Raccoons could become UKs next invasive pest threat
The British Pest Control Association (BPCA) has identified the species as a growing concern, noting that raccoons are already well-established pests in parts of Europe and could quickly adapt to UK environments if introduced.
Niall Gallagher, technical manager at the BPCA, said: "Raccoons were imported into Germany from North America during the 1930s and rapidly became established across central Europe.
"What we've learned from this is that once established, raccoons can thrive in our natural environments."
While there is no evidence of a breeding population in the UK, raccoons have been identified by the Non-Native Species Secretariat (NNSS) as one of the top 20 species most likely to become invasive over the next decade.
Raccoons can live for up to four years in the wild and pose risks to both property and wildlife.
They also carry diseases and parasites that can be harmful to humans.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Do Employers Have A Rational Fear Of Hiring Disabled Staff?
Sir Charlie Mayfield, a stalwart of the UK business community and advisor to Liz Kendall, Work and Pensions Secretary, has recently been quoted in The Times stating that employers have a 'rational' fear of hiring disabled staff. During his review of workplace sickness, Mayfield concluded that adapting work to staff with health problems was a huge issue that required employers to change, but suggested extra duties on businesses were not the answer. He said: "We've got a large amount of legislation which places requirements on employers and it's partly because of that that a lot of employers see it as risky to employ disabled people. And so quite rationally, they don't, even though we all know that's not the right outcome." The context for these comments is one in which 2.5 million UK workers are permanently off sick, and 8.7 million workers identifying as disabled. There's been an increase of 800,000 people too unwell to work since 2019, which is unsustainable for workers, their life outcomes and financial stability as well as the national economy. Rights Versus Reality? So are Mayfield's comments and his discovery report for the Department of Work and Pensions yet another stick with which to beat disabled people? Or are his remarks click bait headlines, papering over some well reasoned insights which need to be surfaced, understood and addressed? Mayfield commented on the rise in Employment Tribunals and the extra duties on UK businesses: The present approach "pitches rights against reality. If someone's ill and they have a fit note, there's a stand-off almost between that person and their employer, who could be part of the solution. We need to move from a position where too much of this is about risk and fear, to one where we humanise this and encourage people to be talking of finding solutions." The adversarial narratives that exist between communities of lived experience and employers has swiftly deepened in recent years, with each group finding very different sources of advice online and increases in perceptions of conflict and unfairness from all sides – employee, colleague and employer. However, read deeper into the report, and Mayfield is recommending an incentivisation approach to disability employment (the proverbial 'carrot', rather than the legislative 'stick'). Crucially, he recommends that employers intervene early when someone is struggling, rather than lagging in the provision of adjustments or support. Indeed, failure to provide timely intervention is a frequent cause of employment tribunals, with compensation up to £230,000 in one recent case. A shift in responsiveness would be very welcome by the disabled and neurodivergent community and it seems pretty logical. Government support and incentives for early intervention seem rational, but we will need to think carefully about what to provide. Early Intervention Guidance Advice on disability adjustments for individuals from the government service Access to Work or in-house / private Occupational Health is routinely a first port of call for employees and employers respectively. Access to Work has been a lifeline for employees over the past few decades, and has funded services and equipment that exceeds the budgets of many small businesses. However, it has become so log jammed that there is a community pressure group now set up to raise awareness of the problem founded by Dr Shani Dhanda. Occupational health services can be excellent and provide or signpost the specialist advice needed. But costs have spiralled with a clinical, 'assessment first' provision when there are so many referrals. There's a lack of filtering so those with the greatest needs are getting the same level of intervention as those who need a simple set of strategies or some software. Some of the occupational health companies are delivering the same services that they recommend, which is a structural conflict of interest and risks driving up costs - this practice is banned in Access to Work and Disabled Students Allowance, for example. So while we're telling employers to do more, faster, we will also need to be clear about the 'how' and the 'what'. With grand policy gestures and an increasingly litigious atmosphere, the needs of the businesses risk being overlooked and on that note, Sir Mayfield's comments are on point. Advice on adjustments for health and disability needs to be a collaboration between employer and employee. An assessment should consult both parties, and review what the individual needs in relation to the resources available. For example, a higher cost burden might be acceptable for a larger business than a small business. Safety critical roles might not have as much flexibility as a standard role. It is therefore not possible to list reasonable adjustments for each physical, emotional or cognitive difficulty. These can act as guidance, but not definitive entitlements. The policy and specialist support environment is going to need to become more sophisticated, and more responsive to balancing needs and addressing conflict, unfairness and unreasonable requests / restrictions. This is not a straightforward ask. Needs-led models How can employers find good advice in a complex and risky environment? The needs-led model is a good alternative to the medical model, relying more on practical support than clinical diagnosis. At work, we don't need to know the cause of back pain to know that a first port of call is a desk assessment or moving and handling review. Improving knowledge of functional, everyday difficulties and potential scaffolding is within the grasp of HR with the occasional advice of specialists where needed. Up-skilling employer confidence and competence is a potential avenue to improving outcomes, particularly in the areas of emotional regulation and cognition-dependent task performance where the challenges and the solutions are not visible. Knowing what to provide can be a pragmatic, low-cost conversation – research indicates that the cheapest or free adjustments are typically the most welcome, and that employees prefer the ability to personalize rather than passively receive an off-the-shelf allocation. As the population ages, the disability inclusion problem is not going to go away. Employers who are not developing a straightforward and accessible pathway to inclusion – at the company and individual level – will remain at risk of employment tribunal losses. This isn't a question of rights versus reality, it is a question of taking charge of a business need versus sticking your head in the sand. The rational fear of tribunals can be replaced by a rational approach to managing a large and growing cohort of disabled employees. Given the urgency of resolving the problem at the national level, now is a great time to start a strategic workforce plan.


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Hackers Steal Passwords From UK's NHS With Sneaky Malware Tool
Ambulances parked outside the emergency department at the National Health Service's Royal Liverpool University Hospital in Liverpool, UK.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cash pay is 'going to constitute a major part of the Wegovy business': Novo Nordisk CFO
Novo Nordisk (NVO) reported an earnings miss Wednesday, sending its stock down 4% in early trading, pressuring the stock further after a surprise management shake-up earlier in the year and sharply lowered guidance despite growing sales of its blockbuster GLP-1 drugs Ozempic and Wegovy. The stock is down more than 46% year to date as a result. CFO Karsten Munk Knudsen discussed some of the changes in recent weeks. He told Yahoo Finance that the leadership change — the ousting of CEO Lars Jørgensen and international head Mike Doustdar taking his place — was a surprise. "I was surprised about the changes of CEOs back in May," Knudsen said. "But ... looking at other companies ... when pressure is on, in terms of performance and competition, then it's not unusual that bosses and owners assess what's the right team to lead the company. In a macro setting I don't think its extraordinary, but in a Novo setting it was indeed surprising." The US market has also proven a challenge for Novo Nordisk, as it lost its lead despite a first-mover advantage to competitor Eli Lilly (LLY). Executives blame the compounding market, in which copycats are allowed under special circumstances, with telehealth platforms taking advantage of the loophole despite the FDA ending a shortage of GLP-1s that previously allowed copycats to freely sell on the market. Knudsen said the compounding market is about one-third of current GLP-1 prescriptions in the US market. On top of the competition and copycats, Novo Nordisk, like other big pharma names, has been targeted by the Trump administration to lower prices for consumers. It was one of 17 companies to receive a letter demanding lower costs for current and new products. "In reality, we're not that far apart in the sense that we also drive for affordable access in products that we supply. Our GLP-1 pricing is already rather low," Knudsen said, without revealing the actual numbers. Outgoing CEO Lars Jørgensen said on an earnings call Wednesday that its prices for Medicaid, for example, are already lower than in Europe. Those prices are not publicly available. The letter also asked the companies to price new drugs at the same low pricing found in other developed countries and to provide the lower cash prices more widely. Crunching cash numbers Some experts have expressed doubt about cash market success, however. Craig Garthwaite, a professor of strategy and healthcare at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management, posted on X in response to the Trump letters, questioning the strategy's viability. "How many customers do we believe have the ability (or willingness) to pay out of pocket for brand name drugs? A simple reading of the literature on increasing cost sharing suggests that people are not prepared to pay cash for these products — even if it is at the net and not the list price," Garthwaite said. But Knudsen noted that of its Wegovy patients in the US, 10% are paying cash through NovoCare, the direct-to-consumer channel, after it launched in March. "I am absolutely convinced that the cash channel is going to increase from here, and going to constitute a major part of the Wegovy business into the future," he said, adding that the overall cash market for GLP-1 in the US is already way above 10%. Knudsen referenced the compounding market, saying it provides insight into the potential, as those customers are cash-paying and represent one-third of the Wegovy market. But the cash price paid for copycats is significantly lower than the $499 per month available on NovoCare. Hims and Hers (HIMS), which Novo recently cut ties with over its refusal to stop selling compounded semaglutide, advertises prices as low as $199 per month for a 12-month plan of the copycat drug. Anjalee Khemlani is the senior health reporter at Yahoo Finance, covering all things pharma, insurance, provider services, digital health, PBMs, and health policy and politics. That includes GLP-1s, of course. Follow Anjalee as AnjKhem on social media platforms X, LinkedIn, and Bluesky @AnjKhem. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data