‘Train SC filmmakers': Adoor's remark sparks row
Speaking at the event, Adoor criticised the Kerala State Film Development Corporation (KSFDC) for providing what he termed excessive funding to directors from the SC community.
'Those from SC backgrounds should be given at least three months of training under experienced filmmakers before being supported. The `1.5-crore grant should be split among three people, rather than funding one project. Government money shouldn't be used just because the film has a superstar or simply because the director is a woman,' Adoor said. Further, he claimed that many of the films funded under the initiative lacked quality and artistic value.
Minister for Cultural Affairs Saji Cherian, while presenting a report on the two-day conclave, rebutted Adoor's statements. He said the filmmakers were selected by an expert committee based on merit and their work reflects deep social and creative commitment.
'The fact is that people from the SC communities were kept out of mainstream cinema for nearly a century. The government's decision to support them is both timely and essential. This is the first time many of them are getting to direct a film. We have also taken steps to empower women and recognise transgender artists,' the minister said.
The government will not backtrack on its inclusive film policy, he stressed.
'This is a conscious decision to correct historical imbalances. We will continue to provide support,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Supreme Court bans hand-pulled rickshaws in Matheran
The Supreme Court on Wednesday banned hand-pulled rickshaws in the ecologically sensitive Matheran near Mumbai, a destination which draws tourists in large numbers, saying that the practice 'is against the basic concept of human dignity' and needs to be done away with completely. A bench of Chief Justice of India B R Gavai and Justices Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria said that those plying it are not doing so by choice but because they have no other source of livelihood. 'Permitting such an inhuman practice, which hits at the basic concept of human dignity in a country like India, which is a developing country, belittles the constitutional promise of social and economic justice,' the court added. The bench pointed out that the SC had in the case People of India for Democratic Rights v. Union of India, given an expanded meaning to Article 23, holding that it was intended to abolish every form of forced labour and said that even if remuneration is paid, labour supplied by a person will be hit by Article 23 if it is forced labour. It referred to the SC's 1980 ruling in the case Azad Rickshaw Pullers Union (Regd.) vs State Of Punjab & Others which dealt with the rehabilitation of cycle rickshaw pullers in Punjab. The bench said it was then held that the practice of allowing cycle-pulled rickshaws was inconsistent with the preambular promise of social justice. The bench said, 'it is really unfortunate that after 45 years of the observations made by this Court in the case of Azad Rickshaw Pullers Union, the inhuman practice of a human being pulling another human being is still prevalent in the town of Matheran.' It said that allowing manual rickshaws today would be a betrayal of the promise of social and economic justice that the people of India promised to themselves. 'The question that we ask ourselves is as to whether this practice is alive to the Constitutional promise of social and economic equality and social and economic justice. The answer, unfortunately, will have to be in the negative. To continue such human practice even after 78 years of tecountry getting freedom and after 75 years of the Constitution being enacted and promising social and economic Justice to its citizens, however, would be betraying the promise given by the people of India given to themselves,' the order said. The SC added, 'we therefore find that the practise of permitting hand-pulled rickshaws needs to be stopped forthwith.' It directed the 'state to stop the practice of hand-pulled rickshaws in a phased manner within a period of 6 months from today'. The bench said the question would then arise as to what will happen to those dependent on it for their livelihood. It said that the answer lies in switching to environmentally friendly e-rickshaws. The Court asked the Maharashtra government to roll out a rehabilitation scheme for the rickshaw pullers of Matheran saying 'the state… has also a duty under the directive principles to ensure that social and economic justice is done to the citizens…'. The bench said that the non-availability of funds 'cannot be an excuse for non-implementation of the…scheme' and added, 'we earnestly hope that the state would tender necessary assistance in stopping such an inhumane practice.' The court asked the state to adopt the model followed in Kewadia of Gujarat, where the state purchases e-rickshaws and gives them to genuine rickshaw pullers on hire. It asked the Matheran monitoring committee, headed by the Collector, to identify genuine rickshaw pullers who need to be rehabilitated and said the committee will decide the number of e-rickshaws needed after taking into account ground realities. It permitted the state government to lay paver blocks from Dasturi Naka (bus station) up to the Shivaji Statue in Matheran and said that no paver blocks are to be laid on the internal road and the trading routes. The court also directed that any concrete blocks already laid should be replaced by paver blocks.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Call for action against Adoor
T'puram: Women's organizations, including Women's Collective in Cinema, Disha and Anweshi have filed a complaint with state women's commission against filmmaker Adoor Gopalakrishnan for his controversial remarks at the film conclave. In the complaint, the organizations have demanded that Gopalakrishnan be summoned for an explanation. They also requested that Gopalakrishnan be excluded from govt events, stating that his remarks were anti-women and insulting especially to singer Pushpavathi. Gopalakrishnan made the controversial remark during the closing session of the film conclave. As the comment became controversial, minister V N Vasavan and musician Sreekumaran Thampy came to Gopalakrishnan's defence. The minister said that he did not believe Gopalakrishnan's comment was made with ill intent and that it was twisted into a controversy. Vasavan also mentioned that the govt stands with women and SC-ST communities. However, minister R Bindu responded by rejecting Gopalakrishnan's remark. She said that govt has a responsibility to ensure justice for those who are denied it. "There is nothing wrong with govt providing necessary funds for women and marginalized communities to express their creative talents. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Susan Boyle Is Now so Thin and Looks Beautiful! Undo Making films is an expensive process and there is no issue in providing funds for first-time filmmakers. This is one of the best projects of the cultural department. The gaze of the camera is always a male one and there needs to be an alternative perspective. We need to create space for that," Bindu said. CPM state secretary M V Govindan also came down heavily against Gopalakrishnan stating that the filmmaker still had a feudal mindset.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Considerable interference by executive in appointment process of judges: Ex-SC judge
New Delhi, Former Supreme Court judge Justice Madan B Lokur on Wednesday said there had been a considerable interference by the executive in the appointment process of judges. Considerable interference by executive in appointment process of judges: Ex-SC judge He was speaking at an event organised by The Global Jurists on the topic 'Morality in Judiciary, A Paradigm or a Paradox'. "Now, about the appointment of judges. We have had a lot of problems in the recent past. There has been, I think, a considerable interference by the executive in the appointment process," he said. "The Memorandum of Procedure was finalised a long time back. But despite the MOP, which was, by the way, drafted in consultation with the Government of India, there have been all kinds of problems in its implementation," Justice Lokur added. In the appointment of judges, the former the former apex court judge said, "I believe, for reasons, that it has nothing to do with his merit. But it has something to do with a few cases that they decided," . He said that if the appointment process of judges was in the hands of the executive, "a kind of mischief" could be played. "You can appoint some person in the beginning, and a senior person can be kept pending for about six months or seven months so that he loses or he or she loses the seniority, and this is what is happening. Outstanding advocates who should have been appointed are not being appointed," Justice Lokur said. He said the process of making the appointment process less opaque needed to be deliberated upon. "Opaque not only from the side of the collegium of the high court or the collegium of the Supreme Court, but also from the side of the government," Justice Lokur said. He said that at present there were two impeachment motions pending against judges, one against Justice Yashwant Varma in the Parliament and the second against Justice Shekhar Yadav with the Rajya Sabha Chairperson. "I think for the first time in the history of the country, two impeachment motions are pending. I think we have to be very careful about the kind of persons that we appoint, and second, to keep a check on the judges while they are on the bench to make sure that these kinds of incidents do not happen," Justice Lokur said. Underlining the importance of delivering easily understandable judgments, he said, "I had to deal with a couple of judgments written by a particular judge. The English that he used, nobody could understand. The judges could not understand it. The lawyers could not understand it. So you know, this kind of quality is being demonstrated now." Regarding the transfer of judges, he said, "On the other hand, we have situations where judges are being transferred left and right without any reason. Delhi has had the experience in the recent past of Justice S Muralidhar everybody knows that this was during the riots in 2020, for passing an order which, for some reason, the government did not like." Justice Lokur, on post-retirement appointment of judges, said, "Now we have had a situation where a former Chief Justice of India has been apparently rewarded by a seat in the Rajya Sabha. We have another judge who has been rewarded with the governorship of one state. The third judge has also been awarded the governorship of another state." "We have had judges who have retired and joined politics immediately after. We had a sitting judge who resigned and joined politics, and actually got elected as a member of Parliament. We need to sort things out," he added. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
