fully resolved ... inviolably to preserve; nor will we surrender … to any Ministry, to any Parliament, or any body of men upon earth, by whom we are not represented, and in whose decisions, therefore, we have no voice.'
The document is certainly a precursor to the Augusta Declaration of May 10, 1776, which called for the colonies to form a permanent and independent union of states. The 1776 Declaration directly calls for the formation of what became the United States of America. As the July 4 declaration was being crafted, the Virginia founders were undoubtedly aware of the sentiments expressed by Augusta.
The delegates to the Second Continental Congress penned a letter to the Augusta delegates
A hand-colored lithograph of "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death!–Patrick Henry delivering his great speech on the Rights of the Colonies, before the Virginia Assembly, convened at Richmond, March 23rd, 1775. Concluding with the above sentiment, which became the war cry of the Revolution," 1876, by Currier & Ives. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City. In 1775 the burgesses listened to Patrick Henry deliver his speech and raised regiments.
Public Domain
Historians may debate how much the Augusta documents influenced the Declaration of Independence, but there is no doubting the heart and spirit they brought to the American Revolution. Staunton historian Armistead C. Gordon
What arts and culture topics would you like us to cover? Please email ideas or feedback to
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
4 minutes ago
- USA Today
JD Vance's working vacation to England riles some locals
CHARLBURY, England, Aug 12 (Reuters) - U.S. Vice President JD Vance's working holiday in Britain was met with dismay by some locals on Tuesday, who gathered to register their disapproval of both his politics and the turmoil he has brought to their quiet corner of the English countryside. Vance has mixed work with leisure while in Britain, staying first with foreign minister David Lammy at the Chevening estate in Kent - where the two held a formal bilateral meeting after a spot of fishing - before moving on to the hamlet of Dean in Oxfordshire, in the picturesque Cotswolds. More: JD Vance to kick off UK visit with transatlantic tensions high On Tuesday, several dozen people, including activists from the Stop Trump Coalition, gathered in the nearby town of Charlbury to stage what they called a "Not Welcome Party". They posed with cake and signs including pro-Palestinian slogans and messages saying "Go Home." A van showing an unflattering manipulated image of a bald Vance drove around Charlbury. "We want to show our feelings, hopefully some of it will get through to Vance and the American press and to Ukraine, so people know what we stand for," said Brian Murray, 65, a retired tour guide. "The fact he is in our backyard gives us a great opportunity to have our voices heard." More: Will JD Vance run for president in 2028? VP pressed on potential White House bid Vance will meet on Tuesday evening with Robert Jenrick, a source in the opposition Conservative Party said. Jenrick was runner-up in the Conservative leadership contest last year, and is widely considered next in line for the job if it becomes available. The Telegraph newspaper said Vance would also meet Nigel Farage, the leader of the right-wing Reform UK party. Vance has developed a warm friendship with Labour's Lammy, officials said, with the two bonding over their difficult childhoods and shared Christian faith. Long a destination of the British elite - former British Prime Minister David Cameron lives in Dean - the Cotswolds is also becoming increasingly popular with wealthy Americans, some of whom moved to the region following the election win of President Donald Trump last year. TV personality Ellen DeGeneres has cited the election result as the reason behind her full-time relocation to the area. More: JD Vance reacts to brutal parody in latest 'South Park' episode Around Charlbury, motorcades roared along the narrow country lanes and cordons blocked off roads to Dean, rendering it inaccessible. While Tuesday's protest was unlikely to disrupt the vice president's trip, for some locals, Vance's politics and the disruption were too much to swallow. "It's a massive intrusion and it's not just the fact our lives are disrupted but it's who he is," said Jonathan Mazower, the head of communications for NGO Survival International, who owns one of Dean's 15 homes. "I feel and many others feel we can't allow someone like that to come into our village and not say something publicly against it." (Reporting by Aislinn Laing, Toby Melville and Marissa Davison; Editing by William James and Rosalba O'Brien)


Vox
6 minutes ago
- Vox
The Joe Rogan Experience is a mirror for America
is a correspondent at Vox, where he covers the Democratic Party. He joined Vox in 2022 after reporting on national and international politics for the Atlantic's politics, global, and ideas teams, including the role of Latino voters in the 2020 election. Joe Rogan is many things — a comedian, a commentator, and a contrarian; a reality TV star and martial artist-turned-host of the most listened to podcast in America: The Joe Rogan Experience. His fans say he's just asking questions, calling out liberal hypocrisy, and defending free speech. His critics use other terms: a conspiracy theorist and peddler of misinformation and anti-trans rhetoric, who platforms not just off-the-wall ideas, but dangerous narratives that cause real-world harm. There's truth in all these labels. There's another way to think of Rogan that may help put him in his rightful context for this decade: 'Joe Rogan is the Walter Cronkite of Our Era,' declared British satirist Konstantin Kisin for Quilette in 2019. 'Not one established newspaper or broadcaster can now compete with a popular YouTube host conducting a conversation from his self-funded studio,' he wrote at the time, reflecting on Rogan's three-hour interrogation of Twitter executives. Vox Culture Culture reflects society. Get our best explainers on everything from money to entertainment to what everyone is talking about online. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Kisin's declaration — before the global Covid-19 pandemic, before the 2020 election of Joe Biden or the 2024 reelection of Donald Trump — might have been a bit premature. But he effectively predicted what Rogan would yet become: not just one of the most influential voices in politics, popular culture, and social commentary, but also a harbinger for a new form of media, communications, trust, and truth in a post-pandemic world. There is no monoculture in 2025; but for a huge part of America, the realm Rogan pioneered and steers is as close as we might get. Related The Gen Z divide that could decide the next election He and his show have been at the crossroads of just about every major moment and societal change that defines the 2020s, from Covid misinformation and vaccine fearmongering to the expansion of the 'manosphere' universe. His show is a mirror for a country that has grown more anxious, distrustful, and paranoid in the last decade. Like a lot of America, the pandemic changed Rogan When Kisin made his Cronkite comparison in 2019, Rogan's mainstream crossover was just getting started. Back then, The Joe Rogan Experience was well on its way to being the most popular podcast show in America — the second most downloaded Apple podcast in 2017 and 2018, before topping the list the next year. His YouTube uploads regularly attracted a million views each (racking up more than 2 billion by mid-2020), and the show had become a must-stop destination for both traditional celebrities and a realm of alternative and conspiratorially minded pseudointellectuals (think: Alex Jones, Kanye West, Elon Musk). There is no monoculture in 2025; but for a huge part of America, the realm Rogan pioneered and steers is as close as we might get. He had achieved that by developing a space for curious-minded average joes and those folks Slate once described as ''freethinkers' who hate the left' to listen to his two-to-three-hourlong, anarchic episodes. In trying to understand what made Rogan's show work, the writer Devin Gordon summarized his roster as being roughly divided into three categories: fellow comedians, fellow athletes and fighters, and ''thinkers.'' The latter label, Gordon wrote in The Atlantic, 'requires air quotes because it encompasses everyone from Oxford scholars…all the way across the known intellectual galaxy to conspiracy theorists like Rogan's longtime buddy and Sandy Hook denier Alex Jones.' And gobbling up this content were millions of, primarily, American men, across every demographic. Through it all, a handful of principles anchored the show. While he wasn't overtly political, he described himself as having essentially libertarian views with strong socially liberal leanings. Free speech, and the platforming of those who had been canceled in the mainstream, were a foundational goal of the show. Skepticism of government, big tech, and corporate media were a corollary. And a pseudo-Socratic line of curiosity and skepticism were his modus operandi. That led him to take traditionally liberal positions on social issues and civil rights, to criticize interventionist foreign policy, and to embrace the policies of political figures like Andrew Yang, Tulsi Gabbard, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as well as populist movement headed by Sen. Bernie Sanders, who Rogan backed during the 2020 Democratic primaries. Yet with the dawn of the pandemic, a few things changed. While originally critical of Trump, the tone of his shows, and his guests, began to move in a rightward direction after Trump's 2020 defeat. Rogan had been critical of pandemic shutdowns and mitigation efforts, questioned the efficacy of vaccines, and railed against what he called censorship and speech suppression on social media platforms. And once the 'left,' and 'woke' liberals became the establishment in the Biden administration, media, pop culture, and business, Rogan and his show had an easy foil to criticize and ask questions. This post-2020 period was a time of growth and challenge for Rogan. He inked a reported $200 million multiyear deal with Spotify for the platform to exclusively host his podcast, but both he and Spotify faced intense calls by artists, liberal activists, journalists, and science communicators to either censor, deplatform or moderate his show to prevent the spread of conspiracy theories and misinformation. He has previously described this era between 2020 and 2022 as 'terrifying' — for the threats to free speech he felt were being emboldened by the Biden administration, by popular culture, and by mainstream media. This period contextualizes his feuds during that time with Facebook and Twitter for allegedly suppressing right-wing opinions and speech, with the Biden White House for pressuring social media companies to regulate speech, and with the mainstream media. Yet he survived this controversy, and his show only grew bigger since then, aligning with his eventual drift to not only interviewing but endorsing Trump in 2024. His format, and style, has changed America and its relation to truth Rogan and his show are now perfect avatars of America's political and cultural revolution in the Trump era: The Joe Rogan Experience is now one of the key arbiters of truth and reality for scores of Americans who get informed from nontraditional and alternative media sources. His YouTube channel now boasts over 6 billion views across the episodes uploaded there; his episodes are rarely not the top shows across Apple, Spotify, and other podcast apps. He's become the mainstream, popular enough to cause strife during the 2024 election when he declined to interview Kamala Harris but hosted Trump and Vice President JD Vance. He also interviews the likes of Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, various politicians and entrepreneurs, and many more celebrities, actors, and comedians. His format has been imitated or adapted across the internet — yielding a web of right-wing, testosterone-driven, trash-talking shows collectively known as the manosphere. In this realm, pioneered by Rogan, inquiry and curiosity can easily give way to conspiratorial thinking and paranoia. There's a sense that there are greater forces and powers trying to influence American minds, and thus requires radical skepticism. In this realm, pioneered by Rogan, inquiry and curiosity can easily give way to conspiratorial thinking and paranoia. In that way, Rogan's show encompasses the crossroads of three defining forces of the 2020s: the anti-incumbent, change-the-status-quo energy that permeated American politics in the last years of the Biden administration; the silo-fication of news, media, and truth into echo chambers and algorithmically powered feeds; and the political awakening and radicalization of low-information, low-political engagement, and low-trust Americans. Rogan has successfully helped to yoke together a particularly reactive, ill-informed, and even paranoid group; a group that is now accustomed to having their beliefs confirmed by increasingly powerful people. Yet now that he's the mainstream, Rogan finds his show in a potentially tenuous position: holding together a vast audience that could eventually come to question their loyalties and question him. His Trump endorsement, in particular, came with risks — opening him up to accusations of hypocrisy, flip-flopping, or misplaced trust should Trump end up walking back the policies and stance he promised. Those tensions are already playing out across the manosphere, as other hosts who endorsed Trump claim they were duped or regret their support.


San Francisco Chronicle
34 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Bangladeshi officials testify against former British minister Tulip Siddiq in anti-corruption trial
DHAKA, Bangladesh (AP) — Bangladeshi anti-corruption officials testified in court on Wednesday against former British Minister Tulip Siddiq, accused of using her familial connection to deposed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to obtain state-owned land plots in the South Asian country. Siddiq, who is Hasina's niece, resigned from her post as an anti-corruption minister in Prime Minister Keir Starmer 's government in January following reports that she lived in London properties linked to her aunt and was named in an anti-corruption investigation in Bangladesh. She is being tried together with her mother, Sheikh Rehana, brother, Radwan Mujib, and sister, Azmina. Siddiq has been charged with facilitating their receipt of state land in a township project near the capital, Dhaka. The four were indicted earlier and asked to appear in court, however, the prosecution said they absconded and would be tried in absentia. The trial at the Dhaka Special Judge Court-4 formally began Wednesday with testimonies by officials of the country's Anti-Corruption Commission. By Wednesday afternoon, the court had heard from two officials and a third is expected to testify later in the day, said Muhammad Tariqul Islam, a public prosecutor. Siddiq's lawyers had previously called the charges baseless and politically motivated. Separately, the anti-corruption investigation has also alleged that Siddiq's family was involved in brokering a 2013 deal with Russia for a nuclear power plant in Bangladesh in which large sums of money were said to have been embezzled. Siddiq represents the north London district of Hampstead and Highgate in Parliament, served in Britain's center-left Labor Party government as economic secretary to the Treasury — the minister responsible for tackling financial corruption. Hasina was ousted after a 15-year rule in a student-led mass uprising in August last year. She fled to India and has been in exile ever since. Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus took over as interim leader and vowed to try the former prime minister. Hundreds of protesters were killed during the uprising and Hasina now faces charges, including crimes against humanity. —