logo
Ryanair introduces £500 fine for certain types of 'unacceptable' behaviour

Ryanair introduces £500 fine for certain types of 'unacceptable' behaviour

Daily Mail​12-06-2025
Passengers who disrupt flights with bad behaviour on Ryanair flights will now face a hefty fine after the airline announced plans for a 'major clampdown' on 'unruly behaviour'.
Tourists who have to be taken off planes - delaying the journeys of their fellow flyers - will face a £500 fine, the airline has announced.
Europe's largest carrier, which takes thousands of revellers to resorts and cities across Europe and beyond every year, said it would now come down on hard on those who stop other passengers enjoying a stress-free flight.
A statement released by Michael O'Leary's airline said: 'Passengers expect to travel in a comfortable and stress-free environment with an on-time arrival, free from unnecessary disruption caused by a tiny number of unruly passengers.'
A spokesperson for Ryanair added: 'It is unacceptable that passengers are made to suffer unnecessary disruption because of one unruly passenger's behaviour'.
Passengers who become aggressive towards staff or display drunken behaviour that compromises the safety of others will be offloaded and then sent a bill.
The carrier said: 'Ryanair is committed to tackling unruly passenger behaviour for the benefit of its passengers and crew, and will continue to pursue disruptive passengers for civil damages, but at a minimum, they will now be issued with a £500 fine.'
Last month, a British woman was filmed being dragged off a Ryanair flight and thrown to the floor by security staff after she allegedly assaulted passengers and forced the plane to divert to Portugal.
Footage showed a woman being led off the grounded plane by several members of staff, after the flight from Tenerife to Glasgow Prestwick was diverted on May 18th.
A second video showed the woman being led outside the plane on the tarmac of the Portuguese airport.
Blair Morgan, a passenger on the plane, told MailOnline that passengers were left terrified after the 'angry, hostile passenger was being aggressive towards staff and other passengers.'
'The passenger made a [false] bomb threat towards everyone on the plane, along with saying she would "bottle" people with a glass wine bottle.
Blair said: 'A lot of passengers didn't know what to do. Everyone was distressed and scared. It was really scary - it's not something you really expect.'
The airline said it hoped that taking a new 'proactive approach' on such incidents in future that 'will act as a deterrent to eliminate this unacceptable behaviour onboard our aircraft.'
And in April, a Ryanair flight descended into chaos when staff were forced to strap an 'unruly' passenger to his seat using spare belts after he refused to sit down during landing.
The passenger onboard the flight from Manchester to Rhodes, Greece, on April 3 was shouting at cabin crew who onlookers said had confiscated two bottles of booze from him and refused to serve him alcohol .
He failed to follow orders to sit down during landing, forcing the pilot to abort the descent, circle round, and land again.
Video shows staff and other passengers huddled around the man and a member of staff shouting: 'Sit down, now.'
A separate clip shows police officers appearing to escort the man down the aisle upon landing.
Passenger Emily, 26, who filmed the incident, said: 'The flight was going completely fine until the cabin crew came up to me and my partner at the front of the plane and asked us if we were travelling together and if we could be separated because a little girl needed to come down to the front of plane with her dad because a man was being disruptive.
Another Ryanair fee was recently in the spotlight after the airline was told to refund a passenger £124 over hand luggage charges after a court ruled it was an essential part of air travel and should not be subject to extra fees
'We were together so they asked someone else instead who moved and that's when I got made aware of this guy being really disruptive at the back of the plane.'
Emily explained how cabin crew had to get two spare seatbelts and tried pinning the man down on his seat.
Another Ryanair fee was the focus of charges last month when the airline was told to refund a passenger £124 over hand luggage charges could see budget airlines charge a pricier 'all inclusive' fare, an aviation legal expert warned today.
A landmark court ruling in Salamanca, Spain, decided that hand luggage is an essential part of air travel and should not be subject to extra fees.
The passenger involved in the case will be reimbursed £124 (€147) for hand luggage costs charged on five flights between 2019 and 2024 following the judgment.
Kevin Bodley, a consultant at Steele Raymond LLP Solicitors, which specialises in aviation law, said the decision has 'potentially significant implications' for English law and air travel policy.
He added that the ruling raises the likelihood that airlines in Spain will be forced to change policies to allow all standard sized cabin bags within a standard fare.
This could also lead to challenges on the legality of similar fees levied by other airlines, some of whom allow a free small personal bag but charge for larger bags.
The Spanish judgment was based on a decision by the European Court of Justice in 2014 in which it was said hand luggage is 'an indispensable element of passenger transport and that its carriage cannot, therefore, be subject to a price supplement'.
The passenger's claim was backed by Spanish consumer rights organisation Facua, in the latest case during a long-running battle against budget airlines.
The group has now won five rulings in recent months relating to hand luggage, against Ryanair and Vueling.
Facua has relied on article 97 of Spain's Air Navigation law which states that airlines are 'obliged to transport not only the passenger, but also, and without charging anything for it, the objects and hand luggage that they carry' with them.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police will not endorse activities of volunteer ‘force' launching patrols
Police will not endorse activities of volunteer ‘force' launching patrols

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Police will not endorse activities of volunteer ‘force' launching patrols

A police force said it will not endorse the activities of volunteers in Bournemouth who have set up a uniformed 'force' to patrol the streets, adding a review of their vetting processes highlighted 'areas of significant concern'. Safeguard Force, whose volunteers will wear branded bibs, said it aims to create 'safer, more supportive communities by providing visible, compassionate and non-confrontational patrols' which were set to start on August 11. The move follows two high-profile murder cases in the town as well as the local police force having to introduce dispersal powers on the seafront after a disturbance involving a 'large group of people' on June 30 which left a teenage girl and two officers injured. Dorset Police said a multi-agency meeting was held with Safeguard Force on Friday and 'a review of their vetting processes has highlighted areas of significant concern'. Assistant Chief Constable Mark Callaghan, of Dorset Police, said: 'Following a multi-agency meeting on Friday 15 August 2025, which involved Dorset Police, other emergency services, the local authority and representatives of Safeguard Force, we will not be endorsing their activities. 'We have engaged with the group extensively and a review of their vetting processes has highlighted areas of significant concern. The organisers have been unable to provide reassurance that this group has sufficient safeguards in place to ensure volunteers are adequately vetted, trained, and equipped to undertake high-visibility patrols in the community. 'Safeguard Force's policies provided to police contain insufficient details in relation to the use of body-worn cameras, publishing of photographs of members of the public, administration and recording of any force used or first aid provided and limited evidence of any training provided. 'We welcome the responsible use of volunteers, who wish to carry out public service and there are many ways in which this can be facilitated in a safe way, including becoming a Special Constable, joining the street pastor programme, or via established Watch schemes. 'All these initiatives have appropriate policies and processes in place, particularly around the vetting of individuals and safeguarding of vulnerable people. 'Dorset Police continues to carry out high-visibility patrols, with 289 foot patrols taking place in the past seven days throughout Bournemouth town centre, gardens and seafront. 'This resulted in arrests being made and dispersal notices being issued, stop searches for drugs or weapons, anti-social behaviour incidents attended, intelligence gathered and almost 1,200 conversations with members of the public and 131 businesses and local premises visited. 'We would encourage members of the public to speak to our officers and report incidents and crimes directly to us so we're able to effectively respond and investigate.' In March, Nasen Saadi was jailed for life to serve a minimum of 39 years at Winchester Crown Court for the murder of Amie Gray and attempted murder of Leanne Miles on Bournemouth beach on May 24 2024. And in January 2023, Afghan asylum seeker Lawangeen Abdulrahimzai was jailed for life to serve a minimum of 29 years at Salisbury Crown Court for the murder of 21-year-old Thomas Roberts outside a Subway takeaway shop in Bournemouth in March 2022.

Why a sonic boom was heard in parts of England
Why a sonic boom was heard in parts of England

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Why a sonic boom was heard in parts of England

A sonic boom was heard across parts of Essex, Cambridgeshire, Suffolk, Kent, and London on Friday morning. The loud bang was caused by two RAF Typhoon fighter jets that were scrambled from RAF Coningsby, Lincolnshire. The jets were launched to intercept a San Marino-registered private aircraft that had lost contact with air traffic control. The civilian aircraft was safely escorted to Stansted Airport, where communications were re-established. Essex Police confirmed that officers on the ground found nothing of concern after the aircraft landed.

Vile TikTok migrant sticking fingers up at Britain is a symbol of our pathetic borders… we are being taken for a ride
Vile TikTok migrant sticking fingers up at Britain is a symbol of our pathetic borders… we are being taken for a ride

The Sun

time13 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Vile TikTok migrant sticking fingers up at Britain is a symbol of our pathetic borders… we are being taken for a ride

BRITISH taxpayers who work all hours to make ends meet have every reason to feel angered by a TikTok video posted last week by Parwiz Hanifyar. He is the Afghan migrant who gloated about his journey to Britain and his stay at a four-star hotel. 3 They have even more reason to be disgusted by a video clip which has subsequently emerged of him appearing to advise men who want to kill their estranged wives to drink heavily first, in the belief that it will lessen their sentence. But in one sense he has done us all a favour. He has destroyed once and for all the pretence that all migrants who come to our shores to seek asylum are 'desperate' and fleeing for their lives. That is what we are told continuously by refugee charities and advocacy groups: That they are deeply traumatised people who have fallen victim to people-traffickers because they cannot see any other option to save their lives — and we should all be generous to them as a result. I don't know much about Hanifyar's situation, other than the reports I have read suggesting that he has spent the past few years living in not-very-war-torn France and Germany. I can't say he looks all that traumatised to me. Were he genuinely fleeing from danger, you would expect him to be deeply grateful for the help he received from Border Agency officials who scooped him and his fellow migrants from their boat mid English Channel and sped them to Britain. You would think he would want to show his appreciation to the people of Britain. Instead, the tone of his now-defunct TikTok channel is one of gloating — and taking the mickey out of people whose taxes are funding his new life. 'Tell your friends to come,' he said to his 70,000 followers. He then went on, appearing to advertise the services of people-smugglers: 'Why are you so stingy? Being stingy is not good for God. You see, I risked my life! Why don't you come? My wish was to come to this hotel and live. I came here just for this.' Migrant housed in UK asylum hotel promoted how to kill 'cheating wives' with a razor blade Showing us all around his room at the Crowne Plaza at Heathrow, with its freshly pressed sheets and puffed-up pillows, he then says: 'This is dedicated to those haters who were happy thinking we either drowned or ended up dead.' Since his video was removed from TikTok, a darker side to Hanifyar has emerged. Taken for a ride In an earlier clip which seems to have been made in Germany in recent weeks, he put himself in the hypothetical situation of wanting to murder his wife. 'Before I kill her I drink a bottle of alcohol,' he says. 'When the police comes, they say, he was drunk.' I disassociate myself from anyone who wishes harm to Hanifyar or any other migrant, but police must now investigate what he posted, just as they — rightfully — do people who have called for attacks on migrants. A functioning asylum system would dismiss out of hand any claim by someone who has advocated violence. The reaction to Hanifyar's videos needs to go further than that. This, finally, needs to be the moment of realisation that Britain and its high-principled asylum system is being taken for a ride. 3 Listen to the refugee charities and you would think that no economic migrant ever tried to cheat the asylum system by posing as someone fleeing from danger, either by faking their nationality or by falsely claiming to be Christian, or gay. You would think that no migrant ever came here to commit a crime or involve themselves in terrorism. Sadly, we know that there are many migrants who have done just these things. Worse, our asylum system, which cravenly defers to the human rights establishment, so often refuses to deport them. The tragedy is that our failure to weed out the criminals, liars and chancers makes it much harder to help those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives. Like everything else in a democratic society, the asylum system ultimately depends on public consent, and cases of migrants fooling the system are utterly poisonous to public opinion on asylum. No one should be taken in by the swift action of TikTok, encouraged by the Prime Minister, to remove Hanifyar's video. In some ways, I wish it had stayed up so as to symbolise our pathetic borders policy. Even if this individual ends up being removed from Britain — and I am not holding my breath for that — there will be many others of his kind who will be waved through. Even if this individual ends up being removed from Britain — and I am not holding my breath for that — there will be many others of his kind who will be waved through We are not going to have a sensible borders policy until we can wrest it back from the human rights lawyers and become serious about what are supposed to be the rules — not least that if you want to claim asylum, you must do so in the first safe country you reach. We should be deeply suspicious of the motives of any asylum-seeker who has come here from France, unless they can claim a need to flee from Emmanuel Macron's government. boatloads of mostly young men who are sticking their fingers up at Britain.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store