Who is Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez? US-born citizen detained by ICE
ICE agents conduct an arrest as part of Trump's wide-ranging immigration crackdown in Chicago, Illinois, January 26. via Immigration and Customs Enforcemen PHOTO:REUTER
Listen to article
Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez is a 20-year-old US citizen, born in Grady County, Georgia, who has found himself at the center of a legal controversy after being wrongfully detained under Florida's immigration law.
Despite holding a valid US birth certificate and Social Security card, Lopez-Gomez was arrested by a Florida Highway Patrol trooper during a traffic stop, where he was a passenger.
He was charged with being an 'unauthorised alien' under a controversial new state law, despite clear evidence of his citizenship.
The charge has since been dropped, but a 48-hour ICE detainer issued by Homeland Security Investigations in Tampa continues to keep him in Leon County Jail.
Lopez-Gomez speaks Tzotzil, a Mayan language, and has limited English proficiency.
He lived in Mexico from the age of one until four years ago, when he returned to Georgia.
During his court hearing, Judge LaShawn Riggans verified the authenticity of his birth certificate, stating it bore a watermark confirming it was a legitimate document.
However, she said the court could not release him due to ICE's detainer request.
His mother, Sebastiana Gomez-Perez, broke down in court upon seeing her son appear virtually and expressed deep distress over being unable to help him.
Community advocates have voiced concern that Lopez-Gomez is the victim of racial profiling and misuse of immigration laws against a US-born citizen.
This is the second time Lopez-Gomez has faced legal trouble recently; he was previously detained in Georgia for a DUI but released when his citizenship was confirmed.
His case draws attention to Florida's SB 4-C immigration law, currently blocked by a federal judge, and raises questions about its impact on US citizens with immigrant backgrounds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan warns Israel's strikes on Iran pose grave threat to regional, global security
Pakistan's Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, speaks at the UN Security Council meeting on Israel-Iran conflict on June 13, 2025. Courtesy: X@PakistanUN_NY Listen to article Israel's strikes on Iranian nuclear and military facilities have been described as a 'grave danger and a serious threat' to the peace, security, and stability of the entire region and beyond, Pakistan told the UN Security Council during an emergency session convened on Friday. The 15-member Council adjusted its original schedule to address the rapidly evolving crisis, hearing from the head of the UN nuclear watchdog, who warned of the grave risks to both regional stability and nuclear safety. In his remarks, Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, Pakistan's permanent representative to the UN, strongly condemned Israel's 'unjustified and illegitimate' aggression against Iran. He reaffirmed that Pakistan stood in resolute solidarity with the Iranian government and people. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had requested the Security Council meeting, stating that Israel had 'now crossed every red line,' urging the international community to ensure that these crimes were not left unpunished. Among those supporting the request for the meeting were Pakistan, China, and Russia. In the face of escalating tensions, Ambassador Ahmad urged the Security Council to uphold its responsibility to enforce international law and immediately halt the aggression. He strongly called for the resolution of the crisis through dialogue and diplomacy. During the meeting, Rosemary DiCarlo, the UN Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, briefed the Council on the repercussions of the attacks, which were already being felt across the region. 'I reaffirm the Secretary-General's condemnation of any military escalation in the Middle East,' she said, urging both Israel and Iran to exercise maximum restraint and avoid, 'at all costs, a descent into a deeper and wider regional conflict.' She also highlighted that the military escalation had occurred just as 'some significant diplomatic developments' were unfolding, including the planned resumption of US-Iranian talks in Oman, which Iran has now indicated it will no longer attend. DiCarlo urged all parties to stay committed to diplomacy, stating, 'A peaceful resolution through negotiations remains the best means to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear programme.' She added, 'We must avoid, at all costs, a growing conflagration that could have enormous global consequences.' Rafael Grossi, Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), also briefed the Council, saying his agency was in constant contact with Iran's Nuclear Regulatory Authority to assess the status of affected facilities and determine the broader impacts on nuclear safety and security. He stressed that nuclear sites should never be targeted under any circumstances. 'Such attacks have serious implications for nuclear security, safety, and safeguards, as well as for regional and international peace and security,' Grossi said. He added that he was ready to travel to the region as soon as possible to assess the situation and support safety, security, and non-proliferation efforts in Iran. 'It is clear that the only sustainable path forward for Iran, Israel, the entire region, and the international community is one grounded in dialogue and diplomacy to ensure peace, stability, and cooperation,' Grossi concluded. He also offered the IAEA as a neutral platform, where 'facts prevail over rhetoric' and where technical engagement can replace escalation. 'I reaffirm both my personal commitment and the agency's readiness to facilitate dialogue and support efforts that promote transparency, security, and the peaceful resolution of nuclear issues in Iran.'
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Trump and ancient Chinese wisdom
The writer heads the independent Centre for Research and Security Studies, Islamabad. He is currently a visiting Research Fellow at Fudan University, Shanghai Listen to article Is Donald Trump the present day manifestation of the ancient Chinese businessman who enjoyed the least of respect in society? A direct comparison may sound unfair to the president, but his fixation on tariffs – seemingly rooted in arrogant nationalism – has prompted many in China to recall how ancient Chinese emperors and philosophers viewed businessmen. The falling out of Trump and Elon Musk – two powerful businessmen – also perhaps offers the latest illustration of that Chinese wisdom on businessmen's propensity to be self-righteous, arrogant and self-serving when the situation so demands. When Trump, a businessman turned politician, intensified his pursuit of increased tax revenues by imposing customs duties on a wide range of US imports from various global sources, he elicited a reaction from even the most esteemed traditional partners, such as the European Union and India. While Trump's intentions to revitalise the US economy and achieve 'Make-America-Great-Again' resonated with many, his actions evoked a comparison in China to the behaviour of ancient Chinese businessmen. These individuals were renowned for their unwavering pursuit of personal gain, often disregarding societal norms and values. This is how businessmen were viewed in general. Within the traditional Chinese cultural hierarchy, the Emperor of course stood above everybody else, with the absolute authority. All others – the citizens of the empire – however, were divided into four distinct classes. While businessmen were respected for their wealth and success, their primary focus on profit was perceived as less noble than their contributions to society through learning or government service. The most esteemed members of this class were the wisemen, scholars, advisors and officials. Their invaluable contributions to the Emperor's governance were recognised through their knowledge, virtue and intellectual pursuits. Their writings and intellectual endeavours were highly valued and contributed to the state's development. The second most respected class consisted of farmers, who were responsible for cultivating crops and providing food for the population. They were regarded as the foundation of the economy, ensuring the sustenance of the entire population. Artisans, technicians, engineers and construction experts, who possessed specialised skills, were the third most esteemed class. Their contributions were instrumental in developing technical tools and facilitating daily life. The business community, comprising merchants, held a lowly position in society, regarded as the least respected class. The Emperor held a disdain for businessmen, believing they prioritised money over morality and would resort to any means, ethical or immoral, to achieve financial gain. Consequently, few businessmen sought proximity to the Emperor. While there were methods to evade the Emperor's disdain, businessmen were generally the least welcomed and least respected members of the royal court due to their perceived greed for wealth. However, this perception has shifted over time, not only in China but also in other parts of the world. Businessmen have played a pivotal role in the country's economic growth, exemplified by the billionaire founder of Ali Baba, Jack Ma. The concept of 'Chinese businessman wisdom' has emerged, referring to the practical, astute, and often pragmatic approach to business that is highly esteemed by both Chinese and international audiences. The traditional hierarchical structure has undergone a gradual softening, and various professions, including business, are now recognised for their unique contributions to society. The contemporary emphasis on economic development has fostered a more positive attitude towards business and entrepreneurship. The government actively encourages entrepreneurship and private enterprise, acknowledging the indispensable role of businesses in the nation's development. Nevertheless, certain actions are considered unacceptable and should not be crossed. Jack Ma's conduct a few years ago prompted many to draw upon ancient wisdom and draw parallels between the past and the present. His interactions with the central bank invariably drew comparisons to the past and often served as an example of a businessman attempting to exert control over the central bank. The context involved technical difficulties experienced by Ali-Pay, a digital payment system, in conjunction with the central bank. Upon making his public complaint, Jack Ma faced significant repercussions from the Chinese authorities. His passing remark about China's finance system was interpreted as a mockery by the Beijing authorities, leading to questions about his intentions. They expressed concern that Jack Ma might intend to control the finance system through Ali-Pay. As a result, Jack Ma encountered substantial opposition from the authorities. They argued that the Central Bank is a trusted institution – in fact a public Trust – that efficiently manages and looks after the interests of the people. If allowed to operate like a Western capital institution, entities such as Ali-Pay could potentially disrupt the system and harm the interests of the Chinese people. The official backlash compelled Jack Ma to take a break from business – a sort of sabbatical. However, he recently resurfaced with more empathetic views on China's financial system – more aligned with the national ethos as projected by the leadership. A Chinese friend described him as helpful and engaged in significant philanthropic activities – something expected of every affluent Chinese who are expected to pay back after benefitting under the system, which rests on a national spirit and ethos that keep citizens at the centre. The citizen, says the ancient Chinese philosophy, is central to a state's stability, and hence his/her welfare is paramount for the political economy. All indicators suggest the Chinese Communist Party continues to follow that golden philosophy. It's yet to be seen how much the Trump-Musk acrimony hurts the people. There couldn't have been a better validation of the Chinese definition of a businessman than the mutual public trolling both Trump and Musk indulged in following the implosion of their alliance.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
'We knew everything,' Trump says about Israel's strikes on Iran
US President Donald Trump speaks during a swearing-in ceremony for the new US ambassador to China, former US Senator David Perdue, at the White House in Washington, DC, US on May 7, 2025. Photo: REUTERS Listen to article President Donald Trump told Reuters in a phone interview on Friday that he and his team knew everything about Israel's plan to attack Iran and that he had given Tehran fair warning it needed to make a deal on its nuclear program. "We knew everything, and I tried to save Iran humiliation and death. I tried to save them very hard because I would have loved to have seen a deal worked out," Trump said. "They can still work out a deal, however, it's not too late," he added. Trump had repeatedly pushed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to delay an Israeli attack to give diplomacy more time, though the president himself had threatened to bomb the Gulf nation if nuclear talks failed. Trump said he had given the Iranians 60 days to come to an agreement, "and today is 61." Iran has balked at the US insistence that it give up uranium enrichment. "We knew just about everything," he said. "We knew enough that we gave Iran 60 days to make a deal and today is 61, right? So, you know, we knew everything.' Trump said it was unclear if Iran still has a nuclear program following Israeli strikes on the country. "Nobody knows. It was a very devastating hit," Trump said. Israel said it had targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders at the start of what it warned would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon. Trump said the US still has nuclear talks planned with Iran on Sunday but that he was unsure they would take place. He said it was not too late for Iran to make a deal. US special envoy Steve Witkoff is scheduled to meet an Iranian delegation in Oman on Sunday, but the Israeli attacks have raised doubts on whether the session will still take place. "They're not dead," Trump said of the US-Iran talks. "We have a meeting with them on Sunday. Now, I'm not sure if that meeting will take place, but we have a meeting with them on Sunday." The president had convened his top national security advisers at Camp David on Sunday night for what he said were discussions that included Iran, and he spoke to Netanyahu on Monday about Iran. He said he was not concerned about a regional war breaking out as a result of Israel's strikes but did not elaborate. Asked if the US would support Israel against Iranian counterattacks, Trump said he supports Israel. 'We've been very close to Israel," he said. "We're their number one ally by far." "We'll see what happens," he said.
