logo
Rare image of great white shark captured off the coast of Maine

Rare image of great white shark captured off the coast of Maine

Yahoo5 days ago
The nonprofit National Geographic Society, committed to illuminating and protecting the wonder of our world, funded Explorer Brian Skerry's work through a collaboration with Builders Vision. Learn more about the Society's support of Explorers.
As soon as National Geographic Explorer and photographer Brian Skerry locked eyes with the enormous animal, he knew immediately what was staring back at him. 'There's no mistaking that face,' he says.
A nearly 10-foot long great white shark was just four feet away.
Sharks tagged with tracking devices have been documented off the U.S. coast of Maine, but Skerry thinks this is the first underwater photo of one here. Skerry started diving in these waters around 50 years ago. Since then, he's spent more than 10,000 hours underwater , photographing marine animals from above and below the water.
Once rare, great whites are now flourishing in the Gulf of Maine, which stretches from Cape Cod, Massachusetts, to Nova Scotia, Canada. While these growing numbers might make it easier to see or photograph a shark in nearby waters, experts say the risk of being bitten by a great white remains low.
Skerry's encounter on July 8 was fleeting. 'Maybe three minutes,' he says. 'Then she was gone, and we never saw her again.'
Luckily, his camera was ready. He snapped a photo of what he suspects is a juvenile, mouth slightly open and white belly glowing against the eerie green water. Her surface reflection hovered above her like a halo.
'White sharks have always been here,' says John Chisholm, a marine biologist at the New England Aquarium in Boston who says this is the first confirmed underwater photo of a great white shark he's seen in Maine.
In the Gulf of Maine, great whites have been recorded in historic fisheries data and 1,000-year-old teeth have been found in archaeological digs, but trophy fishing and commercial bycatch in the 1970s and 1980s may have caused populations to decline by around 73 percent.
In 1972, the Marine Mammal Protection Act created legal protections for seals and thereby protected one of the key prey species great whites feed on.
Over two decades later, in 1997, the National Marine Fisheries service began more tightly regulating and in some cases prohibiting shark fishing, a protective regulation Massachusetts strengthened in 2005 after the state banned the possession and sale of lucrative shark fins. They are now protected throughout their Northwest Atlantic range–it's illegal to catch, keep, or possess a white shark in U.S. waters.
This helped great white populations rebound. Scientists recorded over 100 individual great whites in Maine waters between 2012 and 2023.
'We started seeing both seals and white sharks in more and more numbers than we had ever seen in recent memory on the Cape,' says Camrin Braun, assistant scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution's marine predators group. Braun is also unaware of any previous such image of a great white in Maine.
A fatal shark bite in 2020, the first in the state's history, made the public aware that there were even white sharks off the coast, he adds.
Could warming sea surface temperatures be luring more sharks to Maine's coastline?
The Gulf of Maine is warming faster than 97 percent of the world's oceans. 'It's one of the global epicenters for warming,' says Braun.
Warmer waters might allow juveniles to travel further north into waters that were once too cold for great whites, though Chisholm thinks an increase in shark numbers is more likely to result from conservation regulations.
More sightings might also be the result of more people on the water with a digital phone camera. Twenty years ago, it could take Chisholm days, weeks, or even years to confirm a sighting. Now he receives dozens a day through the Sharktivity app.
And while a new photo of a great white has now surfaced, it's no indication that New England beachgoers should now be more fearful of setting foot in the ocean.
There's a higher risk of being hurt while driving to the beach than getting bitten by a great white shark in the water, Chisholm says.
We can coexist with sharks if we are mindful 'in the way that somebody in Alaska walks in the woods knowing there might be a grizzly bear,' Skerry says. 'We can learn to appreciate these animals, even if we don't want to swim out and give them a hug.'
To be shark smart, don't swim alone, in murky water, or if you see seals or big schools of bait. Avoid swimming at dawn and dusk and don't 'make a commotion… That can attract a shark,' Chisholm says.
As apex predators, sharks play a vital role in keeping the ocean healthy, but they face more danger from us than we do from them. Humans kill over 100 million sharks each year, says Skerry: 'The only truly scary ocean would be one without sharks in it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

National Geographic Masthead
National Geographic Masthead

National Geographic

time19 hours ago

  • National Geographic

National Geographic Masthead

Nathan Lump, SVP & Editor in Chief, National Geographic Geoffrey Gagnon, VP, Executive Editor Paul Martinez, VP, Creative Director Alex Pollack, Director of Photography Sadie Quarrier, Editorial Director for Integrated Storytelling Alissa Swango, VP, Head of Digital & Video Oussama Zahr, Director of Editorial Operations Features Ben Paynter, Editorial Features Director Amy Briggs, Senior Editorial Manager, History Alexa McMahon, Senior Editorial Manager, Features & Special Projects Matt Skenazy, Senior Editorial Manager, Features Brian Kevin, Editorial Manager, Features Eve Conant, Jennifer Leman, Nick Martin, Rose Minutaglio, Senior Editors Alicia Russo, Creative Producer, Integrated Storytelling Digital Editorial Katie Baker, Digital Editorial Director Amy McKeever, Senior Digital Editorial Manager Brian Resnick, Digital Editorial Manager Stassa Edwards, Senior Digital Editor, Features Sarah Gibbens, Senior Digital Editor, Science & Environment Hannah Cheney, Kwin Mosby, Senior Digital Editors, Travel Anne Kim-Dannibale, Senior Digital Editor, Special Projects Helen Thompson, Senior Digital Editor, Science Yasmine Maggio, Nicholas St. Fleur, Starlight Williams, Digital Editors Domonique Tolliver, Digital SEO Editor Janey Adams, Director of Digital Engagement Francis Rivera, Manager, Digital Engagement Setota Hailemariam, Emily Martin, Digital Producers Jennifer Murphy, Senior Video Manager Cosima Amelang, Video Manager Rebekah Barlas, Zach Baumgartner, Halley Brown, Tiffany D'Emidio, Rubén Rodríguez Pérez, Veda Shastri, Senior Video Producers Nick Garbaty, Video Producer William O'Connor, Manager, Editorial Newsletters Photography Breann Birkenbuel, Photography Manager, Research & Operations Samantha Clark, Photography Manager, Digital & Short Form Anne Farrar, Alexa Keefe, James Wellford, Photography Managers Julie Hau, Allyson Torrisi, Senior Photo Editors Rebecca Fudala, Crystal Henry, Allison Hess, Ian Morton, Cameron Peters, Photo Editors Elena Sheveiko, Assistant Photo Specialist Claire Caple, Madison Tessler, Photo Coordinators Mark Thiessen, Manager of Photo Engineering & Studio Tom O'Brien, Senior Photo Engineer Rebecca Hale, Staff Photographer Eric Flynn, Assistant Photo Engineer Special Interest Titles Bridget E. Hamilton, Editorial Director of Special Interest Titles Cheryl Grant-Albano, Senior Editorial Manager, Special Interest Titles Kay Boatner, Allyson Shaw, Senior Editors, Kids & Family Alexandra Hartnett, Senior Production Editor, Special Interest Titles Natalie Konopinski, Senior Editor, Newsstand Special Issues Tiara Beatty, Editor, History Magazine Creative Andrea Nasca, Director of Design Linda Makarov, Hannah Tak, Managing Designers Brandon Ferrill, Senior Designer Megan McCrink, Sandi Owatverot-Nuzzo, Designers Madison Tran, Assistant Designer John Tomanio, Director of Graphics Fernando Gomez Baptista, Alberto Lucas López, Senior Artists Diana Marques, Graphics Production Manager Monica Serrano, Jason Treat, Senior Graphics Editors Lucas Petrin, Elizabeth Sisk, Associate Graphics Editors Matt Chwastyk, Senior Cartography Manager Rosemary Wardley, Digital Cartography Manager Christine Fellenz, Senior Cartography Editor Scott Zillmer, Senior Cartographic Quality Control Editor Soren Walljasper, Cartography Editor Patricia Healy, Map & Graphic Research Editor Claire Manibog, Director of Interactive Storytelling Ryan Morris, Senior Interactive Storytelling Editor Eduardo Vélez, Senior Developer, Interactive Storytelling Courtney Beesch, Projects Editor, Interactive Storytelling JoElla Carman, Visual Editor, Interactive Storytelling Ben Scott, Graphics Editor, Interactive Storytelling Michael G. Lappin, Production Manager John Chow, Imaging Manager Rebekah A. Cain, Manufacturing Manager Rahsaan J. Jackson, Wendy K. Smith, Imaging Specialists Editorial Operations Amy Kolczak, Senior Editorial Manager of Copy & International Cindy Leitner, Senior Copy Editor Caroline Braun, Emily Shenk Flory, Jennifer Vilaga, Copy Editors Sylvia Espinoza, Senior Editorial Manager of Research Michael Fry, Robin A. Palmer, Taryn L. Salinas, Heidi Schultz, Research Editors Leigh Mitnick, International Editions Editor Ariana Pettis, Production Editor Elena Giardina, Editorial Coordinator

The Genographic Project® Geno 2.0 Next Generation Helix Product Privacy Policy
The Genographic Project® Geno 2.0 Next Generation Helix Product Privacy Policy

National Geographic

time19 hours ago

  • National Geographic

The Genographic Project® Geno 2.0 Next Generation Helix Product Privacy Policy

This policy has been updated to reflect new contact information. Please note that National Geographic stopped selling Geno kits on May 31, 2019 and is no longer processing results. Please see the FAQ page for more information. Effective November 21st, 2016 The Genographic Project began in 2005 and is a research project carried out by the National Geographic Society's scientific team to reveal patterns of human migration. The project is carried out in partnership with National Geographic Partners, LLC, whose activities include managing the sale of the Geno 2.0 Next Gen Helix Product and operation of the website. National Geographic Partners, LLC is a joint venture of the National Geographic Society and 21st Century Fox. Throughout this document, the terms 'National Geographic,' 'we' or 'our' or 'us' refer to National Geographic Society and National Geographic Partners, LLC collectively. This Privacy Policy describes how we use, share and protect the information we receive from and about you when you use the Geno 2.0 Next Gen Helix Product and what choices you have about how that information is used. As discussed below in the section entitled Treatment of Non-Genetic Personal Information, information that is not what we define as Genographic Genetic Information or Self-Reported Information, including information we collect from and about you when you visit our other websites or purchase the Geno 2.0 Next Gen Helix Product, is governed by the privacy policy posted on the website or app on which that information is collected. Information We Collect From and About You When you purchase the Geno 2.0 Next Gen Helix Product, you will receive a saliva collection kit from our partner Helix, who handles sample collection, DNA sequencing and secure data storage for the Geno 2.0 Next Gen Helix Product. When you return your saliva sample to Helix, Helix will sequence your DNA as described in the Helix Platform Consent and Helix Terms of Service. That sequence is your 'Genetic Information.' Helix will share with National Geographic the portion of your Genetic Information needed by National Geographic to provide you with your deep ancestry insights (we're calling this your 'Genographic Genetic Information'). You must be 18 or older to use the Geno 2.0 Next Gen Helix Product. Getting Your Results To use the Geno 2.0 Next Gen Helix Product, you must give consent to Helix for Helix to share the portion of your Genetic Information needed by National Geographic to provide you with your Geno 2.0 Next Gen Helix Product deep ancestry insights results. By agreeing to the Helix Platform Consent, you will authorize Helix to share this information. You must also register on the Genographic website at When your results are available, you will be notified via the email address you provided when you registered on the Helix website or, if you have already registered with you will be notified via the email address you have on record with At that point, you may view your results through your account at This process may take approximately six to twelve weeks from the time you mail your saliva sample to the Helix lab. (Please note that in some cases, inconclusive data may occasionally require additional testing and might delay posting of results by two to three additional weeks.) How National Geographic Uses Your Information Providing You With Deep Ancestry Insights National Geographic's analysis of your Genographic Genetic Information will produce your deep ancestry insights. Deep ancestry is your ancestry from hundreds or even thousands of years ago. It's based on the paths your ancient ancestors took to migrate around the world. As noted above, we're calling these results your Genographic Genetic Information. Treatment of Non-Genetic Personal Information Information we collect from and about you when you visit National Geographic's other websites or purchase the Geno 2.0 Next Gen Helix Product or other products, such as your full name, email address, mailing address, or consumer product preferences, is 'Non-Genetic Personal Information.' Non-Genetic Personal Information does not include Genographic Genetic Information. National Geographic's treatment of Non-Genetic Personal Information is governed by the privacy policy posted on the National Geographic website or app on which the information is collected, and not this privacy policy, which applies only to the Genographic Genetic Information as that term is used herein and any email address you provided to participate in the Genographic program. Improving the Geno 2.0 Next Gen Helix Product National Geographic is dedicated to providing current, reliable, and high-quality experiences. We will use the information you give us for quality control and to improve the Geno 2.0 Next Gen Helix Product and Genographic website. Some of these improvements may focus on how we analyze your Genographic Genetic Information. Some may focus on how we store and send your Genographic Genetic Information. Some of these improvements may focus on how easy it is to use the Genographic website. All information used for quality control will be used only within National Geographic. Storing and Sharing Your Information Genographic Genetic Information National Geographic Society will store your Genographic Genetic Information and any email address you provided to participate in the Genographic program in our DNA Analysis Repository. The DNA Analysis Repository is a central database that manages DNA data from around the world for the Genographic Project. National Geographic Society may provide access to the Genographic Genetic Information to third parties that provide services necessary for the functionality of the Geno 2.0 Next Gen Helix Product. This may include services to improve the interpretation of the Genographic Genetic Information to provide ancestry-related results. National Geographic Society will not use the Genographic Genetic Information for scientific research or share it or your email address with third parties for scientific research without your separate, express consent. National Geographic Society will keep your Genographic Genetic Information until you ask us to destroy it. You can ask us to do so by sending an email to genographic@ If you still want access to your results, you must print or copy them. Once we destroy your information, you will not be able to access your results from National Geographic again. Please note that requesting National Geographic Society to destroy your Genographic Genetic Information affects only the information we hold. If you would like Helix to destroy any information they hold or to close your Helix account, you must make a separate request to Helix. National Geographic Society may disclose your Genographic Genetic Information and any email address you provided to participate in the Genographic program in response to legal process and when we believe that doing so is required by law, may be necessary to protect any person's property, rights, or safety, or to investigate a potential violation of law. Choosing to take part in research When you log onto the Genographic website to access your results, you may be given the opportunity to consent to participate in a major global research effort by National Geographic Society to collect population genetic data from hundreds of thousands of individuals from around the world. If you agree to contribute your results to this effort, your Genographic Genetic Information will be made available to National Geographic Society-affiliated and third party researchers for research purposes. If you agree to contribute your results to this scientific research effort, National Geographic may ask you to provide Self-Reported Information in the My Profile section of the Genographic website. Self-Reported Information is other details about you that you choose to supply to National Geographic. This may include details about your family tree. Participation in the research and whether you provide any Self-Reported Information to National Geographic is your choice and is not necessary in order to access your individual test results. Security We take a number of commercially reasonable administrative, technical, personnel and physical steps to safeguard information in our possession from loss, theft and unauthorized use, disclosure or modification. However, no method of transmitting or storing electronic data is ever completely secure, and therefore we cannot warrant or guarantee that such information will never be accessed, used or released in a manner that is inconsistent with this privacy policy. Questions If you have any questions concerning the Geno 2.0 Next Gen Helix Product, your rights or the procedures involved, please visit You may contact a customer service representative at: Email: nationalgeographic@

Farmers forced to shut down operations after discovering devastating health risk: 'I am hoping this will help us better understand'
Farmers forced to shut down operations after discovering devastating health risk: 'I am hoping this will help us better understand'

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Farmers forced to shut down operations after discovering devastating health risk: 'I am hoping this will help us better understand'

Farmers forced to shut down operations after discovering devastating health risk: 'I am hoping this will help us better understand' Maine farmers are worried about their health and that of their families after state regulators discovered that more than 80 farms were contaminated with toxic "forever chemicals." What's happening? Farmers like Adam Nordell, who spoke with News Center Maine, bought a farm in 2014 that he later discovered had previously used PFAS-laced municipal sludge on fields as a fertilizer for years in the 1990s. Now, he has been forced to shut down his organic vegetable and grain operation, and his family members have high levels of PFAS — also known as forever chemicals — in their blood. He told the news site that they're worried about the long-term health impacts of years of exposure to contaminated dust from tilling and plowing as well. Contaminated dust could have also reached other properties, putting others in danger. Meanwhile, Caleb Goossen, a crop production and conservation specialist with the Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association, is embarking on a study that will look into how soil particles contaminated with forever chemicals can become airborne. The scientists hope that the data they collect will provide better information to Maine farmers affected by contamination as they transition to new livelihoods, such as switching to new crops or installing solar panels. At the same time, they want to keep that contaminated soil intact. "I am hoping this will help us better understand personal exposure risk for anyone working on a farm or near a contaminated farm," Goossen told News Center Maine, adding that they want to look into how much disturbance is related to any new endeavor. "How much does it take for a one-time transition, like a transition to solar panels or something like that?" Why is PFAS concerning? PFAS describes a group of thousands of human-made chemicals that are used in products like non-stick cookware, water-resistant clothing, and firefighting foams. They have been linked to a range of health concerns, including cancer, poor immunity, and reproductive disorders. The conundrum faced by Maine's farmers is part of a larger trend regarding the use of toxic PFAS-laden sludge in fields nationwide. For instance, a third-generation cattle rancher in Michigan, whose property was found to be contaminated with sludge fertilizer in 2020, had a health advisory placed on his beef. A community in Pennsylvania is grappling with PFAS-contaminated water that is likely linked to sewage sludge spread on nearby fields in the 1980s. What's being done about PFAS? In addition to the research being conducted by Goossen's team, some lawmakers are looking at banning the use of sewage sludge on fields. So far, Maine is the only state to have outright banned its application, according to The New York Times. However, lawmakers in other states, such as Texas and Oklahoma, have proposed certain limitations on its use, and one town in New York is inching closer to a ban. Plus, some states have enacted legislation targeting PFAS in some of the everyday products we use. For instance, New Hampshire lawmakers recently banned ski, board, and boat waxes containing these chemicals. Scientists are also working on ways to break these chemicals down before they have a chance to harm humans or the environment. For instance, researchers at the University of Illinois found a way to remove the full spectrum of PFAS from water in a single process, and scientists at the University of Rochester are doing similar work. Editor's note: A previous version of this article misstated that Nordell's farm applied the sludge during the time he owned it. It has been updated to reflect that while the farm in question did use the sludge, it was before he bought the land. Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home? Majorly Sometimes Not really I don't know enough about them Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store