Milei vetoes pension, disability spending increases as Argentina feels cuts
Milei's administration announced the decision on Monday, less than three months before the crucial mid-term elections, saying the country does not have enough money to finance the legislation.
The vetoes can still be overturned by a two-thirds majority in the Congress, where politicians passed the laws in July.
The Argentinian president, whose party only holds a small number of seats in parliament, will hope for a repeat of last year, when he managed to successfully stop pension rises, thanks to support from the conservative PRO bloc.
In a statement published on X on Monday, the president's office suggested that the now-vetoed laws had been approved by Congress in an 'irresponsible manner', without identifying funding sources.
It claimed that the spending rises would have amounted to 0.9 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) this year and 1.68 percent of GDP in 2026.
'This president prefers to tell an uncomfortable truth rather than repeat comfortable lies,' the president's office said.
'The only way to make Argentina great again is with effort and honesty, not the same old recipes,' it added, echoing the 'make America great again' rhetoric of the United States President Donald Trump.
Since taking office in December 2023, Milei, a self-described 'anarcho-capitalist', has slashed federal spending in an attempt to reduce inflation.
As part of these largescale economic changes, his government has removed tens of thousands of civil service jobs and made drastic cuts to social spending and public works.
In 2024, Milei's policies saw Argentina gain its first annual surplus in 14 years, and in June, Argentina's monthly inflation rate fell below 2 percent for the first time since 2020.
However, the president's measures have been blamed for tipping millions of people into poverty in the first half of last year.
Unemployment has also grown, and prices are up 40 percent year-on-year, conditions which have led people to protest.
Researchers say pensioners, who have been at the centre of weekly demonstrations, are the hardest-hit group.
Despite the public protests, polls show that Milei's party holds a sizeable lead ahead of October's mid-term elections, which will be seen as a referendum on his first two years in office.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
10 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Fact check: Did Democrats take action over Epstein case transparency?
After the US House Speaker, Mike Johnson, sent lawmakers home early for recess in July, he said if they were so concerned about releasing records related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, they could have sought them during Joe Biden's presidency. US Representative Thomas Massie and Representative Ro Khanna – along with 30 Democratic and 11 Republican cosponsors – filed legislation to try to force the government's release of federal Epstein investigation files. During the last presidency, 'neither of those guys said a word about it', Johnson said of Massie and Khanna on July 24 on CBS. Trump made a similar argument that Democrats could have acted before he took office in January. Democrats controlled the files for four years, Trump said, 'So if they had something, they would've released it before the election.' Khanna said on July 27 on NBC's 'Meet the Press' that the Trump administration's conflicting statements about its plans to release the Epstein files prompted the legislation. We decided to explore Johnson's larger point about what lawmakers said before this year about releasing Epstein records or investigating the case. We focused on Democrats; Massie is a conservative maverick who has clashed with Trump. Democratic lawmakers began to seek records about Epstein after the Miami Herald's late 2018 investigation into the case. Before then, political coverage of the Epstein case was typically framed around the financier's ties to former President Bill Clinton. His wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, lost the presidential election to Trump in 2016, and her role as a Trump rival kept the Epstein topic alive, especially in conservative media outlets. Given this framing, Democrats often weren't asked to comment on the topic, declined to comment, or didn't raise Epstein as an issue. Starting in 2019, but before Epstein's arrest that year on federal sex trafficking charges, some Democratic lawmakers including Representative Lois Frankel and Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, both of South Florida, launched a years-long quest to release Epstein records. The Democrats called for former US Attorney Alex Acosta, who served as labour secretary during Trump's first term, to testify about Epstein's plea deal. They asked the Justice Department to investigate and release records. Democrats later pursued other strategies, including asking a Palm Beach, Florida judge to release records. 'A full accounting for these heinous crimes is lacking,' Wasserman Schultz told PolitiFact in an August 1 written statement. 'Those prospects changed when Republicans momentarily joined the call for full disclosure.' In 2019, some Democrats called for a plea deal investigation Acosta signed off in 2007 on Epstein's secret plea deal in which he agreed to plead guilty to state prostitution charges, serve 18 months in county jail and pay monetary damages to his victims. In exchange, the US attorney's office agreed to forgo federal prosecution. Epstein entered his guilty plea in 2008. The Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility investigated Acosta's role and, in November 2020, released a summary that said he showed 'poor judgement'. Spring 2019: Focus on Acosta's role Before Epstein's July 2019 arrest on federal charges, Frankel and Wasserman Schultz called on the Justice Department to make public Acosta's role in the plea deal. Frankel submitted a list of questions for Acosta, including whether any politicians lobbied prosecutors on Epstein's behalf. Senator Tim Kaine and Senator Patty Murray joined the effort, sending a separate letter to the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility asking to make its records public. Summer 2019: Focus on how past investigations were handled US Representative Elijah Cummings invited Acosta to testify before the House oversight committee, which Cummings chaired. A few days later, on July 12, Acosta announced he had resigned as labour secretary, after Democratic leaders and presidential candidates called for him to do so. On the day Acosta resigned, Khanna said Acosta should testify before the House oversight committee, and later that month Senator Chuck Schumer was among the Democrats who called on the Justice Department to make public the results of its review of Acosta's handling of the Epstein case. Also in July, the congressional Democratic Women's Caucus requested that the House Oversight and Reform Committee open an investigation into how the Palm Beach, Florida Sheriff's Office handled the Epstein investigation. Days after Epstein's August 2019 death in a Manhattan jail cell, Khanna posted his support for an investigation into the death, writing: 'There are too many unanswered questions, and far too many who deserve closure, to leave this case unexamined.' Khanna attached to his post a link to a Daily Beast article that said bipartisan lawmakers sent a letter to the FBI demanding answers about Epstein's suicide. Democrats continued their push for a plea deal investigation, writing multiple letters, including one to Trump's then-Attorney General Bill Barr and another to the House judiciary and oversight committees. Democrats, along with some Republicans, proposed legislation to prevent prosecutors from striking secret plea deals, and Democrats also sought records about the Epstein case from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. 2020 to 2024: Focus on records Democrats tried other tactics to obtain records, such as requesting them from a Palm Beach judge – a strategy spearheaded by the Palm Beach Post that can take years to succeed. Some records emerged from civil lawsuits and the federal prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted for her role in a scheme with Epstein to sexually exploit and abuse multiple minor girls. When Maxwell was charged in 2020, Democrats continued to push for transparency. Frankel told PolitiFact in an August 1 interview that the House oversight committee wanted to hold a hearing at which they would hear from Epstein victims, their lawyers and prosecutors. They wanted to subpoena the prosecutors to ask them under oath 'why they gave this guy a slap on the wrist, who pressured them?' Frankel said. However, 'We were told by the Justice Department to cut it off' because it could compromise the Maxwell investigation, Frankel told PolitiFact. After Biden took office in 2021, Democrats appeared to dial back their public calls for Epstein records' release. 'Pushes for oversight and record releases were at times tempered by a need to respect both the victims' pursuit of justice in courts and their fears of reprisals,' Wasserman Schultz told PolitiFact. 'As disclosures were denied or delayed, we did what lawmakers do and legislated to protect future victims.' In February 2024, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, a Republican, signed a bill to allow the release of Epstein 2006 grand jury testimony after a similar effort failed in previous state legislative sessions. Frankel praised the legislation. A Palm Beach judge released records in July 2024, which showed prosecutors had heard testimony about how Epstein sexually assaulted two teenage girls before they gave Epstein a plea deal. Frankel again repeated her push for an explanation. In September 2024, Wasserman Schultz along with Representative Burgess Owens, introduced a bill, similar to earlier proposals, to require prosecutors to inform victims of such plea deals. The bill did not receive a vote. *Caryn Baird and Louis Jacobson contributed to this report*
Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Argentina's Javier Milei vetoes pension, disability spending hikes
Agencies Argentina's libertarian President Javier Milei vetoed on Monday an attempt to hike spending on pensions in the country and a law expanding protections for people with disabilities, saying the legislation would have undermined his flagship pledge to eliminate the nation's chronic fiscal deficit before October's midterm elections. In publishing the veto decisions, Milei's administration said that Congress last month passed the spending bills – meant to more fully compensate retirees for inflation and offer more financial benefits for people with disabilities – 'without determining the source of the funds.' It said the bills 'contradicted (Milei's) popular mandate' to bring down inflation. Since coming to power in late 2023, Milei has vetoed all efforts to boost public spending, often wielding the slogan 'there is no money' against people's demands that he restore subsidies. The government projects that the additional expenditures, including a 7.2% pension increase, will amount to about 0.9% of gross domestic product (GDP) this year and 1.68% next year. 'This president prefers to tell an uncomfortable truth rather than repeat comfortable lies: There is no money,' the government said. Spinning off the slogan of his ally, U.S. President Donald Trump, it added: 'The only way to make Argentina great again is with effort and honesty, not the same old recipes.' Last year, Milei racked up Argentina's first annual fiscal surplus in 14 years by making painful cuts to social spending and public works. The austerity measures helped drive down Argentina's monthly inflation rate to below 2% in June for the first time in five years, compared to more than 25% when Milei entered office in December 2023. But the fiscal shock program has also deepened economic misery for many Argentines: Unemployment has climbed, wages adjusted for inflation have declined, and prices are still up 40% year-on-year. Congress can still overturn these vetoes with a two-thirds majority in both chambers, a challenge for Milei's libertarian party, which holds only a small minority of seats. Milei, whose relationship with lawmakers has been tense ever since he took office, last year managed to win enough votes from his party's closest ally, the conservative PRO bloc, to prevent the pension increases. Milei is looking to Argentina's crucial midterm elections in October to boost his party's representation as he seeks to continue his fiscal balance drive and draw more foreign investment. The elections are widely seen as a referendum on his two years in office. Retirees have been at the forefront of protests against Milei's government. Every Wednesday now for months, dozens of older Argentines struggling to scrape by on pensions of just $400 a month have faced off against security forces armed with tear gas and water cannons.
Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Trump vows ‘substantial' tariff hike on India over Russian oil
Agencies U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he would increase the tariff charged on imports from India 'very substantially' over the next 24 hours, given the country's continued purchases of Russian oil. The threat comes nearly a week after Trump announced 25% tariffs on Indian imports, and U.S. officials have cited a range of geopolitical issues standing in the way of a U.S.-India trade accord. Trade rift deepened as Trump also threatened unspecified penalties over India's oil purchases from Russia. 'India has not been a good trading partner, because they do a lot of business with us, but we don't do business with them,' the president said on Tuesday. 'So we settled on 25% but I think I'm going to raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours, because they're buying Russian oil,' he told CNBC in a televised interview. Earlier on Tuesday, India's ruling party and main opposition condemned Trump's threat, in a show of political unity. Manish Tewari, a member of Parliament and leader of the opposition Congress, said Trump's 'disparaging remarks hurt the dignity and self-respect of Indians.' 'The time has come to call out this constant bullying and hectoring,' he added. BJP Vice President Baijayant Jay Panda quoted Henry Kissinger – the most powerful U.S. diplomat of the Cold War era – in a post on social media platform X: 'To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.' India's Foreign Ministry said the country was being unfairly singled out over its purchases of Russian oil, and highlighted continued trade between Moscow and both the U.S. and the European Union, despite the war in Ukraine. 'It is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia,' it said in a statement issued late on Monday. 'It is unjustified to single out India,' the ministry said. It said the EU conducted 67.5 billion euros ($78.02 billion) in trade with Russia in 2024, including record imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) reaching 16.5 million metric United States, the statement said, continues to import Russian uranium hexafluoride for use in its nuclear power industry, palladium, fertilizers and chemicals. It did not give a source for the export information. Both the United States and the EU have sharply scaled back their trade ties with Russia since it launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In 2021, Russia was the EU's fifth-largest trading partner, with goods exchange worth 258 billion euros, according to the EU executive European Commission. India is the biggest buyer of seaborne crude from Russia, importing about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by trade sources. It has faced pressure from the West to distance itself from Moscow since Russia invaded Ukraine. New Delhi has resisted, citing its longstanding ties with Russia and economic needs. India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval is likely to travel to Russia this week on a scheduled visit, two government sources said. Foreign Minister S Jaishankar is expected to visit in the coming weeks. The sudden rift between India and the U.S. has been deepening since July 31, when Trump announced the 25% tariff on goods being shipped to the U.S. and for the first time threatened unspecified penalties for buying Russian oil. Trump has said that from Friday, he will impose new sanctions on Russia as well as on countries that buy its energy exports, unless Moscow takes steps to end the war with Ukraine. The trade tensions have caused concern about the potential impact on India's economy. The equity benchmark BSE Sensex closed down 0.38%, while the rupee dropped 0.17% versus the dollar.
