&w=3840&q=100)
Jane Street to resume trading: Arbitrage vs market manipulation explained
On July 3, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) temporarily barred the firm from participating in its securities markets. The regulator alleged that Jane Street carried out a coordinated trading strategy that distorted prices in India's Bank Nifty index, misleading investors and profiting from the resulting volatility.
Jane Street, which has denied any wrongdoing, is now challenging the order and has deposited more than ₹4,800 crore (around $560 million) into an escrow account and has resumed trading in the Indian market.
The case has left some institutional investors unsettled and may even serve as a larger wake-up call for India's financial market, sparking debate between legal arbitrage and illegal market manipulation. Here's a closer look at what this means.
What is Jane Street?
Jane Street is a global quantitative trading firm that uses mathematical models and algorithms to trade rapidly and across markets. With operations in more than 45 countries and over 3,000 employees, it is one of the largest players on Wall Street. In 2023, the firm reportedly accounted for more than 10.4 per cent of North America's equity trading volume, up from 7.6 per cent in 2022, according to a report by the Financial Times.
In India, the firm traded heavily in both the cash market, where investors buy and sell actual shares, and the derivatives market, where traders use instruments like options and futures to bet on future price movements.
What is an arbitrage trading strategy?
Arbitrage is a legal trading strategy that takes advantage of price differences in different markets. This means that if a stock is trading at slightly different prices across two exchanges, a trader can buy low in one market and sell high in another.
In India, arbitrage often occurs between the cash market and derivatives market, where traders can simultaneously buy and sell related assets to lock in small, low-risk profits. Arbitrage is legal in India as long as these trades are based on existing inefficiencies and do not attempt to create false price movements.
Arbitrage may even be beneficial as it can help align prices, thereby improving market efficiency, as former Sebi primary market board member V Raghunathan told CNBC.
What is market manipulation?
Market manipulation is illegal. It involves deliberately distorting prices or creating a misleading impression of market activity. This could include tactics like artificially inflating demand, moving prices without a valid economic reason, or placing trades solely to influence market outcomes.
Difference between arbitrage and market manipulation
The difference between arbitrage and manipulation lies in intent and impact.
Arbitrage works within the natural functioning of markets, while manipulation seeks to interfere with it. The latter can often harm other investors in the process.
What are Sebi's accusations against Jane Street?
According to Sebi, Jane Street used multiple entities to carry out a coordinated trading strategy in the Bank Nifty index. The market regulator alleges that one entity bought large volumes of banking stocks in the early morning, which pushed up the index price. At the same time, another entity took positions in the derivatives market anticipating a fall in the index.
Near the close of the trading day, particularly on expiry days when derivative contracts are settled, Jane Street is alleged to have sold off the earlier stock purchases in large volumes, pushing the index lower. This price drop, Sebi claims, boosted the profitability of the firm's bets on falling prices.
This practice is known as 'marking the close', which is considered manipulative if it involves intentionally influencing prices during the final minutes of trading.
Sebi argues that Jane Street's actions created an artificial and misleading appearance of market activity, which in turn caused retail investors to trade at distorted levels and suffer losses.
Jane Street's response to Sebi allegation
Jane Street has denied any manipulation, describing its actions as basic index arbitrage. The firm has not commented publicly but has indicated it intends to challenge the regulator's order.
On July 14, Jane Street deposited ₹4,844 crore into an escrow account, a step that Sebi said was required while reviewing the firm's request to resume trading in Indian markets.
Broader market reaction and regulatory concerns
The episode has unsettled parts of the institutional investor community. Although Indian stock indices are near all-time highs, foreign institutional investors (FIIs) have become increasingly cautious, particularly around midcap and smallcap stocks, where valuations appear stretched and liquidity is thinner.
Jignesh Desai, chief executive for institutional equities at Centrum Broking, told Business Standard, 'FIIs are looking for consistency and predictability in regulatory actions, especially around high-frequency and algorithmic trading. As long as Sebi maintains transparency and market stability, this episode is unlikely to deter long-term foreign capital.' Read the full interview here.
Meanwhile, K P Krishnan, honorary senior fellow at the Isaac Centre for Public Policy, has pointed out that the outcome of this case will matter not just for Jane Street but for how India defines and regulates complex trading in its increasingly sophisticated markets.
What does this crackdown mean?
The Jane Street case has raised critical questions about how modern financial markets operate — and how regulators balance market growth and activity with investor protection.
Sebi recently reported that 91 per cent of retail traders lost money in the derivatives market last year, with total losses exceeding ₹1 trillion. While these losses cannot be attributed to any single firm, the contrast between large institutional profits and widespread retail losses has renewed concerns about market fairness.
Sebi's intervention in this case could mark a turning point in how such strategies are policed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump announces 25% tariffs: PM, ministers in huddle; Oppn seeks response
A little after US President Donald Trump announced the imposition of 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods from August 1, Prime Minister (PM) Narendra Modi held a meeting with Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, and senior officials at his office in Parliament House to assess the implications. Opposition parties said they would demand a statement from the government in Parliament on the impact of the US tariffs on India. They pointed out that the PM's friendship with Trump has meant little, urged the PM to stand up to the American President, and protect India's sovereignty. Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM), an economic think tank affiliated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), said the country needs to safeguard its food security, national security, and health security, even if it comes at the cost of trade with the US. During the India–US Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) negotiations, SJM and Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh had cautioned the government not to surrender the interests of India's farmers and entrepreneurs. These RSS affiliates appreciated the government's statement, issued late in the evening. In it, the government said it 'attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and micro, small and medium enterprises'. SJM's National Co-convenor Ashwani Mahajan told Business Standard that the US had violated the rules-based international trade order it has espoused in the past by bringing in non-trade issues, such as India's ties with Russia. 'On defence purchases, we have to safeguard our interests and become self-reliant. We know that we are better off dealing with Russia to achieve that objective, and the joint development of the BrahMos missile is an example of that,' Mahajan said, arguing that India cannot stop buying Russian oil. He said the impact on trade with the US will be relative and should be seen in the context of the tariffs the US has imposed on other countries. Mahajan noted that several other countries have also not signed trade deals with the US. Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh said Modi should take inspiration from former PM Indira Gandhi and stand up to the US President. 'President Trump has slapped a tariff of 25 per cent plus penalty on imports from India. All that 'taarif' (praise) between him and 'Howdy Modi' has meant little,' Ramesh said in a post on X. 'Mr Modi thought that if he kept quiet on the insults the US President has hurled at India — the 30 claims of stopping Operation Sindoor, the special lunch for the Pakistan Army Chief whose inflammatory remarks provided the immediate backdrop to the brutal Pahalgam terror attacks, and US support for financial packages to Pakistan from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank — India would get special treatment at the hands of President Trump. Clearly, that has not happened,' he added. 'He should take inspiration from Indira Gandhi and stand up to the US President,' the Congress leader said. In its statement, issued after the meeting chaired by the PM, the government said it had taken note of the US President's statement on bilateral trade, was studying its implications, and remained committed to the objective of concluding 'a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial' BTA. It said the government would take all steps necessary to secure India's national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements, including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK. In a post on Facebook, Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Liberation General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya said Trump was punishing India not just for what he calls India's high tariffs and 'obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers', but also for buying military equipment and energy from Russia. 'In other words, for not becoming exclusively dependent on the US. Can there be a more brazen attack on India's sovereignty? The more the Modi government surrenders and keeps quiet, the more the Trump administration blackmails and pressurises India,' he said. Trinamool Congress Rajya Sabha (RS) leader Derek O'Brien shared a video of the PM and Trump on X, where the PM is heard saying, 'We in India have connected well with President Trump,' and urged Indian Americans to vote for Trump by raising the slogan 'Abki baar Trump Sarkar'. Shortly after Trump's announcement, Union Home Minister Amit Shah met with protests from Opposition Members of Parliament (MPs) when, a little after 7 pm, he rose to reply to the discussion on Operation Sindoor in the RS. The INDIA bloc MPs demanded that Modi reply to the debate, but Shah pointed out that the PM was indeed in the Parliament House premises and indicated that he was holding an important meeting. At this, Opposition MPs staged a walkout.
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's 25% tariff will immediately impact India's export-intensive sector: FICCI's Director General Jyoti Vij
Donald Trump's imposition of 25 per cent tariffs on all Indian goods 'will immediately impact India's export-intensive sector,' said Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce & Industry (FICCI) Director General Jyoti Vij. 'We are confident that Indian negotiators will be able to secure a meaningful and permanent agreement with the United States, without compromising on the national interests," added Vij in her statement. Donald Trump, in a fiesty Truth Social post on Wednesday, slapped 25 per cent tariffs on all Indian goods starting August 1 citing 'obnoxious' trade barriers, and an additional 'penalty' for India's continued energy and defense ties with Russia. The POTUS also criticised India's military and oil imports from Russia, saying it has enabled Moscow to continue the war on Ukraine. Following Trump's tariff announcement, the Central government issued a statement, stating that it has taken note of the US tariffs on India. The Ministry of Commerce & Industry said that the government is 'studying the implications', and "will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK,' the ministry stated. Indian trade bodies expressed disappointment over Trump's decision to impose 25 per cent tariffs and additional penalties, calling it a setback for the Indian export market. While some trade and industry leaders warned of short-term disruptions, others remained confident that India's strong manufacturing base — especially in sectors such as pharmaceuticals and medical equipment — would help it withstand the impact and forge new trade partnerships. Dilip Kumar, Chairman of Medical Tourism, Chamber of Commerce claimed that Trump is 'trying to kill the market of the Indian economy, but it is not going to happen. The reason behind this is that we are exporters, especially of medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, and disposables, which mostly come from India,' reported ANI. Kumar also noted that the American market relies heavily on Indian and Chinese supplies, and that the cost of treatment and medical procedures in the US is likely to rise in response to Trump's move. He added that the impact would be more severe for Americans than for India, which could redirect its exports to European markets. According to analysts, Trump's tariffs are likely to spark a knee-jerk reaction when the Indian stock market opens for trading tomorrow, July 31, with the tariffs set to take effect from August 1. "There could be a knee-jerk reaction in the short term, but the issue with Trump is that he often says one thing today and something completely different tomorrow. What is certain is the uncertain nature of Trump's approach," said Kranthi Bathini, Director - Equity Strategy, WealthMills Securities
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 minutes ago
- Business Standard
China launches global AI body to rival US in $4.8 trillion tech race
While humanoid robots faced off in a boxing ring at China's flagship artificial intelligence conference in Shanghai, a fight in the US-China tech war was fought in suits nearby over who gets to set the rules in the AI age. China's answer is a new global organization to convene countries to foster safe and inclusive use of the powerful new technology. At the annual World AI Conference over the weekend, Chinese Premier Li Qiang warned of AI 'monopoly' and instead called on foreign officials in the room — mostly from developing countries — to cooperate on governance. The new group, known as the World AI Cooperation Organization, embodies China's plan to jostle with the US for sway by positioning itself as a champion of AI for all. More favorable rules may give a global boost to Chinese companies competing with US firms to sell hardware and services in a market estimated to hit $4.8 trillion by 2033. For many of the countries represented at the conference, Chinese firms already offer competitive solutions, even if the US dominates the supply of cutting-edge AI chips. 'The Chinese are coming to the table with a very different AI product mix that is going to be extremely appealing to lower-income countries that lack the computing and power infrastructure needed for large-scale implementation of OpenAI-like AI systems,' said Eric Olander of the China-Global South Project. Over 800 AI companies from more than 70 countries and regions attended the conference, according to the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Using technology as both carrot and calling card, Beijing's approach appears to take a page out of its earlier Digital Silk Road initiative, which put Chinese companies at the center of telecommunications networks spanning continents. China for years has strived to define the global parameters for emerging technologies such as 5G, seeking to influence development and set the stage for its companies to win market share abroad. Huawei Technologies Co.'s prominent role in standard-setting groups became the subject of scrutiny of the US government when it cracked down on the use of its equipment. Global AI governance has emerged as a new battleground for the world's leading powers, both seeing the technology as critical not just for their economy but national security. President Donald Trump declared last week that his country will 'do whatever it takes' to lead in AI, with his plan for actions including countering Chinese influence in international governance bodies. While there are no binding global rules for AI development, China's action plan calls for building more digital infrastructure that uses clean power and unifying computing power standards. The country also said it supports the role of businesses in creating technical standards in security, industry and ethics. Details about the Chinese body, to be headquartered in Shanghai, are scarce. In brief public remarks before media were ushered out of the room, a Chinese Foreign Ministry senior official, Ma Zhaoxu, said the organization would work to establish standards and governance frameworks. China would discuss details with those countries that are willing to join, he added. As US and Chinese companies race to develop systems that could match or even surpassed human intelligence, safety concerns have also prompted calls for guardrails. AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton, who spoke at the Chinese event, expressed support for international bodies to collaborate on safety issues. Part of Beijing's AI strategy appears to come from its diplomatic playbook, which urges support for Global South countries to step up in international affairs. In his address to kick off the Saturday event, Li emphasized helping those nations develop AI. These countries made up most of more than 30 nations that were invited to the high-level governance talks, including Ethiopia, Cuba, Bangladesh, Russia and Pakistan. A handful of European countries including the Netherlands, France and Germany, the EU and several international organizations were also represented. No nameplate for the US was seen by Bloomberg News. The US Embassy in Beijing declined to comment on any official presence. Achmad Adhitya, special adviser to Indonesia's vice president who attended the meeting, told Bloomberg News that China's initiative is 'very appreciated by the Indonesian government.' His country is preparing AI curricula to be rolled out across 400,000 schools and is training 60,000 teachers about the tech, he said. Beijing's emphasis on openness — a word used 15 times in its governance action plan — appears to ride on the success of Deepseek earlier this year. The AI upstart stunned the world not just by releasing AI models that are almost as capable as those of OpenAI but also made them freely available for anyone to download and customize for free. A succession of Chinese companies has done the same, with companies from incumbent giants like Alibaba and newcomers like Moonshot releasing cutting-edge large language models that are similarly open-weight. That accessibility may be especially important to developing countries who may not have the resources to gather vast datasets and train their own AI models from scratch, a process that would involve expensive chips made by companies such as Nvidia Corp. China also emphasizes internet sovereignty, something that may appeal to more autocratic regimes around the world. 'We should respect other countries' national sovereignty and strictly abide by their laws when providing them with AI products and services,' according to the country's Global AI Governance Initiative issued in 2023. In contrast, Trump's AI plan vows that the US government will only work with engineers who 'ensure that their systems are objective and free from top-down ideological bias.' The US-China rivalry presents a familiar dilemma for countries that may feel pressured to choose a side, but Solly Malatsi, minister of communications and digital technologies of South Africa, rejects the binary choice. 'It's not a case of one model over the other,' Malatsi said from the conference. 'It's about an integration of the best of both worlds.'
