Occupied Territories Bill: Irish citizens grow more cautious
Occupied Territories Bill
in recent months, with almost half of all voters now favouring either not passing the Bill or investigating the possible consequences for Ireland before passing it.
Just one-fifth of voters (20 per cent) say the Bill should be passed quickly, with a further 14 per cent saying its scope should be expanded and it should be passed quickly.
About 38 per cent of people, however, say the
Government
'should investigate possible consequences for Ireland before passing the Bill', while a further 10 per cent are opposed to passing the Bill at all.
The Bill, which is being discussed by the Oireachtas foreign affairs committee and is due before the Dáil in the autumn, would ban trade in goods with the occupied Palestinian territories.
READ MORE
Pro-Palestine activists and Opposition parties want the Government to include a ban on trade in services – which ministers have said they are open to examining.
However, the Bill has been fiercely criticised as anti-Semitic by the Israeli government, by
US politicians
and by representatives of Jewish groups in Ireland, not least because it singles out Israel among participants in many global conflicts.
There is significant nervousness in Government about the possible economic consequences of passing the legislation. There is also strong support, however, for the Palestinians and a sense that Ireland is taking a leading role in the EU in advocating on their behalf.
Today's poll suggests that the public has shifted towards a more cautious position. When the subject was raised in the last Irish Times poll in April, a small majority of those who expressed a view said the Government should introduce the Bill as soon as possible, outnumbering those who favoured either pausing or dropping it altogether.
Today's poll shows the balance has shifted. The 'net pass' number – including those who want the bill passed as it is now or with the inclusion of services – is 34 per cent; the 'net don't pass' number – including those who want to wait and consider the consequences and those who want to drop it altogether – is 48 per cent.
[
Taoiseach rejects US politicians' claims that Occupied Territories Bill is 'diplomatic intoxication'
Opens in new window
]
The poll was conducted among a representative sample of adults aged 18 years and upwards across 120 sampling points throughout all constituencies.
The Irish Times/Ipsos B & A series is conducted through face-to-face sampling; personal in-home interviewing took place on July 14th and 15th. The number of interviews conducted was 1,200. The accuracy is estimated at plus or minus 2.8 per cent.
Meanwhile, head of employers' group
Ibec
, Danny McCoy, citing concerns about the consequences for business, said the Bill was 'hypocritical'.
'We're not talking about millions here,' he declared. 'This is not about actually helping in any material way. It's symbolism and moral positioning, and so on. However, with moral positions, you can also reveal hypocrisy.'
Ireland's stand on Israel is 'well intentioned', he said, but it is 'causing us significant damage. Quantifying it is really difficult, but we know it is going to have consequences'.
[
Irish Times poll: Shift in public mood noted on Occupied Territories Bill
Opens in new window
]
The head of
Amnesty International
has urged Ireland to resist 'bullying' from the US and pass the Bill in the autumn, which she said would be a 'precedent'.
After meetings with Taoiseach Micheál Martin, President Michael D Higgins and the Attorney General Rossa Fanning, Agnes Callamard told The Irish Times she believed the Government's assessment was that
the costs would be 'minimal'
.
'I felt that there was a prudent recognition that the cost could be handled,' Ms Callamard said. 'That it is not something that will be a determining factor.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
29 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
John Whelan: Trade war leaves Ireland's booming aviation sector vulnerable
US president Donald Trump's threat of a 30% tariff on EU goods from August 1 puts Ireland's continued growth narrative at risk. Exporters of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, food and drink, and aviation services consider a 30% tariffs on their sales to the US would be very damaging and, in many instances, make supplying their customers across the Atlantic unsustainable. However, having been caught off guard by a letter threatening the 30% duty on EU goods the weekend before last, the European Commission last week quickly tabled a plan to put counter tariffs worth €72bn on imports of US goods. Inevitably, this will hit the European Union's own economy, with Ireland potentially being one of the most impacted. The proposed EU retaliatory tariffs target imports of industrial goods from the US, including aircraft and aircraft parts, machinery, automotives, chemicals and plastics, and medical devices and equipment. Potential EU countermeasures on aircraft imports, coupled with retaliation from the US administration, could risk Ireland's position as a world-leading hub in aviation. Aviation is a highly important part of the Irish trading base, covering aircraf and parts and set to be heavily impacted by EU countermeasures. Potential EU import restrictions on these goods, worth nearly €14bn, according to a document from the Central Statistics Office, would be very damaging to many companies in the sector, including the lucrative aircraft leasing sector. A recent report by aviation investment group Irelandia said the industry in Ireland accounts for 37% of the global commercial fleet, making Ireland a central player in the world's air transport infrastructure. Within the EU member states, the country with the biggest US aircraft imports in 2024 was Ireland, followed by France, the Netherlands, and Germany. Ryanair, Europe's largest airline, imports new aircraft on a regular basis. A 30% import duty would significantly increase the cost of acquiring these new planes. Increased import costs would also likely lead to higher operating expenses for Ryanair. This could affect their ability to maintain their low-cost model and potentially lead to fare increases or reduced profitability. If the cost of new aircraft becomes prohibitive, it could also delay Ryanair's expansion plans, potentially affecting the addition of new routes and increased flights on existing routes. Furthermore, increased costs might lead to a reduction in the number of aircraft available for service, potentially impacting their operational efficiency. Ryanair has already threatened to cancel orders for hundreds of Boeing aircraft if a US tariff war leads to materially higher prices, and said it could look at alternative suppliers, including Chinese plane maker COMAC. However, this will still leave Ryanair exposed to higher costs on Boeing-related maintenance, repair, and overhaul, all increasingly critical with the growth of their fleet. A new import tariff would add to these challenges, potentially exacerbating existing operational difficulties. Aviation between the US and EU is a highly interconnected sector. French multinational aerospace and defence company Thales with a manufacturing base in Northern Ireland, and supplies US-based Boeing and European competitor Airbus with flight management systems and cockpit displays. In exchange, US aerospace giant Honeywell provides flight management systems for Airbus. Hence, the EU's potential retaliatory tariffs on US-made aircraft could escalate the trade war to impact a wider range of aviation products exported to the US. Eurostat figures show Boeing earned €7.5bn of its revenues from Europe in 2024. Airbus had sales of €16bn to the US last year. Future sales would likely be caught in the crossfire. Ireland is already facing a serious hit to its economy due to potentially high tariffs on exports to the US after the August 1 deadline. After Germany, Ireland could be the most affected economies in the EU. Retaliatory actions by the EU could then be more damaging than increased US tariffs on exports. Brussels says it is still seeking a deal to avoid a tit-for-tat escalation in the trade war but is poised to retaliate if needed. Preparations for retaliation are underway. Some commentators believe it is time for the EU to put its guns on the table in the tariff spat and show strength and determination. But there may be extensive consequences. Brussels-based think tank Bruegel has estimated that Ireland's cumulative real GDP loss, due to the total impact of US tariffs, could be 3% by 2028.

The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Government plans to inject up to €30bn extra into Ireland's infrastructure
THE GOVERNMENT IS finalising plans to inject up to an additional €30bn into Ireland's infrastructure between 2026 and 2030. Fianna Fáil Minister for Public Expenditure, appearing on RTÉ's This Week radio programme today, said that the plan is to be published on Tuesday, and that the coalition party leader met last night. 'This really gives an opportunity for transformational investment within the Irish economy. 'Over the next five to 10 years we'll be providing up to €30bn in additional capital expenditure… that's for the National Development Plan, the roads, the schools, the health infrastructure, and the homes that are critical to ensuring Ireland's prosperity and growth over the medium term,' Chambers said. He said that the plan will also present a long term commitment to €200bn in capital investment, which he said will help to 'bridge the infrastructure deficit' we have in the country. Advertisement He was questioned on where an additional €10bn has come from, as before today it was expected that the figure would be an additional €20bn, rather than the thirty that has been announced. Chambers said that of the additional €30bn, ten is being set aside for 'specific strategic investment', and that the money will be 'ring fenced for our grid, our water infrastructure and also the necessity to provide that medium to long term funding for the metro project, as an example.' He said that while the Government was making these plans it didn't want to see the likes of public transport and road infrastructure competing for funding. Chambers said that the purpose of the plan being announced this week is to provide 'funding certainty' which has been an issue 'in the last number of years'. Chambers said that the Government is not planning to publish its new housing plan until Autumn time, as part of the National Development plan. Responding to Mary Hanafin's comments about how it would be a 'disgrace' if Fianna Fáil didn't run an election candidate in the presidential race, Chambers said that the party is engaging on the matter 'internally' and that it will set out its position 'in the early autumn'. He also said that he is not aware of any engagements between Fianna Fáil and the former Chief Medical Officer of Ireland Tony Holohan on a potential presidential bid. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Almost €100bn expected to be invested in Ireland's infrastructure over next five years
Almost €100 billion is expected to be earmarked for investment in infrastructure between now and 2030 under plans being finalised by Government. Senior Coalition figures met on Saturday as work continues on the revised National Development Plan (NDP) which is due to be unveiled on Tuesday. The Irish Times understands that as much as €30 billion in extra funding is set to be added to the NDP. That is up from a previously mooted sum of around €20 billion – bringing the overall sums to be spent over the next five and a half years to almost €100 billion. The Government's coffers have been boosted by the proceeds of the Apple tax case and sale of AIB shares . READ MORE The plans are being billed within the Coalition as one of the largest ever capital expansion programmes in the history of the State. The goal is to transform capital infrastructure over the next decade with housing, water, energy and transport all being prioritised for investment. There will be a significant focus on scaling up housing delivery by providing big 'once in a generation' capital funding into Úisce Éireann , ESB and EirGrid. The key utilities' difficulties in delivering services to new housing developments has been identified as a significant barrier to scaling up housing. A source said: 'This will be critical investment in key infrastructure to drive growth for the future'. [ We need to face up to the fact that not all middle-earners are squeezed Opens in new window ] Tuesday's publication is expected to set out departmental capital ceilings to 2030 and overall capital investment to 2035. Deliberations for finalising the NDP are to continue on Monday in advance of a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday. Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers is expected to tell Cabinet colleagues that there is profound uncertainty around global trade and the threat of tariffs by US president Donald Trump poses significant risk to Ireland's economy. He will say the best way to way to safeguard the economy and to protect growth, jobs and living standards is to address the country's infrastructure deficits through focused investment in the key growth enabling sectors of the economy. Ministers will also be briefed on work being progressed to reform the country's delivery systems so that project life cycles can be reduced and better value for money can be achieved. Ministers will outline the specific programmes and investment they will prioritise as part of Budget 2026 in October.