
US unveils world's first supersonic artillery shell that can hit targets 100 miles away at a blistering 2,700mph speeds
THE US has revealed the world's first supersonic artillery shell, capable of striking targets 100 miles away at speeds of a blistering 2,700mph.
Tiberius Aerospace, a UK - US defence firm, unveiled the Sceptre TrBM 155HG supersonic missile at the Future Artillery Conference in London.
6
6
The technological milestone can reach speeds of Mach 3.5 and soars to an altitude of 65,000 feet.
This makes it impervious to countermeasures and GPS jamming systems.
It uses a ramjet engine, enabling supersonic speeds and a range of up to 150km.
The missile is equipped with AI technology, GPS, and a sensor system that corrects errors in real-time.
An important feature is that the Sceptre TrBM 155HG can be powered by diesel, JP-4, or JP-8 fuel.
Unlike typical solid- fuel missiles, the supersonic shell's fueling design boosts shelf life to over 20 years and cuts storage risks.
The Sceptre's propulsion system also reduces reliance on niche energetics, letting the defence firm source fuel from established logistics networks and strengthening the supply chain.
Chad Steelberg, CEO and founder of Tiberius Aerospace, described the state-of-the-art missile as a "10X solution" in range precision, cost-effectiveness, survivability and operational adaptability.
He added: "This is a weapon designed for the future battlefield: fast, precise, and resilient in a denied environment."
It comes after Britain hit a major milestone in the race for hypersonic supremacy – with a powerful new missile engine tested 233 times and hailed as a game changer for UK defence.
Putin develops yet another secret new hypersonic missile - this time mini-sized - in bid to outdo West, as 6,100 mph Zircon to be tested next month
The new air-breathing propulsion system, designed to fire cruise missiles at speeds of over five times the speed of sound, is part of a £1billion push to build a British hypersonic weapon by 2030.
The breakthrough comes as military experts warn a British version of Israel's famed Iron Dome missile shield would be "too prohibitively expensive" to protect the entire UK – leaving cities exposed to attacks from Putin's rockets.
Defence Secretary John Healey said: 'We are living in a more dangerous world and it has never been more important for us to innovate and stay ahead of our adversaries, equipping our forces with the technologies of the future.
'This milestone moment on hypersonics research, supported by British scientists and British small businesses, demonstrates another crucial area where we are working in lockstep with the United States to bolster our Armed Forces and strengthen our deterrence.'
The engine, developed through a joint effort between the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), the US Air Force Research Laboratory, and UK industry players like Gas Dynamics Ltd, was successfully trialled at NASA's Langley Research Centre in Virginia.
Over six weeks, scientists carried out 233 static tests across a range of supersonic and hypersonic speeds, analysing real-time data to tweak designs and boost performance.
Paul Hollinshead, Chief Executive of Dstl, said: 'This milestone represents a critical advancement in the UK's defence capabilities and reinforces our standing in the AUKUS hypersonic weapon development collaboration.
"The success of these tests highlights the UK's commitment to technological leadership and innovation in this crucial area.'
What is the Iron Dome – and is it really effective?
ISRAEL'S Iron Dome is a high-tech, all-weather mobile air defence system designed to intercept and destroy short-range threats like rockets, missiles, mortars and drones.
The system is made up of at least 10 batteries placed strategically around the country.
Each battery includes a radar detection system, a control centre to assess threats, and truck-towed launchers that fire radar-guided Tamir interceptor missiles.
How does it work?
The radar detects incoming projectiles and sends data to a central command that decides if the threat will hit a populated or strategic area. If it will, the system fires interceptors to destroy it mid-air – ignoring rockets headed for open spaces.
Range & reach:
The Iron Dome can take out targets launched from up to 43 miles away. Each launcher holds up to 20 interceptors, and the batteries together can protect nearly 60 square miles of land. Israel has worked on increasing the range to up to 155 miles and enabling the system to handle multiple threats from different directions.
How effective is it?
Very. Iron Dome has a reported success rate of around 90 per cent, according to its developer Rafael Advanced Defence Systems. It has intercepted thousands of rockets since its first combat use in 2011. During the 2021 conflict with Gaza, it stopped roughly 90 per cent of over 4,000 rockets fired into populated areas. In the October 2024 Iranian missile barrage, the system again proved its mettle, downing most of the 180 missiles fired.
Limits under pressure:
The system isn't invincible. On October 7, 2023, when Hamas fired thousands of rockets at once, it overwhelmed the system. Experts say there's a limit to how many incoming projectiles the Iron Dome can handle at once – and anything above that threshold can get through.
Part of a trio:
The Iron Dome is just one part of Israel's multi-layered defence network, alongside David's Sling (for medium-range missiles) and Arrow 2/3 (for long-range ballistic missiles), creating overlapping protection against a variety of aerial threats.
Bottom line:
Iron Dome is a battlefield game changer – incredibly effective against limited rocket fire, but not a silver bullet against massed missile barrages.
6
6
6

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump makes Second World War joke about Germany re-arming during Merz meeting
Donald Trump made a Second World War joke about Germany re-arming while meeting the country's chancellor, Friedrich Merz, in the Oval Office on Thursday, 5 June, amid negotiations over tariffs. Mr Merz went into the meeting hoping to keep Western support for Ukraine, make progress on trade, and bolster German military spending. 'I know that you're spending more money on defence now,' the US president began. 'They said never let Germany rearm." Mr Trump added that Germany's rearming is a good thing, "at least to a certain point".


The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump says he is ‘very disappointed' in Elon Musk after attacks on tax bill
Donald Trump said on Thursday he was 'very disappointed' with Elon Musk, after the Tesla CEO and former head of the president's 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) spent days attacking the tax and spending plan Republicans are working to pass through the Senate. Trump accused Musk of turning against the bill because of its provisions revoking incentives for consumers to purchase electric vehicles that had been approved by Congress during Joe Biden's term. 'I can understand that, but he knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' Trump said in the Oval Office as he welcomed the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Trump also said at one point: 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more.' Musk almost immediately rejected the president's statement, writing on X: 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' The tech boss's criticism has become the latest obstacle facing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which the House of Representatives approved last month by a single vote. The bill is expected to extend tax cuts enacted during Trump's first term in 2017, step up spending on deportations, border fortifications and the military, and impose funding cuts and work requirements on federal safety net programs to partially offset its costs. The measure is nonetheless expensive, with the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimating it will add $2.4tn to the deficit over the next 10 years. Arguing that cost is unaffordable, Musk has made dozens of posts on X criticizing the proposal in recent days, including referring to it as 'the Debt Slavery Bill' and encouraging people to call their lawmakers and ask them to vote against it. Musk has also warned it would undo the efforts of Doge, the Trump-sanctioned initiative he stepped down from leading last week after months of directing its layoffs of federal workers and cancellations of programs. So far, the initiative has saved less than 20% of the $1tn Musk said it could cut. The House speaker, Mike Johnson, spent weeks negotiating with his fractious Republican majority to get the bill passed narrowly through his chamber, and on Wednesday said he had been trying to speak with Musk about his concerns. In an interview with Bloomberg TV on Thursday, he called the Tesla CEO 'a good friend' and said the two had exchanged text messages ahead of a call he expected to take place that morning. 'I just want to make sure that he understands what I think everybody on Capitol Hill understands. This is not a spending bill, my friends, this is a a budget reconciliation bill. And what we're doing here is delivering the America first agenda,' Johnson said. 'He seems pretty dug in right now, and I can't quite understand the motivation behind it,' the speaker added. The 'big, beautiful bill' is now being considered by the Senate, where Republican leaders have shown no indication that they share Musk's concerns. Instead, they are eyeing changes to some aspects of the bill that were the result of hard-fought negotiations in the House, and could throw its prospects of passage into jeopardy. One issue that has reappeared is the deductibility of state and local tax (Salt) payments, which the tax bill passed under Trump in 2017 limited to $10,000 per household. House Republicans representing districts in Democratic-run states that have higher tax burdens managed to get a provision increasing the deduction to $40,000 into the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. But there are almost no Republican senators representing blue states. The majority leader, John Thune, said after a meeting with Trump on Wednesday that his lawmakers were not inclined to keep that provision as they negotiate the bill. 'We also start from a position that there really isn't a single Republican senator who cares much about the Salt issue. It's just not an issue that plays,' Thune said. That could upset the balance of power in the House, where Republicans can lose no more than three votes on any bill.


The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Civil war splits cabinet over Rachel Reeves' spending review
Rachel Reeves has defended her economic policy, countering criticism from within the Labour Party regarding her spending review. Ms Reeves highlighted her efforts to rebalance the economy, referencing her childhood experiences and the need to address inequalities. She emphasised her commitment to providing free school meals and increasing universal credit, framing these as choices to support those most in need. Ms Reeves faces internal opposition, particularly from Angela Rayner, who is advocating for wealth taxes as an alternative to potential austerity measures. The upcoming spending review is expected to draw criticism, with concerns raised about potential cuts due to Reeves' commitment to not raising income tax, VAT, or national insurance contributions.