‘Take everything - I need to live': Kim Kardashian testifies in Paris robbery trial
Her testimony marked the emotional climax of a trial that has gripped France and reignited debates about the cost of fame and what it means to live in public.
Following digital breadcrumbs
At the time of the robbery, Kardashian was one of the most recognised women on the planet. A fashion icon. A reality star. A billionaire business mogul. She had mastered a new kind of celebrity – one broadcast in real time, post by post, to millions of followers.
But in the early hours of October 3, 2016, that visibility became a weapon against her. The robbery marked a turning point for Kardashian, and for how the world understood vulnerability in the digital age.
Investigators believe the attackers followed Kardashian's digital breadcrumbs – images, timestamps, geotags – and exploited them with old-school criminal methods.
Dressed in black with defiant sparkling diamonds, Kardashian on Tuesday stood across from her mother, Kris Jenner, in the heavily secured courtroom. Her voice trembled as she thanked French authorities for 'allowing me to share my truth.'
She described how the attackers arrived at her hotel disguised as police officers, dragging the concierge upstairs in handcuffs. 'I thought it was some sort of terrorist attack,' she said.
One attacker demanded she turn over the diamond ring valued at $US4 million on the bedside table. 'He said, 'Ring! Ring!' and he pointed to his hand,' she recalled.
French prosecutors say the assailants – most in their 60s and 70s – were part of a seasoned criminal ring. Two defendants have admitted being at the scene. One claims he didn't know who she was.
Twelve suspects were originally charged. One has since died. Another was excused due to illness. The French press dubbed them les papys braqueurs – 'the grandpa robbers' – but prosecutors insist they were no harmless retirees.
They face charges including armed robbery, kidnapping and membership in a criminal gang, offences that carry the potential for life imprisonment.
'Take everything. I need to live'
After the men fled, Kardashian rubbed the tape against the bathroom sink to free her hands. She hopped downstairs, still bound, to find her friend and stylist, Simone Harouche. Fearing the robbers might return, they went onto the balcony and hid in bushes. While lying there, Kardashian called her mother.
Earlier in the trial, Harouche recalled hearing Kardashian scream from upstairs: ''I need to live.' That is what she kept on saying, 'Take everything. I need to live.''
Harouche locked herself in a bathroom and texted Kardashian's sister and bodyguard: 'Something is very wrong.' Later, when she saw her friend she described how '(Kim) was beside herself,' Harouche said. 'She just was screaming.'
Judge David de Pas asked whether Kardashian had made herself a target by posting images of herself with 'jewels of great value.' Harouche rejected the premise. 'Just because a woman wears jewellery, that doesn't make her a target,' she said. 'That's like saying that because a woman wears a short skirt that she deserves to be raped.'
After the robbery, critics like designer Karl Lagerfeld slammed Kardashian for flaunting her wealth, with Lagerfeld telling the Associated Press she was 'too public' with her jewellery. But as details of the heist emerged, public opinion grew sympathetic.
The heist triggered a cultural shift, prompting publicists and managers to urge clients to delay social media posts, remove location tags and think twice before flashing luxury online.
Yet, Kardashian's own image, some say, continues to complicate that narrative. Even as she testified about her trauma, journalists received a press release touting her Paris courthouse appearance: 'Kim Kardashian stuns …wearing a show-stopping $US1.5 million diamond necklace by Samer Halimeh New York, featuring 80 flawless diamonds.' Visibility, it seemed, remains currency.
Loading
She told the court her house in Los Angeles was robbed shortly afterward in what appeared to be a copycat attack. Without security guards, she said, 'I can't even sleep at night.' She now keeps between four and six guards at home.
'I started to get this phobia of going out,' Kardashian said. 'This experience really changed everything for us.'
At the time of the 2016 robbery, she said, her bodyguard was staying in a separate hotel: 'We assumed that if we were in a hotel it was safe, it was secure.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Advertiser
19 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Historical weapons donated to RSL after raid on underworld figure's house
Stolen historical weapons, seized from the home of a known criminal, have been donated to a regional RSL after police spent years trying to track down their rightful owners. Members of the public have been invited to the Rosebud RSL club on Victoria's Mornington Peninsula to see the "historically significant" bayonets on display with its extensive military collection. It comes after police seized two bayonets, among a cache of weapons, while searching the home of a Middle Eastern organised crime gang member in Caroline Springs, in Melbourne's western suburbs, in November 2021. Investigators went to "considerable lengths" to find the rightful owner of the bayonets after discovering that the stolen 100-year-old weapons were historically significant. Two military historians examined the World War I era bayonets and found that one was issued by the British army while was from the French army. Detective Sergeant Ciaran Duryea said, "It's not every day that you seize a weapon that is over 100 years old, let alone one that has some historical significance". "We were really hopeful that enquiries would lead us to the rightful owner - we had no way of knowing whether these items were of particular significance to someone's family and they had been taken from them," he said. "Unfortunately, and despite a significant amount of work, we were never able to find the owners. "So we wanted to make sure that the weapons didn't end up being destroyed and that piece of history wouldn't be lost forever." Rosebud RSL president Bruce Turner said he was "honoured" to receive the historic weapons from the police on June 13. "We got memorabilia from all conflicts on display at the RSL. We have an extensive collection [donated by the community]," he said. Mr Turner laughed when asked if he was worried the gang member could return to reclaim the historic weapons. "That's no problem at all," he said. All weapons were seized from the criminal syndicate member, due to a Firearms Prohibition Order, and he was charged with weapons and drug offences, police said. Stolen historical weapons, seized from the home of a known criminal, have been donated to a regional RSL after police spent years trying to track down their rightful owners. Members of the public have been invited to the Rosebud RSL club on Victoria's Mornington Peninsula to see the "historically significant" bayonets on display with its extensive military collection. It comes after police seized two bayonets, among a cache of weapons, while searching the home of a Middle Eastern organised crime gang member in Caroline Springs, in Melbourne's western suburbs, in November 2021. Investigators went to "considerable lengths" to find the rightful owner of the bayonets after discovering that the stolen 100-year-old weapons were historically significant. Two military historians examined the World War I era bayonets and found that one was issued by the British army while was from the French army. Detective Sergeant Ciaran Duryea said, "It's not every day that you seize a weapon that is over 100 years old, let alone one that has some historical significance". "We were really hopeful that enquiries would lead us to the rightful owner - we had no way of knowing whether these items were of particular significance to someone's family and they had been taken from them," he said. "Unfortunately, and despite a significant amount of work, we were never able to find the owners. "So we wanted to make sure that the weapons didn't end up being destroyed and that piece of history wouldn't be lost forever." Rosebud RSL president Bruce Turner said he was "honoured" to receive the historic weapons from the police on June 13. "We got memorabilia from all conflicts on display at the RSL. We have an extensive collection [donated by the community]," he said. Mr Turner laughed when asked if he was worried the gang member could return to reclaim the historic weapons. "That's no problem at all," he said. All weapons were seized from the criminal syndicate member, due to a Firearms Prohibition Order, and he was charged with weapons and drug offences, police said. Stolen historical weapons, seized from the home of a known criminal, have been donated to a regional RSL after police spent years trying to track down their rightful owners. Members of the public have been invited to the Rosebud RSL club on Victoria's Mornington Peninsula to see the "historically significant" bayonets on display with its extensive military collection. It comes after police seized two bayonets, among a cache of weapons, while searching the home of a Middle Eastern organised crime gang member in Caroline Springs, in Melbourne's western suburbs, in November 2021. Investigators went to "considerable lengths" to find the rightful owner of the bayonets after discovering that the stolen 100-year-old weapons were historically significant. Two military historians examined the World War I era bayonets and found that one was issued by the British army while was from the French army. Detective Sergeant Ciaran Duryea said, "It's not every day that you seize a weapon that is over 100 years old, let alone one that has some historical significance". "We were really hopeful that enquiries would lead us to the rightful owner - we had no way of knowing whether these items were of particular significance to someone's family and they had been taken from them," he said. "Unfortunately, and despite a significant amount of work, we were never able to find the owners. "So we wanted to make sure that the weapons didn't end up being destroyed and that piece of history wouldn't be lost forever." Rosebud RSL president Bruce Turner said he was "honoured" to receive the historic weapons from the police on June 13. "We got memorabilia from all conflicts on display at the RSL. We have an extensive collection [donated by the community]," he said. Mr Turner laughed when asked if he was worried the gang member could return to reclaim the historic weapons. "That's no problem at all," he said. All weapons were seized from the criminal syndicate member, due to a Firearms Prohibition Order, and he was charged with weapons and drug offences, police said. Stolen historical weapons, seized from the home of a known criminal, have been donated to a regional RSL after police spent years trying to track down their rightful owners. Members of the public have been invited to the Rosebud RSL club on Victoria's Mornington Peninsula to see the "historically significant" bayonets on display with its extensive military collection. It comes after police seized two bayonets, among a cache of weapons, while searching the home of a Middle Eastern organised crime gang member in Caroline Springs, in Melbourne's western suburbs, in November 2021. Investigators went to "considerable lengths" to find the rightful owner of the bayonets after discovering that the stolen 100-year-old weapons were historically significant. Two military historians examined the World War I era bayonets and found that one was issued by the British army while was from the French army. Detective Sergeant Ciaran Duryea said, "It's not every day that you seize a weapon that is over 100 years old, let alone one that has some historical significance". "We were really hopeful that enquiries would lead us to the rightful owner - we had no way of knowing whether these items were of particular significance to someone's family and they had been taken from them," he said. "Unfortunately, and despite a significant amount of work, we were never able to find the owners. "So we wanted to make sure that the weapons didn't end up being destroyed and that piece of history wouldn't be lost forever." Rosebud RSL president Bruce Turner said he was "honoured" to receive the historic weapons from the police on June 13. "We got memorabilia from all conflicts on display at the RSL. We have an extensive collection [donated by the community]," he said. Mr Turner laughed when asked if he was worried the gang member could return to reclaim the historic weapons. "That's no problem at all," he said. All weapons were seized from the criminal syndicate member, due to a Firearms Prohibition Order, and he was charged with weapons and drug offences, police said.


The Advertiser
2 days ago
- The Advertiser
Pelicot settles Paris Match privacy case over photos
Gisele Pelicot, the French woman who became a symbol of courage and resilience during the trial of her ex-husband and 50 other men for repeatedly raping her, has settled with magazine Paris Match after it published photos of her without her consent. The magazine, owned by French luxury group LVMH, has agreed to make two 20,000-euro ($A35,000) payments to associations that support victims of sexual violence, her lawyer Stephane Babonneau said. Pelicot had taken Paris Match to court alleging invasion of privacy but withdrew her case ahead of a court hearing on Wednesday. Pelicot's case against Paris Match raised interesting questions about the right to privacy in France, which has strong laws to protect against intrusions. Pelicot waived her right to anonymity during the rape trial, becoming an internationally recognised figure. The court's ruling would have likely hinged on whether or not there was a public interest in her private life now the trial was over, experts said. "She became a public figure unwillingly," Babonneau told Reuters. "It didn't mean that because she waived her right to anonymity for the trial, she was giving up her right to privacy." The pictures of Pelicot and her partner were taken on the Île de Ré, an island off western France where she now lives. "We had warned Paris Match not to publish these photos ten days before," Babonneau added. A lawyer for Paris Match did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Pelicot has said she "never regretted" going public during the trial, which ended last December. Her ex-husband was found guilty of repeatedly drugging and raping her for almost a decade, and inviting dozens of strangers to their home to rape her while unconscious. The other 50 co-defendants were also found guilty of rape, attempted rape or sexual assault. Her lawyer said the publication of the pictures shocked her greatly. Sophie Barre, a member of women's rights organisation NousToutes, told Reuters the pictures represented another act of violence after the abuse she had endured. "Her former husband filmed the rapes," she said. "With these pictures, her image is again captured without her consent." Gisele Pelicot, the French woman who became a symbol of courage and resilience during the trial of her ex-husband and 50 other men for repeatedly raping her, has settled with magazine Paris Match after it published photos of her without her consent. The magazine, owned by French luxury group LVMH, has agreed to make two 20,000-euro ($A35,000) payments to associations that support victims of sexual violence, her lawyer Stephane Babonneau said. Pelicot had taken Paris Match to court alleging invasion of privacy but withdrew her case ahead of a court hearing on Wednesday. Pelicot's case against Paris Match raised interesting questions about the right to privacy in France, which has strong laws to protect against intrusions. Pelicot waived her right to anonymity during the rape trial, becoming an internationally recognised figure. The court's ruling would have likely hinged on whether or not there was a public interest in her private life now the trial was over, experts said. "She became a public figure unwillingly," Babonneau told Reuters. "It didn't mean that because she waived her right to anonymity for the trial, she was giving up her right to privacy." The pictures of Pelicot and her partner were taken on the Île de Ré, an island off western France where she now lives. "We had warned Paris Match not to publish these photos ten days before," Babonneau added. A lawyer for Paris Match did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Pelicot has said she "never regretted" going public during the trial, which ended last December. Her ex-husband was found guilty of repeatedly drugging and raping her for almost a decade, and inviting dozens of strangers to their home to rape her while unconscious. The other 50 co-defendants were also found guilty of rape, attempted rape or sexual assault. Her lawyer said the publication of the pictures shocked her greatly. Sophie Barre, a member of women's rights organisation NousToutes, told Reuters the pictures represented another act of violence after the abuse she had endured. "Her former husband filmed the rapes," she said. "With these pictures, her image is again captured without her consent." Gisele Pelicot, the French woman who became a symbol of courage and resilience during the trial of her ex-husband and 50 other men for repeatedly raping her, has settled with magazine Paris Match after it published photos of her without her consent. The magazine, owned by French luxury group LVMH, has agreed to make two 20,000-euro ($A35,000) payments to associations that support victims of sexual violence, her lawyer Stephane Babonneau said. Pelicot had taken Paris Match to court alleging invasion of privacy but withdrew her case ahead of a court hearing on Wednesday. Pelicot's case against Paris Match raised interesting questions about the right to privacy in France, which has strong laws to protect against intrusions. Pelicot waived her right to anonymity during the rape trial, becoming an internationally recognised figure. The court's ruling would have likely hinged on whether or not there was a public interest in her private life now the trial was over, experts said. "She became a public figure unwillingly," Babonneau told Reuters. "It didn't mean that because she waived her right to anonymity for the trial, she was giving up her right to privacy." The pictures of Pelicot and her partner were taken on the Île de Ré, an island off western France where she now lives. "We had warned Paris Match not to publish these photos ten days before," Babonneau added. A lawyer for Paris Match did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Pelicot has said she "never regretted" going public during the trial, which ended last December. Her ex-husband was found guilty of repeatedly drugging and raping her for almost a decade, and inviting dozens of strangers to their home to rape her while unconscious. The other 50 co-defendants were also found guilty of rape, attempted rape or sexual assault. Her lawyer said the publication of the pictures shocked her greatly. Sophie Barre, a member of women's rights organisation NousToutes, told Reuters the pictures represented another act of violence after the abuse she had endured. "Her former husband filmed the rapes," she said. "With these pictures, her image is again captured without her consent." Gisele Pelicot, the French woman who became a symbol of courage and resilience during the trial of her ex-husband and 50 other men for repeatedly raping her, has settled with magazine Paris Match after it published photos of her without her consent. The magazine, owned by French luxury group LVMH, has agreed to make two 20,000-euro ($A35,000) payments to associations that support victims of sexual violence, her lawyer Stephane Babonneau said. Pelicot had taken Paris Match to court alleging invasion of privacy but withdrew her case ahead of a court hearing on Wednesday. Pelicot's case against Paris Match raised interesting questions about the right to privacy in France, which has strong laws to protect against intrusions. Pelicot waived her right to anonymity during the rape trial, becoming an internationally recognised figure. The court's ruling would have likely hinged on whether or not there was a public interest in her private life now the trial was over, experts said. "She became a public figure unwillingly," Babonneau told Reuters. "It didn't mean that because she waived her right to anonymity for the trial, she was giving up her right to privacy." The pictures of Pelicot and her partner were taken on the Île de Ré, an island off western France where she now lives. "We had warned Paris Match not to publish these photos ten days before," Babonneau added. A lawyer for Paris Match did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Pelicot has said she "never regretted" going public during the trial, which ended last December. Her ex-husband was found guilty of repeatedly drugging and raping her for almost a decade, and inviting dozens of strangers to their home to rape her while unconscious. The other 50 co-defendants were also found guilty of rape, attempted rape or sexual assault. Her lawyer said the publication of the pictures shocked her greatly. Sophie Barre, a member of women's rights organisation NousToutes, told Reuters the pictures represented another act of violence after the abuse she had endured. "Her former husband filmed the rapes," she said. "With these pictures, her image is again captured without her consent."


West Australian
2 days ago
- West Australian
Pelicot settles Paris Match privacy case over photos
Gisele Pelicot, the French woman who became a symbol of courage and resilience during the trial of her ex-husband and 50 other men for repeatedly raping her, has settled with magazine Paris Match after it published photos of her without her consent. The magazine, owned by French luxury group LVMH, has agreed to make two 20,000-euro ($A35,000) payments to associations that support victims of sexual violence, her lawyer Stephane Babonneau said. Pelicot had taken Paris Match to court alleging invasion of privacy but withdrew her case ahead of a court hearing on Wednesday. Pelicot's case against Paris Match raised interesting questions about the right to privacy in France, which has strong laws to protect against intrusions. Pelicot waived her right to anonymity during the rape trial, becoming an internationally recognised figure. The court's ruling would have likely hinged on whether or not there was a public interest in her private life now the trial was over, experts said. "She became a public figure unwillingly," Babonneau told Reuters. "It didn't mean that because she waived her right to anonymity for the trial, she was giving up her right to privacy." The pictures of Pelicot and her partner were taken on the Île de Ré, an island off western France where she now lives. "We had warned Paris Match not to publish these photos ten days before," Babonneau added. A lawyer for Paris Match did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Pelicot has said she "never regretted" going public during the trial, which ended last December. Her ex-husband was found guilty of repeatedly drugging and raping her for almost a decade, and inviting dozens of strangers to their home to rape her while unconscious. The other 50 co-defendants were also found guilty of rape, attempted rape or sexual assault. Her lawyer said the publication of the pictures shocked her greatly. Sophie Barre, a member of women's rights organisation NousToutes, told Reuters the pictures represented another act of violence after the abuse she had endured. "Her former husband filmed the rapes," she said. "With these pictures, her image is again captured without her consent."