logo
Von der Leyen cools on EU army as Trump fuels demand

Von der Leyen cools on EU army as Trump fuels demand

Telegraph01-03-2025

Ursula von der Leyen has distanced herself from her past support for an EU army, despite Donald Trump fuelling demands for the creation of a joint European fighting force.
European governments are scrambling to boost their collective defence amid concerns over deteriorating relations with Mr Trump's administration, as well as fears US troops will pull out of Europe and weaken Nato.
These concerns would have been only exacerbated by Volodymyr Zelensky's disastrous Oval Office meeting with Mr Trump on Friday, which descended into a shouting match.
The crisis has boosted calls to ensure Europe can act independently of Washington, and raised the long-distant prospect of an army coming a step closer.
In 2015, the European Commission president who was then Germany's defence minister, said: 'Our future as Europeans will one day be a European army.'
Mrs von der Leyen's officials played down those comments this week when The Telegraph asked if she thought that day was getting nearer.
'The president has always been very clear on the fact that troops and their organisation are absolutely the responsibility of the member states,' a commission spokesman said.
European leaders, faced with Mr Trump's insistence they will police the peace in Ukraine, have been shocked into action.
On Monday, Jose Manuel Albares, Spain's foreign minister, urged plans for a joint rapid reaction force, potentially including commandos, to be accelerated.
He said the 5,000 soldier-strong group 'could be the embryo, even, of a European army that we have often talked about' before EU leaders meet for an emergency summit on defence on March 6.
'I really believe that the time has come that the armed forces of Europe must be created,' Mr Zelensky said at the Munich Security Conference in February2025.
'Let's be honest, now we can't rule out that America might say 'no' to Europe on issues that might threaten it.'
Independent from US
On Sunday, Friedrich Merz, Germany's chancellor in waiting, said Europe had to make itself independent from the US and warned Nato could be dead by June.
He told reporters: 'It is five minutes to midnight for Europe,' days after suggesting Germany could ask for the shelter of Britain and France's nuclear deterrent.
It was an astonishing intervention from an election winner on the night of his victory who was, until recently, one of Germany's most nakedly pro-US politicians.
Mr Merz's opinion matters. The leader of the conservative CDU, which is also Mrs von der Leyen's party, should soon take the reins of Europe's largest economy.
His comments will have come as music to the ears of Emmanuel Macron, the French president, who may be enjoying his 'I told you so' moment.
He has urged his allies to do more on common defence since Mr Trump's first term.
Back in 2018, Mr Macron declared that Europe could not be protected without 'a true European army'.
Jean-Claude Juncker, Mrs von der Leyen's predecessor as commission president, called for an EU army in 2015.
Mr Macron eventually extracted some reluctant words of support from Angela Merkel, then German chancellor, but little progress was made.
The UK, still an EU member, would have opposed any concrete plans on the grounds they risked undermining Nato. Mr Macron now hopes the Paris-Berlin engine of EU policymaking can finally deliver the 'strategic autonomy' he wants.
The European army has long been a niche obsession of fearful Brexiteers and enthusiastic arch-federalists. Could its moment have finally arrived?
Long and wasted years
The idea of a supranational European military force has periodically raised its head since the European Defence Community was discussed in the 1950s.
France vetoed plans that could have led to a joint armed force among the six original member states in 1954, amid sovereignty fears.
Since then, the pre-eminence of Nato as Europe's security guarantor kept the idea largely on the shelf.
The EU has had multinational battle groups of 1,500 personnel each since 2007 but these have never been deployed.
'First there has to be political will,' one EU diplomat said. 'No leader wants to send troops to die under an EU flag.'
After the chaotic US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, Mr Macron and Mrs von der Leyen pushed for the creation of the joint rapid reaction force. The idea was this 5,000-strong unit would mean the EU would never again be solely dependent on the US in the crisis zones of the future.
It is hoped the force would be able to be used to enforce ceasefire zones, secure airlifts, safely evacuate EU nationals and provide emergency humanitarian assistance.
The scheme is supported by France and Germany on the basis of a 'coalition of the willing', as long as no EU governments object, and is also supported by Italy and Spain, which backed an even larger formation of up to 50,000 troops.
The hope is that the force, backed up a headquarters with 350 staff members, could be ready to deploy anywhere in the world in 2025.
The end of Nato?
'We are never going to get a European Union army, we may have a European Nato force, but it'll be extremely difficult,' said Edward Lucas, senior fellow and senior adviser at the Centre for European Policy Analysis
All Nato members were hugely dependent on US equipment and resources, for example in mid-air refuelling.
Command and control in Nato was done by the US and that would have to be rebuilt by the Europeans if the former pulled out after 80 years of protecting the continent after the Second World War.
'Britain could probably command a division. We can't field one, and most European countries could struggle to put a brigade in the field,' Mr Lucas said.
He added: 'I think we're in a post-Nato era and we're reaping the harvest of our three decades of eating the peace dividend.'
Given such challenges, not to mention the constitutional neutrality of EU members such as like Austria and Ireland, Brussels is now focusing on ramping up the defence industry and finding ways to boost spending.
Where's the money?
The EU as a whole spends about 1.8 per cent of its GDP on defence. According to The Economist, it will need to spend between 4 and 5 per cent to be able to defend itself without the US.
Among the ideas being considered is the pooling of common debt to buy weapons, which is controversial in several richer member states, further joint research funding and a greater role for the European Investment Bank.
Sir Keir Starmer has held talks with Mrs von der Leyen about how Britain can be involved in raising finance for Europe's collective defence and continued support for Ukraine.
A European Commission spokesman said: 'The defence industry is an industry in the single market. And industry and the single market are the competence of the commission.'
Brussels could also act on military mobility, which helps 'armed forces and their equipment to move around the EU with ease'.
Military mobility was critical for security and resilience and 'an additional deterrent', the spokesperson said.
The dream marches on
'Even if it will not be possible in the short term to make one big jump towards a European army, we can move forward step by step,' said Luc Frieden, Luxembourg's prime minister, in 2024 as he suggested a smaller group of willing states could take the plunge first.
Andrew Duff, a former Liberal Democrat MEP and former president of the Union of European Federalists, believes it has come a step closer.
'But a fully integrated EU army is years away, and will probably only crystallise when Putin has his next crack at Ukraine,' the European Policy Centre think tank fellow said.
He added, 'The top thing now is to fast track Ukraine into the EU. Ukraine as a member state will quicken the development of the EU military dimension.'
Rob Jetten, the leader of the opposition Democrats 66 party in the Netherlands, recently shared an image of tanks, battleships and jets heading into battle under the flags of Europe on social media.
Steeds meer Nederlanders steunen een Europees leger 🇪🇺
Als we ons eigen continent willen beschermen, kunnen we dat samen doen. Met één sterk Europees leger in plaats van een tiental losse systemen. Toon nu daadkracht en wacht niet af tot het misgaat. Deze tijd vraagt om actie! pic.twitter.com/1WQtXlvFVn
— Rob Jetten (@RobJetten) February 26, 2025
The meme is doing the rounds of the majority pro-EU European Parliament, sources said.
'If we want to protect our own continent, we can do it together. With one strong European army instead of a dozen separate systems,' he posted.'These times call for action!'
An Ipsos IO survey for state broadcaster NOS this week found that half of Dutch people now supported the creation of an EU army.
But it also found that only 18 per cent of young Dutch people would be prepared to actually join it.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk bows to Trump: Tesla boss admits posts attacking the president 'went too far' in humiliating climb down after their spectacular feud
Elon Musk bows to Trump: Tesla boss admits posts attacking the president 'went too far' in humiliating climb down after their spectacular feud

Daily Mail​

time20 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Elon Musk bows to Trump: Tesla boss admits posts attacking the president 'went too far' in humiliating climb down after their spectacular feud

Elon Musk has said that he regrets some of the posts he made last week about Donald Trump in a humiliating climbdown from his online feud with the president. 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far,' Musk wrote in a message on his social media platform X on Wednesday. He did not say which specific posts he was talking about. Tesla shares in Frankfurt were up 2.44% after Musk's post. Trump and Musk exchanged insults last week after the former DOGE boss described the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination.' A full spat exploded in public as Trump said his relationship with Musk was over, threatening to take away government funding from Musk's SpaceX company. But Musk doubled down, escalating with a now-deleted post that claimed the president appears in documents related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump rejected the allegations and told ABC News that Musk had 'lost his mind', making clear he has no immediate plans to reconcile. Musk has also since deleted a post signaling support for impeaching the president. Sources close to Musk had said his anger has started to subside, and that they believe he may want to repair his relationship with Trump. The abrupt volte-face comes after Trump threatened 'serious consequences' for Musk if he sought to punish Republicans voting in favour of the controversial spending bill. Some lawmakers who were against the bill had called on Musk to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation. Musk bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. Trump named Musk to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' Trump, who also branded Musk 'disrespectful,' told NBC News on Saturday, without specifying what those consequences would be. There were reports that said Trump planned to sell off the Tesla he purchased earlier this year. 'I haven't heard that, I mean, I may move the Tesla around a little bit,' Trump told reporters Monday. Musk's father said on Monday that the spat was triggered by months of intense stress on both sides, and that it needed to stop. Asked whether he thought his son had made a mistake by engaging in a public clash with the president, Errol Musk said people were sometimes unable to think as clearly as they should 'in the heat of the moment.' 'They've had five months of intense stress,' Musk told Reuters at a conference in Moscow organised by conservative Russian tycoons. Elon Musk was asked about The New York Times story during his May 30th going away event in the Oval Office alongside the president. He pushed back and mocked the newspaper for its 'Russiagate' coverage, but later denied the Times' report on his social media site, X 'With all the opposition cleared and two people left in the arena, all they have ever done is get rid of everything and now they are trying to get rid of each other - well that has to stop.' Asked how it would end, he said: 'Oh, it will end on a good note - very soon.' Musk's father told reporters he was standing by his son. 'Elon is sticking to his principles but you cannot always stick to your principles in the real world,' Musk's father said. 'Sometimes you have to give and take.' Trump has, in recent days, held back on criticising Musk and publicly wished him the best. On Monday, the president was asked about a New York Times report that said while campaigning for Trump, Musk had been doing so much ketamine it was affecting his bladder, while also taking Ecstasy and psychadelic mushrooms. Trump said: 'I really don't know, I don't think so, I hope not.' He then added, 'I wish him well ... I just wish him well, very well, actually.' He also said he'd keep Musk's Starlink system in place. Trump also said he never saw Musk get physical with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, which had also been alleged. 'No I didn't,' the president answered. 'They did have an argument, but I didn't see a lot of physicality there,' Trump said. Musk had roundly denied the allegations of drug use.

More than 55,000 Palestinians killed in Israel-Hamas war, health officials say
More than 55,000 Palestinians killed in Israel-Hamas war, health officials say

Western Telegraph

time21 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

More than 55,000 Palestinians killed in Israel-Hamas war, health officials say

The ministry does not distinguish between civilians and combatants, but has said that women and children make up more than half the dead. It is a grim milestone in the war that began with Hamas' attack into southern Israel on October 7, 2023, and shows no sign of ending. Israel says it only targets militants and blames civilian deaths on Hamas, accusing the militants of hiding among civilians, because they operate in populated areas. Israeli army vehicles inside the southern Gaza Strip (Ohad Zwigenberg/AP) The ministry says 55,104 people have been killed since the start of the war and 127,394 wounded. Many more are believed to be buried under the rubble or in areas that are inaccessible to local medics. Israeli forces have destroyed vast areas of Gaza, displaced about 90% of its population and in recent weeks have transformed more than half of the coastal territory into a military buffer zone that includes the now mostly uninhabited southern city of Rafah. A two-and-a-half-month blockade imposed by Israel when it ended a ceasefire with Hamas raised fears of famine and was slightly eased in May. The launch of a new Israeli and US-backed aid system has been marred by chaos and violence, and the UN says it has struggled to bring in food because of Israeli restrictions, a breakdown of law and order, and widespread looting. Israel accuses Hamas of siphoning off aid, but the UN and aid groups deny there is any systematic diversion of aid to militants. Hamas has suffered major setbacks militarily, and Israel says it has killed more than 20,000 militants, without providing evidence. The militants still hold 55 hostages — less than half of them believed to be alive — and control areas outside of military zones despite facing rare protests earlier this year. The war began when Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, in the October 7 attack and abducted 251 hostages. More than half the captives have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Israeli forces have rescued eight and recovered the remains of dozens more. Israel's military campaign, one of the deadliest and most destructive since the Second World War, has transformed large parts of cities into mounds of rubble. Hundreds of thousands of people are living in squalid tent camps and unused schools, and the health system has been gutted, even as it copes with waves of wounded from Israeli strikes.

Trump says China tariffs will stay high after two days of talks
Trump says China tariffs will stay high after two days of talks

NBC News

time32 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Trump says China tariffs will stay high after two days of talks

The U.S. will keep high tariffs on Chinese goods, President Donald Trump said Wednesday morning, touting a preliminary trade agreement that he and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, will need to approve. China will supply rare earth minerals and magnets "up front," Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform, although he didn't clarify the exact terms. Trump also said "we are getting a total of 55% of tariffs, China is getting 10%" without explaining further. A White House official told NBC News that the 55% figure isn't new, as it reflects the 30% tariffs Trump has implemented this year in addition to pre-existing duties totaling 25%. The president's announcement came the morning after top-level U.S. and Chinese officials wrapped up two days of negotiations in London that were meant to get a trade truce, originally brokered in Geneva last month, back on track. Trump's post also went further than what Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, one of the top U.S. negotiators in London, said about the outcome of the negotiations. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents,' Lutnick told reporters Tuesday night. "I think we have the two largest economies in the world have reached a handshake for a framework." Trump added in a later Truth Social post that "President XI and I are going to work closely together to open up China to American Trade." The American negotiators on Tuesday night did not announce any major modifications to Chinese market access for U.S. companies after the conclusion of talks. Additionally, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said there were no further meetings planned with Chinese officials. Lutnick and Greer did not commit to releasing the "framework" agreed upon in London either. Chinese officials, likewise, said the two sides agreed in principle on a consensus regarding the Geneva agreement but did not provide any specific details. The talks in London occurred after the U.S. and China accused each other of breaching a pact reached in early May, which led to both countries lowering tariffs by 115%. Part of that agreement was easing export restrictions on rare earth minerals and metals that are critical for everyday products such as batteries and automobile production.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store