EXCLUSIVE Watch Democrats squirm as they're grilled on who's REALLY leading their party as young 'communists' rise in ranks
Though House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer are technically the left's top lawmakers, Democrats on Capitol Hill shared that there is still no consensus on who is the party's head.
In the absence of a clear frontrunner to lead the party in 2028, Democrats are left to tout their current efforts resisting Trump.
'It's a group leadership at this point in time, obviously Hakeem, obviously Chuck Schumer, a lot of governors,' veteran Democrat Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland told the Daily Mail in an interview. 'I think there are a number of leaders.'
Hoyer twice served as House Majority Leader under former Speaker Nancy Pelosi. He has served on Capitol Hill for over 43 years since 1981 and is the longest tenured Democrat in the House of Representatives. It's safe to say he's been around a while to witness the party in and out of power.
'When you don't have the presidency...I can't remember a time when there was a leader,' he continued. 'So I think it's a collective leadership.'
Other Democrats flat-out admitted there is no clear head of the party.
Hoyer told the Daily Mail that there are a number of Democratic leaders, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. But his colleague, Rep. Moskowitz, said the party doesn't really have a leader at the moment
A recent poll from Reuters/Ipsos found that 62 percent of Democratic voters want completely new leadership
'We don't have a counterpart in our party at the moment, because ... we're coming out of the last presidency,' Florida Democrat Rep. Jared Moskowitz told the Daily Mail. 'But no, we don't have a counterbalance at the moment.'
The Floridian, known for his cool Air Jordan sneaker collection, noted that when Trump's term expires in 2028, both parties will be left searching for new leadership, ostensibly ignoring the platform JD Vance will have after serving as vice president.
'The Republicans, will be in the same boat, right?' Moskowitz said. Who will be the leader of the party? Because it won't be the president anymore.'
In addition to Jeffries and Schumer, there are a number of Democrats who have been floated as the next party boss.
On those lists are usually Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett, and occasionally, former VP Kamala Harris.
Popular prediction sites Kalshi and Polymarket list Newsom as the most likely Democratic nominee for the 2028 presidential contest, AOC is listed as close second while former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg comes in third.
Democrats have indicated they want new faces steering the party.
According to a June poll from Reuters/Ipsos, 62 percent of self-identified Democrats agreed that 'the leadership of the Democratic Party should be replaced with new people.'
That could be why Democratic candidate for New York mayor Zohran Mamdani, a self-declared democratic socialist, has been surging in the polls and landing countless TV interviews.
'Zohran Mamdani, the new leader of the Democratic Party, supports 'the abolition of private property' and 'seizing the means of production,' Republican Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana wrote this week.
'But Washington Democrats are still cozying up to him. There's no doubt about it: the loon wing is running the show.'
Mamdani, 33, embodies a political archetype akin to former presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, also a self-declared democratic socialist.
The young mayoral candidate has even caught the attention of the president.
'It's finally happened, the Democrats have crossed the line. Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Dem Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor. We've had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous,' Trump wrote recently on Truth Social.
Mamdani met personally with AOC, along with about 40 other Democratic lawmakers this week in D.C.
The meeting was an hour-long session on communicating and organizing hosted by AOC, the progressive leader of the 'Squad.'
The venue had to change because of high demand from lawmakers to sit in on the session, a Mamdani spokesperson said.
One longtime Democrat even likened Mamdani to Trump, saying they share a similar populist appeal.
'Donald Trump and he both get out and they talk to people and they listen to people and they understand how people feel. And he's using social media the way that Donald Trump has,' Rep. Debbie Dingell of Michigan said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tulsi Gabbard openly accuses Obama of longstanding effort to overthrow Trump in coup
Tulsi Gabbard has openly accused the Obama administration of launching a 'years-long coup' against President Donald Trump in an attempt to subvert his 2016 election win. Gabbard released declassified emails Friday and claimed that they reveal a 'treasonous conspiracy' committed by former President Barack Obama and his officials over the investigation surrounding Russian interference in the 2016 election. Trump pushed the 'conspiracy' over the weekend on Truth Social by sharing an interview Gabbard gave Fox News on the allegations. He also congratulated Gabbard in a separate post Saturday. 'Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people,' Gabbard said of the Obama administration. Democrats have blasted the accusation as an attempt to 'change the subject' from the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. The president has found himself on the receiving end of MAGA's fury over the Justice Department's decision not to release any further evidence in the convicted pedophile's case. Trump has instructed his embattled Attorney General Pam Bondi to release some of the files relating to grand jury testimony, subject to court approval. Gabbard has called for the prosecution of Obama and former U.S. national security officials, accusing them of 'manufacturing intelligence' to suggest that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, despite evidence proving otherwise, she claimed. Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, and former FBI Director James Comey were cited in the DNI memo. Trump has claimed for years that the investigation into Russian interference was a 'hoax.' The intelligence community has long concluded that Russia attempted to influence the 2016 election through a social media campaign, but the Mueller investigation couldn't prove those operators had ties to the Trump campaign. Democratic Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut slammed Gabbard's claims as 'utter nonsense.' 'Odd that then CIA Director Pompeo didn't say any of this. Or that none of the six DNIs in Trump's first term said any of it,' Himes responded in a post on X. 'Once again, @DNIGabbard is trashing her own people in an attempt to regain Trump's favor or to distract from the Epstein scandal. Probably both.' He added, 'No one alleges that the Russians did technical hacks of voting technology. But ALL of the investigations, including the Senate bipartisan investigation, found that the Russians sought to influence the 2016 election in Trump's favor.' Democratic Sen. Mark Warner, vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, accused Gabbard of 'weaponizing' her position as Trump's director of national intelligence. 'It is sadly not surprising that DNI Gabbard, who promised to depoliticize the intelligence community, is once again weaponizing her position to amplify the president's election conspiracy theories,' Warner said in a post on X. 'It is appalling to hear DNI Gabbard accuse her own IC workforce of committing a 'treasonous conspiracy' when she was unwilling to label Edward Snowden a traitor.' Obama has not yet responded to Gabbard's claims.
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Border Patrol agent shot in the face by illegal immigrant during botched robbery in New York City park
An off-duty Border Patrol agent was shot in the face by an illegal immigrant in a robbery gone wrong - before the agent fired back in dramatic scenes on Saturday. The federal agent, 42, was sitting in Fort Washington Park, Manhattan, when he was approached by two men on a moped attempting to rob him just before midnight. One of the immigrants took out a gun after a brief commotion and fired at the agent, hitting him in the face and left forearm. The victim, who was sitting on a rock with a female friend, quickly reacted and took out his own gun and shot at the two men. The 42-year-old is expected to survive his injuries - but is currently in hospital. His bullets hit a Dominican national, who has been living illegally in the US since 2023. He has been taken into custody. The second suspect has not been found. A crime scene was set up in the early hours of Sunday morning - and police with the NYPD were seen sweeping the park for shell casings and evidence. There is still a large police presence inside the park and underneath the George Washington Bridge. A firearm was found at the scene - as well as a backpack, along with a wallet and jacket. It's unclear who they belonged to. The frightening ordeal comes amid the White House's massive deportation push. Trump is continuing full steam ahead to try and remove the over 10 million migrants who illegally entered the country under President Joe Biden. The Department of Homeland Security said the administration has carried out 239,000 deportations since Trump's inauguration in January. New York City in particular felt the brunt of the immigration crisis over the last four years - with thousands of migrants arriving in the Big Apple seeking shelter and asylum. The Roosevelt Hotel in Midtown was set up as a makeshift registration center and shelter for immigrant families who had arrived in the US through the southern border and made their way to the Democrat city to start their new life.
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
It's time to rethink how we measure labor in the US
Last week the Wall Street Journal reported that, as a result of the 'tougher environment' in the labor market, companies are 'in control again' and are warning applicants of 'long hours and few boundaries'. At the same time some industries are reporting worker shortages due to Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. And then there's artificial intelligence, which is about to devastate the jobs market – or is about to create new jobs. Amid all this change, what do we really know about the jobs market? Just the other week the Department of Labor said the economy added 147,000 new jobs to the economy. So that seems encouraging? But the official figures are subject to revision – and big ones too. The labor department has said its own numbers were overstated by as much as 818,000 during the first eight months of 2024. The payroll giant ADP is more in line with the some pessimists on Wall Street, saying that the private economy shrank by 33,000 in June. But their competitor, Paychex, reported that small business employment – which represents about half of the country's workers – has continued to 'hold steady' throughout this year. Job openings 'jumped' to a six-month high last month. Does anyone know how the labor market is actually doing? No economist, no government agency, no academic that I know has yet figured out how many Americans are working or not. Why? Because it's not just about jobs anymore. It's about income. The 'jobs' data we read isn't relevant. Last week a report in Fortune introduced us the concept of the 'over-employed'. These are workers – many in the tech industry – that are holding down more than one job at a time, with some making as much as $3,000 per day working for multiple employers. But the over-employed trend goes beyond this. That's because in the same week, new data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics revealed what we already knew: workers working remotely were logging two hours less hours per day than their counterparts coming into the office. So what are they doing with this extra time? Maybe they're watching Netflix. Others were generating more income for themselves doing other things, like starting their own businesses. According to new data from the Census Bureau: almost 460,000 applications were filed for new businesses in June alone, a level almost twice the amount of the monthly average before the pandemic. We all know these 'workers'. Some have multiple full-time jobs. Others have multiple part-time jobs. Many have multiple sources of income. They drive Ubers. They have Etsy shops. They're selling used sneakers on eBay and working late shifts under the table at the local bar. They write programs. They work with data. They do it all! Are we taking all of these people into consideration when analyzing the 'job market?' Some of the 'over-employed' and really just underpaid and need the extra work to make ends meet, unfortunately. According to a new NerdWallet data, nearly two in five Americans are aiming to make more money this year and 10% have started a side business or second job just to cover basic necessities. In this increasingly complicated 'jobs' market perhaps it is time for economists to stop evaluating the labor market in terms of jobs. This is quickly becoming obsolete. We need to measure income. How many people over the age of 18 in the US are earning more than, say $50,000 per year, taking into consideration all sources of income and inflation-adjusted? What percentage is that compared to the working-age population? How has that increased or decreased over time? Isn't this more relevant than the numbers we're getting now? And shouldn't the numbers come from actual, real data and not from an unreliable Department of Labor survey that's revised 10 times after it is initially published? Can't we get this information from tax returns, social security and private sources such as Etsy, Amazon, eBay, ADP and Paychex? Can't this be calculated and updated monthly and annually? Of course it can. Major economic policy decisions still hinge on the unemployment rate and jobs growth. Politicians get re-elected or ejected on this data. But in a job market that's being shaken by AI, immigration and the rapid rise of side gigs, it's time we rethought how we measure the health of the labor market.
