Trump defends giving Putin '50 days' to make peace with Ukraine
"Well, at the end of 50 days, if we don't have a deal, it's going to be too bad," Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday.
When asked why he decided to give the Russian leader nearly two months to comply with his demand, President Trump deflected.
"I don't think 50 days is very long. It could be sooner than that," Trump said.
"You should have asked that same question to Biden. Why did he get us into this war?" he continued. "You know why he got us in? Because he's a dummy, that's why."
MORE: Trump sending weapons to Ukraine, threatens 'severe tariffs' against Russia if ceasefire deal not reached in 50 days
Despite pledging additional U.S. made weapons for Ukraine, Trump also said he didn't support Ukraine's President Zelenskyy ordering strikes on the Russian capital.
"He shouldn't target Moscow," he said. "No, we're not looking to do that."
MORE: Trump admin live updates: WH confirms Trump, Zelenskyy discussed strikes on Moscow
MORE: Russia 'didn't care' about Trump's weapons for Ukraine, tariff threats, official says
On Monday, Trump said that Russia's failure to reach a negotiated settlement with Ukraine within 50 days would lead to his administration imposing a 100% tariff rate on Russian imports as well as what he called "secondary tariffs" on countries that have continued to do business with Moscow.
"We're very, very unhappy with him," Trump said of Putin on Monday. "We're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days."
U.S. imports from Russia, which totaled around $3 billion in 2024 according to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, account for a small share of Moscow's revenue, meaning Trump's threat to hike tariffs on Russian goods likely wouldn't pack much punch.
However, the president's promise to raise tariffs on imports from third-party countries could carry more weight.
Some secondary sanctions aimed at weakening Russia's war economy are already in place. The Biden administration steadily ramped up its use of the penalties throughout the conflict, primarily targeting foreign financial institutions accused of supporting Moscow's military industrial complex and the so-called "shadow fleet" of tanker operators working to circumvent Western sanctions and price caps on Russian oil.
But going after countries that import oil and other resources from Russia would be a significant escalation.
Through much of the war, the Biden administration avoided taking direct aim at Russian energy exporters out of concern that doing so would cause global fuel prices to rise. Instead, the former administration worked with other members of the G7 to cap the price of Russian oil products, cutting into Moscow's profits while allowing the exports to remain on the market.
Trump, on the other hand, has previously promised to go after Russia's customers.
In March, Trump threatened to put "secondary tariffs on oil, on all oil coming out of Russia" during an interview with NBC News -- adding "if you buy oil from Russia, you can't do business in the United States."
The White House has yet to release specific details on Trump's secondary tariffs, but his ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, said on Monday the top importers of Russian oil would be in the administration's crosshairs.
"It's about tariffs on countries like India and China that are buying their oil. And it really is going to I think dramatically impact the Russian economy," he said during an interview with CNN.
But whether the secondary tariffs would stop at countries like China and India is an open question.
Despite the web of sanctions in place against Russia, the country still has many meaningful trade relationships, including ones with European allies.
Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the EU has significantly dropped its share of Russian oil and gas imports and its plan to fully phase out those imports isn't expected to fully come to fruition until the end of 2027 at the earliest.
Some Eastern European and Central Asian countries also have economies that rely on doing business with Russia, meaning they would almost certainly be unable to significantly scale back trade with Russia and would have the face the consequences of secondary tariffs.
If the president sticks to his 50-day window, Russia can continue to carry out its summertime campaign against Ukraine until early September without facing additional consequences.
In his interview with CNN, Whitaker was also asked about how Trump made the decision on the timeline but didn't give a clear answer.
"The time to end the slaughter is now. The time to end the killing is now. And so 50 days is the appropriate amount of time because it needs to happen now," he responded.
Currently, Russia is making modest gains against Ukraine and may soon seek to leverage those advances to launch additional offenses in the eastern reach of the country, according to a recent assessment from the Institute of the Study of War.
Many officials and experts have long predicted that the Kremlin would push off serious talks on ending the war until the cooler months set in because it hopes to strengthen its position at the negotiating table by claiming as much territory as possible during the summer season.
In an interview with the BBC on Monday, Trump indicated he still wanted to pursue diplomacy with Russia, but that his patience with Putin was wearing thin.
"I'm not done with him, but I'm disappointed with him," he said.
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov responded to Trump's threats on Monday, saying Moscow needed "time to analyze" the comments.
"The U.S. president's statements are very serious," Peskov said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SharpLink (SBET) Soars 33.86% on ETH Leadership
We recently published . SharpLink Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ:SBET) is one of this week's biggest players. SharpLink Gaming capped off the trading week, boasting a 33.86-percent gain to close at $28.98 versus the $21.65 close on July 11, as investors cheered its new leadership position in the cryptocurrency industry. This came after announcements on Wednesday that it is now the largest holder of Ethereum cryptocurrencies globally following the acquisition of 74,656 ETH last week, pushing its total ownership to 280,706. The assets were acquired between July 7 and 13 at a weighted average price of $2,852 each. Investors snapped up shares following the news, propelling its stock price by 80.51 percent during the week alone. The transaction also coincided with SharpLink Gaming, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SBET) successful raising of $413 million through the issuance of more than 24 million shares At-The-Market between July 7 and 11. As of July 13, SharpLink Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ:SBET) said approximately $257 million of the total proceeds have yet to be spent on ETH purchases. While we acknowledge the potential of SBET as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Boston Globe
26 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
With gavel in hand, Trump chisels away at the power of a compliant Congress
The moment left a memorable mark on a historic day. The gesture reflected a traditional nod of honor, from one leader to another, a milestone of the Republican Party's priority legislation becoming law. But the imagery also underscored a symbolic transfer of political power, from Capitol Hill to the White House as a compliant Congress is ceding more and more of its prerogative to the presidency. Since Trump's return to the White House in January, and particularly in the past few weeks, Republicans in control of the House and Senate have shown an unusual willingness to give the president of their party what he wants, regardless of the potential risk to themselves, their constituents and Congress itself. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Republicans raced to put the big package of tax breaks and spending cuts on Trump's desk by his Independence Day deadline. Senators had quickly confirmed almost all of Trump's outsider Cabinet nominees despite grave reservations over Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as health secretary, Pete Hegseth as the Pentagon chief and others. House Republicans pursued Trump's interest in investigating his perceived foes, including investigating Democratic Advertisement But at the same time, Congress hit the brakes on one of its own priorities, legislation imposing steep sanctions on Russia over its war on Ukraine, after Trump announced he was allowing President Vladimir Putin an additional 50 days to negotiate a peace deal, dashing hopes for a swifter end to the conflict. Advertisement This past week, Congress was tested anew, delivering on Trump's request to rescind some $9 billion that lawmakers had approved but that the administration wanted to eliminate, including money for public broadcasting and overseas aid. It was a rare presidential request, a challenge to the legislative branch's power of the purse, that has not been used in decades. 'We're lawmakers. We should be legislating,' said a defiant Sen. Lisa Murkowksi, R-Alaska, as she refused to support the White House's demand to rescind money for National Public Radio and others. 'What we're getting now is a direction from the White House and being told, 'This is the priority. We want you to execute on it. We'll be back with you with another round,'' she said. 'I don't accept that.' Congress, the branch of government the Founding Fathers placed first in the Constitution, is at a familiar crossroads. During the first Trump administration, Republicans frightened by Trump's angry tweets of disapproval would keep their criticisms private. Those who did speak up — Liz Cheney of Wyoming in the House and Mitt Romney of Utah in the Senate, among others — are gone from Capitol Hill. One former GOP senator, Jeff Flake of Arizona, who announced in 2017 during Trump's first term that he would not seek reelection the next year, is imploring Republicans to find a better way. 'The fever still hasn't broken,' he wrote recently in The New York Times. 'In today's Republican Party, voting your conscience is essentially disqualifying.' Advertisement But this time, the halls of Congress are filled with many Republicans who came of political age with Trump's 'Make America Great Again' movement and owe their ascent to the president himself. Many are emulating his brand and style as they shape their own. A new generation of GOP leaders, Johnson in the House and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, have pulled closer to Trump. They are utilizing the power of the presidency in ways large and small — to broker deals, encourage wayward lawmakers to fall in line, even to set schedules. Johnson, R-La., has openly pined for what he calls a 'normal Congress.' But short of that, the speaker relies on Trump to help stay on track. When Republicans hit an impasse on cryptocurrency legislation, a Trump priority, it was the president who met with holdouts in the Oval Office late Tuesday night as Johnson called in by phone. The result is a perceptible imbalance of power as the executive exerts greater authority while the legislative branch dims. The judicial branch has been left to do the heavy lift of checks and balances with the courts processing hundreds of lawsuits over the administration's actions. 'The genius of our Constitution is the separation of power,' said Democratic Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, the former speaker, in an interview on SiriusXM's 'Mornings with Zerlina.' 'That the Republicans in Congress would be so ignoring of the institution that they represent, and that have just melted the power of the incredibly shrinking speakership' and Senate leadership positions, 'to do all of these things, to cater to the executive branch,' she said. Advertisement Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., endured Trump's criticism over his opposition to the tax and spending cuts bill. The senator raised concerns about steep cuts to hospitals, but the president threatened to campaign against him. Tillis announced he would not seek reelection in 2026. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, voted against that bill and the rescissions package despite Trump's threat to campaign against any dissenters. One Republican, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, appears to be pressing on, unphased. He recently proposed legislation to force the administration to release the Jeffrey Epstein files, something the president had been reluctant to do. 'Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that if the president wants something, you must do it,' said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, in a Senate speech. 'We don't have to do this. We don't have to operate under the assumption that this man is uniquely so powerful.'
Newsweek
27 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Tariffs Are Killing Affordable Cars in US: Study
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's new tariffs on vehicles and auto parts have contributed to a slowdown in affordable car availability in the United States, according to a study by The findings suggested that the 25 percent auto tariffs imposed in April, alongside the 50 percent metals tariffs targeting the European Union (EU), Mexico, and Canada, have affected new and used car prices, impacting average Americans seeking budget vehicles. Why It Matters The rise in car prices and tightening supply of affordable models present challenges for millions of Americans facing high transportation and insurance costs. Industry analysts, dealership owners, and consumer advocates have warned that tariffs would make new and used vehicles less accessible, further straining surging auto repair bills and insurance premiums. The Trump administration imposed a sweeping 25 percent tariff on imported vehicles and car parts in April. The president also hiked the 25 percent levy on steel and aluminum up to 50 percent last month. However, an earlier executive order prevents tariff "stacking" on auto parts for two years, with firms assembling the vehicles in the U.S. allowed small reimbursements. What To Know reported that cars priced under $30,000—long a staple for cost-conscious buyers—had inventory growth of just 3.9 percent year-over-year during the first half of 2025. The vast majority, 92 percent, of sub-$30,000 models in the U.S. are imports meaning they are especially susceptible to Trump's tariffs. The new study also found imported models dominated the more affordable new car market, with only the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla being produced domestically for under $30,000—and some trims of those were still imported. Price increases for new cars have been relatively modest, at $97 on average, since the tariffs were announced. However, sharp rises were seen for certain models, especially those from the United Kingdom, which were over $10,000 more expensive, and the EU at about $2,500 more. Many experts believe that most of the auto sales this year have been of inventory that was imported before the duties, meaning their prices would be unaffected. Consultants at AlixPartners has projected that tariffs would ultimately add nearly $2,000 per vehicle and reduce total U.S. car sales by approximately 1 million over three years. Trump's tariffs on metals such as steel and aluminum continued to raise production costs for automakers, compounding pressure on entry-level vehicle affordability. While the average American spends approximately $45,000-$48,000 on a new car, according to J.D. Power and Anderson Economic Group, cars at the lower range are essential for millions of Americans who cannot afford higher purchase prices, or the many budget-focused consumers who prefer a more affordable deal. Hondas are seen at a dealership in Bedford, Ohio, on July 8. Hondas are seen at a dealership in Bedford, Ohio, on July 8. Sue Ogrocki/AP Who People Are Saying said in its July report: "The pace of sales and inventory movement will depend on the scope of tariffs, with automakers likely to adjust production to align with a smaller, more price-sensitive buyer pool." Mark Wakefield, global auto market lead for AlixPartners, told reporters in an online briefing last month, "These tariffs bring a big wall of cost..."Consumers [will be] taking the majority of the hit." President Trump said in April as he unveiled his 25 percent auto tariffs: "You're going to see prices go down." Chris Harto, a senior policy analyst at Consumer Reports, told Inside EVs: "It does not appear like any of the policies will result in people paying less to buy and own vehicles in 2028 or 2029 than they do today." Jessica Caldwell, head of insights at auto-buying resource Edmunds, told Associated Press even repairs could become more expensive due to tariffs: "If you are bringing your car to get repaired, chances are, it's going to have a part that comes from another country. That price that you pay is likely going to be directly affected by the increase [from these tariffs]." What Happens Next? Analysts agreed that most of the early 2025 car sales involved vehicles imported before tariffs took effect, delaying the full impact on prices. However, as pre-tariff inventory dwindles in the second half of the year, both new and used car prices are expected to rise.
