
Punjab files plea to recall high court order on Bhakra water release
Chandigarh: The Punjab govt has filed a petition in the Punjab and Haryana high court seeking a recall or modification of the court's May 6 order directing the state to comply with a decision made during a May 2 meeting chaired by the Union home secretary regarding the release of additional water from the Bhakra Dam to Haryana.The Punjab govt's plea contends that the May 6 order was based on misleading information and concealment of key facts by the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB).According to Punjab, the board's petition failed to disclose that the matter had already been referred to the central govt for decision-making under Rule 7 of the 1974 BBMB Rules.
Despite this, a meeting was convened by the BBMB on April 30, which, without proper adjudication by the competent authority, decided to release 8,500 cusecs of water to Haryana.Punjab also informed that in the petition filed by BBMB, although a reference was made to the indent made by Haryana, the material fact regarding the state's request to refer the matter to the central govt was concealed.Punjab also pointed out that the Union home secretary, who chaired the May 2 meeting, was not the appropriate authority to decide on water allocation issues according to Rule 7 of the BBMB Rules. The state also mentioned that the meeting convened on May 2 was related to law and order concerns and could not legally decide on water allocation."The applicant state is aggrieved by the direction passed as a result of completely erroneous, factually incorrect, and legally unsustainable submissions made by the BBMB, Haryana, and the Union of India before the HC. The correct facts came to light when the Union of India produced before this court the letter dated May 9, along with the undated record of discussion of the meeting dated May 2. It is apparent that neither was the Union home secretary competent to decide the issue regarding the allocation of water under Rule 7 BBMB Rules of 1974, nor were the minutes ever circulated to the concerned states before May 9, which was the last date of hearing in the present matter," said Punjab's plea.An official spokesperson said that the Punjab govt argued in the petition that the BBMB was attempting to "illegally divert Punjab's water to Haryana at the behest of the BJP-led Centre".The Punjab govt said that no official minutes of the May 2 meeting were ever provided to state authorities. Only a press note was circulated, which cannot be considered an official record of decisions made, it said."How can an order be implemented when no formal decision was made in the first place?" questioned the state govt, saying that the BBMB overstepped its authority by attempting to release water to Haryana without completing the required legal process.The Punjab govt highlighted that even the Centre failed to produce official minutes of the May 2 meeting when directed by the court, instead presenting only what they termed a "discussion record".The matter will come up for hearing on Wednesday.BOX'Home Secy Lacked Authority'Punjab argues that the Union home secretary, who chaired the May 2 meeting, lacked the legal authority to decide on water allocation, which should fall under a competent authority as per BBMB rules.Punjab contends that no official minutes were recorded from the May 2 meeting; only a press note was shared, which cannot be treated as a formal decision document for court compliance.Punjab accuses BBMB and BJP-led central govt of trying to "illegally divert" water to Haryana.MSID:: 121109824 413 |

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scroll.in
12 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Funds under Right to Education need not be linked to National Education Policy: Madras HC to Centre
Funds payable by the Union government to state governments under the Right to Education Act need not be linked to the implementation of the National Education Policy, the Madras High Court said on Tuesday, according to Live Law. A bench of Justices GR Swaminathan and V Lakshminarayanan urged the Centre to release to Tamil Nadu the funds under the Right to Education Act. 'It is true that implementation of the Samagra Siksha Scheme is aligned to NEP 2020, but the obligation under RTE is independent by itself,' Live Law quoted the bench as saying. The Samagra Shiksha scheme, implemented in 2018, is the scheme through which the Union government provides support for elementary and secondary school education. In April, the Union Education Ministry had told the Rajya Sabha that Tamil Nadu, Kerala and West Bengal received no funds under the central education scheme for 2024-'25. Data shared in the Upper House by Minister of State for Education Jayant Choudhary showed that while Kerala was allocated Rs 328.90 crore, Tamil Nadu Rs 2,151.60 crore and West Bengal Rs 1,745.80 crore from the Centre for the current fiscal year under the scheme, no funds had been released to these states as of March 27. The halt in funding to Kerala, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal came against the backdrop of these states refusing to comply with the PM Schools for Rising India, or PM SHRI, scheme. The centrally-sponsored scheme aims to upgrade the infrastructure of schools managed by central, state or regional bodies. However, to avail the scheme's benefits, state governments must first sign a memorandum of understanding with the Centre to implement the 2020 National Education Policy. Tamil Nadu has repeatedly expressed opposition to the three-language formula in the National Education Policy. The state government said it will not change its decades-old two-language policy of teaching students Tamil and English. Of the total funds pending to be paid to the state, the Right to Education component amounts to Rs 200 crore, according to The Hindu. On Tuesday, the High Court pointed out that under section 7 of the Right to Education Act, states and the Union government have concurrent responsibility for providing funds to carry out its provisions. 'Therefore, funds payable to the state governments representing the central government share towards discharging the RTE obligations need not be linked to NEP 2020,' said the bench. It also took note that the state government had moved the Supreme Court against the Centre withholding funds under the Samagra Shiksha scheme. 'We are not in a position to issue any binding direction in this regard,' said the bench, urging the Union government to consider delinking the Right to Education component from the Samagra Siksha Scheme. The court was disposing of a public interest litigation petition seeking directions to the Tamil Nadu government to begin admissions under the Right to Education Act for 2025-'26.


Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
D for dope test returns to Punjab politics vocabulary as Ludhiana West bypoll heats up
A demand for legal cultivation of poppy in drug-hit Punjab has triggered a war of words between the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and Congress ahead of the high-stakes June 19 Ludhiana West Assembly bypoll, with leaders challenging each other to take dope tests. Making a case in favour of legalisation of poppy cultivation, Ludhiana MP and Punjab Congress chief Amarinder Singh Raja Warring on Sunday said that consumption of poppy was less harmful than synthetic drugs. Ruling out any possibility of meeting the demand, state Finance Minister Harpal Singh Cheema on Monday demanded Warring undertake a dope test and accused him of 'promoting drug culture'. Cheema also held the previous Congress and Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD)-BJP governments responsible for the 'alarming rise of drug abuse in Punjab'. 'It was during their terms that drugs were sown in Punjab's soil. The AAP government led by Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann is now committed to uprooting this menace,' he said. Warring almost immediately responded and urged Cheema not to politicise the issue. 'I welcome Cheema's suggestion (of me taking a dope test)… I am ready for the test but I will get it done along with Cheema. Before that, CM Mann should also undergo the test… I raised the issue of opium cultivation as the number of deaths due to drug overdose have been on the rise. The cultivation of poppy can put an end to this,' he said. Leader of the Opposition in the Punjab Assembly Partap Singh Bajwa too echoed Warring's views. 'I have been suggesting for a while now that all leaders, starting with the CM, must take the test…' he said. Terming the issue a 'diversionary tactic', state BJP chief Sunil Jakhar said, 'As the bypoll is round the corner, politics is being played over the issue to divert the people from real ones.' The standoff comes amid the Mann government's crackdown on the drug menace to make a 'drug-free Punjab', a pre-poll promise of the AAP. The Punjab Police has filed 11,156 FIRs under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act between April 1, 2022, and February 28, 2023. The Punjab and Haryana High Court in January 2023 also weighed in on the issue. 'The lives of citizens are being destroyed due to the selling of these banned substances… There is an alarming spike in the number of people buying and selling these contraband in the country, especially in Punjab, which needs to be controlled in an effective manner so as to minimise the said offence, if not to eradicate,' the court held, while hearing the anticipatory bail plea of a person accused of peddling drugs. In March 2023, then Punjab Health Minister Balbir Singh told the Assembly that the number of individuals grappling with addiction stood at 10 lakh. Now new to Punjab's politics Incidentally, demanding testing for drugs is not new in Punjab's politics. In 2018, with former CM Amarinder Singh at the helm, state minister Tripat Rajinder Singh Bajwa had demanded dope tests for all government employees after several people died of drug overdose. As employee unions demanded that leaders take the test first, several MLAs and ministers volunteered for it, before the government took a call. First to get himself tested for drugs was Punjab AAP chief and then Sunam MLA Aman Arora. Tripat Bajwa himself took a dope test and was followed by a few MLAs, including then Speaker Rana K P Singh. In 2015, a similar demand was put forward by the then Opposition Congress, which demanded SAD and BJP ministers undergo the test after then DSP Jagdish Singh Bhola, an alleged drug kingpin, was nabbed. The upcoming bypoll, necessitated after sitting AAP MLA Gurpreet Gogi 'accidentally' shot himself to death in January, has turned into a prestige battle for the AAP as it comes close on the heels of its drubbing in the February Delhi Assembly polls, where party bigwigs including party chief Arvind Kejriwal and former Delhi deputy CM Manish Sisodia lost. The Congress is also going all out to wrest the seat from the AAP. The AAP has fielded Rajya Sabha MP Sanjeev Arora for the bypoll. He will be up against former minister Bharat Bhushan Ashu of the Congress, the Akali Dal's Parupkar Singh Ghumman and Jiwan Gupta of the BJP.


India Today
18 minutes ago
- India Today
Why Mamata invoked PoK as Modi govt's ‘missed opportunity'
West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, on June 10, questioned the Narendra Modi government's handling of national security following the terror strike in Kashmir's Pahalgam and suggested that India had missed a rare strategic opportunity to take control of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) during the subsequent military offensive.'There was a need to teach them a lesson; and we salute the bravery of our armed forces. India had an opportunity to take control of PoK,' Mamata said in the legislative mincing words in holding the Centre accountable for the April 22 Pahalgam attack, she said: 'The Pahalgam attack is the result of the Centre's callousness. Why were no security forces or police personnel present at the site?' She also took a swipe at the prime minister, remarking that 'PM Modi is only busy advertising himself', and accused the BJP of 'trying to politicise the valour of the armed forces'.Mamata unequivocally praised the armed forces for their precision strikes inside Pakistan. Her government moved a resolution in the legislative assembly condemning the Pahalgam massacre and hailing India's military response. Though the resolution conspicuously omitted the term 'Operation Sindoor', it recorded the assembly's 'gratitude and appreciation for the coordinated efforts of the Indian armed forces in destroying major terrorist infrastructures in Pakistan and PoK'.advertisement 'This House strongly condemns this brutal attack [in Pahalgam] and at the same time salutes the discipline, dedication and courage shown by different wings of the Indian armed forces in combatting terrorist activities and safeguarding the sovereignty of the nation,' the resolution stated, also acknowledging the 'extraordinary display of unity, compassion and resilience' by the people of Jammu and Kashmir in the aftermath of the tragedy. Mamata also questioned why the perpetrators of the Pahalgam attack hadn't been apprehended comments, especially her assertion about PoK and criticism of the Centre's diplomatic failure, gained attention. 'Not sure if our international diplomacy is having issues. Pakistan received loans from the IMF (International Monetary Fund) instead of being cornered globally,' she said, expressing doubt over India's ability to isolate Pakistan on the world the resolution was passed unanimously, it drew sharp criticism from the BJP. Party leader Agnimitra Paul questioned the omission of the term 'Operation Sindoor' in the official resolution. 'What kind of appreciation is this when the name Operation Sindoor hasn't even been mentioned in the resolution?' she asked, implying political double accused Mamata and the Trinamool Congress of posturing for international audiences. 'On the one hand, she is sending Abhishek Banerjee in the all-party delegation. He, while abroad, is painting a good picture that the Trinamool Congress is with the central government and our prime minister. However, the moment he comes back to India, he begins to demean and abuse our PM. Under whose leadership was all of this achieved?' she BJP's counterattack extended to Leader of the Opposition in the assembly Suvendu Adhikari, who accused the Trinamool Congress of failing to maintain consistency in its stance. While Adhikari's remarks were not included in the assembly proceedings, his party's criticism made clear that the political fallout of the Pahalgam attack and its military aftermath was far from Trinamool MLAs moved a breach of privilege motion against Adhikari for allegedly making defamatory remarks outside the assembly and claiming that Mamata Banerjee had 'praised Pakistan' more eloquently than Pakistan prime minister Shehbaz Sharif. Ministers, including Chandrima Bhattacharya and Sovandeb Chattopadhyay, signed the motion, with Firhad Hakim expected to join in. Assembly speaker Biman Banerjee confirmed receipt and may refer it to the privilege committee. Earlier, Adhikari had been suspended in February for unparliamentary the debate continues over how the government had handled the April 22 terror strike and Pakistan thereafter, Mamata's speech in the legislative assembly has shifted attention to strategic questions about India's foreign policy, domestic security gaps, and the Centre's 'missed opportunities' in leveraging military momentum for long-term geopolitical to India Today Magazine